No Arctic Convoys
-
- Member
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: 17 Nov 2004, 00:17
- Location: Israel
No Arctic Convoys
The disaster of Convoy PQ17 meant that 200 aircraft, 400 tanks, and 3000 vehicles didn't reach the Russians. PQ18 was also a near disaster.
If the Germans had shut down the Arctic convoys already in May 1942 by annihilating (ie not one merchant ship gets through) PQ16, could the Russians have survived without this materiel, or were they absolutely critical?
If the Germans had shut down the Arctic convoys already in May 1942 by annihilating (ie not one merchant ship gets through) PQ16, could the Russians have survived without this materiel, or were they absolutely critical?
Sovjets tended to use the new tanks and planes at lesser important battlescenes. Like in Finland. I think.
But as I know, much of the lorries come to good use! So the weapons played a second grade role yes, but the cars and lorries were pretty useful. Probably the most useful part of all the material send.
Now, there were also other routes more or less used and useful: Via Iran, and via Vladivostok. So a total blockade of the Murmansk-passage wouldnt be lethal - although of course, very unconvenient.
But as I know, much of the lorries come to good use! So the weapons played a second grade role yes, but the cars and lorries were pretty useful. Probably the most useful part of all the material send.
Now, there were also other routes more or less used and useful: Via Iran, and via Vladivostok. So a total blockade of the Murmansk-passage wouldnt be lethal - although of course, very unconvenient.
The Germans almost closed the northern routes of land-lease deliveries in mid-1942. See the table showing the shipments from Western Hemisphere and its distribution between different routes:
http://www.o5m6.de/Routes.html
It is easy to calcualte that in the second half of 1942 140 thousands tonns of cargo were sent via North, 589 thousands - via Pacific and 483 via Iran. So the Northern Route became secondary in comparison with other two. The heavy losses on the North and the contannt strain on naval forces forced Allies to switch the deliveries to other routes, namely to Persian Gulf:
http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/wwii/S ... r15.htm#b2
http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/70-7_09.htm
So the scenario "No Arctic convoys" is very close to the reality.
http://www.o5m6.de/Routes.html
It is easy to calcualte that in the second half of 1942 140 thousands tonns of cargo were sent via North, 589 thousands - via Pacific and 483 via Iran. So the Northern Route became secondary in comparison with other two. The heavy losses on the North and the contannt strain on naval forces forced Allies to switch the deliveries to other routes, namely to Persian Gulf:
http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/wwii/S ... r15.htm#b2
http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/70-7_09.htm
So the scenario "No Arctic convoys" is very close to the reality.
The Arctic convoys used a great deal of shipping and a large # of escorts that might have been better used in Atlantic. At that point, the Atlantic battles where at a very critical juncture. Bringing that many ships into such close proximity to German air assets, as well as the U boats made life almost impossible on the defenses.
Information more directly related to the topic. The deliveries of Brittish and American tanks in USSR:
http://rkkaww2.armchairgeneral.com/weap ... neral1.htm
The deliveries of planes in 1942:
A-20 667
B-25 108
Total Bombers 775
Hurricane II 1115
P40 Tomahawk 17
P40 Kittihawk 487
P39 Airacobra 192
P51 Mustang 4
Total fighters 1815
O-52 14
Total planes 2604
http://rkkaww2.armchairgeneral.com/weap ... neral1.htm
The deliveries of planes in 1942:
A-20 667
B-25 108
Total Bombers 775
Hurricane II 1115
P40 Tomahawk 17
P40 Kittihawk 487
P39 Airacobra 192
P51 Mustang 4
Total fighters 1815
O-52 14
Total planes 2604
Last edited by Art on 24 Jul 2007, 12:39, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: 03 Sep 2003, 19:15
- Location: Canada
Postwar, the Russians took the attitude; that the tanks and airplanes sent; were inferior to Russian designs and not all that helpful. Was partially due to propoganda that Russia felt they won the war, basically. That being said; they never rejected any Allied shipments, in fact continually asked for more.Stephan wrote:
But as I know, much of the lorries come to good use! So the weapons played a second grade role yes, but the cars and lorries were pretty useful. Probably the most useful part of all the material send.
The quote above is relevant. Even the Russians admitted, the thousands of lorries sent by Britain and the USA had been invaluable. That, and the foodstuffs sent, as well.
If no convoys took place in 1942/43, I believe Russia would have collapsed.
-
- Member
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: 03 Sep 2003, 19:15
- Location: Canada
Good point. The converse being, no Arctic convoys would free up the bulk of the Kriegsmarine to rain havoc elsewhere as well.Lars wrote:Ah, but at what costs could the Germans stop the Arctic convoys. It would take more Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine assets that were in use elsewhere. Strip the Med of the Luftwaffe, have the Kriegsmarine abandon the battle of the Atlantic, or?
-
- Member
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: 17 Nov 2004, 00:17
- Location: Israel
How many aircraft did the Luftwaffe deploy to take on the Arctic convoys?
Enough to have made a significant difference if used in Russia or N.Africa?
eg would 100-200 extra Ju87s, 88s, He111s and Fw200s in August 1942 have tipped the balance at Leningrad, Stalingrad or El Alamein?
Enough to have made a significant difference if used in Russia or N.Africa?
eg would 100-200 extra Ju87s, 88s, He111s and Fw200s in August 1942 have tipped the balance at Leningrad, Stalingrad or El Alamein?
Last edited by Von Schadewald on 29 Jul 2007, 03:06, edited 1 time in total.
If the Germans would have used them there. And if it didn't trigger a stronger counter effort by the British. As for North Africa since the Germans were pretty well resource limited not sure the additional planes would have done much good. Vs Soviets maybe some effect. Depends a lot on what the Western allies do with their extra resources.