April 4th, 1940. German invasion force for Narvik.
Re: April 4th, 1940. German invasion force for Narvik.
It seems to me the bottom line is:
Likely any other German naval unit would have ended up on the bottom of the fjords or oceans as well, maybe even on the way up north, which would have been even worse.
I thus created a new What if:
What if: April 1940. No German forces sent to Narvik
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 1&t=174004
Likely any other German naval unit would have ended up on the bottom of the fjords or oceans as well, maybe even on the way up north, which would have been even worse.
I thus created a new What if:
What if: April 1940. No German forces sent to Narvik
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 1&t=174004
Re: April 4th, 1940. German invasion force for Narvik.
Where did you find the textphylo_roadking wrote:Apart from what we already know from naval-history.net, that after the Scharnhorst/Gneisenau encouter, Renown detached four of her destroyer group to return to Vestfjord and specifically guard/operate in the minefield thereSo that isn't any specific data regarding Minelaying outside Ofotfjord then ?
"specifically guard/operate in the minefield " ?
All I can find is this
Do you have any other source that specifically states "operate in the minefield " ?http://naval-history.net/xDKWW2-4004-13APR02.htm wrote:On orders from the Admiralty, the destroyers of the 2nd Destroyer Flotilla, HARDY (Captain B. A. W. Warburton-Lee, D 2), HOTSPUR, HAVOCK and HUNTER proceeded up Vestfjord on Operation TN towards Narvik leaving the destroyers of the 20th Destroyer Flotilla to patrol the minefield.
Cheers
/John T.
-
- Member
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 23 Oct 2010, 16:04
- Location: Estonia
Re: April 4th, 1940. German invasion force for Narvik.
I visited my granny the other day and quess what- the ship in the painting in her living room is SS Blythmoor( appears to be painted in 1933).
I took a picture of it( sorry for the poor quality):
http://i358.photobucket.com/albums/oo29 ... N00808.jpg
Is this the same ship that was sunked during the attack?
Cheers,
Addy.
I took a picture of it( sorry for the poor quality):
http://i358.photobucket.com/albums/oo29 ... N00808.jpg
Is this the same ship that was sunked during the attack?
Cheers,
Addy.
Me leegion sammub ja kindel on ta rüht,
Sest kohustus püha meil täita.
Eesti tulevik see meie kõikide siht,
Mille eest tuleb surra või võita.
Sest kohustus püha meil täita.
Eesti tulevik see meie kõikide siht,
Mille eest tuleb surra või võita.
- schwarzermai
- Member
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: 09 Mar 2013, 07:52
- Location: Germany
Re: German fighters can't reach Narvik
helloDave Bender wrote: 916 motorized artillery battery. 4 x 15cm cannon.
936 motorized artillery battery. 4 x 15cm cannon.
any idea of the model of czech canons in those batteries?
15cm Kanone (t) (model??)
thanks Uwe
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=223633
My Bookproject: "Organisationsgeschichte der deutschen Heeresartillerie im II. Weltkrieg"
http://balsi.de/Heeresartillerie/
My Bookproject: "Organisationsgeschichte der deutschen Heeresartillerie im II. Weltkrieg"
http://balsi.de/Heeresartillerie/
-
- Host - Allied sections
- Posts: 10063
- Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 21:31
- Location: USA
Re: German fighters can't reach Narvik
Spent 20 mintes with my copy of Hogg 'German Artillery of WWII' and found nothing refering to Cezch or Skoda 15cm guns or howitzers in use with the Germans in 1940, or any other year. Wiki has a brief article on the Skoda "K" models, which claims a few of the K-4 for motorized use were built in 1937-38... and that production under German management continued with the weapon designated the 15 cm schwere Feldhaubitze 37(t) or sFH 37(t). It was suposed to have been widely used on the eastern front.schwarzermai wrote:helloDave Bender wrote: 916 motorized artillery battery. 4 x 15cm cannon.
936 motorized artillery battery. 4 x 15cm cannon.
any idea of the model of czech canons in those batteries?
15cm Kanone (t) (model??)
thanks Uwe
Odd that Hogg has nothing on this weapon. There are five entries for Cezch origin beute cannon, and a dozen others for German designed Skoda built cannon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skoda_K-series
- schwarzermai
- Member
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: 09 Mar 2013, 07:52
- Location: Germany
Re: April 4th, 1940. German invasion force for Narvik.
hello Karl, thanks for your help.
starting in January 1940 three units (II./2, 737, I./77) converted to each 12x s.F.H. 37 (t) - so a total of 36 were in german use (this sum was not increased substantial (dont know why, there were a lot more avaible but they were not used)
so s.F.H. 37 (t) was not in Norway.
Uwe
starting in January 1940 three units (II./2, 737, I./77) converted to each 12x s.F.H. 37 (t) - so a total of 36 were in german use (this sum was not increased substantial (dont know why, there were a lot more avaible but they were not used)
so s.F.H. 37 (t) was not in Norway.
Uwe
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=223633
My Bookproject: "Organisationsgeschichte der deutschen Heeresartillerie im II. Weltkrieg"
http://balsi.de/Heeresartillerie/
My Bookproject: "Organisationsgeschichte der deutschen Heeresartillerie im II. Weltkrieg"
http://balsi.de/Heeresartillerie/
- Alexderome
- Member
- Posts: 105
- Joined: 01 Feb 2009, 22:45
- Location: Pontault Combault
- Contact:
Re: April 4th, 1940. German invasion force for Narvik.
Which was the first gun at Oscarborg to shot the first round : Gun 2 (Moses) or gun 3 (Aron) ?phylo_roadking wrote:Exactly. Look at the details of the Battle of Drobak Sound - both the Oslofjord Fortress and the Oscarborg Fortress fired on the oncoming Ggerman vessels; historically, the unknown-to-the-Germans torpedo battery in the Oscarborg Fortress took out the Blucher, the lead ship of the convoy...but before that -
The Oscarborg 28cm battery fired twice and hit Blucher each time, doing considerable damage; imagine the effect if THOSE hits had each been on separate destroyers Probably scratch two destroyers. The fortress' secondary batteries, the Husik and Kopas 15cm and 57mm guns hit Blucher with thirteen 15 cm rounds and around thirty 57 mm shells. Blucher was in a terrible state BEFORE the Norwegians fired torpedoes at her - the Blücher's steering system was disabled and the cruiser's crew was to steer her using the engines and propeller to avoid running aground. The fire fighting system on the Blücher was also knocked out by shell fragments from the two Norwegian batteries, making attempts to control the fires aboard the ship and rescue the many wounded much more difficult...while one of the 28cm hits had penetrated the side of the ship and exploded inside a magazine containing cans of oil, smoke dispensers, incendiary bombs, aircraft bombs for the cruiser's Arado Ar 196 reconnaissance seaplanes and depth charges, and the other had knocked out the electricity central for the ship's main guns, rendering them unable to return fire After that...only two of the three Oscarborg torpedo tubes were fired at the intruder....with BOTH fish hitting her!
That's a suprising number of hits the untrained and semi-trained Norwegian gun crews achieved...and a 100% hit rate with torpedoes that had been test-fired over 200 times and noone knew for sure they'd work! Imagine that performance and damage scattered through a convoy of destroyers!
As it was - OTL, the convoy DID turn round! It was a pre-emptive attempt to sieze the king and government - and failed. Both parties were able to evacuate from Oslo. So...if the operation "failed" from ONE ship in the convoy being hit and sunk - what if many had been? The Germans might have called off the entire Oslo operation...
http://hongrie2gm.creer-forums-gratuit.fr/forum.htm
Eravamo 30 d'una sorte, 31 con la morte (Gabriele d'Annunzio).
Eravamo 30 d'una sorte, 31 con la morte (Gabriele d'Annunzio).