A higher priority for the Graf Zeppelin class

Discussions on alternate history, including events up to 20 years before today. Hosted by Terry Duncan.
Post Reply
EPOCH3
Member
Posts: 641
Joined: 30 Jul 2006, 23:22
Location: RI USA

Re: A higher priority for the Graf Zeppelin class

#121

Post by EPOCH3 » 16 Aug 2013, 01:48

KM platforms are not my subject of research but the Graf Z thread is very interesting - I didn't see these here so please find attached a few datapoints to help discussion on GZ and Weser - with regards
Attachments
Graf Z lr.jpg
Wesser lower hanger deck lr.jpg

User avatar
LWD
Member
Posts: 8618
Joined: 21 Sep 2005, 22:46
Location: Michigan

Re: A higher priority for the Graf Zeppelin class

#122

Post by LWD » 19 Aug 2013, 16:02

Interesting. I hadn't seen or looked close enough at the drawings to note the fact that the trolly tracks weren't straight.


User avatar
JAG13
Member
Posts: 689
Joined: 23 Mar 2013, 02:50

Re: A higher priority for the Graf Zeppelin class

#123

Post by JAG13 » 05 Jul 2015, 00:08

EPOCH3 wrote:KM platforms are not my subject of research but the Graf Z thread is very interesting - I didn't see these here so please find attached a few datapoints to help discussion on GZ and Weser - with regards
Very useful, than you.

Carl Schwamberger
Host - Allied sections
Posts: 10062
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 21:31
Location: USA

Re: A higher priority for the Graf Zeppelin class

#124

Post by Carl Schwamberger » 05 Jul 2015, 03:58

ChristopherPerrien wrote:
Well it might run at revolutions for 35kts but would probably be lucky to hit more than 25kts-28kts in really bad weather
Be fun to see all that stored lumber shift. :lol:
"'Seeing' it shift implies one is aboard, and worse in the compartment 8O Not good, not good at all.

Post Reply

Return to “What if”