What If Hitler Went For the Caucasus in 1941?

Discussions on alternate history, including events up to 20 years before today. Hosted by Terry Duncan.
Locked
User avatar
LWD
Member
Posts: 8618
Joined: 21 Sep 2005, 22:46
Location: Michigan

Re: What If Hitler Went For the Caucasus in 1941?

#91

Post by LWD » 01 Apr 2014, 14:57

If it looked like Germans were responsible for Kemal's death in a case like the above the Turks might have been pushed into the war on the other side as well. Pushing the Turks is one thing making sure they continue in the direction desired is another.

User avatar
BDV
Member
Posts: 3704
Joined: 10 Apr 2009, 17:11

Re: Axis' Turkey

#92

Post by BDV » 01 Apr 2014, 15:08

To top it off, Bulgarians, a key Germany ally in the Balkans would be totally bummed if too hot an amitie would open on the Berlin-Ankara axis. Between Kemal's intransigence, Schicklgruber-Ribentropp impotence, and geopolitical limitations in the Balkan-NearEast region, a total non-starter.
Nobody expects the Fallschirm! Our chief weapon is surprise; surprise and fear; fear and surprise. Our 2 weapons are fear and surprise; and ruthless efficiency. Our *3* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency; and almost fanatical devotion


alltoes
Member
Posts: 226
Joined: 29 May 2011, 00:07

Re: What If Hitler Went For the Caucasus in 1941?

#93

Post by alltoes » 01 Apr 2014, 16:38

I am curious how Germany would attack the Baku oilfields from Turkey. Would they drive through Armenia? Go around through Georgia? Or drive through northern Iran?
Any thoughts? This is also presuming during 1941 during Barbarossa. How about during 1942. Also presuming Turkey allowed transit rights.

thaddeus_c
Member
Posts: 816
Joined: 22 Jan 2014, 04:16

Re: Axis' Turkey

#94

Post by thaddeus_c » 02 Apr 2014, 13:39

BDV wrote:To top it off, Bulgarians, a key Germany ally in the Balkans would be totally bummed if too hot an amitie would open on the Berlin-Ankara axis. Between Kemal's intransigence, Schicklgruber-Ribentropp impotence, and geopolitical limitations in the Balkan-NearEast region, a total non-starter.
well, Germany could have used the Bulgarians to threaten Turkey (Operation Gertrude) and sided with the Kurdish peoples.

30 - 40 million Kurds, never have had a real patron? centered in eastern Turkey through Iraq all the way to Iran.

all Germans need to do is have access to airfields in Van Turkey for a few months to bomb Soviet ships in the Caspian Sea, they had to move oil by tanker to (present day) Turkmenistan after the invasion.

follow a plan similar to that instead of futile attempt to take Stalingrad and Moscow, move more u-boats into the Black Sea to consolidate.

User avatar
BDV
Member
Posts: 3704
Joined: 10 Apr 2009, 17:11

Re: What If Hitler Went For the Caucasus in 1941?

#95

Post by BDV » 02 Apr 2014, 14:42

How many kurds were there in 1940? How much a sway had Great Britain over them after the tribal pacification actions of the 1920s and 1930s?
Nobody expects the Fallschirm! Our chief weapon is surprise; surprise and fear; fear and surprise. Our 2 weapons are fear and surprise; and ruthless efficiency. Our *3* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency; and almost fanatical devotion

thaddeus_c
Member
Posts: 816
Joined: 22 Jan 2014, 04:16

Re: What If Hitler Went For the Caucasus in 1941?

#96

Post by thaddeus_c » 03 Apr 2014, 12:45

BDV wrote:How many kurds were there in 1940? How much a sway had Great Britain over them after the tribal pacification actions of the 1920s and 1930s?
35 - 45 million today in Kurdistan areas today and a large number have emigrated (800k in Germany alone)

30 million in ME during WWII era was educated guess since the diaspora happened post-war.

Great Britain was mainly focused on holding the oil resources in Iraq (the reason Kurdistan was not created?)

of course the best outcome for Germany is Turkey joining the Axis, not trying to start a civil war there.

User avatar
Cantankerous
Member
Posts: 1277
Joined: 01 Sep 2019, 22:22
Location: Newport Coast

Re: What If Hitler Went For the Caucasus in 1941?

#97

Post by Cantankerous » 18 Jan 2024, 00:00

If Hitler had chosen to invade the Caucasus after overrunning the Ukraine and bypassing Stalingrad, then Nazi Germany would have had a secondary source of oil to keep its planes, tanks, submarines, jeep, and other weapons of war running. Also, tens of thousands of German troops would not have died of frostbite creating by the Russian winter and once the Soviet war machine ground to a halt, then the Russian Fascist Party headquartered in Manchuria would have launched a revolt against the Soviet government in a show of anti-communist solidarity with Hitler and Mussolini, overthrown Stalin's government and brought the Russian Orthodox Church back to life while throwing copies of Karl Marx and Leon Trotsky's works into a bonfire just because Marx and Trotsky had Jewish ancestry, sending Stalin back to Georgia, and granting Armenians, Georgians, and Azeris their independence. Hitler thought he was learning from the mistakes made by Napoleon in his failed invasion of Russia in 1812 by choosing to send separate contingents of German troops to the outskirts of Leningrad, Moscow, and Stalingrad, but this didn't work out for him because the Soviet armed forces were stronger than he had thought.

ljadw
Member
Posts: 15676
Joined: 13 Jul 2009, 18:50

Re: What If Hitler Went For the Caucasus in 1941?

#98

Post by ljadw » 18 Jan 2024, 10:22

1 To capture the Caucasus would not mean that millions of tons of oil could be transported to Germany
2 If the SU was defeated,Hitler would not need a secondary source of oil
3 There was NO Russian Fascist party in Manchuria or elsewhere in the SU .

User avatar
Terry Duncan
Forum Staff
Posts: 6272
Joined: 13 Jun 2008, 23:54
Location: Kent

Re: What If Hitler Went For the Caucasus in 1941?

#99

Post by Terry Duncan » 18 Jan 2024, 13:57

Pointless necromancy yet again.

Locked

Return to “What if”