D-Day Fails
D-Day Fails
What if, for whatever reason, D-Day would have (completely) failed?
What exactly would have happened afterwards?
Indeed, any thoughts on this?
What exactly would have happened afterwards?
Indeed, any thoughts on this?
Last edited by Futurist on 08 May 2016, 05:48, edited 2 times in total.
Re: D-Day Fails
Would there be a larger Operation Dragoon in this scenario, or what?
- T. A. Gardner
- Member
- Posts: 3546
- Joined: 02 Feb 2006, 01:23
- Location: Arizona
Re: D-Day Fails
I'd think that hinges on exactly how and why it fails.
First, all five beaches would have to be defeated in detail. The paratroop landings, likewise, would have to be crushed. The naval forces off shore bringing in subsequent waves, etc., would have to have suffered serious losses. Somehow, the Allied air forces would have to lose domination of the air.
Once we know the reason for the Allied defeat, then we can postulate what the alternatives might have been.
First, all five beaches would have to be defeated in detail. The paratroop landings, likewise, would have to be crushed. The naval forces off shore bringing in subsequent waves, etc., would have to have suffered serious losses. Somehow, the Allied air forces would have to lose domination of the air.
Once we know the reason for the Allied defeat, then we can postulate what the alternatives might have been.
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 16 May 2010, 15:12
- Location: United States of America
Re: D-Day Fails
The reserve panzers wouldn't have mattered much, except to give more work to the guys who stencil tank silhouettes on Typhoons and P-47s. Interdiction of ground traffic prevented troop movement to concentration points.
A serious problem for the Germans is developing.
A serious problem for the Germans is developing.
Re: D-Day Fails
What about having the Germans somehow find out about D-Day in advance and thus position much more troops in Normandy in May 1944 and beyond? Would that work for this?T. A. Gardner wrote:I'd think that hinges on exactly how and why it fails.
First, all five beaches would have to be defeated in detail. The paratroop landings, likewise, would have to be crushed. The naval forces off shore bringing in subsequent waves, etc., would have to have suffered serious losses. Somehow, the Allied air forces would have to lose domination of the air.
Once we know the reason for the Allied defeat, then we can postulate what the alternatives might have been.
Re: D-Day Fails
What about if these reserve panzers would have been moved to Normandy when there is cloudy weather, though?OpanaPointer wrote:The reserve panzers wouldn't have mattered much, except to give more work to the guys who stencil tank silhouettes on Typhoons and P-47s. Interdiction of ground traffic prevented troop movement to concentration points.
Developing what, exactly? Better military technology?A serious problem for the Germans is developing.
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 16 May 2010, 15:12
- Location: United States of America
Re: D-Day Fails
Panzer that aren't mobile are pill boxes. Moving panzers catch the eye of the tank-busters. So if they move in when it's cloudy they'll still be destroyed. They wouldn't be able to make much of a difference, local delays only.
And I meant much the same as when Hirohito said "the war has developed not necessarily in Japan's favor".
And I meant much the same as when Hirohito said "the war has developed not necessarily in Japan's favor".
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 16 May 2010, 15:12
- Location: United States of America
Re: D-Day Fails
Now, if you want to get into an interesting what-if, consider moving Dragoon to the Netherlands.
-
- Member
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: 03 Sep 2003, 19:15
- Location: Canada
Re: D-Day Fails
There are already several similar threads on this topic.
Re: D-Day Fails
Done.OpanaPointer wrote:Now, if you want to get into an interesting what-if, consider moving Dragoon to the Netherlands.
Re: D-Day Fails
OK. Thus, would you say that the success of D-Day was inevitable? Completely serious question, for the record.OpanaPointer wrote:Panzer that aren't mobile are pill boxes. Moving panzers catch the eye of the tank-busters. So if they move in when it's cloudy they'll still be destroyed. They wouldn't be able to make much of a difference, local delays only.
Well, Yeah, but that's pretty obvious. Of course, Adolf Hitler appears to have believed that there might be a last-minute miracle for him and for Nazi Germany just like there previously was for Frederick the Great and Prussia back in the Seven Years' War. Seriously.And I meant much the same as when Hirohito said "the war has developed not necessarily in Japan's favor".
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 16 May 2010, 15:12
- Location: United States of America
Re: D-Day Fails
D-Day's success wasn't inevitable, but it was certain.
Re: D-Day Fails
What exactly is the difference between "inevitable" and "certain," though?OpanaPointer wrote:D-Day's success wasn't inevitable, but it was certain.
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 5644
- Joined: 16 May 2010, 15:12
- Location: United States of America
Re: D-Day Fails
The initial landings may have been repulsed in places, but the attack would have accomplished its goal despite that. And if by some utter miracle the whole landing had been a failure we would have come back. The effect of a failed landing on the Germans would have been, I believe, to draw more troops from the Ostfront, weakening Germany further in that sector.Futurist wrote:What exactly is the difference between "inevitable" and "certain," though?OpanaPointer wrote:D-Day's success wasn't inevitable, but it was certain.
Re: D-Day Fails
Futurist wrote:What if, for whatever reason, D-Day would have (completely) failed?
What exactly would have happened afterwards?
Indeed, any thoughts on this?
As T.A. Gardner pointed out, the devil is in the details. The reason is mighty important.
Basically the germans dared the Wallies to attack at Pais de Calais:
"I bet you cannot go through here"
And the unexpected Wally retort on June 6 was:
"you're right, we'll try somewhere else"
Geman reactions post invasion, in particular when they flooded one of Utah forces' flanks thereby rendering that flank secure for the US troops shows they were caught with their pants down.
Nobody expects the Fallschirm! Our chief weapon is surprise; surprise and fear; fear and surprise. Our 2 weapons are fear and surprise; and ruthless efficiency. Our *3* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency; and almost fanatical devotion