Axis History Forum

This is an apolitical forum for discussions on the Axis nations, as well as the First and Second World Wars in general hosted by Marcus Wendel's Axis History Factbook in cooperation with Michael Miller's Axis Biographical Research and Christoph Awender's WW2 day by day.

Skip to content

The Rapid Collapse Of The Polish Army

Discussions on all aspects of Poland during the Second Polish Republic and the Second World War.
Hosted by Peter K

Re: The Rapid Collapse Of The Polish Army

Postby Peter K on 27 Sep 2011 16:31

Von Rundstedt yet in May of 1939 tried to predict what defensive actions would the Poles undertake:

He considered several variants of Polish actions:

1. Variant most favourable for the Germans according to von Rundstedt:

"If the Poles are to make the same mistake as the Czechs made in the Autumn of 1938, namely if they since the very beginning want to defend all of their borders (...) it will be easy to pierce such defence with concentrated forces in over a dozen points."

2. Variant most reasonable and thus most probable according to him:

"This is why it should be presumed, that the Poles will seek to defend their vast borders only with weaker forces, while maintaining the main part of their army as mobile reserve force. In the region of Poznan Polish forces shall not be too strong.
Behind the Warthe line, the resistance will grow stronger. Polish mobile units will be located probably (a) in the region of Jaroslaw & Przemysl (b) in the region of Deblin (c) in the region of Warsaw and (d) at the Narew."


3. Variant most unfavourable for the Germans in his opinion:

"If the Poles could count on fast and sure help of other powers, they would put up resistance with the main bulk of their forces to the east of Vistula, defending fiercely and withdrawing behind the line San - Vistula - Narew. (...) For us this means a problem of concentrating all units on the western and southern banks of these rivers, without dispersing forces in the eastern direction."

Bookmark and Share

Peter K
Forum Staff
Poland
 
Posts: 3126
Joined: 12 Jul 2006 19:17
Location: Poland

Re: The Rapid Collapse Of The Polish Army

Postby JBbelgium on 16 Jul 2012 18:36

Some of my thoughts on Blitzkrieg and Poland:
1) Germany lost WW1 and by consequence examined closely the lessons learned from WW1 + they had experience from civil war in Spain + Anschluss (30% of the panzers broke down, they had to use civilian gasstations for refueling) + occupation of czech republic. GB and France won WW1. As a consequence there were fewer pushfactors to come up with new tactics. + less recent experience
2) Hitler listened to Oswald Lutz, Heinz Guderian etc Other countries had similar personalities (Fuller, Lidell Hart, de Gaulle...) but weren't heared or to lesser extent. Not much you could do about that. So a lot depended on a few military leaders.
3) The panzerbreakthroughs stunned and paralyzed high commands that had to deal with them (Polish, French, you name it). So troops in the field were enormously affected by elements beyond their control no matter how well they fought. It also meant that they were often ordered to pull back (due to being outflanked) without fully understanding the reasons for that. => bad for the morale.
4) Germans fought on foreign soil unitil 1944. So their families and houses were safely behind them. Most of the allies fought on their own lands. So they preferred, understandably to defend as much as possible instead of the best/shortest positions. How can you ask your soldiers to defend the country if their own home, wife, kids, parents are already given up from the beginning.

Bookmark and Share

JBbelgium
Member
Belgium
 
Posts: 62
Joined: 06 Jul 2012 18:02

Re: The Rapid Collapse Of The Polish Army

Postby Peter K on 22 Aug 2012 15:57

Excerpts from "Polish Armed Forces in the World War 2, Volume I - September Campaign 1939, Part II - Course of Operations from 1 to 8 September", chapter "Supply & Logistics in period 1 - 5 September", pp. 425 - 427:

"(...) Polish medical service almost immediately faced extremely difficult tasks.

Vast majority of its formations started to mobilize only during the general mobilization. Even divisions mobilized already during the alarm mobilization in most cases didn't have their field hospitals with them yet (field hospitals were mobilized in alarm mobilization only for divisions from Corps Districts VII and VIII). Out of non-divisional medical units, only part of surgeon and anti-gas units as well as 9 sanitary trains and 11 motorized sanitary columns (out of 36 sanitary trains and 17 motorized sanitary columns included in the mobilization plan) were mobilized during the alarm mobilization. In addition, some of medical units mobilized as part of the general mobilization, had very late dates of mobilizational readiness (up to 20th day of mobilization).

From domestic medical formations all peaceful hospitals (district hospitals and such - in total 13) and wartime hospitals located in Corps Districts VII and VIII were mobilized in alarm mobilization.

Expectations regarding the inflow of wounded were based on experiences of the First World War. It was considered, that the number of wounded will grow systematically and basing on this, dates of mobilizational readiness of medical formations were calculated.

Indeed the number of wounded during the very first days of war (at least those wounded who actually could be evacuated from the battlefield and float away to the rear area instead of being captured by the Germans) was relatively not too big. As of 4 September the total number of wounded in military hospitals amounted to around 12,000 (including some number of civilian wounded). Additionally in sanitary trains (if they were all fully filled with wounded) there were up to 4,500 further wounded (on that day 15 sanitary trains were on the move with transports of wounded - including 9 typical and 6 improvised trains). The number of still empty beds in all working at that time military hospitals amounted on 4 September to 7,620.

However, other, not expected previously problems, emerged.

First of all the number of wounded among the civilian population immediately started to grow to very large numbers as the result of German air attacks against settlements, cities and roads crowded with civilian refugees.

Secondly, evacuation of wounded with use of railway trains was being conducted very slowly because of constant air attacks of the railway network by enemy Air Force. There were also cases of enemy Air Force attacking sanitary trains directly, as the result of which casualties were suffered. One of sanitary trains (No. 25) was thoroughly bombed and destroyed at the railway station Szydlowiec.

Thirdly, coordination of the evacuation of wounded became very difficult due to problems with communication.

On 5 September the main Chief of the Medical Service described the situation as follows:

"Sanitary trains in usually sufficient numbers. But due to difficulties with communication... they are not able to capably shuttle, which causes slow evacuation and getting behind of wounded in the operational area. Evacuation from the area of combats to hospitals and to evacuation stages is hindered by lack of means of motor wheeled transport. Individual sanitary chiefs try to carry out evacuation using local means of transport with great effort to complete it. Detailed situations in the operational terrain are unknown due to lack of reports from medical chiefs and as the result of difficulties with obtaining communications with them."

But the most burdened with consequences was the necessity of radical change of the entire plan of dislocating military hospitals (both field and domestic) due to unfavourable development of situation on the frontline.

On days 3 - 4 September evacuation further hinterland of district hospitals from Poznan, Krakow, Torun and Lodz had to be started. Also new places of concentration for army evacuational hospitals had to be designated along the line of Bug-Wisla-San rivers (Brest Litovsk, Warsaw, Lublin and Jaroslaw). Wartime hospitals were ordered to concentrate in the south-eastern part of the country (including Lwow).

Implementation of all those new orders could no longer be carried out without considerable confusion. Some voivodeship hospitals had just finished their concentration or were during the process of concentration: some others were on the move to their previously designated places of concentration. Now everything had to be rolled up or doubled back. In such a way in a period of a constant growth of the influx of wounded, a general evacuation of hospitals from from the west to the east and to the south started. Additionally this evacuation was going to take place in the most difficult conditions due to activity of German Air Force and more and more difficult situation of the railway services."

=======================================================

Later I will post more information about problems with other aspects of logistics & supply. Many of them also resulted from late mobilization of services, supply columns, etc. for most of divisions - even if combat elements of those divisions were already mobilized & concentrated on 01.09.1939, they often had incomplete services.
There are words which carry the presage of defeat. Defence is such a word. What is the result of an even victorious defence? The next attempt of imposing it to that weaker, defender. The attacker, despite temporary setback, feels the master of situation.

Bookmark and Share

Peter K
Forum Staff
Poland
 
Posts: 3126
Joined: 12 Jul 2006 19:17
Location: Poland

Previous

Return to Poland 1919-1945

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot], wm and 0 guests