ANZACS
Re: ANZACS
kingfish.
Useful for numbers of men, but less so for equipment & heavy weapons.
Useful for numbers of men, but less so for equipment & heavy weapons.
Re: ANZACS
Did you scroll down to the bottom of each page?
There are sections that break down the battalion to company/platoon/squad levels and describe the weapons load out for each.
There are sections that break down the battalion to company/platoon/squad levels and describe the weapons load out for each.
Re: ANZACS
Yup, right to the bottom.
- Saxon Cross
- Member
- Posts: 158
- Joined: 05 Apr 2010, 15:33
- Location: UK/USA
Re: ANZACS
I see detailed info. describing battalion weapons and equipment.
What info. do you need to know that is not described by BayonetStrength?
Saxon
What info. do you need to know that is not described by BayonetStrength?
Saxon
Re: ANZACS
OK. In case I can't see something you guys can.....
Number of Bren Guns.
.5" Vickers.
2" Mortars
3" Mortars
4.2" Mortars
Boyes ATR
Carriers
2 pounders
I see 6x 3" mortars in the HQ Co Mortar platoon.
I see carriers & 2 pounders but not quantities.
I see an AA platoon in the HQ Co, but no list of equipment.
Cheers guys
Number of Bren Guns.
.5" Vickers.
2" Mortars
3" Mortars
4.2" Mortars
Boyes ATR
Carriers
2 pounders
I see 6x 3" mortars in the HQ Co Mortar platoon.
I see carriers & 2 pounders but not quantities.
I see an AA platoon in the HQ Co, but no list of equipment.
Cheers guys
Re: ANZACS
Murphy in The Relief of Tobruk (footnote p. 174) noted the 25th N.Z. Battalion had 50 LMGs (Brens), nine 3" mortars and no MMGs (which I took to be the 'establishment' for the 1941 rifle battalion) in it's fight with I./Afrika-Regiment 361 (ex-French Foreign Legionaires) for Point 175. Presumably the total of Brens would include those mounted on the battalion's 12-13 Carriers.
In comparison the German battalion is said to have 8 MMGs, 61 LMGs and 10 heavy mortars.
He also mentions ( p. 171) some figures for other German battalions facing the New Zealanders in Crusader:
Kradschutzen-Bataillon 15 - 13 MMGs, 33 LMGs, 6 heavy and 9 light mortars,
Maschinengewehr-Bataillon 2 - 36 MMGs, 10 LMGs, 6 heavy and 9 light mortars, and
"a normal German motorised infantry battalion" (like those of Schutzen-Regiment 115) - 6 MMGs, 57 LMGs, 6 heavy and 9 light mortars.
I had been under the (mistaken?) impression that the British and ANZAC battalions were similarly equipped, at least in 1941.
David R
In comparison the German battalion is said to have 8 MMGs, 61 LMGs and 10 heavy mortars.
He also mentions ( p. 171) some figures for other German battalions facing the New Zealanders in Crusader:
Kradschutzen-Bataillon 15 - 13 MMGs, 33 LMGs, 6 heavy and 9 light mortars,
Maschinengewehr-Bataillon 2 - 36 MMGs, 10 LMGs, 6 heavy and 9 light mortars, and
"a normal German motorised infantry battalion" (like those of Schutzen-Regiment 115) - 6 MMGs, 57 LMGs, 6 heavy and 9 light mortars.
I had been under the (mistaken?) impression that the British and ANZAC battalions were similarly equipped, at least in 1941.
David R
Re: ANZACS
The information is there, but since the site breaks each formation down to squad level it will require some basic math on your part to calculate the number of Brens, Boyes, etc. at battalion level.David W wrote:OK. In case I can't see something you guys can.....
These were division level assets, which puts it outside of the scope of your inquiry.4.2" Mortars
From the '42 Aussie section of Bayonet Strength:I see carriers & 2 pounders but not quantities.
Carrier Platoon - the Carrier Platoon contained four Sections, each of three carriers, plus one at Platoon HQ for a total of thirteen. Each Carrier was crewed by three men, an NCO, a driver-mechanic and a rifleman, with each carrier mounting a Bren gun, and each Section having both a 2-inch mortar and a Boys anti-tank rifle.
Same Page, a little further down:
As with the British, the Australians authorised an Anti-tank Platoon for their Infantry Battalions, initially with four 2-pdr guns, during July and August 1942. This was subsequently increased to eight guns by the time of El Alamein in October 1942. The Australian Infantry Battalions also added a Machine Gun Platoon with six Vickers, authorised in mid 1942.
Same page again, only further up this time:I see an AA platoon in the HQ Co, but no list of equipment.
Anti-aircraft Platoon - had six 15-cwt trucks, four of which were each armed with twin Bren light machine guns and an anti-tank rifle. The remaining two vehicles carried spare crews.
Re: ANZACS
Thank you guys, especially Kingfish.
As anaside, would the 4.2" mortars have been with the Divisional HQ?
I was looking under "New Zealand"!From the '42 Aussie section of Bayonet Strength:
As anaside, would the 4.2" mortars have been with the Divisional HQ?
Re: ANZACS
From Bayonet Strength, but looking at 'The British infantry Division, 1943 to 1945':David W wrote:As anaside, would the 4.2" mortars have been with the Divisional HQ?
Machine Gun Battalion (from early 1944 onwards) - with thirty six Vickers medium machine guns, divided into three Companies, with three Platoons of four MMGs per Company. Also one Heavy Mortar Company with sixteen 4.2-in mortars, divided into four Platoons of four mortars each.
As mentioned earlier, this was a divisional level asset that first saw action at El Alamein. However, it was common practice to parcel out these heavy weapons (as well as AT, AAA, Engineer, etc) down to the Brigades.
Re: ANZACS
Daviddor1941 wrote: "a normal German motorised infantry battalion" (like those of Schutzen-Regiment 115) - 6 MMGs, 57 LMGs, 6 heavy and 9 light mortars.
How do you get to 57 lMGs?
I get 3x3x3 (3 coys, 3 platoons ea, 3 sections ea), which gets me to 27. If each section has two, that makes 54. Would each Coy HQ have a spare lMG to get to 57?
The enemy had superiority in numbers, his tanks were more heavily armoured, they had larger calibre guns with nearly twice the effective range of ours, and their telescopes were superior. 5 RTR 19/11/41
The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42
The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42
-
- Member
- Posts: 3370
- Joined: 19 Sep 2008, 14:44
Re: ANZACS
BHQ elements would also have LMGs so perhaps that is the mssing three ?JBond wrote:Daviddor1941 wrote: "a normal German motorised infantry battalion" (like those of Schutzen-Regiment 115) - 6 MMGs, 57 LMGs, 6 heavy and 9 light mortars.
How do you get to 57 lMGs?
I get 3x3x3 (3 coys, 3 platoons ea, 3 sections ea), which gets me to 27. If each section has two, that makes 54. Would each Coy HQ have a spare lMG to get to 57?
Alan
Re: ANZACS
Don't know where W. E. Murphy got this information-the N.Z. OH (published in 1961) in "Note on Sources" (p. 530) refers to "Photographic copies or translations of almost all relevant German war diaries except those from Panzer Group Africa from 19 November onwards (which are missing)...".JBond wrote:Daviddor1941 wrote: "a normal German motorised infantry battalion" (like those of Schutzen-Regiment 115) - 6 MMGs, 57 LMGs, 6 heavy and 9 light mortars.
How do you get to 57 lMGs?
I guess you'll have to ask Murphy
David R
Re: ANZACS
Thanks both. Could be, I guess, or could be spares.
The enemy had superiority in numbers, his tanks were more heavily armoured, they had larger calibre guns with nearly twice the effective range of ours, and their telescopes were superior. 5 RTR 19/11/41
The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42
The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42