Many statistics from the sites below are the same, also correct with what I can find on other websites.
However, the casualties of the divisions are everytime different. Which one is correct. Personally I'd go for the first link. Examples below:
http://www.history.army.mil/documents/E ... ID-ETO.htm - 15,066 / 25,884 casualties
http://www.historyshots.com/usarmy/Division.cfm?did=28 - 16,795 casualties
Website statistics, which one is correct?
Re: Website statistics, which one is correct?
One just list's the combat casualties, while the other list's non-combat(sickness/accidents) as well.
The first list uses the word "tentative' which is another way of saying they are not completely sure it's the correct figure, so for combat casualties I would go with the second figure of 16,795.
The first list uses the word "tentative' which is another way of saying they are not completely sure it's the correct figure, so for combat casualties I would go with the second figure of 16,795.