Axis History Forum

This is an apolitical forum for discussions on the Axis nations, as well as the First and Second World Wars in general hosted by Marcus Wendel's Axis History Factbook in cooperation with Michael Miller's Axis Biographical Research and Christoph Awender's WW2 day by day.

Skip to content

Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Discussions on all (non-biographical) aspects of the Luftwaffe air units and general discussions on the Luftwaffe.

Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby Topspeed on 30 May 2012 09:16

[Split from "The Men Who Killed the Luftwaffe"]

Wasn't Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

His order to use Me-262s as bombers etc. left only 50 ac to aircomcat instead 300 according to Adolf Galland.

Then again in BoB he ordered to bomb London when the victory was nearly at hand and all UK airfields nearly down ?

See Battle of Britain movie to verify this.

Hitler was a nut case...almost as bad as Stalin was.

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Topspeed
Member
Finland
 
Posts: 4181
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 15:19
Location: Finland

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby Marcus Wendel on 02 Jun 2012 16:12

Topspeed wrote:See Battle of Britain movie to verify this.


A movie is perhaps not the best of sources?

/Marcus

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Marcus Wendel
Forum Staff
Sweden
 
Posts: 28083
Joined: 08 Mar 2002 22:35
Location: Sweden

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby jayastout on 02 Jun 2012 19:30

Movies usually aren't the best sources, although Topspeed does make an excellent point. German leadership not only meddled outside its expertise, but failed to create--or allow the creation of--the conditions that would have allowed the Luftwaffe to mount a stronger defense in the West. The failure to train enough pilots was one of the primary mistakes.

Bookmark and Share

jayastout
Member
United States
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 19 Sep 2009 23:16

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby Uncle Fritz on 02 Jun 2012 19:48

I have always thought that Luftwaffe was rather messed up by Göring and Milch while Hitler focused on eastern front. His main mistake was not to sack Göring of all honors in 1938 and allow him to continue screwing things. A sensible leader would learn from the Americans and create many air services like US Army and Navy had their own aviation, US Airforce was a separate entity etc.
Last edited by Dieter Zinke on 19 Jun 2012 13:28, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Only correct is Göring - not Goring or Goering !!!!

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Uncle Fritz
Member
Poland
 
Posts: 140
Joined: 27 Dec 2011 15:34
Location: 1914 Samoa

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby phylo_roadking on 02 Jun 2012 20:44

A sensible leader would learn from the Americans and create many air services like US Army and Navy had their own aviation, US Airforce was a separate entity etc.


Wrong time frame...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Air_Force

The United States Air Force (USAF) is the aerial warfare service branch of the United States Armed Forces and one of the seven American uniformed services. Initially part of the United States Army, the USAF was formed as a separate branch of the military on 18 September 1947 under the National Security Act of 1947


It was created from the US Army Air Force that fought WWII.

It's worth noting that the vast majority of nations with a naval aviation component DO run it as a separate entity - hence the British Fleet Air Arm.

The failure to train enough pilots was one of the primary mistakes.


Mistake...or forced upon them? ;) Remember, training was curtailed severely in an attempt to save aviation fuel. Potentially, doing so ALSO freed up a considerable number of pilots for combat duties that would otherwise have had to be retained at home as a training cadre. As with so many things...it looks like a mistake to US - only because they lost :P

Then again in BoB he ordered to bomb London when the victory was nearly at hand and all UK airfields nearly down ?


I posted on this recently...

22nd August - Erpro210 hit Manston and destroyed a number of aircraft on the ground, and half the station's buildings.

24th August - Manston hit again when N0.264 Sqn was refuelling there; they decamped to Hornchurch - but were bombed there again! North Weald was hit simultaneously....and on their way out, this raid plastered Manston AGAIN, forcing its closure. 17 dead on the ground in this raid, all contact with the RAF telephone network cut, and the flightline too badly cratered. Horchurch and North Weald were still open for business...but badly damaged.

25th August - Only seven of the 40+ bombers that No.17 Sqn, Ten Group encountered heading for Portland, Weymouth and Warmwell got through....but these severely badly damaged Warmwell; two hangars destroyed, and the station also taken off the RAF telephone and teleprinter network so it was unable to function.

26th August - Biggin Hill and Kenley hit again; Debden was hit an hour later, with buildings destroyed and aircraft badly damaged on the ground, and a number of fatalities. (The Debden raid was one of those that should specifically have been prevented by Douglas Bader's Duxford Wing, but they were off gallivanting down on the coast )

28th August - Eastchurch, a joint FC/Coastal Command field, was hit and buildings destroyed, and several bombers destroyed on the ground.

30th August - In the morning, Biggin Hill was attacked (AGAIN while Bader's aicraft were...elsewhere), along with Kenley (major damage this time) Croydon and Detling. In the early afternoon, Kenley was hit again...and Tangmere and Shoreham - and Detling again after 4pm. This was a bad raid; Detling's oil bunkers were set on fire, it was isolated from the RAF network, hangars were badly damaged and the runway cratered....then late in the day, after 6pm a raid evaded interception and hit Biggin Hill again; another hangar was destroyed, leaving only three, an entire slit trench full of groundcrew was killed, and a similar fate befell a trench full of WRAFs The station's barracks, storehouses, armoury and workshops were all hit. In total 39 ground staff died, water and gas lines were cut, and Biggin too was isolated from operations by telephone and telex cables being cut.

31st August - North Weald hit again...and Debden badly damaged; four aircraft damaged on the ground had to be struck off, and 18 killed. Eastchurch was attacked, but with little damage...and Detling strafed. Croydon aerodrome was hit again....but again it was Biggin Hill that came off worst; two of the remaining three hangars were very badly damaged, two aircraft destroyed on the ground, and the ops room hit and destroyed - undoing ALL the work done since the raid the day before at getting The Hump back onto the RAF network. Hornchurch had been hit ten minutes before Biggin....and was out of action for several hours due to bad cratering; six were killed...but the bombs that fell across the runway and into a housing estate missed all the airfield's buildings; it was back in action by 4pm...then Biggin Hill - and Hornchurch -were hit again at 5.50pm!
(the above culled from Price and Bishop)



As the month ended, it had become clear that the Luftwaffe had abandoned a massed attack on Fighter Command's airfields and was in fact specifically attempting to clear the path to London through Eleven Group. On the 31st alone, 2800 sorties had been flown against Eleven Group's Sector stations and they were flying with VERY heavy fighter escort that Eleven Group's fighters were having problems getting through. The 31st was not a good day for the RAF; at the end of that concentrated seven days of operations, their kill margins had been prejudiced by the number of aircraft lost on the ground, and the RAF had lost more that day than the Luftwaffe had, well over forty aircraft.

As for the actual damage of the last week - well, No.56 and No. 151 Sqn both had to be withdrawn and replaced, they were shattered. No. 264 had already been replaced after its losses on the ground (and in the air) over Manston and Hornchurch. Biggin Hill was only able to accomodate one squadron instead of its previous four, No. 79...and just for airfield defence, not interception. Manston was "open" again after 3-4 days (accounts vary) but as with Biggin, "open" was a debateable term....and very much a matter for propaganda And Lympne and a couple of dispersal fields right on the coast had already had to be closed. We've seen the list of the attacks, and frequent temporary gaps in coverage as airfields were taken off the RAF net.


Note particularly the last paragraph...in a "glass half full" sense; a small number of airfields in one Fighter Command Group in only two counties of England were put out of action completely only very temporarily...longer term closures had come far earlier in the battle with the closure of a couple of small dispersal fields like Lympne because they were just too close to the coast to react fast enough to incoming raids, and only Manston was closed regularly and for anything like a protracted period, the maximum duration of one of these closures being only four days IIRC.

If you want to base your idea of the history the Battle of Britain on the (admittedly good) film...again, take it from the other aspect of the film's message; despite Dowdings fears and well-known pessimism (the film does indeed portray him as "Stuffy" Dowding, Larry Olivier spent some time with Dowding to learn his mannerisms) Fighter Command DID keep fighting, DID keep beating the Luftwaffe...! :wink:
"Charming's a special town - not many folks take to it. I like to think the town chooses its occupants. Right ones stay, wrong ones...disappear."

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 15374
Joined: 30 Apr 2006 23:31
Location: Belfast

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby Larry D. on 02 Jun 2012 20:49

Since this appears to be a qualitative rather than a quantitative question, I think the answer is more one of Hitler's lunatic ambition to take on the world than perhaps anything Göring or the rest of the Luftwaffe leadership did or did not do. The Reich simply did not have the material means capable of taking on the enormous material and human resources of the Western Allies and the USSR working together. By the beginning of 1944, the number of aircraft and pilots being cranked out by the combined Allies began to overwhelm the Luftwaffe and things only got worse over the following months. The figures are all there for those who want to dig them up. This discussion has occurred several times before here on AHF and the facts and figures are here, too. You just have to do a search and pull them up.

L.

Bookmark and Share

Larry D.
Financial supporter
United States
 
Posts: 3363
Joined: 04 Aug 2004 23:03
Location: Winter Springs, FL (USA)

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby phylo_roadking on 02 Jun 2012 21:25

Something I forgot...

His main mistake was not to sack Göring of all honors in 1938


Nnever forget that until he actually failed militarily...and especially BEFORE the war began - Göring was arguably the NSDAP's main political BTO after Hitler! Speaker of the Reichstag etc., one of the three NSDAP Cabinet members in the February 1933 Cabinet, founder of the Gestapo, etc., etc...he was one of the main strengths of Hitler's chaotic rule until his precious Luftwaffe was found wanting.
Last edited by Dieter Zinke on 19 Jun 2012 13:26, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Göring - not Goering !!!
"Charming's a special town - not many folks take to it. I like to think the town chooses its occupants. Right ones stay, wrong ones...disappear."

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 15374
Joined: 30 Apr 2006 23:31
Location: Belfast

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby jayastout on 03 Jun 2012 00:27

Mistake...or forced upon them? ;) Remember, training was curtailed severely in an attempt to save aviation fuel. Potentially, doing so ALSO freed up a considerable number of pilots for combat duties that would otherwise have had to be retained at home as a training cadre. As with so many things...it looks like a mistake to US - only because they lost :P


Well, the mistake was in not dramatically ramping up pilot training immediately upon the U.S. entry into the war. The GAF needed to be in a position/condition to overwhelm the USAAF forces just as soon as they started operations. Giving the Eighth Air Force a tremendous drubbing just as soon as it started flying might have changed the complexion of the air war.

Stamping out increased numbers of aircraft was relatively easy, but it took approximately a year to train a good fighter pilot. The latest the Germans could have started an emergency pilot training program that would have made a difference would have been about early 1943 (when fuel was still reasonably available). That would have put greater numbers of pilots in the field prior to D-Day.

But it wasn't done. Instead they robbed the flight schools of instructor pilots ("eating your seed corn") and put pilots who should have been retired due to injuries (Milch's son is an example) back into the cockpit. This was little more than a self-destructive delaying action that was too little/too late, regardless.

My point is that the German leadership should have anticipated the need for more pilots. Certainly they saw how fast the U.S. mobilized for World War I and should have been ready for the same.

Bookmark and Share

jayastout
Member
United States
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 19 Sep 2009 23:16

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby phylo_roadking on 03 Jun 2012 01:20

Well, the mistake was in not dramatically ramping up pilot training immediately upon the U.S. entry into the war. The GAF needed to be in a position/condition to overwhelm the USAAF forces just as soon as they started operations.


Hardly a mistake - given the circumstances of the U.S.' entry into the war, it must have come as a suprise that FDR and Churchill managed to agree that the ETO would be the main theatre for prosecuting the war against the Axis.

Certainly they saw how fast the U.S. mobilized for World War I and should have been ready for the same.


Fast? 8O I know it's only Wiki, but it's all I have to hand at this time of night...

The first American troops, who were often called "Doughboys", landed in Europe in June 1917. However the AEF did not participate at the front until late October 1917, when the 1st Division, a formation of experienced regular soldiers and the first division to arrive in France, entered the trenches near Nancy.

Pershing wanted an American force that could operate independently of the other Allies, but his vision could not be realized until adequately trained troops reached Europe. In order to rush as many troops as possible to France, the AEF left its heavy weapons behind and used French and British equipment. Particularly appreciated were the French canon de 75, the canon de 155 C modele 1917 Schneider and the canon de 155mm GPF. American aviation units received the SPAD XIII and Nieuport 28 fighters and the US tank corps used the French Renault FT light tanks. Pershing established facilities in France to train new arrivals with their new weapons. By the end of 1917 four divisions were deployed in a large training area near Verdun: the 1st Division, a regular army formation; the 26th Division, a National Guard formation; the 2nd Division, a combined formation of regular troops and United States Marines; and the 42nd "Rainbow" Division, a National Guard formation consisting of units from nearly every state in the United States. A fifth division, the 41st Division, had been converted into a depot division near Tours.

At the beginning, during early 1918, the four battle-ready U.S. divisions were deployed with French and British units to gain combat experience by defending relatively quiet sectors of their lines. After the first offensive action and AEF victory on 28 May 1918 at the Battle of Cantigny, by the 1st U.S. Division, and a similar local action by the 2nd Division at Belleau Wood beginning 6 June, both while assigned to French armies, Pershing worked towards the deployment of a US field Army. The rest followed at an accelerating pace during the spring and summer of 1918. By June Americans were arriving in-theatre at the rate of 10,000 a day


In WWI, what the Americans could mobilise was men - but the U.S. was woefully short of equipment for them...whereas in WWII, the Americans had been ramping up forces and producing equipment for them in areas like the PCD for several years.

Giving the Eighth Air Force a tremendous drubbing just as soon as it started flying might have changed the complexion of the air war



Perhaps...but remember - the "8th Air Force" only officially began operations in 1944; it's direct predecessor, VIII Bomber Command, DID experience very heavy losses during the second half of 1942 8O Enough to raise questions over continuing its daylight role...
"Charming's a special town - not many folks take to it. I like to think the town chooses its occupants. Right ones stay, wrong ones...disappear."

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 15374
Joined: 30 Apr 2006 23:31
Location: Belfast

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby jayastout on 03 Jun 2012 07:02

Hardly a mistake - given the circumstances of the U.S.' entry into the war, it must have come as a suprise that FDR and Churchill managed to agree that the ETO would be the main theatre for prosecuting the war against the Axis.


Actually, it was indeed a huge mistake. Regardless of the circumstances, the Luftwaffe needed to be ready and it simply was not.

Fast? 8O I know it's only Wiki, but it's all I have to hand at this time of night....


I dunno...recruiting and training an Army...and shipping 10,000 men a day across the Atlantic...all within a year's time seems like a fairly rapid mobilization to me. Certainly it had an impact on the outcome of the war. Bottom line, the Nazi leadership should have understood what the U.S. was capable of doing in terms of industrial and manpower mobilization.

Perhaps...but remember - the "8th Air Force" only officially began operations in 1944; it's direct predecessor, VIII Bomber Command, DID experience very heavy losses during the second half of 1942 8O Enough to raise questions over continuing its daylight role...


That debate began long before the Eighth ever flew its first mission. The RAF tried daylight bombing and failed. They said it couldn't be done and pressed the USAAF to join them in their night bombing campaigns before Eaker ever left the States for England.

And actually, the Eighth flew nine missions in 1942 before it lost its first bomber. During all of 1942 it lost thirty bombers. This was a loss rate of 4% which was considerable but probably sustainable. Had the Luftwaffe been able to savage the first tentative American forays over Europe when they were under acute public and military scrutiny in the U.S...again, I think the air war would have been fought differently.

Cheers.

Bookmark and Share

jayastout
Member
United States
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 19 Sep 2009 23:16

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby phylo_roadking on 03 Jun 2012 12:14

Actually, it was indeed a huge mistake. Regardless of the circumstances, the Luftwaffe needed to be ready and it simply was not.


I think you should take a look at some of the many threads in here discussing the planning issues and contending priorities faced by the LW/RLM ;) They had to face some very stringent decisions regarding what they were ready for. When circumstances force you into decisions - they can hardly be fairly called "mistakes" if you have very little or no room to manouver.

I dunno...recruiting and training an Army...and shipping 10,000 men a day across the Atlantic...all within a year's time seems like a fairly rapid mobilization to me.


Take a look at the scale of the similar events in WWII, and how fast they moved along; remembering too that the U.S. was involved in a two-hemisphere war in WWII...

And actually, the Eighth flew nine missions in 1942 before it lost its first bomber.


You're perhaps thinking of its B-17/B-24 operations ;) The first operational element of VIII Bomber Command, the 15th Bombardment Sqn. flying Boston IIIs, actually lost two of its six aircraft in its first mission on the 4th of July against targets in Holland.

During all of 1942 it lost thirty bombers.


During its first few months of operations in the summer and autumn of 1942 - it was operating similarly small numbers of aircraft; when the 97th Bombrdment Group began operations as the first B-17 equiped element of VIII BC, it was operating only 24 crews. Its first raid on the 17th of August flew off only twelve aircraft. Losses during the several month long campaign aginst German uboat bases on the French coast were high...but the averages were skewed by events like the Romilly raid on 20th December when only six aircraft were lost out of 101 despatched.
"Charming's a special town - not many folks take to it. I like to think the town chooses its occupants. Right ones stay, wrong ones...disappear."

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 15374
Joined: 30 Apr 2006 23:31
Location: Belfast

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby jayastout on 03 Jun 2012 15:26

phylo_roadking wrote:
Actually, it was indeed a huge mistake. Regardless of the circumstances, the Luftwaffe needed to be ready and it simply was not.


I think you should take a look at some of the many threads in here discussing the planning issues and contending priorities faced by the LW/RLM ;) They had to face some very stringent decisions regarding what they were ready for. When circumstances force you into decisions - they can hardly be fairly called "mistakes" if you have very little or no room to manouver.

I dunno...recruiting and training an Army...and shipping 10,000 men a day across the Atlantic...all within a year's time seems like a fairly rapid mobilization to me.


Take a look at the scale of the similar events in WWII, and how fast they moved along; remembering too that the U.S. was involved in a two-hemisphere war in WWII...

And actually, the Eighth flew nine missions in 1942 before it lost its first bomber.


You're perhaps thinking of its B-17/B-24 operations ;) The first operational element of VIII Bomber Command, the 15th Bombardment Sqn. flying Boston IIIs, actually lost two of its six aircraft in its first mission on the 4th of July against targets in Holland.

During all of 1942 it lost thirty bombers.


During its first few months of operations in the summer and autumn of 1942 - it was operating similarly small numbers of aircraft; when the 97th Bombrdment Group began operations as the first B-17 equiped element of VIII BC, it was operating only 24 crews. Its first raid on the 17th of August flew off only twelve aircraft. Losses during the several month long campaign aginst German uboat bases on the French coast were high...but the averages were skewed by events like the Romilly raid on 20th December when only six aircraft were lost out of 101 despatched.


Oh, I think we're fast approaching the splitting hairs point. I'll stand by my belief that the Nazi leadership simply did not react appropriately to prepare for U.S. operations over Europe. At the same time I understand and respect that you don't feel the Germans had many options.

BTW...I can't help myself...I'm pretty sure you're aware that the July 4, 1942 raid was nothing more than a holiday publicity stunt flown at Arnold's behest using (re)borrowed aircraft and that it had nothing to do with the U.S. strategic bombing campaign.
:)

Bookmark and Share

jayastout
Member
United States
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 19 Sep 2009 23:16

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby phylo_roadking on 04 Jun 2012 00:09

BTW...I can't help myself...I'm pretty sure you're aware that the July 4, 1942 raid was nothing more than a holiday publicity stunt flown at Arnold's behest using (re)borrowed aircraft and that it had nothing to do with the U.S. strategic bombing campaign.


If it was a stunt...it was strangely one that was repeated quite a few times ;)The 15th continued flying missions in borrowed Bostons for two months, until it received USAAF-spec Douglas Havocs in the first week of September.

Oh, I think we're fast approaching the splitting hairs point. I'll stand by my belief that the Nazi leadership simply did not react appropriately to prepare for U.S. operations over Europe.


Hair-splitting is what we do in the Research Sections ;)
"Charming's a special town - not many folks take to it. I like to think the town chooses its occupants. Right ones stay, wrong ones...disappear."

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 15374
Joined: 30 Apr 2006 23:31
Location: Belfast

Re: Was the Luftwaffe killed by Adolf Hitler ?

Postby jayastout on 04 Jun 2012 21:32

If it was a stunt...it was strangely one that was repeated quite a few times ;)The 15th continued flying missions in borrowed Bostons for two months, until it received USAAF-spec Douglas Havocs in the first week of September.


Oh, it was a stunt indeed. Gents rushed into it almost literally at the last minute. Arnold was under pressure to get something to happen that would make the papers. He leaned on Spaatz and Eaker and the whole mess was cobbled together in a hurry. It was (as I'm sure you know) a disaster. One of the survivors committed suicide a short time after.

And yes, low level raids of that sort did get underway afterwards, but only after better preparation. Still, they weren't part of the strategic bombing campaign and the unit transferred to the Twelfth for North African duty at the end of summer.

Hair-splitting is what we do in the Research Sections ;)


Actually, I'm hard pressed to split hairs...I've nothing left up top. We'll have to use yours. :)

Bookmark and Share

jayastout
Member
United States
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 19 Sep 2009 23:16


Return to Luftwaffe air units and Luftwaffe in general

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Andrew Arthy, CommonCrawl [Bot] and 1 guest