Miles Krogfus wrote:First Szamveber is not reliable, but now is ?
Szamveber is reliable when quoting from German documents about German losses/casualties.
Szamveber is unreliable when given German estimates of Allied losses. It is that simple.
Miles Krogfus wrote:
I relate to tank unit documents, and to quote Michael, men who were there. I knew the vets of the three Panzer Zugs involved that day.
You are not the final authority on these things. Your information was obtained decades ago and much has since (like your suggestion to Fey about 23rd Hussars losing 15 tanks) been shown to be in error.
The posts I did on Worthington could not have been written by anyone without extensive research a decade ago. I put it together in under an hour. So much new information has surfaced and archives have gone online since then that you simply can not sit back and claim personal contact with a German veteran some 20+years back makes you the sole arbiter of 'the truth'.
Szamveber gives information about 2 knocked out Panthers on August 9th. How was he led astray?
By the way do you have a copy of the book?