Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

Discussions on all (non-biographical) aspects of the Freikorps, Reichswehr, Austrian Bundesheer, Heer, Waffen-SS, Volkssturm and Fallschirmjäger and the other Luftwaffe ground forces. Hosted by Christoph Awender.
Post Reply
Tom from Cornwall
Member
Posts: 3236
Joined: 01 May 2006, 20:52
Location: UK

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#301

Post by Tom from Cornwall » 24 Feb 2015, 20:56

Hi,

Just to add to the difficulty of producing an agreed timeline, I thought you might all be amused to see that in the war diary of 1/7 Queens (WO171/1368) the relevant entry states that:
1000 4 CLY entered VILLERS BOCAGE and passed through it towards high ground west of the city. They were immediately attacked by enemy Mk VI tanks. The 2nd Sqn remained in the town and 1/7 Queen’s were ordered into the town for support. A/tk guns and Carriers immediately moved into the town whilst remainder of Bn debussed at ST GERMAIN 7857 and moved west towards VILLERS BOCAGE. Snipers were found in houses and fields and “D” Coy, who were leading, cleared several houses of snipers and captured a staff-car...
1130 “D” Coy entered town followed by “C” Coy. Shortly after entry a Mk VI fired down the main street destroying half a house & wounding Maj. EM French & several other ranks.
There should be enough contradictions now to keep the debate going for another 70 years. :D

There are no useful details in the war diary of 131 Infantry Brigade.

Regards

Tom

Michael Kenny
Member
Posts: 8267
Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
Location: Teesside

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#302

Post by Michael Kenny » 25 Feb 2015, 01:32

That is why I steer clear of fixing an hour. A War Diary was written up much later than events. Best stick to Radio Logs!
As for who hit Wittmann well candidates are very limited. If not a Firefly then the only other guns known to be in Villers at the right time were the Stuarts of the Recce Troop. Perhaps it was a 37mm that did for him?
Almost lined up with Wittmann's Tiger is a small gap between the blocks of shops. It is not know if it was walled either end at the time but if not would provide a view through from Rue Saint Martin to Rue Pasteur (the high street)
If it was the source of a flank shot then the Tiger stopped almost at once.
It is odd that Wittmann's Tiger was hugging the shop walls so closely. 5 Shops to his rear is an intact petrol pump (the white thing seen halfway between the two Germans) so he swerved in (if indeed he did) just before he stopped-or turned on that spot which would account for his position.

The period views of Villers are long before 1944 and buildings at the exact spot where Wittmann stopped had been altered some time in the intervening years . It does not match up exctly but is the same location.

Red arrow points to gap. Pink spot Wittmann's Tiger.

Looking West
SS101 2.Kp. Tiger 212 - KO'd in V-B - 1944 #1.jpg
Looking East
P-louise 078-vert sml.jpg
Looking East
Villers streets .-vert sml.jpg
Top pic looking West. Bottom pic looking East
SS101 2.Kp-vertyyu sml.jpg
Last edited by Michael Kenny on 25 Feb 2015, 06:39, edited 4 times in total.


sandeepmukherjee196
Member
Posts: 1524
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 06:34

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#303

Post by sandeepmukherjee196 » 25 Feb 2015, 03:03

Tom from Cornwall wrote:Hi,



There should be enough contradictions now to keep the debate going for another 70 years. :D

......

Regards

Tom

Yes..the debates..name calling...and when one's pseudo scholarly pet theories run into rough ground..then the virulent personal attacks and motive digging..the works :D

Tom from Cornwall
Member
Posts: 3236
Joined: 01 May 2006, 20:52
Location: UK

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#304

Post by Tom from Cornwall » 26 Feb 2015, 22:17

Best stick to radio logs!
Absolutely, but are there any available other than those of 7 Armoured Division and 30 Corps HQ?

One question that springs to mind is whether any evidence has surfaced to show that German armoured formations changed their tactics in response to the appearance of the Sherman Firefly which would have been identified at VB?

Regards

Tom

User avatar
Kingfish
Member
Posts: 3348
Joined: 05 Jun 2003, 17:22
Location: USA

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#305

Post by Kingfish » 26 Feb 2015, 22:28

Tom from Cornwall wrote:
Best stick to radio logs!
Absolutely, but are there any available other than those of 7 Armoured Division and 30 Corps HQ?

One question that springs to mind is whether any evidence has surfaced to show that German armoured formations changed their tactics in response to the appearance of the Sherman Firefly which would have been identified at VB?

Regards

Tom
Would that have been the first time a Firefly could have been examined by the Germans?
Did the Sherbooke Fusilier lose any around Buron/Authie?
That is the only other engagement that I know if where the Germans were in possession of the battlefield following an armored battle, at least by D+7.
The gods do not deduct from a man's allotted span the hours spent in fishing.
~Babylonian Proverb

Michael Kenny
Member
Posts: 8267
Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
Location: Teesside

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#306

Post by Michael Kenny » 28 Feb 2015, 08:03

Kingfish wrote:
Would that have been the first time a Firefly could have been examined by the Germans?
Did the Sherbooke Fusilier lose any around Buron/Authie?
That is the only other engagement that I know if where the Germans were in possession of the battlefield following an armored battle, at least by D+7.
The Germans knew a lot about the Sherman and the 17 pdr. Putting them together did not create any new information on either system. There were 4 Firefly lost that day of which 3 were penetrated and thus 'scrap' One was taken intact and had some tests done on it. It featured in various publications and I noticed it was 4th CLY tank and linked it over a decade ago.
Firefly-captured (2).jpg
A photo of each of the 4 Firefly has been found and they will feature in the upcoming book. 3 are shown in the positions where they were hit. The one above was abandoned intact and thus almost certainly driven away before any photos were taken.

sandeepmukherjee196
Member
Posts: 1524
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 06:34

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#307

Post by sandeepmukherjee196 » 01 Mar 2015, 10:53

Hi everyone...

I had promised that I would scan and upload the relevant page from Taylor's " Villers Bocage Through The Lens " ..however the AHF attachment link is not accepting the file..calling it invalid . Dunno why.. I am not tech savvy enough to work around this problem. So I am giving below the relevant paragraph and lines from Taylor's book ( Pg 43) :

" VIllers - Bocage, 0915 - 1030 hrs.

............................

By 0930 hrs, 1/7th Queens was stretched out on the Livry road behind the Sharpshooters. Most of the unit was near St Germain -d-'Ectot, just over three miles from Villers, whilst a few of the lead elements had reached the town. After passing Tac Brigade at Amaye, the battalion had debussed waiting to progress on to the objective. Then came the order from 22nd Armoured Brigade for the carrier ans anti - tank gun platoons to move off. They advanced straight away to Villers to give basic support. This left the four infantry companies to march the rest of the way.

..............


As the anti - tank and carrier platoons of the Queens reached Villers-BOcage they were positioned to defend the major thoroughfares. their first job being to site their 6-pdrs to cover possible access routes........"


Ciao
Sandeep

sandeepmukherjee196
Member
Posts: 1524
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 06:34

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#308

Post by sandeepmukherjee196 » 02 Mar 2015, 05:01

Tom from Cornwall wrote:
Best stick to radio logs!
Absolutely, but are there any available other than those of 7 Armoured Division and 30 Corps HQ?

One question that springs to mind is whether any evidence has surfaced to show that German armoured formations changed their tactics in response to the appearance of the Sherman Firefly which would have been identified at VB?

Regards

Tom
At Norrey en Bessin, on 9 June, a Firefly under Lt GK Henry of the 1st Hussars knocked out 5 Panthers of the 3rd kompanie, 12 Pz rgmnt of the HJ Div. This feat was accomplished by gunner A Chapman with just 6 rounds fired in rapid sequence .

Ciao
Sandeep

User avatar
Urmel
Member
Posts: 4907
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 10:34
Location: The late JBond

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#309

Post by Urmel » 02 Mar 2015, 08:50

Yes, so? The point here is when the Germans became aware of 17-pdrs in tanks, and if so, if/when did they start altering their tactics.
The enemy had superiority in numbers, his tanks were more heavily armoured, they had larger calibre guns with nearly twice the effective range of ours, and their telescopes were superior. 5 RTR 19/11/41

The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42

sandeepmukherjee196
Member
Posts: 1524
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 06:34

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#310

Post by sandeepmukherjee196 » 02 Mar 2015, 18:59

Well exactly 17 pounder or not...the Germans became painfully aware that a Sherman variant was packing enough heat to knock out those many Panthers in rapid succession. All this is in the context of Wittmann showing healthy respect when confronted by Lockwood's Firefly ... He sure didn't stick around to force the issue.

User avatar
Urmel
Member
Posts: 4907
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 10:34
Location: The late JBond

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#311

Post by Urmel » 02 Mar 2015, 22:03

How do you know that they knew it was a 17-pdr in a tank that had knocked those Panthers out? Did you read the relevant German documents? If so, I'd be interested to see them.
The enemy had superiority in numbers, his tanks were more heavily armoured, they had larger calibre guns with nearly twice the effective range of ours, and their telescopes were superior. 5 RTR 19/11/41

The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42

sandeepmukherjee196
Member
Posts: 1524
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 06:34

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#312

Post by sandeepmukherjee196 » 03 Mar 2015, 19:23

Tom from Cornwall wrote:Hi,

Just to add to the difficulty of producing an agreed timeline, I thought you might all be amused to see that in the war diary of 1/7 Queens (WO171/1368) the relevant entry states that:
1000 4 CLY entered VILLERS BOCAGE and passed through it towards high ground west of the city. They were immediately attacked by enemy Mk VI tanks. The 2nd Sqn remained in the town and 1/7 Queen’s were ordered into the town for support. A/tk guns and Carriers immediately moved into the town whilst remainder of Bn debussed at ST GERMAIN 7857 and moved west towards VILLERS BOCAGE. Snipers were found in houses and fields and “D” Coy, who were leading, cleared several houses of snipers and captured a staff-car...
1130 “D” Coy entered town followed by “C” Coy. Shortly after entry a Mk VI fired down the main street destroying half a house & wounding Maj. EM French & several other ranks.
There should be enough contradictions now to keep the debate going for another 70 years. :D

There are no useful details in the war diary of 131 Infantry Brigade.

Regards

Tom

However there is an useful quote on the net from the war diary of the 4 CLY for 13.6.44 :

".......13.6.1944: Regiment moved at first light towards Villers Bocage 8157, A Sqdn leading followed by A Company Rifle Brigade. No opposition. A Sqdn reached feature east of Villers Bocage map reference 8358. Column split at map reference 823578 by two Tiger tanks (Michael Wittman). RHQ brewed up completely. A Sqdn continued to take up battle positions and B Sqdn hold town. Unable to get through to A Sqdn who were attacked at 10.00 by Tigers and infantry. They called for immediate assistance, but none could get through. At 10.30 A Sqdn reports position untenable, withdrawal impossible. At 10.35 all stations go off the air. B Sqdn ordered to hold village at all cost. After six hours of street battles destroyed four Tigers and three mark IVs. At 16.00 B Sqdn reported village still held, but enemy infantry reported in area, map reference 820975, and an attack by the Queens failed to clear the opposition. The Commanding Officer 'The Viscount Cranley' was missing and Major Aird, B Sqdn leader, took command. Major Aird, now acting CO, ordered to withdraw Regiment to 780580, and this was carried out without further loss, while C Sqdn covered the withdrawal. Vehicle casualties 20 Cromwells, 4 Fireflys, 3 Humber Scout cars, 3 Stuarts, and 1 Half Track....."
(http://forums.wildbillguarnere.com/inde ... 944/page-3)


The timing is generally considered to be along these lines.

Ciao
Sandeep

sandeepmukherjee196
Member
Posts: 1524
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 06:34

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#313

Post by sandeepmukherjee196 » 03 Mar 2015, 22:11

Urmel wrote:How do you know that they knew it was a 17-pdr in a tank that had knocked those Panthers out? Did you read the relevant German documents? If so, I'd be interested to see them.

At 0900 on 9 June, III Kompanie, 12 Panzer Regiment was relieved in the line by Mk IVs, and moved to Rots to la Villeneuve. The attack started at 12 hrs,( as per III Kp war diary) when twelve Panther tanks of 3 Kp moved out in a single line at right-angles to the railway embankment ( 1440 hrs given in IV Kp war diary which was on the flank)

"....The company was led by Hauptmann Luedemann, as the commander, Oberststurmfuehrer von Ribbentrop, had been wounded earlier. Though von Ribbentrop merely watched from the rear area along with Max Wuensche, he had recommended that the company drive at high speeds in a broad front — only stopping to fire their 75-mm guns. Luedemann followed Ribbentrop's advice, and the infantry were left far behind. As the Panthers approached the village, not yet facing any enemy fire, Luedemann ordered the company to swing left. The five tanks of the 3rd section hugging the rail embankment were forced to speed past the 2nd section in order to keep a solid line of tanks facing Norrey. The four tanks of the 1st section had by this point slowed to form a reserve. Although the order to swing left, presenting the Panther's thicker frontal armour to the Canadian defenders in Norrey, was an understandable action, it had consequences that the Hitlerjugend had not anticipated.

Nine Sherman tanks including several "Fireflys" equipped with the 17-pounder, were being moved towards the front to reinforce the Reginas' position in Norrey. As the tanks, from the Elgin Regiment, were making a detour in front of the village when they spotted the advancing Panthers. Catastrophically for the 3rd Panzer Company, the swing to the left, though protecting them from the 6-pounders in Norrey, exposed their flanks to the Shermans at not more than 1000 metres distance. The Canadian tanks deployed in a straight line and opened fire. A "Firefly" commanded by Lieutenant Henry hit the tank nearest the rail-line first. Adolf Morawetz thought he had struck a mine; "after a dull bang and shaking, as if the tracks had been ripped off, the tank came to a standstill." After another bang, the ammunition for the MG-42 ignited and the Panther burst into flames. Before Morawetz desperately attempted to open the hatch he had just closed, he looked through his periscope and watched as the neighbouring Panther exploded — throwing the turret into the air. Morawetz survived, but his tank and crew had been destroyed. Six other Panthers were quickly dispatched in the next four minutes. The survivors, including the badly burned crews who had bailed out of their destroyed tanks, fled back towards the underpass. The infantry were forced to join the men of the 2nd Company under the bridge, as an artillery barrage began to pound the area inflicting heavy casualties. The converging attack of the 1st Battalion of the 25th Panzer Grenadiers never materialized. The assault was a complete and total failure...." ( Oliver Haller "The Defeat of the 12th SS: 7–10 June 1944," Canadian Military History: Vol. 3: Iss. 1, Article 2.)

A history of the HJ Div notes that of 12 tanks participating, seven were destroyed, 18 men killed, and an equal number wounded.(Blood and Honor
by Craig W.H. Luther)

Pl refer to for day by day events of this regiment at Normandy: Waffen-SS Armour in Normandy: The Combat History of SS Panzer Regiment 12 ... Norbert Számvéber. Compiled from KTBs of the relevant units,

For 9 June, 1944, I. SS Panzer regiment 12, command post: le Bourg; Its given that Pz # 325, 328, 335, 336, 337 were total write offs within 5 minutes ( enemy couldn't be seen) 327 and 329 were damaged ( by anti tank fire) and retreated to their repair stations.

Like I said in my earlier post, the Germans were not clear about specifically the "17 pounder" ..but they knew enough to generate healthy respect. As borne out by Wittmann's behaviour once facing Sgt Lockwood at VB.

This pic, purportedly taken after the Norrey en bessin battle ( I cant vouch for it though) maybe of interest though not of a panzer trooper.
12.ss.normandy.jpg
https://www.tumblr.com/search/12th%20ss%20panzer%20division
12.ss.normandy.jpg (54.99 KiB) Viewed 525 times
Portrait of 18-year-old Rottenfuehrer Otto Funk of the 25th Pz Gr Regiment, 12th SS Panzer Division HJ, after a failed attack on Allied troops at Norrey-en-Bessin, northwest of Caen, Calvados, Lower Normandy, France. 9 June 1944.

Michael Kenny
Member
Posts: 8267
Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
Location: Teesside

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#314

Post by Michael Kenny » 03 Mar 2015, 23:04

sandeepmukherjee196 wrote:
A history of the HJ Div notes that of 12 tanks participating, seven were destroyed, 18 men killed, and an equal number wounded.(Blood and Honor
by Craig W.H. Luther)
That is an catastrophic casualty total. If it is just the 7 Panthers then every crew member became a casualty and it means the Panther was in all respects a true 'Death Trap'
Even counting all12 tanks would give 3 casualties per tank which is nearly twice the Sherman rate.

Note:
I have not checked the German data and can't really be bothered . When presented with an open goal I just bang it in the back of the net.

User avatar
Urmel
Member
Posts: 4907
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 10:34
Location: The late JBond

Re: Wittmann, Villers Bocage and his kill claims.

#315

Post by Urmel » 03 Mar 2015, 23:34

Okay, two points, and thanks for posting this.

1) It is pretty impossible at 1,000m to ID the kind of tank doing the work other than maybe 'yeah, that's a Sherman', but realistically, given the nature of the action all the Germans would have noted was their own tanks going up like a 4th of July fireworks.
2) Since they were hit in the flank, there was not even any need to suspect a new super-weapon. The Panther's flank armour at this range was vulnerable to pretty much any gun someone cared to bring onto a 1944 battlefield.

So the idea that somehow within days this incident generated a 'healthy respect' in tankers driving a far better protected tank doesn't appear to be based on any evidence. Even if Wittmann had been told about it, his reaction would probably have been 'Wot, Panthers being despatched by flank shots? Whatever revelation are you going to tell me about next? That night follows day?'
The enemy had superiority in numbers, his tanks were more heavily armoured, they had larger calibre guns with nearly twice the effective range of ours, and their telescopes were superior. 5 RTR 19/11/41

The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42

Post Reply

Return to “Heer, Waffen-SS & Fallschirmjäger”