Degrelle interview

Discussions on the foreigners (volunteers as well as conscripts) fighting in the German Wehrmacht, those collaborating with the Axis and other period Far Right organizations. Hosted by George Lepre.
Post Reply
User avatar
''X''
Member
Posts: 263
Joined: 21 Oct 2006, 23:55
Location: Hellas/West Macedonia

Degrelle interview

#1

Post by ''X'' » 12 Apr 2007, 01:40

Leon Degrelle

NAME- Leon Degrelle

NATION- Belgium

DATE (S) OF INTERVIEW (S) March 1984, April 1993 (Telephonic)

PLACE OF INTERVIEW (S) Barcelona, Spain

LANGUAGE (S) CONDUCTED English, German, French

SIGNIFICANCE OF SUBJECT- Leader of the Belgian Socialist Rexist

Movement; German volunteer, Waffen SS General and 28th Waffen SS Division Commander.

OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE- Michele Ulovey

FORMAT- Q & A standard.



Q- When and where were you born?

A- I was born in Bouillon, Luxembourg on 15 June 1906.

Q- What was your family like?

A- My father was a brewer, a good Catholic man, and my mother was the most wonderful woman in the world.

Q- What was your education like?

A- My family had been Jesuit educated for many generations, and I went to the College of Notre Dame de la Paix. I studied the classics and theology, but was seriously drawn to politics. The Jesuits taught us to expand our mind and pursue knowledge, which I did. Unfortunately some of my fellow countrymen took a dim view of my independent writing and publishing on certain political thoughts. I had a tough time.

Q- You were arrested, were you not?

A- Yes, I was arrested in 1940 by French troops, beaten, and moved around from damp jail cells where I was tortured until finally freed by German troops. They knew who I was since I was a leader of the Rexist Party, which was a Socialist anti-Communist political party. Seeing that I would not receive any help, let alone justice from the authorities in Belgium I knew that that government was illegitimate, and I decided that the corruption must be challenged.

Q- How did you join the German army?

A- My brother had been murdered, my parents and wife killed after torture, and my eight children were taken away and scattered to the winds, a situation that would not be resolved for many years. I basically had some additional political problems, and until the Germans invaded and captured the country I was not safe. I felt that Belgium would only be a great and sovereign nation again once Germany won the war and eliminated the dangers of Communism. I formed the first group of volunteers from the Flemish and Walloons, and we were formed in our own battalion. Later we were assigned to the training centres, and then deployed to Army Group Center at first. Many of our men were sent to the Demyansk region as support in late 1941 to early 1942, but were then recalled and joined 5th SS ‘Wiking’ in the Ukraine later. We later became our own independent Waffen SS unit, the 28th der Waffen SS-Panzergrenadier Division ‘Wallonien’ in April 1944 at a ceremony in Brussels. ‘Sepp’ Dietrich, Max Wünsche and other notables were there for the induction ceremony. We started with 400 men in 1940, later growing to about 15,000, but only about 400 would be around after the war, including myself and two other original members. Of the original 6,000 men in the regiment before becoming a division 2,500 were killed. We had a great combat record, and Hitler personally congratulated me and gave me the Oak Leaves. I believe that we had the greatest number of Knight’s Crosses of any foreign unit, but I am not sure.

Q- What was it like for you, fighting on the Russian Front?

A- Well, that was where the real war was. The greatest threat was from Communist Russia and the Western Allies discovered this only too late; we live in the world created by this today. As far as Russia, it must be the weather, especially the bitter winters, and the endless steppe that goes forever. We were not prepared for this environment. The Russians were used to it and were well clothed to resist the cold. The greatest assets we had were the opportunity to strip Russian dead and take their padded clothing and felt boots, as well as those marvelous fur hats. They were very adapted to ski warfare, which we also used, and were perhaps even better at since we were Edelweiss trained as well. The partisan war was the worst, we had to adapt immediately to very situation, and the situation always changed. This was especially bad since they did not wear uniforms and could blend into any village. A typical day was when we moved all night on foot, sometimes with trucks and always looking for the next ambush. The Soviets sent artillery in to try and channel us into their killing zones, but we hit the earth and pushed through, taking casualties every time. The largest partisan fighting I was involved in was near the road at Cherkassy, where the partisan cavalry attacked and withdrew quickly. I ordered my men not to pursue, as it was not our mission. When we linked up with members of 4th Army we felt safer. But that was just the beginning.

Q- You wrote about Soviet atrocities in you your book, Campaign in Russia. Would you describe some of the things you witnessed during the war on both sides?

A- The partisans were usually the worst group to be captured by; they gouged out eyes, cut off fingers, genitalia, toes, and would butcher a man in front of his comrades before beginning their field interrogation. This was confirmed from both soldiers who escaped captivity and defecting partisans who were sickened by the sight and later joined the anti-Stalinist cause. One even had photographs that were turned over to the intelligence section of 2nd SS Panzer Army. I saw them. I saw a young German soldier, part of a reconnaissance patrol that had disappeared who had his legs crudely amputated at the knees with a saw or knife. We could see that even dying after this procedure he had managed to crawl several meters with his fingers. Another SS man had been crucified alive and his genitals removed and stuffed in his mouth. Several times we witnessed the Soviets and partisans retreating after a battle, stopping long enough to kill our wounded, usually by smashing their heads with their weapons or using a bayonet, shovel, ax handle, or knife. This did nothing to engender a more humane attitude towards the partisans when captured.

Q- What was the atmosphere like fighting next to the other European volunteers?

A- Well, the Russians hated the Italians certainly, I think even more than they hated the Germans, which I wrote about. I remember Italians being killed and tortured in horrible ways. Once a group of prisoners was stripped of their clothes and dowsed in ice water and were allowed to freeze to death. This was during the winter, and they died frozen alive. They even killed doctors and the chaplain. We discovered these events after recapturing a couple of villages. It was absolutely horrible.

Q- How were the peasants’ attitudes towards your unit and the Germans?

A- The peasants were just simple people who had suffered under Stalin and the great promises of Communism, and they were, for the most part very supportive of us. This was most evident when we attended their religious services. I attended regularly whenever possible, although I am a Catholic, the Russian Orthodox services were handled by priests who had either been in prison, sent to Siberia, or living in hiding for many years. We supported their religious freedom and they responded very well. It was very moving to see parents bring their young children for Baptisms and Christenings, and the old people holding their icons and crucifixes. They prayed for an end to Stalin and his measures, they also prayed for us to win. Another thing that must be remembered is that we also assisted the peasants in bringing in their crops, protected them from partisan reprisals and gave them jobs. They lived a better life under us for three years than under the Communists during their entire lives. They also gave us great intelligence on partisan and Red Army activity, and worked as translators and scouts. This was especially true in the Ukraine, although sometimes the Germans in charge would do stupid things and destroy the support we had gained. One village I remember was called Baibusy; we had a great relationship with these Ukrainians and others who fled there. They were marvelous. In the Caucasus the anti-Soviet feeling was incredible, especially among the Kalmucks and Armenians, and they fought with us and for us in a fanatical way. Another great memory was an entire village turning out to welcome us as we entered. The people brought out their religious icons and gave us information and valuable intelligence, food, places to stay, everything. The orders from the upper command were to treat the locals humanely; they were our allies. These people became a second family for many of us, and when we left there was a great deal of sadness. Once Paul Hausser and I attended a religious mass; the people knelt before him as if he were a Patriarch, blessing him for his presence and for restoring their religious freedom. With the candles and gilt images it was quite an impressive scene.

Q- You fought the partisans; what was this type of warfare like?

A- Well, it was the worst. First, there were many different types of partisans. There were the Communist fanatics who were the most dangerous and could not be bargained with. Then there were the peasants, conscripts who had little choice in the matter, and then there were the former Red Army men who joined the partisans due to their units having been cut off and destroyed, although many of the last two groups defected to us at some point. They moved quickly in their pig skin sandals as light infantry and in small groups, usually at night, using hit and run tactics and creating turmoil in general. They placed mines in roads, killed sentries, kidnapped officials and forcibly conscripted recruits, and they were very difficult to catch. In the Caucasus the terrain was a jungle, very thick with valleys and great forests where we had a very difficult time against the partisans; snipers climbed trees in the very dense forests, they had bunker complexes, underground hospitals, weapons manufacturing centres, everything. They had dug live graves; holes in the ground where they shared body heat and were well camouflaged. They lived like animals and fought the same way. Many were freed criminals, even murderers who were brought from jails and placed into units. Their snipers were very deadly and were difficult to locate, let alone capture or kill. This type of fighting was the worst; it wore on the nerves of the men and reduced humanity to the lowest level. I would rather face the Red Army than these people. The one thing my men and I knew was that however large and present the threat presented by the Red Army, the partisans were the worst enemy to fight. Since they did not wear uniforms, unless they were in German clothing sometimes, and they blended well with the local population, which created a problem in choosing who was and was not a partisan. Unless you caught one with a weapon or were actively engaged against them it was impossible. Later during the war they were absorbed into Red Army infantry and tank units, and sometimes they were given uniforms. I would say the most disturbing aspect of fighting the partisans was that, unlike the Soviet military, the partisans adhered to no set doctrine, used no set order of battle that we could study, and basically struck where it was the most opportune. If we caught and cornered them they were dead, and they knew it. That was why they fought like fanatics.

Q- What was your impression of the Red Army?

A- Very undisciplined and suicidal in their tactics, but very determined in the fight. They had men and women of all ages and racial backgrounds, teenagers to pensioners, it was incredible. I once saw a boy no older than nine years old who had been killed in action, and it made me hate the Communists even more for their disregard for human life. It was also difficult for our men (Walloons) to shoot women and children; we were not accustomed to this, but it became necessary since they fought just as hard as the men.

Q- What were the prisoners you captured like?

A- Most Russians only wanted to surrender; these were usually peasants who had been caught up in the war and were hoping for something better. Many carried the safe conduct passes distributed along the front, guaranteeing safe passage to anyone surrendering. Thousands deserted carrying these passes.

Q- You mentioned the wearing on the nerves of the men. What was the typical condition of the men?

A- We had a few suicides and some went mad. It was a type of war that cannot be described, it must be experienced, but once experienced it still cannot be described. Does this make sense? I know it seems vague, but that is the best I can do. The exhaustion, hunger, fear, and pain, not to mention the cold of the winter all played their part. Seeing the brutality only made the situation worse. The men were walking ghosts; skeletons that had not eaten a hot meal in weeks, or even a solid meal unless we came across a dead horse or a village that offered us assistance. The orders were that no one would steal or commit any crime against the people. We needed their support, and anything that reduced that support would return to haunt us ten fold. Unfortunately, many German units did not observe this reality. We served with the 5th SS ‘Wiking’ Division during this period [1943], and they generally observed the rules. However, there were exceptions.

Q- How did the authorities handle desertions?

A- Those who were caught, and bear in mind that nearly everyone deserting was caught, were hanged, shot, or executed in some fashion and displayed for public viewing. Many were just children who had been sent into a war that was too much for them. They broke and they were killed by their own men for it. It was better to stay and face the enemy with the chance of surviving, than to desert and definitely be caught by the German Field Police, who were a judge and jury of their own. It was very sad.

Q- Did you ever work with the Freiwilligen?

A- Yes, many times, and it was both a success and a failure. There were some former Communists who re-defected to the Soviets, but I think most stayed and fought until the end. They knew what their fate was if captured by the Communists, and many were anti-Communists who were loyal to us. The best volunteers were generally the Western European units, such as our own Walloons, the French ‘Charlemagne’, and the Dutch and Norwegian units. The ‘Wiking’ was perhaps the most notable and we served with them. They were perhaps the best of all, and were actually the only foreign unit to be designated as an actual SS division, not an auxiliary unit, and they were also made a full panzer division as well.

Q- Were you ever exposed to Soviet propaganda?

A- Yes, quite often. The Reds knew who were and they would broadcast in French to us, asking us to come over and fight for De Gaulle. This did not work of course. We actually found it quite amusing.

Q- Tell us about your meetings with the Nazi elite, such as Hitler and Himmler, and what you thought of them.

A- I met Himmler only four times during the war, if my memory is correct, and Hitler I met several times, besides the Knight’s Cross and Oak Leaves awards. I once had a meeting with both of them at one time, when I made a request in 1943 that my men be allowed to have Catholic chaplains, and they agreed. I also refused to have my men partake in anything that we deemed un-soldierly, and Paul Hausser, ‘Sepp’ Dietrich and others supported me. Hitler once told me that if he had ever had a son, he wished that he would have been like me. I am not exactly sure why he said this, but I know he respected me, and I think Himmler did as well, although I never trusted him, and I was not quite comfortable with him as the supreme commander of the SS, including the Waffen SS, which we had joined. I believed that Germany could have won the war even after the Americans came into it if the mass of the eastern peoples had been rallied to our cause.

Q- Hitler decorated you with the Knight’s Cross personally, didn’t he?

A- Yes, in February 1944, following the Cherkassy battle, which was quite rare. I think only perhaps twenty men received the Knight’s Cross from Hitler personally, and twelve of those were for the Eban Emael operation in 1940. I received my Knight’s Cross at the same ceremony where General Herbert Gille received the Oak Leaves, as both of us were at Cherkassy together, and General Herman Fegelein and Himmler were in attendance as well. Josef Goebbels made a great propaganda exploit out of the situation, which was meant to assist the foreign recruiting effort. Gille would later be awarded the Diamonds, while Fegelein would be shot on Hitler’s orders.

Q- When did you first arrive in Russia?

A- We entered the Ukraine beginning in October 1941, after finishing basic training and mountain warfare school, although some of our troops had been diverted to the Demyansk region under Olivier Thoring, a Knight’s Cross winner who was later killed. They were assigned to 9th Army, then later joined us in the south the next year. It was his detachment that captured Andrei Vlasov in July 1942, for your information.

Q- How did you escape to Spain?

A- This was an interesting situation. After a crazy course through Germany, Belgium, and Denmark, where I met with Himmler in Kiel for the last time, we ended up in Oslo, Norway by ship, and we knew that this situation would not last after my meeting with [Vidkun] Quisling. We refueled the aircraft and took off on our flight. We ran out of fuel and crashed on a beach in Spain, and I have been here ever since. My own government condemned me to death, but they have not pursued those who murdered my family and killed in the name of their own causes. Justice is determined by those in power, nothing else.

Q- What was your final rank?

A- My rank was Oberfuehrer, which is one rank above a full colonel and just below a brigadier general, so there is no Allied equivalent. I was promoted to general in the last week of the war, but I never [personally] received the promotion to Brigadefuehrer.

Q- How has your life been since the war?

A- I spend my time writing about the war and meeting old friends, and now making new ones. I think that people need to understand that there is always another side to a story. If people in your country had suffered the loss of their families due to a political party that was in conflict with your beliefs, then many of your countrymen may find themselves on the other side. Your American Civil War is a prime example.

Q- What do you see yourself doing for the rest of your life?

A- Hopefully still writing, as long as my mind is sharp and I can see; always reading books, and wondering at the great changes that have taken place in my lifetime. The collapse of Communism in Europe has proven that we were right; we just needed validation, and now we have it. I think that what we may write is important, but the history as it unfolds will prove who was right, and who was wrong. I never believed in the purging of Jews and civilians in general, and that was not my war. My war was to fight for my country, which would have been an independent partner of Germany in a Communist free Europe. This is only now a reality, but we fought for it fifty years ago all the same.

Q- Do you feel that Communism will eventually die in the rest of the world as well?

A- Yes, it will fall. Governments are the most intangible structures made by man, they change shapes, and are altered by the forces of time and nature. However, I am an optimist; I am hopeful that we as a species will learn from our mistakes, and perhaps there will be hope for us all. But then again, I could be wrong.

.Charles.
Member
Posts: 19
Joined: 05 Apr 2007, 14:45
Location: French living in Canada

#2

Post by .Charles. » 12 Apr 2007, 22:18

Very interesting interview, thank you!
For those interested in the foreign volunteers, "the Campaign in Russia" by Degrelle is a "must-read" book.


User avatar
Allen Milcic
Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: 09 Sep 2003, 21:29
Location: Canada

#3

Post by Allen Milcic » 13 Apr 2007, 00:15

Please post a link to where this interview was obtained from. Thank you.

Allen/

User avatar
''X''
Member
Posts: 263
Joined: 21 Oct 2006, 23:55
Location: Hellas/West Macedonia

#4

Post by ''X'' » 13 Apr 2007, 09:36


User avatar
''X''
Member
Posts: 263
Joined: 21 Oct 2006, 23:55
Location: Hellas/West Macedonia

#5

Post by ''X'' » 13 Apr 2007, 09:45

Here is Leon Degrelle talking about Islam.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2QfQLxi88o
There is an image of ''Handschar'' in the beggining.Could some French or French-speaking forum member give us a translation ?

Thanks in advance,
Giorgos

.Charles.
Member
Posts: 19
Joined: 05 Apr 2007, 14:45
Location: French living in Canada

#6

Post by .Charles. » 13 Apr 2007, 14:49

Could some French or French-speaking forum member give us a translation ?
Here we go!:

Degrelle is surprised that the public does not know there were 60.000 muslim in the SS.
Hitler was very interested in Islam (Degrelle says "very sensitive" to).
Hitler knew the important muslim potential for a united Europe.
The journalist asks: From what point of view? religious?
Degrelle: Yes, religious.
Degrelle insists that Hitler was deeply religious but was strongly anti-clerical.
Degrelle says he had not much consideration for the Church: the Church attaqued nazism then changed its mind, as usual, to worship the winner, but always too late.
Degrelle says that Hitler wanted muslims in the SS because sooner or later Hitler would need them. Hitler wanted these muslim ss to bring home the Nazie revolution and fight together instead of fighting against each other like we do today.
Degrelle says that in 1945 for New Year Eve, Hitler gave to the 60.000 muslims a necklace with a golden Coran.
Hitler's racism was not about "squashing" other races. His racism what about making strong, intelligent balanced young men and women to build strong united nations. Degrelle speaks about the importance of families with a lot of children and he says that under Hitler's rule, Germans used to have 1.800.000 children a year and conclude that unhappy countries don't have (so many) children.


I believe that all the ideas are in my translation, however, I did not try to translate the passion that (always) exists in Léon Degrelle's speeches. He had very strong convictions and knew how to express them!

Note: please don't shoot the translator (me!), I am not a pro, if someone wants to add something, he is more than welcome to do it.

User avatar
''X''
Member
Posts: 263
Joined: 21 Oct 2006, 23:55
Location: Hellas/West Macedonia

#7

Post by ''X'' » 13 Apr 2007, 15:32

Thank you mr Charles.

zeonchar
Member
Posts: 36
Joined: 10 Dec 2004, 21:05
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Degrelle interview

#8

Post by zeonchar » 17 Aug 2014, 07:15

Fascinating interview! Thank you!

J. Duncan
Member
Posts: 3776
Joined: 02 Aug 2008, 11:22

Re: Degrelle interview

#9

Post by J. Duncan » 18 Aug 2014, 09:23

This is Degrelle's speech / discussion about the Waffen SS (in dubbed English) introduced by his daughter and put together by the Barnes Review (a revisionist group)....video comes from youtube. This was later printed into a short book titled "Story of the Waffen SS". Book is a good companion piece to "Campaign in Russia".


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nKEKhgGsAI

Rob - wssob2
Member
Posts: 2387
Joined: 15 Apr 2002, 21:29
Location: MA, USA

Re: Degrelle interview

#10

Post by Rob - wssob2 » 10 Dec 2014, 02:15

Wow. Well it certainly is interesting to see how an unrepentant Nazi collaborator positions himself in the best possible light.

WRT to the ‘How did you join the German Army?” question:

• His brother was killed by the Resistance in 1944, long after Leon joined the German Army

• I’m not sure about his parents being killed. I believe his wife divorced him post-war. Her lover, a German Luftwaffe officer, was murdered in 1944 and the case unsolved, which makes me wonder if Degrelle had one of his Rexist operatives “take care of the situation,” so to speak.

• Whatever tragedies befell his family, they had little to do with Degrelle joining the German Army. Strange he doesn’t mention German diplomat Otto Abetz, who was a prime mover in encouraging the Western European legions in general and in getting Degrelle to sign up in particular. Abetz’s wife and Degrelle’s wife were childhood friends.
"...Unfortunately some of my fellow countrymen took a dim view of my independent writing and publishing on certain political thoughts. I had a tough time”
And thus a brief but ultimately unsuccessful career as head of a fascist-style party in the 1930’s is summed up in two sentences.
..."Seeing that I would not receive any help, let alone justice from the authorities in Belgium I knew that that government was illegitimate, and I decided that the corruption must be challenged.”
Degrelle ran on a populist, anti-corruption campaign in the 1930’s, but the Belgian voters quickly appraised that his party platform was all bombastic ego and empty slogans. Degrelle met Hitler in 1936 and attempted a Mussolini-style “March on Brussels, so it is little wonder he was considered persona non grata by the Belgian government.

..."I felt that Belgium would only be a great and sovereign nation again once Germany won the war and eliminated the dangers of Communism.”
In January 1941, Degrelle was calling not for Belgium to be a “great and sovereign nation” but "We are a Germanic race calling for integration into an expanded German empire!” Degrelle suggested to Otto Abetz that he was the perfect man to lead a new Burgundian Empire allied with Nazi Germany. Abtez reported the conversation to his boss Ribbentrop. German Army General Eggert Reeder, commander of the German military administration in Belgium, considered Degrelle a charlatan.

Degrelle seized Operation BARBAROSSA as an opportunity to save his collaborationist career from oblivion.

"I formed the first group of volunteers from the Flemish and Walloons, and we were formed in our own battalion.”
Technically, only Walloons. (it was the Legion Wallonie, after all). Degrelle was in a strange position of being the head of a collaborationist party yet volunteering for the legion as a private. He had asked for a officer’s commission, but the German Army turned him down due to his complete lack of military experience.

"Many of our men were sent to the Demyansk region as support in late 1941 to early 1942,”
This comment is weird, as the Walloon Legion didn’t serve in the Demyansk pocket battles.

"We later became our own independent Waffen SS unit, the 28th der Waffen SS-Panzergrenadier Division ‘Wallonien’ in April 1944 at a ceremony in Brussels.”
Degrelle’s memory is incorrect, or he is fudging the unit history. In April 1944 the SS Walloons became an Assault Brigade. The unit didn’t become a division until September 1944.

"We started with 400 men in 1940, later growing to about 15,000,”
This is incorrect. In Sept 1944 the “division” had 3,000 men; in Jan 1945, 4,000 men. It was lamentably understrength.

"We had a great combat record, and Hitler personally congratulated me and gave me the Oak Leaves. I believe that we had the greatest number of Knight’s Crosses of any foreign unit, but I am not sure.”
What’s interesting about Degrelle’s combat career is how “cultivated” it was by the Nazi propaganda machine. Going back to the August 1942 skirmish at Cheryakov, there definitely was a campaign among the OKH and later the SS to position Degrelle and by extension his men as heroic. But when you study his military record in detail you can’t help but see

a) a complete lack of military expertise and

b) his usefulness as a propaganda tool.

Consider this: while the few hundred Walloon SS survivors are barely finding shelter and rations after the Cherkassy debacle, Hitler has Degrelle flown out of the combat zone on Feb 20, 1944, sent to Himmler’s HQ at Hochwald for a shower and change of uniform, and then onto Hitler’s HQ at Rastenburg for a Knight’s Cross award ceremony. And Degrelle isn’t a “leaders eat last,” kind of commander - he accepts the award without a thought for his men still stuck and suffering on the Eastern Front - and claims that Hitler said that if he had a son, it would be someone like Degrelle.

There is no question that Degrelle was personally charismatic; perhaps willing to expose himself to danger. His troops were certainly aware of his overinflated ego - they nicknamed him “Modest the First.”! But as Captain Willard says of Col. Killgore in the movie Apocalypse Now, perhaps Degrelle was “...just one of those guys with that weird light around him. He just knew he wasn't gonna get so much as a scratch here."

Post Reply

Return to “Foreign Volunteers & Collaboration”