Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
Hi,
Is there anybody who could help me to know why there are terms "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon" and "Wolga-Tartaren-Bataillon" among Tatar-Volga Legion? Is there possibility that the term pointed different religion among Idel-Ural ethnicities? I mean if "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon" formed from non-Muslim (Chuvash, Udmurt etc.), while "Wolga-Tartaren-Bataillon" is a term for Muslim unit (Kazan Tatar and Bashkir).
Many thanks in advance
Is there anybody who could help me to know why there are terms "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon" and "Wolga-Tartaren-Bataillon" among Tatar-Volga Legion? Is there possibility that the term pointed different religion among Idel-Ural ethnicities? I mean if "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon" formed from non-Muslim (Chuvash, Udmurt etc.), while "Wolga-Tartaren-Bataillon" is a term for Muslim unit (Kazan Tatar and Bashkir).
Many thanks in advance
- Dr Eisvogel
- Member
- Posts: 414
- Joined: 24 Nov 2006, 19:26
- Location: Croatia
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
Dear ninoo,ninoo wrote:Hi,
Is there anybody who could help me to know why there are terms "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon" and "Wolga-Tartaren-Bataillon" among Tatar-Volga Legion? Is there possibility that the term pointed different religion among Idel-Ural ethnicities? I mean if "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon" formed from non-Muslim (Chuvash, Udmurt etc.), while "Wolga-Tartaren-Bataillon" is a term for Muslim unit (Kazan Tatar and Bashkir).
Many thanks in advance
it seems that since the names of the two battalions imply different ethnic bases for the two units, one Volga Finns (Mari, Mordvins and Udmurts) the other Volga Tatars, obviously there was a religious difference, since Volga Finns are Orthodox Christians, while Volga Tatars (Bashkirs and Tatars) with the exception of Orthodox Christian Kryashen Tatars are Sunni Muslims.
Chuvashes belong to Turkic language group, so linguisticaly seen they are not Volga Finns, although they are Orthodox Christians.
Is there any proof that "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon" was actually raised?
These memoirs mention Christian Company of 150 men, consisting of Chuvashes, Mordvins, Udmurts and Maris.
http://gorod.tomsk.ru/index-1228044196.phpПосле церемонии в честь принявших присягу устроили обед. Затем состоялась встреча в христианской роте – с чувашами, мордвой, удмуртами и марийцами. В роте было 150 человек.
Best regards,
Eisvogel
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
Thank you for your explanation and information Dr. Eisvogel.
While Gilyazov's ‘Legion Idel Ural’ didn't mention existence of "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon", I found a puzzle info at http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de about the existence of Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 837 and Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 838. I remember read in one or some forgotten sources that some non-Muslim volunteers from Idel-Ural Legion didn't like to serve under a Muslim legion and try to join with Russian formations and think that maybe those two Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillons were created to accomodate theirs aspirations. Aside from the Lexicon der Wehrmacht, I didn't found(yet) the existence of "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon" in any reference about Idel-Ural Legion.
Best regards,
Nino
While Gilyazov's ‘Legion Idel Ural’ didn't mention existence of "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon", I found a puzzle info at http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de about the existence of Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 837 and Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 838. I remember read in one or some forgotten sources that some non-Muslim volunteers from Idel-Ural Legion didn't like to serve under a Muslim legion and try to join with Russian formations and think that maybe those two Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillons were created to accomodate theirs aspirations. Aside from the Lexicon der Wehrmacht, I didn't found(yet) the existence of "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon" in any reference about Idel-Ural Legion.
Best regards,
Nino
- Dr Eisvogel
- Member
- Posts: 414
- Joined: 24 Nov 2006, 19:26
- Location: Croatia
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
Dear Nino,
thank you for the precise answers.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... Btl838.htm
Lexikon der Wehrmacht claims that Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 837 was formed on April 15th 1943 at Wesola near Warsaw as a part of Nordkakukasisches Legion. In November of 1943 that battalion was sent to vicinity of Bordeaux and it was destroyed in France in 1944.
Lexikon der Wehrmacht claims that Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 838 was supposedly formed at the end of 1943 in Wesola near Warsaw also as a part of Nordkaukasisches Legion. However, its very existence is questionable according to Lexikon der Wehrmacht.
So, that leaves us with checking Nordkaukasisches Legion history as well as Wesola near Warsaw.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... derung.htm
Now, there was Freiwilligen Stamm-Division stationed in France established in Southeastern France on February 1st 1944 and it was responsible for all Ostvölkischen Verbände. It was divided into 5 regiments.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... ammDiv.htm
Its Freiwilligen Stamm-Regiment 2 was reponsible for all Volga Tatars, Armenians and Azerbaijanis. So, in theory Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 837 could have ended being part of that Regiment.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... ammDiv.htm
Wesola is in fact Wesoła, a town near Warsaw (nowadays integral part of the City of Warsaw), which had Imperial Russian army barracks, which were used by Polish Army.
There is a possibility that Wesola was administratively part of Wehrmacht's Truppenübungsplatz Rembertau/Rembertów.
Best regards,
Eisvogel
thank you for the precise answers.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... Btl837.htmninoo wrote: While Gilyazov's ‘Legion Idel Ural’ didn't mention existence of "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon", I found a puzzle info at http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de about the existence of Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 837 and Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 838.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... Btl838.htm
Lexikon der Wehrmacht claims that Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 837 was formed on April 15th 1943 at Wesola near Warsaw as a part of Nordkakukasisches Legion. In November of 1943 that battalion was sent to vicinity of Bordeaux and it was destroyed in France in 1944.
Lexikon der Wehrmacht claims that Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 838 was supposedly formed at the end of 1943 in Wesola near Warsaw also as a part of Nordkaukasisches Legion. However, its very existence is questionable according to Lexikon der Wehrmacht.
So, that leaves us with checking Nordkaukasisches Legion history as well as Wesola near Warsaw.
Sounds logical to me.ninoo wrote:I remember read in one or some forgotten sources that some non-Muslim volunteers from Idel-Ural Legion didn't like to serve under a Muslim legion and try to join with Russian formations and think that maybe those two Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillons were created to accomodate theirs aspirations.
Thanks a lot. So, let's focus on Nordkaukasisches Legion.ninoo wrote:Aside from the Lexicon der Wehrmacht, I didn't found(yet) the existence of "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon" in any reference about Idel-Ural Legion.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... derung.htm
The text says that Legion was just an administrative unit charged with forming field battalions [such as Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 837 and Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 838], without command authority over the field battalions once these were formed.Die Nordkaukasische Legion wurde am 5. August 1942 in Radom im Generalgouvernement aufgestellt. Die Legionen waren bodenständige Dienststellen, die ausgestattet mit einem Stammpersonal für die Personalangelegenheiten der nicht-russischen Kriegsgefangenen sorgten und diese in verstärkte Feldbataillone formierten. Diese Feldbataillone wurden dann einzeln an die Front geschickt. Die Legion hatte keine Befehlsgewalt über die einzelnen Feld-Bataillone.
Now, there was Freiwilligen Stamm-Division stationed in France established in Southeastern France on February 1st 1944 and it was responsible for all Ostvölkischen Verbände. It was divided into 5 regiments.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... ammDiv.htm
Its Freiwilligen Stamm-Regiment 2 was reponsible for all Volga Tatars, Armenians and Azerbaijanis. So, in theory Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 837 could have ended being part of that Regiment.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... ammDiv.htm
Wesola is in fact Wesoła, a town near Warsaw (nowadays integral part of the City of Warsaw), which had Imperial Russian army barracks, which were used by Polish Army.
There is a possibility that Wesola was administratively part of Wehrmacht's Truppenübungsplatz Rembertau/Rembertów.
Best regards,
Eisvogel
- Dr Eisvogel
- Member
- Posts: 414
- Joined: 24 Nov 2006, 19:26
- Location: Croatia
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
Just to add some more information about the author of memoirs quoted.Dr Eisvogel wrote: These memoirs mention Christian Company of 150 men, consisting of Chuvashes, Mordvins, Udmurts and Maris.http://gorod.tomsk.ru/index-1228044196.phpПосле церемонии в честь принявших присягу устроили обед. Затем состоялась встреча в христианской роте – с чувашами, мордвой, удмуртами и марийцами. В роте было 150 человек.
It is Ivan Skobelev, born in 1915 in the village Nizhniy Kurmey (Нижний Курмей) of the Orenburg Oblast. He was Chuvash by ethnicity and his native village was also settled by Chuvashes.
The village exist nowadays and belongs to Abdulino District.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0 ... 0%BE%D0%BD
Ivan Skobelev was mobilized on June 23rd 1941 into the Soviet Army and he was captured by the Germans around Vitebsk in Belarus. In the POW Camp Skobelev was marked with the letter A meaning "Asiate" in German language, that is Asian. Other letters were R for Russian, U for Ukrainian, B for Belarusian.
He was transferred from Vitebsk to Minsk by foot.
He went through many prisons. He ended up in штатлагер = Shtatlager, I think it should be Stammlager 314 in Saxony. His prisoner number was 154155. In that camp there were also Englishmen, Americans, French and Greeks. He was detained in the national minorities bloc with Armenians, Georgians, Volga nationalities and Central Asians.
He doesn't clearly say how did he volunteer for German military service, but he ended up in Siedlce in Poland in the Tatar company, where beside two Mordvins and him, all the rest were Tatars.
When Islamic mullah called for prayer, he refused to participate, so he was called to the commanding officer, who asked him why doesn't he pray. Skobelev answered that he is a Christian and Chuvash by nationality [по национальности чуваш].
Skobelev mentions Chuvash nationalist Fyodor Dmitrievich Blinov, an economist, who wanted to establish independent Chuvash state and who despised Tatars. Blinov tried to subordinate Christian companies (consisting of Chuvashes and Volga Finns) to general Andrei Vlasov movement.После церемонии в честь принявших присягу устроили обед. Затем состоялась встреча в христианской роте – с чувашами, мордвой, удмуртами и марийцами. В роте было 150 человек. Там я познакомился с Федором Дмитриевичем Блиновым, который потом носил фамилию по своей театральной кличке – Паймук. Он происходил из богатой купеческой семьи. По профессии – экономист, окончил в Москве институт им. Плеханова. Страшный националист! Все носился с идеей создания самостоятельного чувашского государства. Терпеть не мог татар. Несмотря на то, что среди них находился больше полугода, не знал ни одного татарского слова. Свое презрение к ним выражал откровенно. Настаивал о переводе христианских рот под власть Власова.
After WWII Skobelev spent 10 years imprisoned in the Soviet camps.
- Dr Eisvogel
- Member
- Posts: 414
- Joined: 24 Nov 2006, 19:26
- Location: Croatia
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
According to the Census of 1939 the numbers of the Volga Finns and Volga Tatars in the RSFSR were the following:
Volga Finns
Mari = 476 314
Mordvins = 1 375 558
Udmurts = 599 893
+
Chuvashs = 1 346 232
Total = 3 797 997
Volga Tatars
Bashkirs = 824 537
Tatars* = 3 682 956
Total = 4 507 493
* including Crimean and Siberian Tatars
So, the numbers were 4 507 493 : 3 797 997 => and rate between them was 1.19 : 1
Roughly speaking, the population pools were almost equal, but the number of German-raised Tatar battalions was much bigger than the Volga Finns battalions.
No surprise there.
Linguistically speaking, Udmurts are related with Komi (415 009 according to the 1939 Census), but I haven't seen Komi mentioned in relation to the question of Volga Finn battalions.
Volga Finns
Mari = 476 314
Mordvins = 1 375 558
Udmurts = 599 893
+
Chuvashs = 1 346 232
Total = 3 797 997
Volga Tatars
Bashkirs = 824 537
Tatars* = 3 682 956
Total = 4 507 493
* including Crimean and Siberian Tatars
So, the numbers were 4 507 493 : 3 797 997 => and rate between them was 1.19 : 1
Roughly speaking, the population pools were almost equal, but the number of German-raised Tatar battalions was much bigger than the Volga Finns battalions.
No surprise there.
Linguistically speaking, Udmurts are related with Komi (415 009 according to the 1939 Census), but I haven't seen Komi mentioned in relation to the question of Volga Finn battalions.
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
They wouldn't be mentioned as they both speak a Permian, not Volgic, language. In addition, Volga "Finn" isn't a thing.Dr Eisvogel wrote:Linguistically speaking, Udmurts are related with Komi (415 009 according to the 1939 Census), but I haven't seen Komi mentioned in relation to the question of Volga Finn battalions.
In addition to "Volga Finn" being, in my opinion, a very stupid term, the Chuvash speak a Turkic language, which is a whole different language family from Fenno- Ugric.Dr Eisvogel wrote:According to the Census of 1939 the numbers of the Volga Finns and Volga Tatars in the RSFSR were the following:
Volga Finns
Mari = 476 314
Mordvins = 1 375 558
Udmurts = 599 893
+
Chuvashs = 1 346 232
Except for the Muslim ones.Dr Eisvogel wrote: Volga Finns are Orthodox Christians
To be frank, I can't be bothered trying to learn what the German's meant by the word Wolgafinnisches but it's a extremely complex subject even without trying to understand it from the Nazi's particular viewpoint. Seems quite unimportant as we seem to be talking about ~150 guys, which seems rather a poor attempt, but quite consistent with the German's failure to successfully divide and conquer its opponents
- Dr Eisvogel
- Member
- Posts: 414
- Joined: 24 Nov 2006, 19:26
- Location: Croatia
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
Since Udmurts are included under Volga Finnic (Wolgafinnisches) label, by the same criteria the Komi could have been included.antwony wrote:They wouldn't be mentioned as they both speak a Permian, not Volgic, language. In addition, Volga "Finn" isn't a thing.Dr Eisvogel wrote:Linguistically speaking, Udmurts are related with Komi (415 009 according to the 1939 Census), but I haven't seen Komi mentioned in relation to the question of Volga Finn battalions.
I've mentioned that already.antwony wrote:In addition to "Volga Finn" being, in my opinion, a very stupid term, the Chuvash speak a Turkic language, which is a whole different language family from Fenno- Ugric.
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 1#p2060651
Such as?antwony wrote:Except for the Muslim ones.Dr Eisvogel wrote:Volga Finns are Orthodox Christians
What is your source for the claim that the battalion(s) in question numbered ~150 men?antwony wrote:Seems quite unimportant as we seem to be talking about ~150 guys, which seems rather a poor attempt, but quite consistent with the German's failure to successfully divide and conquer its opponents
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
Thanks for your complete explanation. It's really help me.Dr Eisvogel wrote:Dear Nino,
thank you for the precise answers.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... Btl837.htmninoo wrote: While Gilyazov's ‘Legion Idel Ural’ didn't mention existence of "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon", I found a puzzle info at http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de about the existence of Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 837 and Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 838.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... Btl838.htm
Lexikon der Wehrmacht claims that Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 837 was formed on April 15th 1943 at Wesola near Warsaw as a part of Nordkakukasisches Legion. In November of 1943 that battalion was sent to vicinity of Bordeaux and it was destroyed in France in 1944.
Lexikon der Wehrmacht claims that Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 838 was supposedly formed at the end of 1943 in Wesola near Warsaw also as a part of Nordkaukasisches Legion. However, its very existence is questionable according to Lexikon der Wehrmacht.
So, that leaves us with checking Nordkaukasisches Legion history as well as Wesola near Warsaw.
Sounds logical to me.ninoo wrote:I remember read in one or some forgotten sources that some non-Muslim volunteers from Idel-Ural Legion didn't like to serve under a Muslim legion and try to join with Russian formations and think that maybe those two Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillons were created to accomodate theirs aspirations.
Thanks a lot. So, let's focus on Nordkaukasisches Legion.ninoo wrote:Aside from the Lexicon der Wehrmacht, I didn't found(yet) the existence of "Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon" in any reference about Idel-Ural Legion.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... derung.htm
The text says that Legion was just an administrative unit charged with forming field battalions [such as Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 837 and Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 838], without command authority over the field battalions once these were formed.Die Nordkaukasische Legion wurde am 5. August 1942 in Radom im Generalgouvernement aufgestellt. Die Legionen waren bodenständige Dienststellen, die ausgestattet mit einem Stammpersonal für die Personalangelegenheiten der nicht-russischen Kriegsgefangenen sorgten und diese in verstärkte Feldbataillone formierten. Diese Feldbataillone wurden dann einzeln an die Front geschickt. Die Legion hatte keine Befehlsgewalt über die einzelnen Feld-Bataillone.
Now, there was Freiwilligen Stamm-Division stationed in France established in Southeastern France on February 1st 1944 and it was responsible for all Ostvölkischen Verbände. It was divided into 5 regiments.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... ammDiv.htm
Its Freiwilligen Stamm-Regiment 2 was reponsible for all Volga Tatars, Armenians and Azerbaijanis. So, in theory Wolgafinnisches Infanterie-Bataillon 837 could have ended being part of that Regiment.
http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... ammDiv.htm
Wesola is in fact Wesoła, a town near Warsaw (nowadays integral part of the City of Warsaw), which had Imperial Russian army barracks, which were used by Polish Army.
There is a possibility that Wesola was administratively part of Wehrmacht's Truppenübungsplatz Rembertau/Rembertów.
Best regards,
Eisvogel
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
As I've indicated, while I think Volga "Finnic" is an extremely stupid term, it only has any use when used as a term to describe a group of languages. To rope in groups which it doesn't include, like Udmart's, makes no senseDr Eisvogel wrote:Since Udmurts are included under Volga Finnic (Wolgafinnisches) label, by the same criteria the Komi could have been included.antwony wrote:They wouldn't be mentioned as they both speak a Permian, not Volgic, language. In addition, Volga "Finn" isn't a thing.Dr Eisvogel wrote:Linguistically speaking, Udmurts are related with Komi (415 009 according to the 1939 Census), but I haven't seen Komi mentioned in relation to the question of Volga Finn battalions.
Yet you insist on describing on it as such.Dr Eisvogel wrote:I've mentioned that already.antwony wrote:In addition to "Volga Finn" being, in my opinion, a very stupid term, the Chuvash speak a Turkic language, which is a whole different language family from Fenno- Ugric.
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 1#p2060651
I made a pretty simple statement. Some Volga "Finns" are Muslims.Dr Eisvogel wrote:Such as?antwony wrote:Except for the Muslim ones.Dr Eisvogel wrote:Volga Finns are Orthodox Christians
You yourself.Dr Eisvogel wrote:What is your source for the claim that the battalion(s) in question numbered ~150 men?antwony wrote:Seems quite unimportant as we seem to be talking about ~150 guys, which seems rather a poor attempt, but quite consistent with the German's failure to successfully divide and conquer its opponents
- Dr Eisvogel
- Member
- Posts: 414
- Joined: 24 Nov 2006, 19:26
- Location: Croatia
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
I couldn't have been your source, because I mentioned a company, not battalion(s).antwony wrote:You yourself.Dr Eisvogel wrote:What is your source for the claim that the battalion(s) in question numbered ~150 men?antwony wrote:Seems quite unimportant as we seem to be talking about ~150 guys, which seems rather a poor attempt, but quite consistent with the German's failure to successfully divide and conquer its opponents
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 1#p2060651Dr Eisvogel wrote: These memoirs mention Christian Company of 150 men, consisting of Chuvashes, Mordvins, Udmurts and Maris.http://gorod.tomsk.ru/index-1228044196.phpПосле церемонии в честь принявших присягу устроили обед. Затем состоялась встреча в христианской роте – с чувашами, мордвой, удмуртами и марийцами. В роте было 150 человек.
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
Hello guys,
I hope you all are fit and healthy in times like these.
At the moment, I'm at home with enough time to read about foreign volunteers and so I have got a question to the forum of wisdom.
I read that the volga tatar legion was a disaster for the germans. The legion was unreliable with no will to fight. Most of the batallions were dissolved or went to the partisans.
I know, there were a lot of reasons for that and no bataillion was like the others.
But why the germans pressed the Tatars in strict infantry units?
it wouldn't have been better to put these volunteers in calvary units?
Tatars were notorious horsemen in history, for their fighting morale and propaganda it could be a sucess.
The germans did this with the cossacks and the calmyks, why not with the tatars?
Thanks for your reply!
I hope you all are fit and healthy in times like these.
At the moment, I'm at home with enough time to read about foreign volunteers and so I have got a question to the forum of wisdom.
I read that the volga tatar legion was a disaster for the germans. The legion was unreliable with no will to fight. Most of the batallions were dissolved or went to the partisans.
I know, there were a lot of reasons for that and no bataillion was like the others.
But why the germans pressed the Tatars in strict infantry units?
it wouldn't have been better to put these volunteers in calvary units?
Tatars were notorious horsemen in history, for their fighting morale and propaganda it could be a sucess.
The germans did this with the cossacks and the calmyks, why not with the tatars?
Thanks for your reply!
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
Hi!
You need to understand, the Tatars by this point are very different than centuries ago. They are more akin to peasants by this point in the way of life.
Cavalry is almost non-existant. They have moved away from that point.
The Cossack terminology is a different thing wholly. They maintained their horse-riding tradition for centuries and they are used to war and military lifestyle. They live to fight. They are natural born soldiers at this point.
The Calmyks are between the two upper ones. While not fighters naturally now, they are living as half-nomads, so they are used to riding.
It is easier to teach them combat techniques than making someone a useful rider.
You need to understand, the Tatars by this point are very different than centuries ago. They are more akin to peasants by this point in the way of life.
Cavalry is almost non-existant. They have moved away from that point.
The Cossack terminology is a different thing wholly. They maintained their horse-riding tradition for centuries and they are used to war and military lifestyle. They live to fight. They are natural born soldiers at this point.
The Calmyks are between the two upper ones. While not fighters naturally now, they are living as half-nomads, so they are used to riding.
It is easier to teach them combat techniques than making someone a useful rider.
Re: Two types of Tatar Volga Legion
Thanks for your explanation Khor!
Very interesting.
So my thoughts about the tatars were romantic stereotyps out of history books with no reference to today.
Shame on me.
Best regards
Very interesting.
So my thoughts about the tatars were romantic stereotyps out of history books with no reference to today.
Shame on me.
Best regards