English Channel Defences 1940

Discussions on WW2 in Western Europe & the Atlantic.
Post Reply
Clio13
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 13 Feb 2011, 19:00

English Channel Defences 1940

#1

Post by Clio13 » 27 Feb 2011, 15:25

Dover barrage 11940.jpg
You really wouldn't want to take a U-boat through these waters would you ?
Source: BR736
Silent Warriors: Submarines lost around the British coast in war and peace

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

Re: English Channel Defences 1940

#2

Post by phylo_roadking » 27 Feb 2011, 17:32

Thanks for the detailed close-up, I've been looking for one for some years now. One detail that's missing from it is that at least some of the mine barrages were remotely controlled from Dover, they could be shut down to let convoys through! 8O Which was a detail I wasn't aware of until I read it in Brian Lavery's "We Shall Fight On The Beaches". Possibly the ones covering the "Searched" and "Secret" channels?
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...


Clio13
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 13 Feb 2011, 19:00

Re: English Channel Defences 1940

#3

Post by Clio13 » 27 Feb 2011, 17:43

Yes, I think you are right. U 12 was destroyed at 51 10 N 01 30 E by a conventional minefield on 8 October 1939. I plot this location as Field 'D2'. Now U 16 was certainly blown up on a Bragg Loop at 51 09 084 N 01 28 202 E on 25 October 1939. I think the Bragg Loop defences must have been across the searched channel shown in the chart. From my researches I do know that the one which destroyed U 16 was operated from the St Margaret's Bay Indicator Loop Station.

Below find a chart of the Folkestone-Griz Nez Barrage of 1918 for comparison
Folkstone II.jpg
Silent Warriors: Submarines lost around the British coast in war and peace

Clio13
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 13 Feb 2011, 19:00

Re: English Channel Defences 1940

#4

Post by Clio13 » 27 Feb 2011, 21:08

Eastcoast south.jpg
This is the East Coast (South) Mine Chart showing the Thames approaches. Note the 'Gaps' often used for destroyer and submarine patrols
Silent Warriors: Submarines lost around the British coast in war and peace

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

Re: English Channel Defences 1940

#5

Post by phylo_roadking » 27 Feb 2011, 21:47

This time - are those "shallow" or "deep" fields??
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...

Clio13
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 13 Feb 2011, 19:00

Re: English Channel Defences 1940

#6

Post by Clio13 » 27 Feb 2011, 22:18

The broken red lines signify deep fields while the solid red lines define shallow fields.
Silent Warriors: Submarines lost around the British coast in war and peace

Bergedorf
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 20:35
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: English Channel Defences 1940

#7

Post by Bergedorf » 01 Mar 2011, 02:44

Wonderfull Charts!

Could you please tell me what Source: BR736 is. It seems to be no code of Kew?

P.S.: Could it be this: ADM 234/560, Former reference (Department) BR 1736(56)(1) ?

Regards

Dirk

Clio13
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 13 Feb 2011, 19:00

Re: English Channel Defences 1940

#8

Post by Clio13 » 03 Mar 2011, 07:49

I didn't even know it was at Kew. Could have saved myself a lot of effort had I known that...
Cover.JPG
Silent Warriors: Submarines lost around the British coast in war and peace

User avatar
Urmel
Member
Posts: 4911
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 10:34
Location: The late JBond

Re: English Channel Defences 1940

#9

Post by Urmel » 14 Mar 2011, 13:57

I am fairly certain that all of these histories are held at Kew. I have myself accessed two of them.
The enemy had superiority in numbers, his tanks were more heavily armoured, they had larger calibre guns with nearly twice the effective range of ours, and their telescopes were superior. 5 RTR 19/11/41

The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42

Bergedorf
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 20:35
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: English Channel Defences 1940

#10

Post by Bergedorf » 15 Mar 2011, 06:15

They are, indeed... but a little problem is, that the charts are quite expensive:
ADM 234/561 £511.50
Your instructions Copy all pages in this document
Comments from staff
Copying Process No. of Units Unit Cost Process Cost
A2 Mono. prints (from digital scans) 93 £5.50 £511.50
it was a little shock to me :roll:

regards

Dirk

User avatar
Urmel
Member
Posts: 4911
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 10:34
Location: The late JBond

Re: English Channel Defences 1940

#11

Post by Urmel » 15 Mar 2011, 23:36

Not a problem if you can go yourself and take the pictures. :milwink:
The enemy had superiority in numbers, his tanks were more heavily armoured, they had larger calibre guns with nearly twice the effective range of ours, and their telescopes were superior. 5 RTR 19/11/41

The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42

Bergedorf
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 20:35
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: English Channel Defences 1940

#12

Post by Bergedorf » 17 Mar 2011, 05:19

JBond wrote:Not a problem if you can go yourself and take the pictures. :milwink:
yes... if... that´s the problem... but perhaps I can combine a visit to London to see the Ukes with a visit to Kew later this year...

User avatar
Urmel
Member
Posts: 4911
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 10:34
Location: The late JBond

Re: English Channel Defences 1940

#13

Post by Urmel » 17 Mar 2011, 10:00

There are people who offer a paid service to do this for you, it'll be a lot cheaper.
The enemy had superiority in numbers, his tanks were more heavily armoured, they had larger calibre guns with nearly twice the effective range of ours, and their telescopes were superior. 5 RTR 19/11/41

The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42

Post Reply

Return to “WW2 in Western Europe & the Atlantic”