Counter-battery

Discussions on WW2 in Western Europe & the Atlantic.
Post Reply
User avatar
Kingfish
Member
Posts: 3348
Joined: 05 Jun 2003, 17:22
Location: USA

Counter-battery

#1

Post by Kingfish » 30 Dec 2016, 20:01

What was the standard procedure with regards to allocation of arty assets for CB missions?

Were certain batteries assigned exclusively to the task, or was it more like whomever was available and in range?

Also, was there such a thing as fooling an enemy battery into firing and thereby revealing its location?
The gods do not deduct from a man's allotted span the hours spent in fishing.
~Babylonian Proverb

User avatar
Attrition
Member
Posts: 4005
Joined: 29 Oct 2008, 23:53
Location: England

Re: Counter-battery

#2

Post by Attrition » 02 Jan 2017, 19:15



User avatar
Sheldrake
Member
Posts: 3726
Joined: 28 Apr 2013, 18:14
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Counter-battery

#3

Post by Sheldrake » 02 Jan 2017, 19:57

Kingfish wrote:What was the standard procedure with regards to allocation of arty assets for CB missions?

Were certain batteries assigned exclusively to the task, or was it more like whomever was available and in range?

Also, was there such a thing as fooling an enemy battery into firing and thereby revealing its location?
British, German or US practice?

The Nigelevans link is great for the British who invested quite heavily in CB. But this is the page on his site on CB http://nigelef.tripod.com/p_artyintcb39 ... TRODUCTION

The CB plan was made by the Counter Bombardment Officer and his staff at Corps HQ. Hostile battery lists were prepared from a variety of target location sources - Aerial photographs taken by tactical recce aircraft, flash spotting, sound ranging, analysis of craters and reports from field artillery observers.

By 1943 British CB was typically provided by the medium guns (60 pdr, 4.5" and 5.5") and longer ranged heavy artillery (6"). 3.7" heavy AA guns were also used for CB, especially flak suppression before close air support from allied bombers.

One of the techniques for fooling a battery into disclosing a position was to fire what were described as a "Chinese barrage" This was to fire a complete pattern of artillery bombardment, which might include a creeping barrage and smoke screens, indistinguishable from the fireplan that might precede an attack. The defenders would not know whether there were any troops following the barrage. If they did not respond with defensive fires there was a riosk that attackinmg infantry would get close enough to storm the defences. Its an extravagant use of artillery ammunition, but may be the only way to obtain tactical surprise.

Post Reply

Return to “WW2 in Western Europe & the Atlantic”