Operation Market Garden a success or failure

Discussions on WW2 in Western Europe & the Atlantic.
Post Reply
Champymiddle
Banned
Posts: 346
Joined: 10 Feb 2003, 15:30
Location: Bangkok

Operation Market Garden a success or failure

#1

Post by Champymiddle » 23 Jun 2003, 16:54

[Moved from the Polls section]


I just watched Bridge too Far and i was wondering whether OMG was a success or not and i would like people's opnions. Statistical data is welcome :D

User avatar
Qvist
Member
Posts: 7836
Joined: 11 Mar 2002, 17:59
Location: Europe

#2

Post by Qvist » 23 Jun 2003, 17:55

How exactly could it be called a success? It certainly was a failure according to the objectives of the plan itself.

cheers


User avatar
Andy H
Forum Staff
Posts: 15326
Joined: 12 Mar 2002, 21:51
Location: UK and USA

#3

Post by Andy H » 23 Jun 2003, 18:51

2/3rd's a success, 1/3 a failure, but it was very nearly a 100% success.

Andy H

User avatar
Rommel8
Member
Posts: 1192
Joined: 13 Jun 2003, 03:37
Location: Pennsylvania

#4

Post by Rommel8 » 23 Jun 2003, 19:44

I agree with Qvist, it was a failure.

How could the allied Intel fail to see a whole SS Panzer Korps move to what would be their primary objective?

CHRISCHA
Member
Posts: 2477
Joined: 28 Jan 2003, 19:21
Location: England, Kent

#5

Post by CHRISCHA » 23 Jun 2003, 19:53

The failure was in Arnhem.
Operation Market Garden could be classed as a success (ie. Eindhoven, Neimagjen), up to this last bridge, hence the name, 'A Bridge Too Far'.

Witch-King of Angmar
Member
Posts: 915
Joined: 28 Feb 2003, 21:40
Location: Europe

#6

Post by Witch-King of Angmar » 24 Jun 2003, 01:11

If Market Garden was a success, then Kursk was also a success according to the same logic :lol:

~The Witch King of Angmar

User avatar
Tom Houlihan
Member
Posts: 3985
Joined: 06 Oct 2002, 06:53
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

#7

Post by Tom Houlihan » 24 Jun 2003, 01:26

I don't see how anyone could consider it anything other than a failure! The Paras got hammered, Michael Caine didn't make it all the way, er, I mean the ground element didn't reach Arnhem. What part worked?

User avatar
Andy H
Forum Staff
Posts: 15326
Joined: 12 Mar 2002, 21:51
Location: UK and USA

#8

Post by Andy H » 24 Jun 2003, 01:57

I mean the ground element didn't reach Arnhem. What part worked?

The capture of the Bridges at Nijmegan & Eindhoven and XXX Corps along the highway, though this was slower than hoped and eventually it didn't make it on time to Arnhem. The thrust of some 50 miles into German lines musn't be forgotten and the effect this had on the German front in Northern Holland.

Andy H

User avatar
Tom Houlihan
Member
Posts: 3985
Joined: 06 Oct 2002, 06:53
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

#9

Post by Tom Houlihan » 24 Jun 2003, 02:03

Okay, I stand corrected. The overall operation consisted of 'Market' and 'Garden.' Neither operation was successful.
In no way did I mean to take away from the men who fought there. I helped a little with Bando's new book, and learned a helluva lot about the 101st and what they did in Holland. Yes, some elements of Market Garden were successful. The Operation, however, has to be considered a failure.

User avatar
Kugelblitz
Member
Posts: 168
Joined: 16 May 2003, 06:08
Location: CE

#10

Post by Kugelblitz » 24 Jun 2003, 02:21

The Allied go too far in Europe thanks to 4 letters: USAF 8O

User avatar
Aufklarung
Member
Posts: 5136
Joined: 17 Mar 2002, 05:27
Location: Canada

#11

Post by Aufklarung » 24 Jun 2003, 03:05

Not a complete success but to quote Meatloaf: "two outta three ain't bad"

regards
A :)

User avatar
Major Linden
Member
Posts: 292
Joined: 02 Jun 2003, 11:52
Location: Canadian Rain Forest

#12

Post by Major Linden » 24 Jun 2003, 08:08

Tom wrote:I don't see how anyone could consider it anything other than a failure! The Paras got hammered, Michael Caine didn't make it all the way, er, I mean the ground element didn't reach Arnhem. What part worked?
It`s never a good sign when one of the "leads" doesn`t make it... :lol:

Not like the good old days when John Wayne won the war single-handedly without ever having to reload! :lol:

Champymiddle
Banned
Posts: 346
Joined: 10 Feb 2003, 15:30
Location: Bangkok

#13

Post by Champymiddle » 24 Jun 2003, 11:23

In the movie i saw a lot of german casualties, how many german casualties were there and how many allied casualties?

User avatar
MVSNConsolegenerale
Member
Posts: 274
Joined: 23 Apr 2002, 07:34
Location: Ontario, Canada

re: Operation Market Garden

#14

Post by MVSNConsolegenerale » 25 Jun 2003, 22:26

On paper you could make it look like a success. I think it was not however. even though they got 90% or their goals or whatever, the cost in equipment and lives makes it a failure to me. Imagine if in Normany 99% of the allies died in the invasion, does that make it a success, even if they got most of their objectives. If the germans had taken stalingrad before the pocket closed but had lost almost all their men, would that have been a success?

I don't think so in any of these cases. Operation Market Garden is similar to Napolean's adventure into Egypt; It looked good on paper, but was not a lasting victory. Due to the "partial success" of that campaign, the allies were in for a hard winter.

- MVSN

Rafael
Member
Posts: 10
Joined: 10 Jun 2003, 06:41
Location: Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

#15

Post by Rafael » 26 Jun 2003, 06:56

"Both" would be the correct answer. I voted "Success".

Post Reply

Return to “WW2 in Western Europe & the Atlantic”