Structure of Army Groups Wohler/Dumitrescu

Discussions on WW2 in Eastern Europe.
Post Reply
Cartaphilus
Member
Posts: 552
Joined: 06 May 2010, 19:57

Structure of Army Groups Wohler/Dumitrescu

#1

Post by Cartaphilus » 12 Feb 2015, 09:04

Dear friends, I'm trying to establish what the composition of these two army groups, responsible for the defense of Bessarabia in 1943 and 1944.

I know they were mixed units (Wohler had 8 German Army and 4 Romanian Army, and Dumitrescu had 6 German Army and 3 Romanian Army), but I don't know their general composition (which divisions and corps formed each Army).

Do you have any data about these matter?

Greetings from Spain.

Paul_Atreides
Member
Posts: 606
Joined: 09 Sep 2008, 09:05
Location: Russia, St. Petersburg

Re: Structure of Army Groups Wohler/Dumitrescu

#2

Post by Paul_Atreides » 21 Feb 2015, 20:05

On 19th August 1944.

Heeresgruppe Südukraine

Reserve: 10. PGD, 153. Feldausbildungs-Div., 1. Div. (slow.), 959 artill. brig., 286 Stug. brig.

Armeegruppe Dumitrescu

Reserve: 72. AK z.b.V., 1. KD (rum.), 13. PD, 258. ID.

3. Armee (rum)

2. AK (rum): 9 ID (rum.)
3. AK (rum): 110 Inf. brig. (rum.), 2. ID (rum.), 15. ID (rum.)
29. AK: 9. ID, 21. ID (rum.), 4 Geb. brig (rum.)

6. Armee

30. AK: 306. ID, 15. ID, 257. ID, 302. ID, 384. ID
52. AK: 320. ID, 294. ID, 161. ID
44. AK: 335. ID, 282. ID, 62. ID
7. AK: 14. ID (rum.), 106. ID, 370. ID

Armeegruppe Wöhler

Reserve: KG 20. PD, PD Großrumänien (rum.), 8. ID (rum.), 18. Geb.Div. (rum.)

8. Armee

4. AK: 376. ID, 11. ID (rum.), 79. ID
4. AK (rum.): 5. KD (rum.), 102 Geb. brig (rum.), 7. ID (rum.), 3. ID (rum.)

4. Armee (rum.)

6. AK (rum.): 76. ID, 5. ID (rum.), 46. ID, 1. ID (rum.), 13. ID (rum.), 101 Geb. brig (rum.)
5. AK (rum.): 4. ID (rum.), 1. Gd. ID (rum.)
1. AK (rum.): 6. ID (rum.), 20. ID (rum.)
7. AK (rum.): 103 Geb. brig (rum.), 104 Geb. brig (rum.)
17. AK: 3. GD, 8. Jg.Div.
There is no waste, there are reserves (Slogan of German Army in World Wars)


Cartaphilus
Member
Posts: 552
Joined: 06 May 2010, 19:57

Re: Structure of Army Groups Wohler/Dumitrescu

#3

Post by Cartaphilus » 21 Feb 2015, 23:34

Thank you for your answer, Paul.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I think that Army Group Dumitrescu was the first and only time when a German army was under foreing command.

Max Payload
Member
Posts: 574
Joined: 21 Jun 2008, 15:37

Re: Structure of Army Groups Wohler/Dumitrescu

#4

Post by Max Payload » 14 Mar 2015, 17:22

I imagine that Dumitrescu's actual command and control over the 13 German divisions of the German 6th Army would have been somewhat nominal. I can't imagine Fretter-Pico obeying any order from Dumitrescu of which he disapproved, or of Friessner at AGSU HQ admonishing him for so doing. The prime purpose of the whole arrangement was to squeeze the maximum possible defensive potential from the 18 Romanian divisions and brigades on the Army Group's left wing east of Targul Fromos. In Dumitrescu's sector on the right wing, there was little mixing of forces. Admittedly Dumitrescu had two German and one Romanian division in his reserves, but 6.AOK only had one Romanian division and in Dumitrescu's 3rd Army there was only one German division.
"For what a man had rather be true he more readily believes."
Francis Bacon 1620

Post Reply

Return to “WW2 in Eastern Europe”