Axis History Forum

This is an apolitical forum for discussions on the Axis nations, as well as the First and Second World Wars in general hosted by Marcus Wendel's Axis History Factbook in cooperation with Michael Miller's Axis Biographical Research and Christoph Awender's WW2 day by day.

Skip to content

Amphibious landing at Tobruk by the Axis 1941

Discussions on WW2 in Africa & the Mediterranean.
Hosted by Andy Hill

Postby Michael Emrys on 30 Nov 2007 11:33

13emeDBLE wrote:I have no infos of where the british attacked Tobruk at the end of 1942, after El Alamein....


Was there even any serious defense at that time? I think Rommel was reduced to just fighting rearguard actions and the rare riposte by that point.

Michael

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Michael Emrys
Member
United States
 
Posts: 5986
Joined: 13 Jan 2005 18:44
Location: USA

Postby 13emeDBLE on 30 Nov 2007 11:45

You are right.

CM

Bookmark and Share

13emeDBLE
Member
France
 
Posts: 74
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 20:42
Location: France

Re: Amphibious landing at Tobruk by the Axis 1941

Postby Peter H on 15 Oct 2008 10:04

Photos of Kampfgruppe Hecker in training here:

http://www.zweiterweltkrieg.org/phpBB2/ ... =25&t=1470
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Peter H
Forum Staff
Australia
 
Posts: 28422
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Re: Amphibious landing at Tobruk by the Axis 1941

Postby Enrico Cernuschi on 15 Oct 2008 20:39

According the earlyIprograms the 1941 operation had to be only a raid with diversive purposes using some of the early German landing crafts available in North Africa. By mid-November 1941, anyway, the training of the three companies of the III San Marco battalion, coming as they were from different units, was far from ready.
The Italian Navy had planned an other diversion, Operation TORO, a shelling of Tobruk by the III Division cruisers (Trento, Trieste and Bolzano) the same dawn of the scheduled attack against that town. The effects of the fire from the sea would be little, as the Italians knew well, but it had to add the general mass of the assault. The British, anyway, moved 48 hours first than the planned Axis operation and the bombardment was cancelled to spare oil now that its main effect was lost.

EC

Bookmark and Share

Enrico Cernuschi
Member
Italy
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 13 Sep 2008 07:44

Re: Amphibious landing at Tobruk by the Axis 1941

Postby JonS on 16 Oct 2008 01:46

Enrico Cernuschi wrote:... The Italian Navy had planned an other diversion, Operation TORO, a shelling of Tobruk by the III Division cruisers (Trento, Trieste and Bolzano) the same dawn of the scheduled attack against that town. ... The British, anyway, moved 48 hours first than the planned Axis operation and the bombardment was cancelled to spare oil now that its main effect was lost.

The Italian Cruisers must have been at sea, or very close to it when TORO was cancelled then, given that the Axis weren't really aware that CRUSADER was under way for some 24 hours after it started?

Bookmark and Share

JonS
Member
New Zealand
 
Posts: 3925
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 01:39
Location: New Zealand

Re: Amphibious landing at Tobruk by the Axis 1941

Postby Ironmachine on 16 Oct 2008 07:41

About Operation Toro (from http://www.regiamarina.net/operations/toro/toro_us.htm):
On September 10th, 1941 the Germans allies explicitly requested a naval bombardment of the British stronghold of Tobruk at the time surrounded by the Italo-German army of General Rommel. The operation called for a naval bombardment in coordination with a land offensive against the base, real thorn in the flank of the 5th Italian Army and the Afrika Korps. The targets of the mission would have been the coastal defenses, and the area of the bay used by the British to land reinforcements coming from Egypt.
The Regia Marina, mostly basing her comments on experience acquired in Spain and during the occupation of Greece, was very skeptical of the effectiveness of naval bombardments. This kind of action was believed uneconomical compared to aerial bombardment and of low accuracy. Supermarina noted: "the bombardment will be necessarily of brief duration, about half an hour, and due to the distance to be covered to reach Tobruk departing from bases in Italy, it will be difficult to synchronize it with land-based operations." Therefore, the operation was thought to be mostly demonstrative and to benefit morale and obtain some political gain, but of minimal military value.
The operational plan, created by Adm. Angelo Iachino himself, did not call for the utilization of battleships. The naval force tasked with the mission would have included the heavy cruisers Trento, Trieste and Bolzano (3rd Division), with the escort of a squadron of destroyer and two modern torpedo boats to provide, during the bombardment, for mine sweeping operations just ahead of the cruisers.
One of the required elements for the mission was surprise, and therefore it was decided to take an approach route divided into two segments, each to be covered during the night. Leaving Messina (Sicily) two days earlier and with at least 72 hours notice, the units would have reached Navarrino the following morning. From here, immediately after dark, the 3rd Division would have reached Tobruk around 10 AM. Iachino decided not to reach Tobruk around daybreak to avoid encountering superior enemy forces. In the final plan, extensive aerial reconnaissance was to be carried out by German aircraft based in Crete and starting at sunrise of action day. The commander at sea, based on the circumstances, would have established the return route.
The actual bombardment would have been executed by a destroyer at a distance of 800 meters (keeping at a minimum depth of 100 meters), while the cruisers would have sailed further out at about 3000 meters utilizing their airplanes to secure accurate range finding. In the final draft, it was also thought of utilizing land-based airplanes with a naval observer aboard so to spare the Ro43 installed aboard the cruisers in case of engagement with the enemy.
Much more ambitious was a different plan, referred to as "Operation #2". This plan called for the utilization of two fast battleships, the Littorio and Vittorio Veneto, and the 3rd Cruiser Division for an action off Tobruk with the goal of impeding the replenishing of the stronghold during the land offensive. This ambitious plan was nevertheless put aside almost immediately due to the impossibility of keeping the enemy unaware of the redeployment of the major forces of the Regia Marina. As a matter of fact, the two battleships were constantly kept under the eye of British aerial reconnaissance. Furthermore, the elevated consumption of oil fuel was kept under consideration.
Aerial cooperation called for the mobilization of all Italian bombers and torpedo bombers based in North Africa and in the Aegean sector, and the German planes based in Crete. These airplanes would have been used to attack enemy naval formations, while fighters from the Regia Aeronautica's bases in Cirenaica would have provided for a protective umbrella of over 100 aircraft. The Regia Aeronautica's inability to provide for such a large involvement caused a postponement of the original date of mid November. Eventually, due to the successes of the land-based forces, Operation Toro was postponed indefinitely.

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Ironmachine
Member
Spain
 
Posts: 3928
Joined: 07 Jul 2005 10:50
Location: Spain

Re: Amphibious landing at Tobruk by the Axis 1941

Postby Urmel on 20 May 2012 15:40

Coming back to the original question, an ULTRA intercept circulated on 13 November 41 states that at Derna 6 medium and 2 large collapsible floats were to be sent to Panzergruppe; another intercept circulated on 16 November 41 states that sixtythree ladders and two trucks with rubber rafts had been sent to unidentified units.

I guess these were the origin of the warning order for an amphibious landing. This warning reached 'D' Sqdr. 7 RTR on 15 November, and by that time it had become 'dozens of small landing craft on the way' and 'invasion of Tobruch imminent'.

Nice to see the impact of ULTRA on ops. ;)
History, Shmistory.

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Urmel
Member
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 1952
Joined: 25 Aug 2008 09:34
Location: The late JBond

Re: Amphibious landing at Tobruk by the Axis 1941

Postby Urmel on 21 May 2012 10:35

Ironmachine wrote:Eventually, due to the successes of the land-based forces, Operation Toro was postponed indefinitely.
[/quote]

Funny. They must mean the successes of the Commonwealth forces in lifting the siege. :milwink:
History, Shmistory.

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Urmel
Member
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 1952
Joined: 25 Aug 2008 09:34
Location: The late JBond

Previous

Return to WW2 in Africa & the Mediterranean

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 0 guests