Axis History Forum

This is an apolitical forum for discussions on the Axis nations, as well as the First and Second World Wars in general hosted by Marcus Wendel's Axis History Factbook in cooperation with Michael Miller's Axis Biographical Research and Christoph Awender's WW2 day by day.

Skip to content

Viking Conflict with Native Indians of Vinland & Greenla

Discussions on the other eras of our history, pre-Cold War.

Viking Conflict with Native Indians of Vinland & Greenla

Postby Dan Feltmate on 07 May 2002 18:56

Hello, I have a few questions.

I have been running into some conflicting points with my research on the Vikings.

Encarta Encyclopedia 96
-VIKINGS
- - Extension of Viking Activities
"They discovered uninhabited lands in the Atlantic - first the Faroes, then Iceland, then Greenland. From Greenland they launched ambitious expeditions to settle on the eastern seaboard of North America (Vinland) but these attempts to colonize the New World 500 years before Columbus were soon abondoned in the face of hostility from the Native peoples."

Also in Encarta though, it mentions in Greenland that the Vikings carried out trade with the Eskimo's, whom lived quite far to the north of the Norse settlements.
Furhter sayings of this are in:
The Penguin Historical Atlas of the Vikings
-The Vikings in Greenland, page 96
"Even further North, the Norse traded with the Eskimos."

--------

BUT here is something further:
The Penguin Historical Atlas of the Vikings
- The Vikigns in Greenland, page 96 (Again)
"Soon after 1300 the climate began to deteriorate. Stock-rearing suffered and sea-ice cut the settlers off from the outside world for years at a time. The Eskimo's began to move south and there wre violent clashes with the Greenlanders.

In 1341 The Western Settlement was occupied by the Eskimo's
In 1380 the Middle Settlement was occupied by the Eskimo's
And in the late 15th century the last Norse Settlement dies out.



Here are some of my question:

What drove the Native Americans in Newfoundland (Vinland) to take up hostility towards the Norse settlers? Does anyone have any defined reason? Why did the Eskimo's in Greenland move south and occupy the Norse settlements.....was it simply because of a climatic change that they decided to become violent?
As it mentions,the Norse carried out trade with these people for quite some time. Is there a reasonable explanation anyone can offer why the Eskimo's would do this? Were the Norse settlers really a big threat to the Eskimo's way of life?

Were there any "Natives" on Iceland? I mean of coruse, the Native's similar to Newfoundland....or perhaps were there any Eskimo's on Iceland when the Norse settlers arrived?

Answers anyone?

Thanks in advance
- Dan :)

Bookmark and Share

Dan Feltmate
Member
United States
 
Posts: 139
Joined: 18 Mar 2002 19:53

Postby Der Schwarze Ritter on 08 May 2002 09:19

where there any natives on Iceland? I think the Celts settled there before the Norsemen arrived.

-Daniel-

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Der Schwarze Ritter
Member
United States
 
Posts: 88
Joined: 11 Mar 2002 08:12
Location: California

.

Postby Dan Feltmate on 08 May 2002 15:07

I meant Natives in the meaning of the same "Native Americans" (Indians)

Bookmark and Share

Dan Feltmate
Member
United States
 
Posts: 139
Joined: 18 Mar 2002 19:53

Postby Dan on 08 May 2002 15:19

Der Schwarze Ritter wrote:where there any natives on Iceland? I think the Celts settled there before the Norsemen arrived.

-Daniel-


DNA research indicates that Celtic women were brought by Norse men to Iceland.

Bookmark and Share

Dan
Financial supporter
United States
 
Posts: 3323
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 14:06
Location: California

vikings

Postby Der Schwarze Ritter on 08 May 2002 23:23

my bad :oops:


-Daniel-

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Der Schwarze Ritter
Member
United States
 
Posts: 88
Joined: 11 Mar 2002 08:12
Location: California

.

Postby Dan Feltmate on 09 May 2002 19:14

Back to the subject?

Bookmark and Share

Dan Feltmate
Member
United States
 
Posts: 139
Joined: 18 Mar 2002 19:53

Postby Lars EP on 15 May 2002 21:20

Hi Daniel..

It is generally acknowledged that the Norse and Eskimos came into conflict as the worsening climate forces the Eskimos southwards. Furthermore, thse worsening conditions means that where South-Greenland in 1000 AD was margianable farmable, in 1400 it became impossible to farm anymore.

As to America. The only found settlement is on L'anse aux Medaux in New Foundland. It consists of a few houses, and has only been in use for a few years. I have some material about it somewhere, but I think I remember a reference to a Indian arrow-head. If you are interested I'll see what I can find.

However, "Vinland" or "Markland" was probably to far away. The supplylines where to long, and the Indians to many and to strong. So it the idea of establishing a permanent colony was abandoned.

An interesting twist on the story. When I was on Iceland a couple of years back, a guy told me that some Icelandic annal from around 1300 AD, was referring to a ship arriving from Markland with timber. This should indicate that the Icelanders was collecting timber, a commodity that Iceland is desperately poor on, in America. However, I've never been able to confirm this story.

Regards --- Lars EP

Bookmark and Share

Lars EP
Member
Netherlands
 
Posts: 324
Joined: 16 Mar 2002 22:44
Location: Presently the Netherlands

Read the Sagas

Postby Vance Pollock on 18 May 2002 12:25

Here is an interesting link:

http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/vinland.html

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Vance Pollock
Member
Iceland
 
Posts: 105
Joined: 16 May 2002 20:03
Location: Asheville, NC

Postby Birgitte Heuschkel on 21 May 2002 11:26

The incredibly few surviving Viking texts from the period seem to indicate that whilst the weather in Greenland grew colder and rendered cattle farming impossible, hunting conditions for the eskimo also deteriorated (until they adapted), leading to conflict over game and quite likely, domestic animals.

Furthermore, and this may be a key factor, the viking culture believed in vendetta; we'll never know who killed the first human being there, but as soon as an eskimo had killed a viking settler, that settler's family would have to take down an eskimo in revenge, and so forth. This was divine law, and no doubt contributed quite a bit to the mysterious disappearance of the two settlements.

The surviving texts curse the blood revenge without going into details, and mourns the fact that "we did not meet them as human beings".

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Birgitte Heuschkel
Member
Denmark
 
Posts: 456
Joined: 18 Mar 2002 08:07
Location: Fredericia, Denmark

Postby Lars EP on 29 May 2002 21:07

Birgitte Heuschkel wrote:The incredibly few surviving Viking texts from the period seem to indicate that whilst the weather in Greenland grew colder and rendered cattle farming impossible, hunting conditions for the eskimo also deteriorated (until they adapted), leading to conflict over game and quite likely, domestic animals.

Furthermore, and this may be a key factor, the viking culture believed in vendetta; we'll never know who killed the first human being there, but as soon as an eskimo had killed a viking settler, that settler's family would have to take down an eskimo in revenge, and so forth. This was divine law, and no doubt contributed quite a bit to the mysterious disappearance of the two settlements.

The surviving texts curse the blood revenge without going into details, and mourns the fact that "we did not meet them as human beings".


Now I am curious... which texts are we talking about here?

Regards --- Lars EP

Bookmark and Share

Lars EP
Member
Netherlands
 
Posts: 324
Joined: 16 Mar 2002 22:44
Location: Presently the Netherlands

Re: Viking Conflict with Native Indians of Vinland & Greenla

Postby vikings269 on 30 Jun 2012 12:49


Bookmark and Share

vikings269
New member
United States
 
Posts: 1
Joined: 30 Jun 2012 12:43

Re: Viking Conflict with Native Indians of Vinland & Greenla

Postby Carl Schwamberger on 01 Jul 2012 14:11

I wonder if the Grand Banks fish concentration had been found, would the Norse or other Europeans been able to take advantage of it that early? Were the fishermen of western Europe capable of using the Grand Banks, and would they have needed to?

Bookmark and Share

Carl Schwamberger
Forum Staff
United States
 
Posts: 4799
Joined: 02 Sep 2006 20:31
Location: USA

Re:

Postby LWD on 02 Jul 2012 14:44

Dan wrote:
Der Schwarze Ritter wrote:where there any natives on Iceland? I think the Celts settled there before the Norsemen arrived.

DNA research indicates that Celtic women were brought by Norse men to Iceland.

From what I've read the Norse found Irish monks in Iceland when they arrived.

As for conflicts with the inhabitants of the Americas some of the tribes were quite war like others weren't. Even some of those that weren't may not have appreciated a strange "tribe" moving in and establishing a community on land that they regarded as theirs. There is also some evidence for friendly relations with some of the tribes. This would parrallel later European experiance as well.

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
LWD
Member
United States
 
Posts: 7319
Joined: 21 Sep 2005 21:46
Location: Michigan


Return to Other eras

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 0 guests