Axis History Forum

This is an apolitical forum for discussions on the Axis nations, as well as the First and Second World Wars in general hosted by Marcus Wendel's Axis History Factbook in cooperation with Michael Miller's Axis Biographical Research and Christoph Awender's WW2 day by day.

Skip to content

soldiers in Revolt: GI Resistance During the Vietnam War

Discussions on the Cold War era (1946-1991).

Postby Penn44 on 24 Sep 2006 17:09

Anyone with any concrete information on how the US military's use of drug screens affected drug use in the early 1970s?

Penn44


.

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Penn44
Member
United States
 
Posts: 2882
Joined: 26 Jun 2003 06:25
Location: US

Postby Peter H on 27 Sep 2006 12:01

From Woodruff:

Routine urinalysis,designed to identify those men using hard drugs...was initiated in Vietnam in June 1971.At its peak,drug usage was identified in 4.2% of service personnel.A combination of rehabilitation programs and education..brought this figure down to 2.5% by the end of 1971.

One reason for the reported rise in reported drug usage was that,reflecting changes in American social attitudes of that same era,military attitudes to drug use also changed.Beginning in late 1970,drug abuse increasingly became seen as a treatable condition,and users were encouraged to seek professional treatment.So,while previously soldiers would have hidden a drug problem from authorities,by late 1970,they confessed their dependency to obtain punishment-free treatment.

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Peter H
Forum Staff
Australia
 
Posts: 28422
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Re:

Postby Alaric on 25 Jun 2012 05:18

mars wrote:
Peter H wrote:Cortright is a peace activist.

Originally it was written in 1975;why the reprint of his book now?Perhaps to influence those involved in a more current war?

The LA Times has also dredged the war up again recently:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld ... -headlines


thank you Peter, I may pass this book, since I do not like historian books writted by either known Liberal or known Conservative, I prefer reading historian books writtend by serious historian researcher


So if someone is a liberal he or she can't be a "serious historian researcher"? That's a little biased itself isn't it?

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Alaric
Member
United States
 
Posts: 169
Joined: 25 Mar 2008 23:02
Location: Pacific Northwest USA

Previous

Return to Cold War

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 2 guests