The Hopseidet Incident 1945

Discussions on the Holocaust and 20th Century War Crimes. Note that Holocaust denial is not allowed. Hosted by David Thompson.
Post Reply
User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

The Hopseidet Incident 1945

#1

Post by Peter H » 13 Apr 2008, 09:52

Norway,5th/6th May 1945:

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/andrew.eth ... /05/05.htm
Two German submarines U 318 and U 992 broke the surface in Hopsfjorden, Norway late the night of the 4th of May 1945. They continued to travel on the surface toward Hopseidet. 10 km away from the village the submarines put 30 men ashore, and they returned with a prisoner, a fisherman Ivar ÿye, who would be used as a guide further inland.

This operation was followed by Norwegians ashore. The local policeman in Sjanes informed The Military Command about the subs approaching Hopseidet. An observation post was situated in the village, and the soldiers and some volunteer civilians got ready for a fight by taking station in a couple of places with view to the shore.

On the 6th, between two and three o'clock, the Germans went ashore, and fire was opened from the defenders. After some heavy fire from machineguns the defenders were forced to retire. Only one man stayed behind on the beach; the "Bergen-man" Henry Mohr was hiding behind some big rocks while he was responding the fire with his light arms. When he finally ran out of ammo, he stretched his arms up and surrendered. He was badly mistreated by the Germans, but for some reason not shot. Together with the "guide" Ivar ÿye was taken aboard the sub.

Another fisherman was also wounded by the Germans. Mathis Persen had been hit in the knee early in the fight. He was laying in agony on a small grass-field close to the beach. A German soldier approached him, looked at his knee, shook his head and pointed his gun against his head. Persen begged for his life, the German put away his gun and put a bandage to Persens knee. Twice he went back with his gun lifted, but finally left the wounded man.

The Germans concentrated their energy elsewhere; all livestock they could find was gathered and shot. All the buildings who was in such a state that people could take shelter or live in, were blown up (It is necessary to remember that all houses were burned as the Germans redrew from the county in autumn 1944, and these houses were just improvised structures).

Sigurd Ferman was one of the witnesses to what happened. The Germans were leading six fishermen, who were taken prisoner as they were trying to make it for the mountains, towards the only building left in the village, a warehouse. The fishermen were lined up with their hands above their heads, and three Germans lined themselves up against them with their weapons ready. Just before the weapons were fired, the witness Ferman could hear one of the fishermen shout:" Are you firing at civilians.?" Ferman was stunned as he watched the six fishermen being executed. The victims were screaming. An officer then gave them coup de grace with his bayonet.

Two of the soldiers went inside and searched the building. It later showed that two of the fishermen had knives placed in their hands to make it look as they had been armed. Ferman identified the knives and knew that they were taken from the warehouse.

In the cellar of a cowshed Caroline Mikalsen were hiding with nine of her eleven children, the youngest only 4 months old. One daughter was away, and her husband and the eldest son were among the executed fishermen. The Germans become aware of the hideaways, and one soldier went inside the cowshed and fired his weapon through the roof, above which some of the children was hiding and nearly hit by the bullets. The eldest daughters were hiding inside a cupboard.

Caroline asked for mercy, but the soldier said triumphant that her husband and son were shot, and then he raped her with the children watching. As he left the cowshed, he threw a handgrenade in through a window. It landed in a basket of clothes and did not explode. One of her sons later carried the basket down to the sea.

After this the Germans went back to the beach. The loudspeakers on the subs played march-music, and a voice declared that Hopseidet was taken without German casualties, and that six enemies were fallen. The soldiers embarked the subs, and accompanied by loud music they left and were soon out of sight.

To the six bodies by the warehouse were attached propaganda-posters. The wounded man Mathis Persen was still laying down by the shore. Caroline Mikalsen heard his call for help and found him by rowing slowly along the shore. Her 14-year old son and herself carried the wounded, now unconscious man into shelter. Her nursing saved Persens life until the doctor arrived.

At 5 o'clock the following day Norwegian troops arrived at Hopseidet only to find that six innocent civilians lives were lost. Half an hour later the Germans in Norway surrenders, Hopseidet became the last German military action in Norway.

Later two German soldiers were put to trial in West-Germany, accused of the misdeed, but the case was dismissed in 1969. The soldiers claimed self- defence, and a Norwegian trial was never stated.

On the scene of the misdeed a memorial has been placed, bearing the following inscription:

"In memory of six sivilian unarmed fishermen, mishandled and shot by the Germans the 6. May 1945.

Leonard Eriksen 35 years

Einar Mikalsen 47 years

Johan Mikalsen 18 years

Harald Kristiansen 39 years

Henry Kristiansen 16 years

Reidar Karlsen 17 years

The German U-Boats involved were the "U-318" and the "U-992", which landed a platoon of Kleinkampf-Verband 35 under command of Korvettenkapitain Wolfgang Woerdermann at Hopseidet, near Gamvik in Finnmark county, 6th May, 1945. They executed six unarmed Norwegian civilians as well as committing other crimes. Both U-boat captains were tried after the War, but were found not guilty as the crimes committed were not committed by the U-boat crews. (Torstein Saksvik)

michael mills
Member
Posts: 9000
Joined: 11 Mar 2002, 13:42
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: The Hopseidet Incident 1945

#2

Post by michael mills » 14 Apr 2008, 03:17

This requires more background detail.

My understanding is that Norway was under German occupation until the very end of the war. I would like to know the identity of the "Military Command" referred to, and also where the "Norwegian troops" referred to came from.

There is a reference to "volunteer civilians" taking part in a fire-fight with German troops. Presumably if a group of Norwegian civilians mounted an armed attack on German occupation troops, then the Germans would have had a case for treating them as "illegal combatants" and subjecting them to condign punishment.


User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

Re: The Hopseidet Incident 1945

#3

Post by Peter H » 14 Apr 2008, 07:20

The following details are provided in General Arne Dagfin Dahl's The Liberation of Finnmark.

-Hopseidet,in Finnmark, was liberated in November 1944.A Norwegian guard of 6 men from MountainKompanie nr. 2 (Norwegian regulars of the Norwegian Brigade )and Riks 1(Norwegian Police trained in Sweden)acted as its garrison.As a liberated part of Norway no armed resistance members were around.

-the garrison pulled back when the Germans landed after only putting up a token resistance.

-the Germans capture 4 fisherman and 2 boys who were executed on the spot.

-Dahl's view is that it was a punitive operation as well as for obtaining supplies of food,fish.

Printed pamphlets left on the dead stated as follows:


1) We are fighting and working for you for a future European order of states.

2) We are not giving away chocolate and tobacco as bait. However we have proved our friendly attitude against you in 5 years of coexistence

3) We are protecting your homes against Bolshevik blood terror

4) We are protecting your homes against capitalstic exploitation

5) We are protecting your fishing banks for your private use

6) We are providing you work and bread, BUT

ANY who are opposing us.
ANY who support the anti European major powers England and America with Russia in the spearhead.
ANY who openly or hidden goes against us in this for Europe so troubled times
ANY who by evacutions by boats or by fleeing over the borders goes against our objectives
ANY who openly or hidden is helping the enemy on this or the other side of the front

HE is a traitor against Europe and against his Norwegian fatherland, and he shall be found and destroyed anywhere he might be.



The aftermath:
http://img.nrk.no/img/534023.jpeg

Image


Norwegian TV documentary on the episode:

http://www.nrk.no/programmer/tv/brennpunkt/5167568.html

michael mills
Member
Posts: 9000
Joined: 11 Mar 2002, 13:42
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: The Hopseidet Incident 1945

#4

Post by michael mills » 14 Apr 2008, 08:12

How did the liberation of Hopseidet occur?

Were the German occupiers pushed out? If so, by whom? Norwegian forces coming from Sweden? It seems unusual that Sweden a neutral state, would have allowed Allied forces to operate from its territory.

The other possibility is an invasion across the Soviet-Norwegian border. I understand that that did actually occur.

Was Finnmark under Soviet control at the time of the incident? Were the Norwegian forces in the area under Soviet command? Such a situation might possibly account for the slogan in the German propaganda which stated "We are protecting your homes against Bolshevik blood terror".

Certain elements in the account do not ring true, eg it is difficult to see how the German soldier who allegedly raped Caroline Mikalsen in her home could possibly have known that two of the persons summarily executed by the unit he belonged to were her husband and son. Presumably he was a total stranger to the area and could not have been acquainted with her or her relatives.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

Re: The Hopseidet Incident 1945

#5

Post by Peter H » 14 Apr 2008, 10:19

http://home.online.no/~gestrom/history/nbrigfrm.htm
2nd Mountain Company in Finnmark
October 1944 - May 1945

From March 1944 the Norwegian Government had been in discussion with the Soviet Union regarding the liberation of Northern Norway. The government had already negotiated an agreement regarding civil administration and jurisdiction in liberated Norwegian territory with the British and US governments (November 1943 - it would not be signed until the 16th of May 1944). The gist of the agreement was that liberated areas would be under direct Norwegian rule, except when military operations dictated otherwise. A similar agreement with the Soviet Union was now negotiated, also signed on the 16th of May.

At a meeting between Molotov and the Norwegian amassador in Moscow, Andvord, on the 18th of October the Soviets welcomed the participation of a Norwegian force when pursuing the Germans across the Norwegian border. The Norwegian High Command reported that the first contingent - one company from the Norwegian Brigade in Scotland - could be ready for departure on the 27th of October. The Combined Chiefs of Staff agreed to send a "token Norwegian force" of 120. The number of men was then increased to 230. In the event, 208 men from the 2nd Mountain Company arrived in Murmansk on the 30th of October 1944 aboard H.M.S. "Berwick". There was not capacity to transport the entire company, and their vehicles and horses had to be left behind. The company's commanding officer was colonel Arne Dahl. The company was attached to the 114th Soviet Infantry Division, under direct command of Soviet colonel Kosjienko.

...On the 6th of February 1945 command of the company was transferred from the Soviets to Distriktskommando Finnmark under colonel Arne Dahl. The company relocated their base to Børselv and Lakselv. During the winter 1300 Norwegian light infantry from the 13.000 troops trained in Sweden had been entering Finnmark, and in March these troops started arriving in Lakselv and Skoganvarre. A new battallion was formed, consisting of 2nd Mountain Company, 1st and 2nd Rikspolitikompani, 2nd company of Varanger Battallion and volunteers from Alta Battallion. At the time of the German capitulation on the 8th of May there were approx. 3000 Norwegian soldiers in Finnmark, including local volunteers.
German records show that both U-318 and U-992 left Narvik on the 1st May 1945 for their raid on Hopseidet.They returned to Narvik on the 9th May 1945.The printed pamphlets suggest it was a planned operation.Why this raid was carried out at such a date,the German surrender in Norway was on the 7th May,is hard to fathom.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

Re: The Hopseidet Incident 1945

#6

Post by Peter H » 15 Apr 2008, 07:22

From Regiment Norse on Feldgrau.

Norwegian TV documentary:

http://www1.nrk.no/nett-tv/klipp/120321

User avatar
stril
Member
Posts: 2706
Joined: 10 Jul 2003, 11:37
Location: Norway

Re: The Hopseidet Incident 1945

#7

Post by stril » 28 Apr 2008, 13:11

Hello
German records show that both U-318 and U-992 left Narvik on the 1st May 1945 for their raid on Hopseidet.They returned to Narvik on the 9th May 1945.The printed pamphlets suggest it was a planned operation.Why this raid was carried out at such a date,the German surrender in Norway was on the 7th May,is hard to fathom.
In the book "Tyske ubåtmannskaper i norske farvann 1940-1945" (German U-Boats in Norwegian Waters 1940-1945) the incident at Hopseidet is one of the topics. It also have a picture of U-318 with soem of its crew and some MEK soldiers on its way to Hopseidet
Ill add some info taken from this book. From the start it was Abwehr who was responsible for this action. It was planned to send FAT 148 to Hopseidet to gather information, and to damage quays and other vital installations. Captured Norwegian police soldiers have told that Hopseidet was a vital point for transporting supplys to the norwegian police troops in the western part of Finmark. This plan was not carried out, and the Kriegsmarine was to be responisble for the action. Woerdemann in the MEK had been planning the action since march and sent the plan to Berlin to get aproval.
The rape did happen, but none of the children witness this. One of the daughters of C.Mikkelsen comfirms this. She tells that all children was in hiding.
Its a fact that norwegian civilians was commanded by norwegian police troops to do guard duty, but not in uniform, and was given no weapons. When the fight started, the fishermen was told to leave, but one of them was ordered as guide and was given a uniform(coat) and a rifle. The fishermen was heading in northestern direction and met some of the germans who opens fire. The fishermen fled, and the norwegian soldiers opens fire aganst the germans and was trying to get cover in the hills.
H.Mohr was taken as prisoner by the germans told in a report after the war that they was aware of the a u-boat in the area, and that aprox 30 soldiers had been put ashore, and that another u-boat was also seen They organized the defence against the german attack, and got 13 men to do guard duty, and made ready depots with food and ammunition.

The incident happened 6th of may, Dönitz ordered the uboats to return to base on the 4th of may. Why didnt they folllow that order ? One of the crew from U-427 tells in a interview that there was a rumour that U-318 was in need for extra diesel, because they had plans to go to Argentina. This was mentiond as a explanation since the u-boats in Narvik had to tell how how much spare diesel they had. Its possible that this was triggered because the crew of U-318 hadnt follow the order from Dönitz, and with the killing of 6 fisherman as a result.
regards
Stril

User avatar
Andy H
Forum Staff
Posts: 15326
Joined: 12 Mar 2002, 21:51
Location: UK and USA

Re: The Hopseidet Incident 1945

#8

Post by Andy H » 06 Jul 2010, 13:44

In Lawrence Paterson's book Black Flag-The Surrender of Germany's U-Boat Forces 1945, published by Seaforth 2009 ISBN 9781848320376 makes reference to this inncident Pg100-103

The photograph of the two German soldiers on the beach shown earlier in this thread, is also reproduced in this book, where the author states that the photograph "purporting to show men of MEK 35 (Marine Einsatz Kommando 35) and the victims of the Hopseidet massacre (who lay in the forground).

He states further:-
Norwegian authorities questioned several of the men after the end of hostilities inc Ewald Lubben, .....who claimed self defence....The Norwegians, concious of the implication of misconduct in ordering civilians to oppose the Germans allowed the matter to drop.
In 1967, West German authorities arrested 6men for this atrocity, again Lubben being one of them. His familiar story of self defence was used by all those accused, and by 1969 they had been aquitted. More recent forensic study of the case has revealed that there are huge inconsistences between Lubens version of events and the physical remains. Whilst he claimed to have shot the men as they attacked him, most carry wounds to their sides and backs. Also one long volley from his MP40 could leave 32 bullets in the dead men, but more than 50, of different calibres, were recovered at the time by Norwegian police.

User avatar
Andy H
Forum Staff
Posts: 15326
Joined: 12 Mar 2002, 21:51
Location: UK and USA

Re: The Hopseidet Incident 1945

#9

Post by Andy H » 07 Jul 2010, 12:58

Micheal Mills wrote:
Certain elements in the account do not ring true, eg it is difficult to see how the German soldier who allegedly raped Caroline Mikalsen in her home could possibly have known that two of the persons summarily executed by the unit he belonged to were her husband and son. Presumably he was a total stranger to the area and could not have been acquainted with her or her relatives.
Well its not beyond the realms of possibility that those executed were first asked about their identities or papers checked. Likewise when the women was first found, the same proceedure may have been followed. Then maybe they asked her if she was related to the two Mikalsen's just caught/executed which would not be beyond belief given you had just heard the two same surnames!

Regards

Andy H

Post Reply

Return to “Holocaust & 20th Century War Crimes”