history1 wrote:little grey rabbit wrote:[...]
So one possibility I suggested is that these are garrulous Israeli pensioners big noting themselves, the other I am suggesting that some of these deaths may have been reported as suicides. [...]
Or mentioned as deadly car accidents as there were many with former Nazis involved.
little grey rabbit wrote:Anyway Bettina Stangneth clears up the mystery on page 154 as regards Eichmann
A death notice was printed in the Linz and Vienna papers in 1954 - allegedly from Reuters, London, that an SS Oberscharfuehrer Wolfgang Bauer had been killed in the Salzkammergut Mountains near Linz by a Jewish Death squad in 1946. It appeared in the Oberoesterrische Zeitung. On the Sassen tapes Eichmann claimed to have read about this while still in Germany in 1946, but according to the footnotes Stangneth wasn't able to locate any reports from this time.
Linz, the capital of our state Upper Austria, is not in the Salzkammergut-area nor is even the northern border of the Salzkammergut Mountains near the city Linz.
The newspapers name is rather "Oberösterr
eichische Zeitung (Upper Austrian Newspaper), sadly the newspaper archive of the Austrian National Library doesn´t provide files after 1944, at the moment.
I tend towards the view - expressed at the time (1954) - that this was a fake story to try and create the impression Eichmann was dead (incidentally this was a point in time - from about May 1953 - in which all the relevant intelligence agencies would have known that Adolf Eichmann was now living in Argentina and that he was working on a building a power station, see pages 127-133).
This was Valentin Tarra's view that "Nazi circles in London" had spread the information to end the search for Eichmann.
However, I don't believe there were Nazi circles in London, "Reuters, London" was probably just misdirection to give a source to a fake story. Reuters was just a wire service, so if Reuters, London was a genuine source, then
a). It ought to be in Reuters archives and
b). It ought to have been the result of them picking up a story from a London paper, which doesn't appear to exist.
Ironic that a story that probably never happened in the first place and designed to protect a Nazi in hiding, is then repeated decades later by Jewish veterans as reality.
Post by David Thompson » 21 Aug 2015, 22:50
little grey rabbit -- For some previous discussions of your question, see:
The Mysterious Fate of Gustav Wagner
viewtopic.php?f=38&t=206053
Ha! I didn't know we were allowed to raised the possibility that Gustav Wagner didn't insert a large kitchen knife in his own chest without being called a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist. Things must really be changing.
This is Gita Sereny describing the reaction of Stan Szmajzner to the news that Gustav Wagner was alive and in Brazel (Into That Darkness page 130)
Throughout our long conversation Stan Szmajzner was fair and tolerant. Indeed, I felt, almost too anxious to give credit where he could, to a man whose family "who had nothing to do with all this",[ie Stangl] and was also living in his chosen country. This was in sharp contrast to his attitude on hearing from me that Gustav WAgner was still alive and was probably in Brazil, information which I had from Stangl. On hearing this, Stan cried. "It is the wors, the most terrible shock you could have given me," he said. "That man. Here in Brazil. To think that I am now breathing the same air as he - it makes me feel terribly, terribly ill.....I would not know how to find words to describe to you what a terrible, a truly terrible man that is. Stangl - he is good by comparison, very good. But Wagner - he should be dead...." He begged me to find out where Wagner was, because, he kept on repeating, "I must do something." It took most of the day, off and on, to calm him and persuade him that vengeance ought not to be his.
Pour encourager les autres.