Axis History Forum

This is an apolitical forum for discussions on the Axis nations, as well as the First and Second World Wars in general hosted by Marcus Wendel's Axis History Factbook in cooperation with Michael Miller's Axis Biographical Research and Christoph Awender's WW2 day by day.

Skip to content

7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Discussions on the fortifications & artillery used by the Axis forces.
Hosted by Andrzej Ditrich

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby Clive Mortimore on 18 May 2012 19:30

peeved wrote:Sure looks that way. More HE'ish positions at viewtopic.php?f=70&t=134304&p=1529791&hilit=east+markus#p1529791 Looks like the top shot has both a raised platform and circle section trail pit.

Markus


It could lead to people asking why do the conversion in the first place. The 75mm Mle 97 was a fairly good anti tank gun in its own right. :)
Clive

Bookmark and Share

Clive Mortimore
Member
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 825
Joined: 06 Jun 2009 22:38

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby Alanmccoubrey on 18 May 2012 21:10

Clive, part of it was the wish to use their own Pak 40 ammunition I guess and also the poor anti-tank profile of the original carriage being so high.
Alan

Bookmark and Share

Alanmccoubrey
Financial supporter
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 1719
Joined: 19 Sep 2008 13:44

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby Manuferey on 18 May 2012 21:36

We can add the need to tow the guns with trucks at higher speed that could have been done with the original wooden-spoked wheels of the 75 mm Mle 1897.

Emmanuel

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Manuferey
Member
United States
 
Posts: 2296
Joined: 17 May 2007 14:52
Location: Virginia

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby Clive Mortimore on 18 May 2012 23:07

Alanmccoubrey wrote:Clive, part of it was the wish to use their own Pak 40 ammunition I guess and also the poor anti-tank profile of the original carriage being so high.


Hi Alan

The 7.5.cm Pak 97/38 did not fire the Pak 40 ammunition. It fired French HE shells, Polish AP shells and Greman designed HEAT shells with reissued French cartiridges. (Hogg 1975)
Captured Soviet F22 and F22 USV 76.2mm guns had their chambers modified so they could fire Pak40 ammunition. (Hogg 1975)

Manuferey wrote:We can add the need to tow the guns with trucks at higher speed that could have been done with the original wooden-spoked wheels of the 75 mm Mle 1897.

Emmanuel


Hi Emmanuel

Didn't both the French and the Poles modify the Mle 97 for motor towing?

The main reason for the conversion was to give the PanzerJager units a more powerful anti tank gun than the 3.7cm Pak and the combination of the Pak38 carriage and the Mle 97 barrel was a quick solution. I was being light hearted when I suggested they need not modify the Mle 97 if they were going to used the Pak 97/38 as field artillery. All those photos show is that anti tank guns from all armies could be used in a secondary role as field guns if not required for their primary role.

Clive
Clive

Bookmark and Share

Clive Mortimore
Member
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 825
Joined: 06 Jun 2009 22:38

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby Alanmccoubrey on 19 May 2012 12:40

Sorry Clive, it was of course the HEAT round that I was thinking of.
Alan

Bookmark and Share

Alanmccoubrey
Financial supporter
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 1719
Joined: 19 Sep 2008 13:44

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby Manuferey on 19 May 2012 15:09

Clive Mortimore wrote:Hi Emmanuel
Didn't both the French and the Poles modify the Mle 97 for motor towing?
[...]
Clive


Yes, indeed with two different types of pneumatic/rubber tires for the French. But this modernization made the guns very heavy to be rotated by man-power only and thus, less practical for antitank use. A solution for easier handling in AT role was to use steel wheels: e.g. 75 mm "Maroc" type and 75 mm Mle 97/33 with split trail.

Emmanuel

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Manuferey
Member
United States
 
Posts: 2296
Joined: 17 May 2007 14:52
Location: Virginia

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby Sturm78 on 08 Jul 2012 23:31

Hi all,

Two images from Ebay:

Sturm78
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Bookmark and Share

Sturm78
Member
Spain
 
Posts: 6825
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
Location: Spain

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby Clive Mortimore on 08 Jul 2012 23:53

I see that German gun fitters were trained to the same standards as I was. If you appear to not be able to fix it, then hit it with something. :D :D
Clive

Bookmark and Share

Clive Mortimore
Member
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 825
Joined: 06 Jun 2009 22:38

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby peeved on 09 Jul 2012 06:58

Don't force it, get a bigger hammer. [Arthur Bloch]

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
peeved
Member
Finland
 
Posts: 7171
Joined: 01 Jul 2007 07:15
Location: Finland

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby jopaerya on 10 Dec 2012 19:38

A nice picture from Ebay with the 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Regards Jos
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Bookmark and Share

jopaerya
Member
Netherlands
 
Posts: 10271
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 13:21
Location: middelburg

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby Eax-E on 10 Dec 2012 20:57

Hello,
Thanks. Does anyone has an idea of the percentage of 75mm captured by the Germans which has been changed in 97/38 ?

EE

Bookmark and Share

User avatar
Eax-E
Member
France
 
Posts: 173
Joined: 08 Jun 2010 17:58

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby jopaerya on 10 Dec 2012 21:30

Hello EE

I don't know if this list is correct , but it was placed on Axis Forum .

Regards Jos
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Bookmark and Share

jopaerya
Member
Netherlands
 
Posts: 10271
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 13:21
Location: middelburg

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby Clive Mortimore on 10 Dec 2012 23:52

jopaerya wrote:Hello EE

I don't know if this list is correct , but it was placed on Axis Forum .

Regards Jos


Hi Jos

No mention of the 60 7.5cm Pak 97/40. If it is correct could that be why a photo of this gun has never surfaced?

Clive
Clive

Bookmark and Share

Clive Mortimore
Member
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 825
Joined: 06 Jun 2009 22:38

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby jopaerya on 11 Dec 2012 12:38

Hello Clive

Your assumption is right , but I don't know the source of the 60 x 7.5 cm PaK 97/40
and maybe they counted the 60 guns with the 7.5 cm PaK 97/38 ??

Regards Jos

Bookmark and Share

jopaerya
Member
Netherlands
 
Posts: 10271
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 13:21
Location: middelburg

Re: 7.5 cm PaK 97/38

Postby Clive Mortimore on 12 Dec 2012 00:24

jopaerya wrote:Hello Clive

Your assumption is right , but I don't know the source of the 60 x 7.5 cm PaK 97/40
and maybe they counted the 60 guns with the 7.5 cm PaK 97/38 ??

Regards Jos


Hi Jos

Memory is playing up Wikipedia states 160 Pak97/40s were made http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7.5_cm_Pak_97/38#cite_note-sv-3 But a link provide by them http://sturmvogel.orbat.com/GermWeapProd.html does not mention the Pak 97/40 in the production figures :?

Lexion der Wehrmacht also mentions 160 were built http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Waffen/panzerabwehrkanonen.htm
Still no photos :(
Clive

Bookmark and Share

Clive Mortimore
Member
United Kingdom
 
Posts: 825
Joined: 06 Jun 2009 22:38

PreviousNext

Return to Fortifications & Artillery

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: al'saad, CommonCrawl [Bot], Stan P and 1 guest