Bauformen

Discussions on the fortifications, artillery, & rockets used by the Axis forces.
Post Reply
jopaerya
Member
Posts: 19236
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 14:21
Location: middelburg

Re: Bauformen

#136

Post by jopaerya » 19 Dec 2013, 20:14

Hello Friends

(1) Do you five of these tobruks ?
(2) A "normal" 2 cm Flak 30 or 38 does not fit in the tobruk
(3) Any of these tobruks left
(4) Sorry for the many questions

Regards Jos
Attachments
DSCF1625.jpg

User avatar
der bunkermann
Member
Posts: 1591
Joined: 18 May 2006, 17:27
Location: stp. gr. scheveningen holland
Contact:

Re: Bauformen

#137

Post by der bunkermann » 20 Dec 2013, 00:02

Hi jos.
1 i'm not sure if they were all the same.

2 Strange a normal 2 cm dont fit?
3 18 and 19 still excist, but the bettungen are completely covered.
4 my finger hurts :lol:


User avatar
AW
Member
Posts: 821
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 23:25
Location: Germany

Re: Bauformen

#138

Post by AW » 20 Dec 2013, 09:09

Moin,

I think only No. 20 and maybe 21 are from this design...
all the other one had a seperat UK & M.
sadly No. 20 is demolished.

btw. what are BRV R1, R2 and R3?

greetz
Alex

User avatar
AW
Member
Posts: 821
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 23:25
Location: Germany

Re: Bauformen

#139

Post by AW » 24 Dec 2013, 19:27

jopaerya wrote: (2) A "normal" 2 cm Flak 30 or 38 does not fit in the tobruk
Regards Jos
Hello,

the opening Looks bigger than a Bf 261 (70)... if the drawing are right is the Diameter 6,60m
My opinion is that the le Flak are for "Erdkampf" because it was infront of the Höckerline/Pz-Graben.

greetz

Alex

User avatar
der bunkermann
Member
Posts: 1591
Joined: 18 May 2006, 17:27
Location: stp. gr. scheveningen holland
Contact:

Re: Bauformen

#140

Post by der bunkermann » 24 Dec 2013, 22:40

Hi alex, R2 is possible something to do with the cables that connected the complex with the V192 in westbroekpark.
R3 is a tobruk. I think it was 58c.
Gr. Tim.
R1 is not on the map?

User avatar
AW
Member
Posts: 821
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 23:25
Location: Germany

Re: Bauformen

#141

Post by AW » 25 Dec 2013, 11:04

Hello Tim,

thx... I wonder that the Tobruk isn´t on the german map?!
R1 was is the KSS at Willem Beukelzoonstraat.

greetz
Alex

User avatar
der bunkermann
Member
Posts: 1591
Joined: 18 May 2006, 17:27
Location: stp. gr. scheveningen holland
Contact:

Re: Bauformen

#142

Post by der bunkermann » 25 Dec 2013, 14:50

Aha.. i have a drawing of the schaltstelle somewhere. Send it to you.
I remember that tobruk was temporarily open some years ago.

User avatar
der bunkermann
Member
Posts: 1591
Joined: 18 May 2006, 17:27
Location: stp. gr. scheveningen holland
Contact:

Re: Bauformen

#143

Post by der bunkermann » 25 Dec 2013, 14:54

Also where the lonely 4 is on the map (below r2) there should be a tobruk.

User avatar
Eax-E
Member
Posts: 865
Joined: 08 Jun 2010, 18:58

Re: Bauformen

#144

Post by Eax-E » 11 Apr 2014, 22:38

Hello,

Here is a good hint to find "who" is the BF 85. It must be an observation post with workroom.
VF remplacé par BF.jpg
Regards

jopaerya
Member
Posts: 19236
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 14:21
Location: middelburg

Re: Bauformen

#145

Post by jopaerya » 12 Apr 2014, 08:51

Nice find Arthur
:thumbsup:

User avatar
dirk Peeters
Member
Posts: 6568
Joined: 24 May 2011, 21:18
Location: Heist op den Berg Belgium

Re: Bauformen

#146

Post by dirk Peeters » 19 Apr 2014, 02:55

Yep i agree , nice find
Dirk

User avatar
moonraker
Member
Posts: 2642
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 23:06
Location: normandie.french

Re: Bauformen

#147

Post by moonraker » 26 Feb 2017, 15:13

hello,
here one foto of VF1a ...
source ebay.de

Me belfra-team
Attachments
2017-02-26_140838.jpg

forttravel
Member
Posts: 855
Joined: 19 Dec 2010, 23:07

Re: Bauformen

#148

Post by forttravel » 11 May 2018, 12:26

Almost typical Ringstand 58c, but only partially (on top = beam section) with iron reinforcement.
Please note on drawing label, both names existing together Ringstand and Tobrukstand.
Also new function/armament = Panzerbüchse and observer.
Source: http://www.gahetna.nl/collectie/archief ... level/file
Attachments
NL-HaNA_2.13.167_1038_10.jpg

forttravel
Member
Posts: 855
Joined: 19 Dec 2010, 23:07

Re: Bauformen

#149

Post by forttravel » 11 May 2018, 15:49

MG-Stand Typ 5 from designed im year 1943.
Quite deep inside 130 cm from floor to top edge with big diameter of wooden pole in the middle. AA purpose for hmg or light cannon?
Some source as above.
Attachments
NL-HaNA_2.13.167_1038_13.jpg

Lars Bertelsen
Member
Posts: 402
Joined: 16 Apr 2006, 10:02
Location: Denmark

Re: Bauformen

#150

Post by Lars Bertelsen » 13 May 2018, 12:39

Thanks forttravel
Almost typical Ringstand 58c, but only partially (on top = beam section) with iron reinforcement.
Very interesting drawing. It seems to be a Bauform 58c build using the minimal amount of reinforcing bars.
In Denmark (and other placed, I guess), lots of Bauformen were built without rebar in the external walls. To ensure, that the strength of the wall would not be reduced, the thickness of the walls was increased by 50 % (60 cm instead of 40 cm as usual). Nevertheless, today these walls often have got large cracks or sometimes even collapse under their own weight (see attached photo of Bauform 67 variant at Blåvand). The bottom plate and roof plate were usually built in normal thickness and reinforcement (20 cm and 40 cm respectively).
The Bauform 58c on your drawing seems to be built without reinforcement in the bottom plate and only a minimum in the roof plate. Thicknesses are increased by 50 % (30 cm and 60 cm respectively), and the stair case has got an extra step. I wonder if any Ringstände were actually built in this way.
Greetings Lars
Attachments
1.JPG
1.JPG (112.33 KiB) Viewed 4089 times
2.JPG
2.JPG (98.24 KiB) Viewed 4089 times

Post Reply

Return to “Fortifications, Artillery, & Rockets”