Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

Discussions on all aspects of the German Colonies and Overseas Expeditions. Hosted by Chris Dale.
Post Reply
User avatar
Tanzania
Member
Posts: 930
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 14:59
Location: Benghazi / Libya

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#541

Post by Tanzania » 25 Jun 2016, 08:51

Hi Chris

BZ = BrennZünder = Time fuse.

That means, the shells exploded after a fixed time in the air with a splinter effect,
in contrast to a percussion fuse which used by a artillery battle by the navy on sea.

Cheers Holger
“Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. . . . All History was a
palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary” – G. ORWELL 1984

CPT Bob
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: 07 May 2013, 00:40

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#542

Post by CPT Bob » 25 Jun 2016, 16:33

Ruhland was likely referring to crates/cases/boxes of "fuses".......which are always packed and shipped separately from the actual artillery rounds. I would think that most of the fuses carried aboard the K-berg were "impact" or "delay" (which were designed to explode inside a target ship)......"Variable-Time" fuses would not be very useful in a Naval battle......but "VT" fuses would be very desirable was when the target was "Troops in the Open".

This gentleman has a nice collection of WW1 German Artillery Fuses.....and an excellent explanation of the different types of fuses.

http://passioncompassion1418.com/decouv ... n_all.html


CPT Bob
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: 07 May 2013, 00:40

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#543

Post by CPT Bob » 25 Jun 2016, 17:34

Here is a bit of "clarity".....Ha!

The “Maximum Range” and the “Maximum Firing Range” of the 10.5cm SK L/40 gun is listed in several references as approximately 7.5 miles/ 12km.

I assume that these words are referring to the precise terminology used by Artillerymen: “Maximum Effective Range”. This is “mathematically” when you are assured of hitting your target. The projectile will actually fly much further than this, but you chances of hitting a relatively small target (a ship) become less and less as the distance becomes greater and greater.

Artillery can be used to fire “Harassing Fire” at large “Area Targets” (towns, supply depots, troop concentrations, etc.) at an even greater distance……..because you do not care exactly where the projectile lands.

The actual “Maximum Range” of a K-berg gun could easily be 25-30km!

User avatar
Tanzania
Member
Posts: 930
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 14:59
Location: Benghazi / Libya

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#544

Post by Tanzania » 25 Jun 2016, 18:41

Hi Bob,

Please correct me, if I am wrong, but the maximum range was only possible with an elevation of 45deg!?!
“Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. . . . All History was a
palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary” – G. ORWELL 1984

CPT Bob
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: 07 May 2013, 00:40

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#545

Post by CPT Bob » 25 Jun 2016, 20:10

I will give a good "political" answer: Yes & No.

Theoretically, if all variables were equal....I would say "Yes", but......all variables are not.....EVER.....the same!

The actual weight of the projectile flying through the air is fighting gravity, air density, wind direction & speed and differences in elevation between the gun & the target...........all the way to the point of impact.

Will 45 degrees of elevation always get you the maximum range? No.

I do not know the ballistic data for this ammo..........but both the Krupp carriage and the DAR carriage could be raised to 45d by simply digging a large hole at the rear of the gun......and using a Gunner's Quadrant.
plus 30.JPG
plus 30.JPG (31.58 KiB) Viewed 7193 times

CPT Bob
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: 07 May 2013, 00:40

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#546

Post by CPT Bob » 25 Jun 2016, 21:07

My work in my garden has been interrupted by the mid-day sun. I am hiding....next to a Fan....doing this. Ha!

I was looking at my "Kahe" photos........and I noticed what I did not see.

I see the undamaged bracket on the left side of the "Yoke", but I have no clear views of the right side.

A great force was required to blast the "turret" off the Kahe gun. It appears to have cleanly cut 10 large bolts in such a way as to not damage a single hole.

Really!!!

I have seen many photos of the Kahe Barrel, but none of the Turret. Why???? I would expect to see a dozen different photos of soldiers standing around the big curved steel plates.....as if it were a dead dinosaur. There is not one!

Was the Turret jettisoned from the railway car in the vicinity of Tanga in order to lighten the load prior to movement to Kahe?
no turret plates.JPG

CPT Bob
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: 07 May 2013, 00:40

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#547

Post by CPT Bob » 26 Jun 2016, 14:29

It is peculiar that the Germans would have removed the armor-plates......but did not remove this bracket.

User avatar
Chris Dale
Host - German Colonies
Posts: 1955
Joined: 21 Apr 2004, 15:48
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#548

Post by Chris Dale » 26 Jun 2016, 20:47

Very good point Bob. And thanks for the BZ info Holger.
Cheers
Chris

CPT Bob
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: 07 May 2013, 00:40

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#549

Post by CPT Bob » 29 Jun 2016, 21:18

My guess......(my "SWAG").......perhaps the elevation bracket required that the turret bracket remain in place.........and overlapped it......for "support".

Maybe!
Attachments
maybe.JPG

User avatar
Chris Dale
Host - German Colonies
Posts: 1955
Joined: 21 Apr 2004, 15:48
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#550

Post by Chris Dale » 30 Jun 2016, 01:19

So how would that work on the Dar gun carriages? I'm not sure I'm understanding you correctly here...
Cheers
Chris

CPT Bob
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: 07 May 2013, 00:40

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#551

Post by CPT Bob » 01 Jul 2016, 13:47

Sorry........exchange the word "Elevation".....with he word "Traverse".

User avatar
Chris Dale
Host - German Colonies
Posts: 1955
Joined: 21 Apr 2004, 15:48
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#552

Post by Chris Dale » 01 Jul 2016, 15:58

I see what you're saying now and yes, that would seem to make sense.
Cheers
Chris

CPT Bob
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: 07 May 2013, 00:40

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#553

Post by CPT Bob » 02 Jul 2016, 17:28

**SWAG**
The turret bracket was not jettisoned because it supported the Traverse bracket.
*** ***

Perhaps there was not enough time or a workshop capable of producing a "spacer".

Pedestal mounts without Turrets are designed slightly different here. It is likely why a different yoke was used on the DAR carriage for the Stanleyville Gun.

This is only a theory!!!

CPT Bob
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: 07 May 2013, 00:40

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#554

Post by CPT Bob » 07 Jul 2016, 15:50

Nice painting, but where is the Breech Block? Hmmmmmmm........
Attachments
3ca96c14943b470daee52e6472a02e6d.jpg

User avatar
Chris Dale
Host - German Colonies
Posts: 1955
Joined: 21 Apr 2004, 15:48
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Missing Gun from the SMS Königsberg

#555

Post by Chris Dale » 07 Jul 2016, 16:53

Clearly based on the Mkuyuni photo after its capture... and how did that Feldwebel get his EK 1 and 2?
Cheers
Chris

Post Reply

Return to “German Colonies and Overseas Expeditions”