Axis History Forum

This is an apolitical forum for discussions on the Axis nations, as well as the First and Second World Wars in general hosted by Marcus Wendel's Axis History Factbook in cooperation with Michael Miller's Axis Biographical Research, Christoph Awender's WW2 day by day, Dan Reinbold's Das Reich and Christian Ankerstjerne's Panzerworld.

Skip to content

heroes or traitors?

Discussions on all aspects of the resistance in Europe during the WW2 and the immediate post-war period, against Nazi rule in Germany & the occupied counties as well as against the Allied forces.

heroes or traitors?

Postby Roderick on 22 Sep 2003 22:31

Referring the attempt against Hitler on 20 July 1944, I'd like to know following:

Nowadays, for German people, invividuals like Stauffenberg, Witzleben, Stieff, Hoepner, Quirnheim, Haase, Hofacker, Goerdeler and others who took part on this attempt, are considered heroes or traitors? What do the scholls teach?
...or only history without opinions.

Roderick
Roderick
Member
Brazil
 
Posts: 616
Joined: 19 May 2003 13:48
Location: Brazil

Postby SeppCaesar on 22 Sep 2003 23:22

I get the sence that by summer of 44' they'd all be pretty sick of the bombings of their towns and think the plotters to be heros

but I guess it came down to ever persons feelings
User avatar
SeppCaesar
Member
United States
 
Posts: 553
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 04:22
Location: Michigan, U.S.

Re: heroes or traitors?

Postby PAK on 23 Sep 2003 10:31

Roderick wrote:...or only history without opinions.

That comes close, we are taught there was an attempt on Hitlers life which didn't succeed, period.
User avatar
PAK
Member
Germany
 
Posts: 143
Joined: 20 Apr 2003 11:48
Location: Aachen/Germany

Postby hauptmannn on 23 Sep 2003 10:46

Those men were depicted as being traitors in the media it is without doubt there are many who thought it that way. However some may think them as martyrs.
User avatar
hauptmannn
Member
France
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: 12 Jul 2003 14:15
Location: France

Re: heroes or traitors?

Postby Ti.P on 24 Sep 2003 12:32

PAK wrote:
Roderick wrote:...or only history without opinions.

That comes close, we are taught there was an attempt on Hitlers life which didn't succeed, period.


althogh i live in syd i goto a german skool
I agree we arent told this guy is a hero this guy is a traitor etc. thats for the individual perosn to come up with otherwise its no better then wot hitler did to kids!
however those guys r seen as heroes in germy they got street n town named after them!
User avatar
Ti.P
Member
Australia
 
Posts: 182
Joined: 19 Mar 2003 11:10
Location: Sydney

Postby stcamp on 24 Sep 2003 13:12

Interesting in that I have just read that Himmler by 1943 was aware of a possible coup and did nothing knowing he would be the one to benfit from it. Also by 1944 Hauser and Sepp Detrich had agreed to cooperate with the outcome knowing that Himmler would be the succesor.
User avatar
stcamp
Financial supporter
United States
 
Posts: 1636
Joined: 13 Jan 2003 16:43
Location: USA - Virginia

Postby NIBBE on 26 Sep 2003 14:48

why would himmler benfit from this coup? wouldn't someone like Stauffenberg, Witzleben or Stieff become the new leader?
User avatar
NIBBE
Member
Finland
 
Posts: 4
Joined: 24 Aug 2003 09:28
Location: FINLAND

Postby Orok on 26 Sep 2003 15:05

I guess that is because Himmler believed that, due to Hitler's huge popularity, he could easily supress the conspirators and arrest them, and ascended the Third Reich throne himself. :lol:
User avatar
Orok
Member
United States
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: 11 Sep 2003 15:35
Location: USA

Postby Scott Smith on 26 Sep 2003 16:08

Göring was the lawful sucessor so Himmler would have had to support that without alienating the Party and the Luftwaffe.
:)
User avatar
Scott Smith
Member
United States
 
Posts: 4752
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 21:17
Location: Arizona

Postby stcamp on 26 Sep 2003 16:10

In a coup d'etat the winner is usually the one who controls the biggest part of the military and police. There were more party members in the Wehrmacht then there were in the SS. I think he saw himself as the one most capable of carrying on the Hitlers vision.

Also, by not interfering with the Stauffenberg and the rest he would not have Adolf's blood on his hands. The author mentioned how after the blast there was no real mobilization of the police or Berlin SS garrison in response until after Himmler found out the failure of the bomb to kill Hitler.

I think the plan was to support Stauffenberg indirectly. Take control later and see if they could get some kind of peace aggrement with the west.
User avatar
stcamp
Financial supporter
United States
 
Posts: 1636
Joined: 13 Jan 2003 16:43
Location: USA - Virginia

Postby Orok on 26 Sep 2003 16:13

Scott Smith wrote:Göring was the lawful sucessor so Himmler would have had to support that without alienating the Party and the Luftwaffe.
:)


Göring had a much more amiable nature than AH, so he should be more open to manipulation by Himmler & Co. :lol:
User avatar
Orok
Member
United States
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: 11 Sep 2003 15:35
Location: USA

Postby May 10th 1940 on 26 Sep 2003 17:43

They were heroes in my opinion. But what if they had succeed did't they really think they could stand up agianst Himmler Kaltenbrunner and Bormann. i think those tree men took over the power id Hitler had died
User avatar
May 10th 1940
Member
Netherlands
 
Posts: 46
Joined: 16 Jul 2003 18:49
Location: Netherlands

Postby Scott Smith on 26 Sep 2003 18:45

Orok wrote:
Scott Smith wrote:Göring was the lawful sucessor so Himmler would have had to support that without alienating the Party and the Luftwaffe.
:)

Göring had a much more amiable nature than AH, so he should be more open to manipulation by Himmler & Co. :lol:

I don't think one would want to cross Göring, in spite of his usually being portrayed as a buffoon.
:)
User avatar
Scott Smith
Member
United States
 
Posts: 4752
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 21:17
Location: Arizona

Postby Scott Smith on 26 Sep 2003 18:47

stcamp wrote:I think the plan was to support Stauffenberg indirectly. Take control later and see if they could get some kind of peace aggrement with the west.

Are you suggesting that Himmler had advanced knowledge of the plot and did nothing? There wasn't a lot of time to think about it after the bomb was set off and it was learned that Hitler was not dead.
:)
User avatar
Scott Smith
Member
United States
 
Posts: 4752
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 21:17
Location: Arizona

Postby chalutzim on 26 Sep 2003 19:02

Scott Smith wrote:I don't think one would want to cross Göring, in spite of his usually being portrayed as a buffoon.
:)


It could be also added that besides his badly concealed coarseness and vulgarity, it was Goering who comissioned Heydrich to organize the Jewish destruction and he who envisaged the death of millions of people as a very normal thing. 8O
Last edited by chalutzim on 26 Sep 2003 19:04, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
chalutzim
Member
Brazil
 
Posts: 634
Joined: 09 Nov 2002 20:00
Location: Südamerika - Brazil

Next

Return to The Resistance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 1 guest