Did Red Army contribute to the victory in WW2?

Discussions on all aspects of the USSR, from the Russian Civil War till the end of the Great Patriotic War and the war against Japan. Hosted by Art.
User avatar
M1ALT
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 13 Jun 2010, 13:02
Location: BRIDPORT ENGLAND

Re: Did Red Army contribute to the victory in WW2?

#46

Post by M1ALT » 06 Jun 2011, 16:24

Did Red Army contribute to the victory in WW2? Well from what I was told by a great aunt who brought me up, her exact
words were when Hitler invaded Russia we (meaning Great Britain) were "saved" so yes they did. And that was the consensus among many people of her generation who had lived through that time.

Kelvin
Member
Posts: 3118
Joined: 06 Apr 2007, 15:49

Re: Did Red Army contribute to the victory in WW2?

#47

Post by Kelvin » 06 Jun 2011, 16:36

If USSR was crushed in 1941, with all natural resources in the whole of Europe and Russia, Hitler could estalish a large Luffwaffe and navy force, even USA would be threatened. Russia's defeat in 1941 meant the Caucasus and Central Asia was in Hitler's hand, the defence of India was no longer viable. And oil in the Middle East also under Hitler's control.


User avatar
LWD
Member
Posts: 8618
Joined: 21 Sep 2005, 22:46
Location: Michigan

Re: Did Red Army contribute to the victory in WW2?

#48

Post by LWD » 06 Jun 2011, 18:43

Kelvin wrote:If USSR was crushed in 1941, with all natural resources in the whole of Europe and Russia, Hitler could estalish a large Luffwaffe and navy force, even USA would be threatened.
Perhaps in time.
Russia's defeat in 1941 meant the Caucasus and Central Asia was in Hitler's hand,
Possibly and possibly not. Unlikely in 41 in any case.
the defence of India was no longer viable. And oil in the Middle East also under Hitler's control.
Possible but unlikely.

Post Reply

Return to “The Soviet Union at War 1917-1945”