Is Stalin a great mind?

Discussions on all aspects of the USSR, from the Russian Civil War till the end of the Great Patriotic War and the war against Japan. Hosted by Art.
User avatar
Linlu
Member
Posts: 225
Joined: 04 Aug 2002, 17:33

Is Stalin a great mind?

#1

Post by Linlu » 15 Aug 2002, 18:16

Hi guys,

I would like to pose this question: Was Stalin a great mind (as in: "is he a genius")?

The following is my "Great Minds" essay for English class on Stalin. I think he was a great mind for reasons which I present in the following:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Great Minds: Joseph Stalin

There are many kinds of great minds: mathematicians, physicists, chemists, engineers, philosophers and, most importantly, leaders. What then makes a leader deserve to be ranked among the great minds of history? They need to 1) have an aggressive and flexible mind in international and internal politics; 2) be able to learn from their mistakes and respect other’s opinions and 3) always strive to keep their nations united and strong. Joseph Stalin, through his 27-year career as a dictator of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), had all of these qualities to make him a great mind in leadership.

Stalin was a great diplomatist and statesman. What he did was not just for consolidating his power but for the benefit of the Soviet Union as a whole. In some people’s opinions, Stalin was not good at diplomacy at all because of the fact that he became a partner with Hitler by signing the Nazi-Soviet pact and this was his greatest blunder. After the Great Purge of 1938, Stalin realized that the entire command structure of the Soviet Union was seriously weakened. He needed time to reorganize and to recover by signing the Nazi-Soviet Pact. However, he made the misjudgment of trusting Hitler. In fact, other than Winston Churchill, most major Western politicians made that mistake. After World War Two, he carved out large concessions from the Allied powers for the benefit of the Soviet Union. At the many conferences during the war, Franklin D. Roosevelt always felt he knew how to deal with Stalin, but Stalin always outmaneuvered him. Stalin successfully played around the deal drawn at the Yalta Conference of 1) forming broadly representative interim governments, pledged to free elections, and 2) facilitating such elections. He set up puppet governments in Soviet occupied territories in Poland, Romania, East Germany, etc., and held so-called free elections, that was, to let the voters freely elect among pre-selected candidates that the communist party wanted. As a result, Russia received huge reparations from Germany and stripped the occupied territories most of their industrial equipment. Unlike Lenin, Stalin did not care for the wellbeing of the Russian people. He simply maximized their output in labour camps, factories, laboratories and anywhere else that manpower was need. Because of this, Stalin was able to turn a country that was made up mostly of illiterate peasants into a military superpower in a short period of time.

Stalin fulfilled the second requirement through his action during World War Two by being the commander-in-chief of the Soviet armed forces. Early in the invasion of USSR by Germany, Stalin made many strategic errors. The biggest mistake was moving troops from the Stalin Line to the frontiers of the newly conquered territories: Poland, Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania. When the Germans assaulted, the panzer thrusts quickly broke through the local divisional garrisons and immediately encircled them. Russia almost lost the war to Germany because of this strategic oversight. Thanks to the many industries in eastern Russia and to the ingenious scorched-earth policy, which deprived the Germans of any shelter or readily available resources, proposed and implemented by Stalin, the Red forces quickly recovered from their losses. Stalin learned from his mistakes and immediately gave rise to those generals who had great potential to replace those lost in the Great Purge. Unlike Hitler, who was also commander-in-chief of the armed forces, Stalin respected his generals’ opinions in strategy. “Stalin did not decide…important military questions personally, for he well understood the necessity for collective work in those complicated questions,” said Marshal Georgii Zhukov. For this close cooperation with his generals, he successfully coordinated and directed many battles that changed the course of the war. Some of those were the battles of Moscow, Stalingrad, and various offensives in the drive for Berlin.

Stalin was everything that a cruel dictator should be. He utilized anything and everything possible to hold his iron-fisted rule over the Russians. After the communist revolution, Lenin created the Cheka, which was later known as the NKVD ("Narodnii Kommissariat Vnutrennykh Del", The People's Commissariat of Internal Affairs), to terrorize the opposition. These organizations were so brutally efficient in their purpose that the much-feared German Gestapo was modeled after them. With terror as a political weapon, Stalin was able to control the Russian people very effectively by giving them two choices, either to obey or to die. If a person were even suspected of uttering a bad word against the government, he would disappear at night and might never return. In doing so, he was also able to hold such a vast nation together. No matter how many people argue that Stalin made many unforgivable mistakes or even committed crimes against humanity, one hard fact cannot be ignored: Stalin had successfully reigned for 27 years during which the Soviet Union was strong and his power was never questioned.

Stalin, a name that literally meant “man of steel”, was truly a dictator with a great mind who had an iron grip on his country. He had all the qualities of being a great leader and deserves to be ranked among the great minds of history. People tend to overlook Stalin’s contributions because he was a communist dictator and had caused the deaths of many innocent people. However, few people could transform a country from a pre-industrialized one to a superpower. Because of the firm foundation he had laid, the Soviet Union was able to be the first, in the world, to send a satellite, the Sputnik, and a man into space. Also, the Soviet Union was able to keep up with the United States of America in a military race, known as the Cold War, for over 40 years.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

So, what do you think, is Stalin a great mind (as in: is he a genius)? I have to admit the essay sucks, but still... I'm only in high school, dudes and dudettes, and English is my second language (BTW, that's my excuse for everything involving English :D )

- Linlu :mrgreen:
Last edited by Linlu on 17 Jan 2003, 06:28, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Starinov
Member
Posts: 1490
Joined: 18 Apr 2002, 17:29
Location: Québec, Canada.

#2

Post by Starinov » 15 Aug 2002, 19:24

Not bad. There are some parts I don't agree with (i.e. the Soviet Nazi Pact) but in general, it's good.


User avatar
Gott
Member
Posts: 1162
Joined: 10 Jul 2002, 22:49
Location: Asia

#3

Post by Gott » 16 Aug 2002, 19:43

i did a similar essay on stalin when i was in high school. i wrote in my opinion that i agree in some ways that using terror methods to modernize the country was nescessary for a huge nation vunlerable to many enemy attacks. but i then disagree with using terror in a massive basis. i am amazed at his firm agressive means to rebuild the nation, but was disappointed at him as well. i totally didn't like his policies on europe after the war. especially being german, his ideas to take away eastern lands, afterall, my family fled from Koenigsberg. i remember that i did not blame stalin for the division of germany. from sources, stalin wanted germany to be democratic. he wanted nothing from germany but compensations and eastern provinces. but it was the western allies fault whom created the BRD without much knowledge of Moscow.

Caldric
Member
Posts: 8077
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 22:50
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

#4

Post by Caldric » 16 Aug 2002, 20:08

And as you are an example Gott it does appear that Stalin's propaganda tool worked well. If you think Stalin had any intentions of giving up Germany after the hard won victory and making it a democratic nation then well, I will sell you some land in Arizona? :)

User avatar
Gott
Member
Posts: 1162
Joined: 10 Jul 2002, 22:49
Location: Asia

#5

Post by Gott » 16 Aug 2002, 20:12

all i remember the book i read was no propaganda. i know it sounds weird stalin giving his rights on germany after a hard won battle, but i really couldn't remember why, i read the book in high school. i think it was his generals' advice or something like that...

User avatar
Starinov
Member
Posts: 1490
Joined: 18 Apr 2002, 17:29
Location: Québec, Canada.

#6

Post by Starinov » 16 Aug 2002, 22:29

gott wrote:Stalin wanted germany to be democratic.
So he created the DDR. How democratic it was, we all know
gott wrote:he wanted nothing from germany but compensations
Those compensations were like ablack hole; everything in Eastern Germany that even only looked like technology was sent to USSR.

Caldric
Member
Posts: 8077
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 22:50
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

#7

Post by Caldric » 16 Aug 2002, 22:37

all i remember the book i read was no propaganda.
Sorry but if that book claimed that Stalin was going to return Eastern Germany to Democracy then that is insane, and propaganda. If it was democracy it would have been Soviet democracy, which is to say whoever Stalin wanted in power at the time.

I have heard the story and read things about it and even debated it, but it is all fantasy, he was not going to release Germany.

What is the purpose of releasing East Germany ? If anything it would be the hopes that all of Germany including Western would vote in pro-communist so that Stalin could have complete control of Germany.
Last edited by Caldric on 16 Aug 2002, 22:44, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Gott
Member
Posts: 1162
Joined: 10 Jul 2002, 22:49
Location: Asia

#8

Post by Gott » 16 Aug 2002, 22:40

So he created the DDR. How democratic it was, we all know
i guess you need to read all these books on DDR.
Those compensations were like ablack hole; everything in Eastern Germany that even only looked like technology was sent to USSR.
so is that not compensation?

User avatar
Gott
Member
Posts: 1162
Joined: 10 Jul 2002, 22:49
Location: Asia

#9

Post by Gott » 16 Aug 2002, 22:48

Sorry but if that book claimed that Stalin was going to return Eastern Germany to Democracy then that is insane, and propaganda. If it was democracy it would have been Soviet democracy, which is to say whoever Stalin wanted in power at the time.

I have heard the story and read things about it and even debated it, but it is all fantasy, he was not going to release Germany.

What is purpose would releasing East Germany ? If anything it would be the hopes that all of Germany including Western would vote in pro-communist so that Stalin could have complete control of Germany.
i often asked myself why let germany go, but the main thing was that russia is going to cold war with US. stalin reluctantly took DDR with him because it would be helpful for them using german communists as a tool, more like propaganda. if there was no cold war, or at least if cold war had not been that serious, stalin would have let germany go. all stalin wanted from the new, if unified, germany is that compensations, possible economic rights, and have the german peopple have a choice of government, whether communist or democratic. that was what stalin really wanted... he wanted to exploit germany as his kind loving side of stalinist propaganda, but he failed, thats why DDR came out of existance.

User avatar
Starinov
Member
Posts: 1490
Joined: 18 Apr 2002, 17:29
Location: Québec, Canada.

#10

Post by Starinov » 16 Aug 2002, 22:53

gott wrote:
So he created the DDR. How democratic it was, we all know
i guess you need to read all these books on DDR.
I am sorry but the only democratic thing in DDR is the name. A communist country is not democratic. Even if Stalin was saying that he wants to create a democratic Germany, that means he wanted to create a socialist/communist country. That is his definition for democracy.

User avatar
Gott
Member
Posts: 1162
Joined: 10 Jul 2002, 22:49
Location: Asia

#11

Post by Gott » 16 Aug 2002, 22:57

I am sorry but the only democratic thing in DDR is the name. A communist country is not democratic. Even if Stalin was saying that he wants to create a democratic Germany, that means he wanted to create a socialist/communist country. That is his definition for democracy.
i am sorry if you don't know what i meant. for that instance stalin did mean a DEMOCRATIC germany. he might have put poland or hungary to be "democratic" in the outside, he wanted germany as a whole to be democratic for real.

User avatar
Starinov
Member
Posts: 1490
Joined: 18 Apr 2002, 17:29
Location: Québec, Canada.

#12

Post by Starinov » 16 Aug 2002, 23:16

gott wrote:
I am sorry but the only democratic thing in DDR is the name. A communist country is not democratic. Even if Stalin was saying that he wants to create a democratic Germany, that means he wanted to create a socialist/communist country. That is his definition for democracy.
i am sorry if you don't know what i meant. for that instance stalin did mean a DEMOCRATIC germany. he might have put poland or hungary to be "democratic" in the outside, he wanted germany as a whole to be democratic for real.
Having a really democratic Germany would be impossible. It would mean that that country wouls soon leave the "protection" of USSR. It was unthinkable. Stalin maybe wanted to have the entire Germany being democratic (the way he understood the term) but not the western style. He wuld loose control of that country.

User avatar
Starinov
Member
Posts: 1490
Joined: 18 Apr 2002, 17:29
Location: Québec, Canada.

#13

Post by Starinov » 16 Aug 2002, 23:18

gott wrote:
I am sorry but the only democratic thing in DDR is the name. A communist country is not democratic. Even if Stalin was saying that he wants to create a democratic Germany, that means he wanted to create a socialist/communist country. That is his definition for democracy.
i am sorry if you don't know what i meant. for that instance stalin did mean a DEMOCRATIC germany. he might have put poland or hungary to be "democratic" in the outside, he wanted germany as a whole to be democratic for real.
Having a really democratic Germany would be impossible. It would mean that that country wouls soon leave the "protection" of USSR. It was unthinkable. Stalin maybe wanted to have the entire Germany being democratic (the way he understood the term) but not the western style.

User avatar
Gott
Member
Posts: 1162
Joined: 10 Jul 2002, 22:49
Location: Asia

#14

Post by Gott » 16 Aug 2002, 23:23

Stalin maybe wanted to have the entire Germany being democratic (the way he understood the term) but not the western style.
well, i agree. very not likely with the kind of american-style democracy. but certainly in stalin's view, not communist "democracy."

User avatar
Starinov
Member
Posts: 1490
Joined: 18 Apr 2002, 17:29
Location: Québec, Canada.

#15

Post by Starinov » 16 Aug 2002, 23:36

I am not sure I understand you right.
gott wrote:well, i agree. very not likely with the kind of american-style democracy.
or west-european. I agree on that.
gott wrote:but certainly in stalin's view, not communist "democracy."
I am a bit puzzled by that. What you mean here has no sense for me since The Stalin's view was a communist "democracy"

Post Reply

Return to “The Soviet Union at War 1917-1945”