The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

Discussions on all (non-biographical) aspects of the Freikorps, Reichswehr, Austrian Bundesheer, Heer, Waffen-SS, Volkssturm and Fallschirmjäger and the other Luftwaffe ground forces. Hosted by Christoph Awender.
Post Reply
JonS
Member
Posts: 3935
Joined: 23 Jul 2004, 02:39
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#136

Post by JonS » 11 Dec 2011, 23:07

Burkimer wrote:perhaps you see my point regarding the "light infantry" concept and how amalgamating paratroopers into the line units damages the overall combat record of the unit.[/qoute]
No, I don't see that. I do see that the 101st's combat record was considerably enhanced by it's involvment at Bastogne.
They were simply not constructed for such use.
True-ish. That's why (apart from the role of chance which saw various other units fetch up at there on their way back from Skyline Drive) the 101st wasn't alone at Bastogne. but getting back to that combat record thing ... those other units are utterly forgotten, though their presence was vital to the US' ability to retain Bastogne.

User avatar
fredleander
Member
Posts: 2175
Joined: 03 Dec 2004, 21:49
Location: Stockholm
Contact:

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#137

Post by fredleander » 13 Feb 2012, 18:42

Burkimer wrote:Thank you for the correction re: 82nd/101st. You were both quite right. However, perhaps you see my point regarding the "light infantry" concept and how amalgamating paratroopers into the line units damages the overall combat record of the unit..
I do not necessarily agree on that. It would depend on how they were used/integrated with the "normal" troops. If these had their regular support weapons there could be plenty of supplementary work for special units, such as recce, close-in defense of staffs and reduction of enemy infantry break-throughs. Since, after the initial test period of both sides' paras, there was a development towards equipping these, too, with heavier support weapons such as light artillery and mortars they could also in a tight spot use, or assist in using, the fellow units' equipment of said type. In Bastogne, a very important unit was a self-propelled tank destroyer platoon.
Burkimer wrote:They were simply not constructed for such use. It is not a knock against the troops themselves-- one works within the system one is placed-- but I can say from personal experience that when your mission statement is "enter/disable/secure" and you are suddenly required to "long-term defend", everything from tactical implementation to logistics goes a bit awry.
I'd say "secure" contains a tinge of "hold...:)...

The question is when these light forces could be relieved and refitted. The Germans, in particular, as early as 1940 had a very good system for refurbishing their para units. Student, in his book, describes how measures were taken to replace the losses in Holland, at the same time expanding the force as a whole. At the time the Germans had the advantage of a superior infantry training, the numbers, and a fleet of dedicated jump planes. That said, the jump training was resource, not time-demanding, in that aircrafts were needed. It is the tough infantry - and jump training - that create the special spirit of the paras but jump training does not necessarily take more than a week. The jump, however, is only a method of transport. It can get you killed, though - it's the infantry training that is meant to achieve the reduction (read: killing) of the enemy....:)...

Fred
River Wide, Ocean Deep - a book about Operation Sealion:
https://www.fredleander.com
Saving MacArthur - an eight-book series on the Pacific War:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf


Groteska 1
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 21 Jul 2012, 17:15

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#138

Post by Groteska 1 » 21 Jul 2012, 17:39

Hi.
In some earlier posts (few years back) in this thread, one or two members included Poland 1939 as a campaign of Fallschirmjäger. I have never read of any operational use of paratroopers during that campaign. All I ever encountered were some loosely mentioned few "fifth columnist" dropped behind polish lines, no mention of actual paratroopers being used to "enter/acquire/hold' any objectives. Or maybe paras were used as purely infantry formation ?. Could anyone care to enlighten me on this subject ?.
Thank you.

User avatar
fredleander
Member
Posts: 2175
Joined: 03 Dec 2004, 21:49
Location: Stockholm
Contact:

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#139

Post by fredleander » 22 Jul 2012, 09:33

Groteska 1 wrote:Hi.
In some earlier posts (few years back) in this thread, one or two members included Poland 1939 as a campaign of Fallschirmjäger. I have never read of any operational use of paratroopers during that campaign. All I ever encountered were some loosely mentioned few "fifth columnist" dropped behind polish lines, no mention of actual paratroopers being used to "enter/acquire/hold' any objectives. Or maybe paras were used as purely infantry formation ?. Could anyone care to enlighten me on this subject ?.
Thank you.
To my knowledge, that is correct. Student was rather pissed that he was not allowed to use his men during the Polish campaign. Hitler was intent on keeping the FJ units a "secret" for more important missions. That is, the assault in the West.
River Wide, Ocean Deep - a book about Operation Sealion:
https://www.fredleander.com
Saving MacArthur - an eight-book series on the Pacific War:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf

Groteska 1
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 21 Jul 2012, 17:15

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#140

Post by Groteska 1 » 22 Jul 2012, 10:22

Thank you fredleander.
Just as I thought. I did mention that they might have been used in infantry role, but if it was true we would have known about it. What I meant was that maybe because of their excellent physical condition and training some high ranking visitors to the front might have been given personal bodyguards. Pure speculation on my part, nothing to support this. Once again few years back on this thread someone did mention that some Fallschirmjäger were training on some ex polish forts for their finest hour in the West. Any information where?.
Cheers.

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#141

Post by phylo_roadking » 22 Jul 2012, 14:01

I did mention that they might have been used in infantry role, but if it was true we would have known about it.
We do; absence of evidence (known to Fred) is not evidence of absence ;)...

No parachute operation wa carried out by any unit of 7th Flieger....but towards the end of the campaign there were airlanding operations undertaken when 1st Batt./2FJR was put down by Ju52 at Deblin airfield and 2nd Batt. was landed at other airfields between the Vistula and the Bug rivers and near the Dukla Pass, in order to speed up the dissolution of the Polish Army and prevent its senior officers escping by air from those fields. Also, 2nd Batt./1FJR were involved in the ground fighting at Wola-Gulowska, fighting a Polish artillery regiment; that action saw the first FJ fatality in combat in WWII, a Feldwebel Meusel.

(From James Lucas' "Storming Eagles" and Kuhn's "German paratroops in WWII")

As for the aspect of retaining the FJ's capabilities secret - Hitler's comment to Student regarding secrecy made at the Chancellery on the 27th came AFTER the conclusion of the campaign - there WAS a paratroop bridge seizure planned for the Polish campaign, Operation Pulawy, to seize a bridge across the Vistula; the FJ were emplaned and waiting to take off when the operation was cancelled...NOT to preserve their secret, but because panzers, racing ahead of their schedule, seized the bridge on the ground! In fact, there were a number of similar operations called off in the first 48 hours of the campaign - the rapid advance of the ground forces simply obviated the need for them :P
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...

Groteska 1
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 21 Jul 2012, 17:15

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#142

Post by Groteska 1 » 22 Jul 2012, 17:21

Yes, I should have typed "I" instead of "We". :oops: :lol:
Until now I was oblivious about the firefight and airlandings, obviously.
Thanks phylo_roadking

User avatar
fredleander
Member
Posts: 2175
Joined: 03 Dec 2004, 21:49
Location: Stockholm
Contact:

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#143

Post by fredleander » 26 Jul 2012, 15:41

Groteska 1 wrote:Yes, I should have typed "I" instead of "We". :oops: :lol:
Until now I was oblivious about the firefight and airlandings, obviously.
Thanks phylo_roadking
....he-he...dementes is a creepy disease. PRK is of course correct in the information given - you would have found the same if you had googled: "German paratroopers in the Polish campaign" -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_Parach ... _(Germany)

For my own part I should know better, having read up on Student's biography a little while back. I suppose I got stuck in the fact that the FJ's were used neither to purpose nor capacity.

As for why, Student writes a lot. First, they were seemingly planned for "real" operations but the need did not arise. What was needed to use them is not clarified. The fighting at Gulowska was, according to Student, more a mistake than of any practical use. A Polish unit was hiding in the nearby woods and the CO of the FJ unit present just wanted to take up a defensive posture, his priority mission was to secure the German HQ at site. The local commander, however, ordered the unit to hunt the Poles down.

Back to what was needed to use the FJ's fully. In a meeting with Hitler in Berlin after the conclusion of the campaign Hitler stated, according to Student, that it was not his intention to use the FJ's in Poland, even if the Army Staff had planned so. He explained to Student why, his attitude as a sort of excuse to Student. Student was very disappointed that his "boys" had not been used meaningfully and expressed this. Hitler promised that they would see plenty of action soon enough, meaning the upcoming Western campaign.

There was an afterplay as Student was not the only one that was disappointed. There occured a slight crisis in the division, many officers wanted to transfer back to their original units.
River Wide, Ocean Deep - a book about Operation Sealion:
https://www.fredleander.com
Saving MacArthur - an eight-book series on the Pacific War:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf

jeger
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: 09 Jan 2014, 17:16

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#144

Post by jeger » 12 Jan 2014, 13:08

In 1940 both Sola Airfield near the town of Stavanger and Forneny Airfied near Oslo were taken by German paras in the morning 9th April.At Sola they were dropped from the sky,at Forneby they landed i JU-52s, but the Norwegian campaign showed two grave setbacks for the paras.The first were at the battle at Midtskogen i Southern Norway 10 April where a small unit of the Norwegian IR 5 stopped the paras raiding party arriving by busses from Oslo hunting for the King of Norway.The leader of the raiders, hauptman Spiller was killed and the paras had to turn back.The second time was when the paras were dropped from the sky at Dombås, a vital rail point in central Norway where the paras were hunted down and forced to surrender to troops of the Norwegian IR 11. I also like to mention Narvik where the paras were dropped in support of general Dietels mountain troops, but were pushed up near the Swedish /Norwegian border by Norwegian general Fleischers 6 Div. The Germans including the paras were ready to give up and cross into neutral Sweden when allied troops left Norway in early June due to the Germans invading France in May; which ended the fighting in North-Norway and brought about the sub.Norwegian demob.and the total German occupation of Norway.

The Fallschirmjagers finest moment was not in Norway, but most prob.in taking Crete,but losses were high and after Crete, the paras never again jumped from the sky but were employed as ord. infantry both in Russia and in Italy.
Jeger

sandeepmukherjee196
Member
Posts: 1524
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 06:34

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#145

Post by sandeepmukherjee196 » 26 Oct 2014, 15:53

i am a great admirer of the FJ .. however i must point out that later in the war.. as the original highly trained personnel got decimated.. the new recruits and officers let down the FJ mystique on several occasions.. 2 examples that readily come to mind are the failed airborne operation at the beginning of the ardennes offensive and again during the final soviet offensive on the oder front in april '45..i gotta rush now to a party...i promise to get back with more information / details soon..hope that would be useful to my friends here.. :)
ciao

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#146

Post by phylo_roadking » 26 Oct 2014, 23:14

...but the Norwegian campaign showed two grave setbacks for the paras.The first were at the battle at Midtskogen i Southern Norway 10 April where a small unit of the Norwegian IR 5 stopped the paras raiding party arriving by busses from Oslo hunting for the King of Norway.The leader of the raiders, hauptman Spiller was killed and the paras had to turn back.The second time was when the paras were dropped from the sky at Dombås, a vital rail point in central Norway where the paras were hunted down and forced to surrender to troops of the Norwegian IR 11.
Hi Jeger - as discussed previously, the Dombås operation wasn't a failure/setback. In fact, given that only half the force made it to the objective, and what did couldn't actually take the objective...the remainder still managed to act as a blocking force - all that they were meant to be anyway - for a week, keeping the Norwegian and British forces apart despite dwindling numbers, increasing casualties and a lack of ammunition and medical supplies etc.. If anything, it was a remarkable success given its inauspicious start 8O
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...

sandeepmukherjee196
Member
Posts: 1524
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 06:34

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#147

Post by sandeepmukherjee196 » 04 Nov 2014, 13:35

hi everyone.

while on the FJ, would you agree that the defence of monte cassino by the german paras should count as one the greatest defensive battles in history..given the odds..comparable to stalingrad ?

ciao
sandeep

User avatar
KurtSteiner
New member
Posts: 1
Joined: 13 Dec 2014, 13:13
Location: Malta

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#148

Post by KurtSteiner » 13 Dec 2014, 13:26

I research the German medical services of WW II and in the Luftwaffe, if I can be of any help :)

Regards !
Kurt.

User avatar
Marcus
Member
Posts: 33963
Joined: 08 Mar 2002, 23:35
Location: Europe
Contact:

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#149

Post by Marcus » 13 Dec 2014, 13:28

KurtSteiner wrote:I research the German medical services of WW II and in the Luftwaffe, if I can be of any help :)
:welcome:

I think you will find this thread of interest: http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 6&t=174560

/Marcus

User avatar
fredleander
Member
Posts: 2175
Joined: 03 Dec 2004, 21:49
Location: Stockholm
Contact:

Re: The Combat Performance of the Fallschirmjäger

#150

Post by fredleander » 13 Dec 2014, 14:30

sandeepmukherjee196 wrote:hi everyone.

while on the FJ, would you agree that the defence of monte cassino by the german paras should count as one the greatest defensive battles in history..given the odds..comparable to stalingrad ?

ciao
sandeep
In my opinion they can hardly be compared.

Fred
River Wide, Ocean Deep - a book about Operation Sealion:
https://www.fredleander.com
Saving MacArthur - an eight-book series on the Pacific War:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf

Post Reply

Return to “Heer, Waffen-SS & Fallschirmjäger”