takoradi air route

Discussions on WW2 in Africa & the Mediterranean. Hosted by Andy H
Jon G.
Member
Posts: 6647
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 02:12
Location: Europe

#16

Post by Jon G. » 18 Jan 2008, 22:55

The Takoradi air route had actually been explored as early as the 1920s. From a 1975 article by Deborah Wing Ray, from the The Journal of American History, Vol. 62, no. 2.

Image

Wing Ray demonstrates how the infrastructure of the Takoradi route was expanded with American aid. Neutrality restrictions of the time meant that US government agencies couldn't be directly involved with expanding the trans-African air route, so a subsidiary of the Pan American Airways (Pan American Airways - Africa Ltd.) was set up for the occasion. Apart from building and maintaining runways etc. the Pan-Am also ferried pilots back from the Middle East back to the Gold Coast.

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

#17

Post by phylo_roadking » 19 Jan 2008, 17:20

The route was...

Takoradi on the Gold Coast to Lagos in Nigeria, then Minina, Kaduna, Kano and Maiduguri before crossing into French Equatorial Afraica for Fort Lamu, on to El Geneina just over the border in the Sudan followed by El Fasher, El Obeid, Khartoum, Atbara and finally Wadi Halfa before the longest leg of the journey straight to Dekelia outside Alexandria.

The route was originally an Imperial Airways commercial route established in 1936 for an internal African service from Lagos to Alex. The route itself was hell on both aircraft and any new pilots outbound from England, the pilots barely acclimatised to the extreme equatorial climate and the aircraft being high-performance military aircraft with the minimum conversion for climate that preserved their performance, usually just different grades of lubricants and filters. Most of the stops were just fuel dumps with no spares' stock, only the bigger staging posts had spares, and aircraft were often standed for weeks waiting on spares to be brought by transiting aircraft from the coast. No matter how many spares were stockpiled enroute, the wear and tear on engines on the trip meant there was always a shortage for various items. Navigational acidents were frequent, with the longest legs being flown over featureless desert - instrument faults or navigational error caused the loss of many aircraft and crews. On arrival in Alex the aircraft needed FULL overhauls after their desert transits, the trip having put over 3800 miles of dust and sandfilled air through filters etc. in over 30 hours' flying time. This is one of the reasons why aircraft in the Desert Air Force had a reputation for being "secondhand" or highly-unreliable - they were already severely worn by the time they arrived in the Eastern Med even if they'd left the UK factory-fresh or very low hours on their airframes.

There were ferry pilots in the system, particularly due to the large number of aircraft stranded unflightworthy at Takoradi and being released for transit as spares and repairs allowed. But also I've read of a lot of fresh trained personnel travelling to the Gold Coast with their aircraft to transit in-theatre. Remember - not only the RAF used the route, but also the FAA ferrying replacement aircraft and pilots to the Eastern Med to the Illustrious among others. And of course the third case - pilots travelling by sea to Takoradi and collecting aircraft there to ferry while they themselves were en route one-way to specific squadrons or the general replacement pool in Egypt.


User avatar
Michael Emrys
Member
Posts: 6002
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 19:44
Location: USA

#18

Post by Michael Emrys » 20 Jan 2008, 07:27

The Takoradi route was also used by the USAAF from 1942 at least until a route via Morocco and North Africa was opened up. It was used by the USAMEAF, which later became the 9th. AF, as well as units headed for the CBI Theater.

Michael

Jon G.
Member
Posts: 6647
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 02:12
Location: Europe

#19

Post by Jon G. » 20 Jan 2008, 09:41

It was fortunate for the British that Chad had declared for the Free French quite early on. Fort Lamy, which is one of the Takoradi route's staging points, is located in Chad. That gave de Gaulle some political clout with Roosevelt, who at the time was more inclined to cooperate with Vichy.

Interestingly, Wing Ray maintains that the 'first heavy bombers' (=the B-17s which were destroyed on the ground when the Japanese attacked, I presume) sent to MacArthur in the Philippines actually arrived via the Takoradi route, despite taking off from Sacramento when they were sent out. Wing Ray in turn quotes Oliver La Farge The Eagle in the Egg for this statement.

User avatar
Michael Emrys
Member
Posts: 6002
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 19:44
Location: USA

#20

Post by Michael Emrys » 20 Jan 2008, 10:51

Jon G. wrote:Interestingly, Wing Ray maintains that the 'first heavy bombers' (=the B-17s which were destroyed on the ground when the Japanese attacked, I presume) sent to MacArthur in the Philippines actually arrived via the Takoradi route, despite taking off from Sacramento when they were sent out. Wing Ray in turn quotes Oliver La Farge The Eagle in the Egg for this statement.
That would have to be looked into. It is known that the B-17s that unhappily arrived on Oahu the morning of Dec. 7 just as the Japanese attack was hitting its stride were en route from the West Coast to Clark Field. I find it a trifle hard to believe that that wasn't the usual procedure, as going by Takoradi would definitely be going the long way around.

He may be confusing planes sent to the Philippines with planes evacuated from there. According to this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9th_Air_Fo ... Air_Forces
there arrived at Cairo around the middle of June, 1942...
...a detachment of B-17Ds from the 7th Bombardment Group (Heavy) at Allahabad, India led by Major General Lewis H Brereton, and other personnel which Brereton brought from India. The B-17Ds (some being Pearl Harbor attack and Battle of the Phillipines survivors) were assigned to the China Burma India Theater to attack Japan from airfields in China, but after the fall of Rangoon the Burma Road was cut so the detachment could not be logistically supported in China and wound up in west India.
I would like more confirmation that Wiki has this exactly right, but something like this could easily be the case.

Michael

Jon G.
Member
Posts: 6647
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 02:12
Location: Europe

#21

Post by Jon G. » 20 Jan 2008, 20:10

Michael Emrys wrote:... It is known that the B-17s that unhappily arrived on Oahu the morning of Dec. 7 just as the Japanese attack was hitting its stride were en route from the West Coast to Clark Field. I find it a trifle hard to believe that that wasn't the usual procedure, as going by Takoradi would definitely be going the long way around...
I found Wing Ray's comment about MacArthur's B-17s coming via Takoradi strange as well. But presumably she knows her stuff - the article I quote from in turn stems from her ( :wink: ) doctorate, which was about the Takoradi air route.

The full quote reads thusly:
Deborah Wing Ray wrote:...The first heavy bombers sent to General Douglas MacArthur in the Philippines took off from Sacramento, California, but flew by way of the Takoradi route. During 1942 the trans-African route handled the heaviest transport and ferry traffic of all the air routes in the world. In addition to ferrying hundreds of pursuit planes and bombers to the desert air force, PAAF flew war planes to Russia and India via the route. Pan American Airways-Africa's transports flew beyond Africa to deliver supplies to General Joseph Stillwell's troops and ammunition to the Flying Tigers. They brought back to the United States tons of critical war materials - manganese, copper, tantalite and diamonds - from the Far East and Africa...from page 17/355

Andreas
Member
Posts: 6938
Joined: 10 Nov 2002, 15:12
Location: Europe

#22

Post by Andreas » 20 Jan 2008, 21:34

Lack of bases/infrastructure:B-17 not having the legs across the Pacific once Guam/Wake are taken out?

All the best

Andreas

Jon G.
Member
Posts: 6647
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 02:12
Location: Europe

#23

Post by Jon G. » 21 Jan 2008, 00:42

Wing Ray mentions that the Pan-Am greatly expanded its network of airfields in South America in 1940 at Roosevelt's initiative. WR sees this as preparation for US entry into WW2 although it should be mentioned for completeness' sake that the Pan-Am (which was the only intercontinental US airline at the time) was exchanging its fleet of flying boats with traditional land-based aircraft at the same time.

I am also a bit sceptical about Wing Ray's suggestion that bulky items such as copper, manganese and tantalite were brought to the US by aircraft.

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

#24

Post by phylo_roadking » 21 Jan 2008, 00:51

Wing Ray mentions that the Pan-Am greatly expanded its network of airfields in South America in 1940 at Roosevelt's initiative. WR sees this as preparation for US entry into WW2
This is a novel view; it's traditionally put down to The US not preparing the nuts-and-bolts of war - but actually preparing to squeeze Lufthansa and Lufthansa-owned subsidiaries out of the South American internal airlines business as part of squeezing Brazil out from under its overly-pro-German neutrality and its reliance on a German-managed infrastructure. Many of these overland carriers had long-range services into the US via Central America and landing licenses in the US were withdrawn etc.

Jon G.
Member
Posts: 6647
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 02:12
Location: Europe

#25

Post by Jon G. » 21 Jan 2008, 01:09

Well, these two motives do not rule out one another :) Wing Ray writes that the idea was 'sold' to the public as simple expansion of Pan-Am's network, which coincided nicely with Pan-Am's switch away from flying boats to land based planes. I suppose it does tell us something that the Pan-Am's base network expansion apparently was funded by government money.

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

#26

Post by phylo_roadking » 21 Jan 2008, 01:36

Not necessarily "funded by"...there are several known cases where Pan-Am came under pressure by NACA threatening to withdraw licenses for various lucrative routes...;)...if they didn't visibly do what they were told LOL They didn't necessarily want to compete with Varig etc. in Brazil because of the sheer cost of doing so. What actually happened in the end was under both political pressure from the US and...."subsidizing"...the Brazilian nationalised the Lufthansa subsidiaries and the problem was got round that way rather than Pan-Am having to compete economically. Which would have been hard to do, they lost something like 25% of their air routes and destinations as of December 7th and the months following!
Last edited by phylo_roadking on 21 Jan 2008, 03:15, edited 1 time in total.

Jon G.
Member
Posts: 6647
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 02:12
Location: Europe

#27

Post by Jon G. » 21 Jan 2008, 02:15

Yes. But the Airfield Development Program wasn't concipated for competitive reasons, and it wasn't funded by Pan-Am money. A major reason why Pan-Am was used as an agent, in Africa and elsewhere, was that this was the only way Roosevelt's administration could dodge the strict US neutrality rules. Ownership of the Pan-Am subsidiary tasked with servicing the Takoradi route was a pretty creative construction as a result; the US government sold the Pan-Am Africa subsidiary its first DC-3 for a dollar, then leased it back for another dollar. All in order to avoid US neutrality legislation; commercial interests don't appear to have been part of the process at all.

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

#28

Post by phylo_roadking » 21 Jan 2008, 02:30

In Africa yes, but not in South America as Wing Ray says. There was no financing provided for there, for Washington was already and for several years pursuing the twin-track process of creating an open market for Pan-Am by forcing/persuading/paying the Brazilians to nationalise the Lufthansa subsidiaries as well as pushing Pan-Am to extend. Remember the subsidiary airlines were only internal carriers - by pressuring the Brazilians to nationalise the parent company's assets or withdraw Lufthansa's operating licenses they intended the longhaul international routes up to the States to be left open for Pan-Am to pick up. They were prepared to pay the Brazilians, not Pan-Am AND the Brazilians!

Jon G.
Member
Posts: 6647
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 02:12
Location: Europe

#29

Post by Jon G. » 21 Jan 2008, 02:42

Well, Deborah Wing Ray clearly sees the Takoradi route as but one leg - albeit a very important one - of a world-spanning air network. Post-war commercial intent is probably not difficult to identify, particularly with the benefit of hindsight. Personally I find some of her claims a little controversial - for example the claim that MacArthur's ill-fated B-17s entered the Philippines via the Takoradi route - but I don't have a problem with her overall thesis which presents pre-war US expansion of air route infrastructure as preparation for war.

Here is another excerpt from her paper:
Image

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

#30

Post by phylo_roadking » 21 Jan 2008, 03:12

LOL she shoots herself badly in the foot right in the middle! Pan-Am was "the leading company in commercial aviation in Latin America"??? Not by a long shot; Lufthansa/Varig was carrying something like three times as many passsengers a year IN Latin America, Brazilians were already regarding air transport as being as commonplace as bus routes, a position even North America didn't get to until the early 1950s. If she'd said "INTO Latin America" she'd have been far closer to the mark for they were the biggest carriers FROM the US into South America. She's also generalising greatly about Pan-Am's airfield expansions, mentioning "Latin America" then commenting on the size of Natal LOL In fact, under German pressure Brazil managed to refuse Pan-Am permission to expand facilities until early 1942! And Brazil is a BIG chunk of the western side of the continent... But by doing so while Lufthansa's running of the internal subsidiaries was more than transparent, Brazil in turn left herself more open to more pressure for not being open to commercial competition LOL I read a short memoir of a Lufthansa pilot in Brazil about a year ago; Varig aircraft used Lufthansa cutlery and napkins, Lufthansa brochures, often the same ground and reception staff in Lufthansa uniforms and even the flight crew themselves dressed in Lufthansa uniforms LOL

Post Reply

Return to “WW2 in Africa & the Mediterranean”