Topspeed,
Thank you for presenting the opportunity to clarify this detail.
Indeed the
Isänmaallinen Kansanliike, IKL, or Patriotic People's Movement was very anti-Soviet, but it is hard to call it leftist, as its main enemies really were precisely the Finnish Communists, and the IKL was quite frank in public about the Soviet Union presenting the most serious external threat to Finland. The whole movement actually originated in the province of Ostrobothnia as a reaction to the Communist provocations of the late 1920's-1930's, and many of its leaders were also deeply religious, some of them clergymen. In the Finnish Parliament they were seated to the far right as seen from the Speaker's chair, so in that spectrum and also ideologically they were as far right as you can ever get.
Topspeed wrote:IKL:s leader was Vihtori Kosola and there was a saying: " They have got Mussolini and Hitler and we have Kosola."
They acted like mobsters in Chigago in the 1920's. Took politicians for a ride by force and tried to scare the living daylite out of them.
The IKL was organised hierarchically along the principles of Fascist organizations, and they wore a uniform consisting of a black shirt and a blue tie, their heraldic logo was a warrior with club riding a bear. They run their organization in military style. And indeed, they admired the Italian Fascists as well as the Nazis, and like Mussolini himself wrote in his letter, they even tried to defend Mussolinis's actions politically.
Like you mention, the worst hotheads of the IKL resorted to "direct action" against communists, mugging them and in some cases, "giving them a ride to their ideal state". Automobiles were a rare luxury in the 1930's Finland that few people could afford in the countryside, but some IKL members were wealthy enough to own one and in gangs they would force a prominent communist inside the car, resorting to violence if needed, then drove him to the Eastern Border and sometimes even made sure the victim walked across it. Their utmost provocation was giving a ride to Finland's first President K.J. Ståhlberg (not forcing him to cross the border though), which finally led to legal consequences against the IKL.
Topspeed wrote:I think mixing finnish God fearing Christian- and Kokoomus-parties with them is a mistake. Calling them fascists is pretty close to the truth ( this would mean close to socialists like SDP-party ).
Who is mixing them then? The IKL members were religious enough according to the Ostrobothnian tradition, but if they need a label along the left-right dimension they really were nothing but the extreme right.
You are correct in that there was a clear distinction between the IKL and
Kansallinen Kokoomus, the National Coalition Party (sometimes called the Conservative Party), which remains active to the present day (and I never claimed otherwise!). I think the present-day Coalition Party is shy to call itself a right-wing party, but that's how they are seated in the Parliament.
I disagree about the Social Democrats of either the 1930's or the present day being willingly associated with the IKL in any way.
Topspeed wrote:
IKL and National Guard ( Suojeluskunta ) were banned after the war by allied ( soviets ).
Like you said, the Soviet Union demanded the abolition of both the IKL and the
Suojeluskunta (which I translated as Civil Guard in the article) as Fascist organizations after the WWII.
However, in this post-war context the Soviets mixed pears and apples on purpose: the IKL clearly was a political movement that could be called Fascist, while the
Suojeluskunta (in the second official language Swedish:
Skyddskår; hence the Russian term of a
Suojeluskunta member
"Sydskorist") was an apolitical voluntary organization for national defence, which was organized as a part of the Finnish Defence Forces and would accept all volunteers willing to promote national defence regardless of their political views.
Suojeluskunta had an important role in the mobilization of reserves and territorial readiness, and its "sister organization"
Lotta-Svärd was a womens's organization for national defence.
It served Soviet aims to abolish the voluntary organizations for national defence, which were one of the explanations of the unexpected military efficiency of the Finnish Army in the Winter War and the Continuation War, hence the Fascist label for a pretext to get rid of them, like it actually happened. The property of these organizations was then handed over to Finnish Communists to promote Finland's socialist revolution, like the Civil Guard buildings became "Workers' houses" etc.