This is an apolitical forum for discussions on the Axis nations, as well as the First and Second World Wars in general hosted by Marcus Wendel's Axis History Factbook in cooperation with Michael Miller's Axis Biographical Research, Christoph Awender's WW2 day by day, Dan Reinbold's Das Reich and Christian Ankerstjerne's Panzerworld.

David Thompson wrote:stg44 -- Though I appreciate your opinion, having followed the posts in this thread, I do not find those of Michael Miller either inflammatory or baiting.


Michael Miller wrote:Scott~
Maybe I didn't think that through too well. Meant to counter Einsamer's argument that the Allies were unrestrained in their prosecution, while the "justice system" of the vanquished indeed knew no restraint (death sentences for anti-Hitler jokes, spreading anti-regime leaflets, listening to the BBC, etc.).



Scott Smith wrote:Manstein, as I've said before
the purpose of the Nuremberg trials was less to prosecute warcrimes than to divide the German people from their former leaders so that they would not resent collective War-Guilt imposed by the Victors (as they had after the First World War).
If a poster raises a question about the events, other posters may answer the question with evidence. If a poster stops asking questions and begins to express a point of view, he then becomes an advocate for that viewpoint. When a person becomes an advocate, he has the burden of providing evidence for his point of view. If he has no evidence, or doesn't provide it when asked, it is reasonable for the reader to conclude that his opinion or viewpoint is uninformed and may fairly be discounted or rejected


David Thompson wrote:Scott - Do you have any recommended texts for the reader who wants to look into the issue of whether "the purpose of the Nuremberg trials was less to prosecute warcrimes than to divide the German people from their former leaders so that they would not resent collective War-Guilt imposed by the Victors (as they had after the First World War)?"
CLICK! Advance to Barbarism (IHR reprint 1993).
Perhaps the most devasting of all the revisionist debunking of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg and the other post-WWII trials. Knowledgeable, lucid English attorney F.J.P. Veale does more than skewer the judicial outrages of the trials of the Germans and their allies: he shows that these trials, by demonizing the defeated and glossing over the crimes of the victors, abolished the traditional code that had ruled European warfare for centuries. In a revisionist refresher course on modern history, Veale draws on precedents from Napoleonic wars on to demonstrate the hollowness and hypocrisy of the Allies' judgement of the Germans. The Gulf War, Bosnia, and Kosovo seem validation for this books' prediction, grounded in its author's analysis of the IMT that Nuremburg would make future warfare worse for non-combatants by dividing warring nations into good (us) and evil (them).
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/ ... 63-1010561
Hankey, The Right Hon. Lord Politics, Trials and Errors. Reprint of 1950 ed.
2002 Hankey, The Right Hon. Lord. Politics, Trials and Errors. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, [1950]. xiv, 150 pp. Reprinted 2002 by The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. ISBN 1-58477-228-X. Cloth. * Lord Hankey [1877-1963] served as secretary of the British cabinet during the Second World War. This allowed him the rare opportunity to observe crucial events at the highest political levels, which he describes in this volume. Hankey opposes the Allied policy of unconditional surrender and desire to hold war crime trials, goals that were announced during the middle years of the war. He takes the position that the former encouraged the Axis to take desperate measures to prolong the war, a policy that led to needless destruction and death, and dismisses the latter as empty propaganda that did nothing for the victims and impeded the peace process. [Emphasis added.]
http://www.ilabdatabase.com/member/deta ... r=67460489

Hankey opposes ...
He takes the position

witness wrote:So what ?
There are many of those who "oppose " and "take positions"
Anything to back up this "postion " perhaps ?

Return to Holocaust & 20th Century War Crimes
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests