IMT Indictment: Nazi Suppression of Christian Churches

Discussions on the Holocaust and 20th Century War Crimes. Note that Holocaust denial is not allowed. Hosted by David Thompson.
David Thompson
Forum Staff
Posts: 23724
Joined: 20 Jul 2002, 20:52
Location: USA

IMT Indictment: Nazi Suppression of Christian Churches

#1

Post by David Thompson » 15 Dec 2005, 19:43

This is part 1 of 2:

Chapter VII: Means Used by the Nazi Conspirators in Gaining Control of the German State: 6. Suppression of the Christian Churches, from Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, US Government Printing Office (Washington, DC): 1946. Volume I. pp. 263-296.
A. The Nazi conspirators sought to subvert the influence of the churches over the people of Germany.

(1) They sought to eliminate the Christian Churches in Germany.

(a) Statements of this aim. Martin Bormann stated in a secret decree of the Party Chancellery signed by him and distributed to all Gauleiters 7 June 1941:
"Our National Socialist ideology is far loftier than the concepts of Christianity, which in their essential points have been taken over from Jewry * * *. A differentiation between the various Christian confessions is not to be made here * * * the Evangelical Church is just as inimical to us as the Catholic Church. * * * All influences which might impair or damage the leadership of the people exercised by the Fuehrer with the help of the NSDAP must be eliminated. More and more the people must be separated from the churches and their organs the pastors. * * * Just as the deleterious influences of astrologers, seers and other fakers are eliminated and suppressed by the State, so must the possibility of church influence also be totally removed. * * * Not until this has happened, does the state leadership have influence on the individual citizens. Not until then are the people and Reich secure in their existence for all time." (D-75)

Hans Kerrl, Reich Minister for Church Affairs, in a letter dated 9 June 1939 to a Herr Stapel, which indicated that it would be brought to the attention of the Confidential Council and of the defendant Hess, made the following statements:
"The Fuehrer considers his efforts to bring the Evangelical Church to reason unsuccessful and the Evangelical Church with respect to its condition rightfully a useless pile of sects. As you emphasize the Party has previously carried on not only a fight against the political element of the Christianity of the Church, but also a fight against membership of Party Members in a Christian confession. * * *

"The Catholic Church will and must, according to the law under which it is set up, remain a thorn in the flesh of a Racial State * * *." (129-PS)

Gauleiter Florian, in a letter dated 23 September 1940 to the defendant Hess, stated:
"The churches with their Christianity are the danger against which to fight is absolutely necessary." (064-PS)
Regierungsrat Roth, in a lecture 22 September 1941, to a group of Security Police, in the Reich Main Security Office (RSHA) concluded his address on Security Police (Sipo) measures for combatting church politics and sects with the following remarks:
"The immediate aim: the church must not regain one inch of the ground it has lost. The ultimate aim: Destruction of the Confessional Churches to be brought about by the collection of all material obtained through the intelligence service (Nachrichtendienst) activities which will at a given time be produced as evidence for the charge of treasonable activities during the German fight for existence." (1815-PS)


The Party Organization Book states:
"Bravery is valued by the SS man as the highest virtue of men in a struggle for his ideology.

"He openly and unrelentingly fights the most dangerous enemies of the State; Jews, Free Masons, Jesuits, and political clergymen.

"However, he recruits and convinces the weak and inconstant by his example, who have not been able to bring themselves to the National Socialistic ideology." (1855-PS)
(b) The Nazi conspirators promoted beliefs and practices incompatible with Christian teachings. The 24th point of the Program of the NSDAP, unchanged since its adoption in 1920, is as follows:
"We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the germanic race. The Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity without binding itself confessionally to any one denomination. It combats the Jewish materialistic spirit within and around us, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our nation can only succeed from within on the framework: common utility precedes individual utility." (1708-PS)

In official correspondence with the defendant Rosenberg in 1940, Bormann stated:
"Christian religion and National Socialist doctrines are not compatible. * * * The churches cannot be subjugated through compromise, only through a new philosophy as prophesied in Rosenberg's works."

He then proposed creation of a National Socialist Catechism to provide a "moral foundation" for a National Socialist religion which is gradually to supplant the Christian churches. He stated the matter was so important it should be discussed with members of the Reich Cabinet as soon as possible and requested Rosenberg's opinion before the meeting. (098-PS)

In a secret decree of the Party Chancellery, signed by Bormann and distributed to all Gauleiters on 7 June 1941, the following statements appeared:
"When we National Socialists speak of a belief in God, we do not understand by God, like naive Christians and their spiritual opportunists, a human-type being, who sits around somewhere in the sphere * * *. The force of natural law, with which all these innumerable planets move in the universe, we call the Almighty, or God. The claim that this world force * * * can be influenced by so-called prayers or other astonishing things is based upon a proper dose of naivete or on a business shamelessness.

"As opposed to that we National Socialists impose on ourselves the demand to live naturally as much as possible, i.e., biologically. The more accurately we recognize and observe the laws of nature and of life, the more we adhere to them, so much the more do we conform to the will of the Almighty. The more insight we have into the will of the Almighty, the greater will be our successes." (D-75)

Rosenberg in his book "The Myth of the 20th Century" advocated a new National Socialist faith or religion to replace the Christian confessions in Germany. He stated that the Catholic and Protestant churches represent "negative Christianity" and do not correspond to the soul of the "Nordic racially determined peoples"; that a German religious movement would have to declare that the idea of neighborly love is unconditionally subordinated to national honor; that national honor is the highest human value and does not admit of any equal valued force such as Christian love. He predicted:
"A German religion will, bit by bit, present in the churches transferred to it, in place of the crucifixion the spirit of fire the heroic -- in the highest sense." (2349-PS)

The Reich Labor Service (Reichsarbeitsdienst), a National Socialist youth organization, was prohibited from participating in religious celebrations of any kind, and its members were instructed to attend only the parts of such ceremonies as weddings and funerals which took place before or after the church celebration. (107-PS)

The Nazi conspirators considered religious literature undesirable for the Wehrmacht. National Socialist publications were prepared for the Wehrmacht for the expressed purpose of replacing and counteracting the influence of religious literature disseminated to the troops. (101-PS; 100-PS; 064-PS)

The Nazi conspirators through Rosenberg's Office for Supervision of the Ideological Training and Education of the NSDAP and the Office of the Deputy of the Fuehrer "induced" the substitution of National Socialist mottoes and services for religious prayers and services in the schools of Germany. (070-PS)

On 14 July 1939, Bormann, as Deputy of the Fuehrer, issued a Party regulation excluding clergymen, persons closely connected with the church, and Theology students from membership in the Party. It was further decreed that in the future Party Members who entered the clergy or turned to the study of Theology must leave the Party. (840-PS)

(c) The Nazi conspirators persecuted priests, clergy and members of monastic orders. The priests and clergy of Germany were subjected by the police to systematic espionage into their daily lives. The Nazi conspirators through the Chief of the Reich Main Security Office (RSHA) maintained a special branch of the Security Police and Security Service (Sipo/SD) whose duties were to investigate the churches and maintain constant surveillance upon the public and private lives of the clergy. (1815-PS)

At a conference of these police "church specialists" called by Heydrich, who was then SS Gruppenfuehrer and Chief of the Reich Main Security Office (RSHA), in Berlin, 23 September 1941, SS Sturmbannfueherer Hartl, acting for Heydrich, stated that the greatest importance was to be attached to church political activity. The intelligence network in this field, he continued, was to be fostered with the greatest of care and enlarged with the recruitment of informants, particular value being attached to contacts with church circles. He closed his lecture with the following words:
"Each of you must go to work with your whole heart and a true fanaticism. Should a mistake or two be made in the execution of this work, this should in no way discourage you, since mistakes are made everywhere. The main thing is that the enemy should be constantly tackled with determination, will, and effective initiative." (1815-PS)

In a letter of 22 October 1941, Heydrich, as Chief of the Reich Main Security Office (RSHA) issued detailed instructions to all State Police Offices outlining the organization of the Catholic Church and directing close surveillance of the activities, writings, and reports of the Catholic clergy in Germany. In this connection he directed:
"Reports are also to be submitted on those Theological students destined for Papal Institutes, and Priests returning from such institutes to Germany. Should the opportunity arise of placing someone for intelligence (Nachrichtendienst) purposes in one of these Institutes, in the guise of a Theological student, we should receive immediate notification." (1815-PS)

Priests and other members of the clergy were arrested, fined, imprisoned, and otherwise punished by executive measures of the police without judicial process. In his lecture before a conference at the Reich Main Security Office (RSHA) in Berlin, for "church specialists," of the Security Police, 22 November 1941, Regierungsrat Roth stated (1815-PS):
"It has been demonstrated that it is impracticable to deal with political offenses (malicious) under normal legal procedure. Owing to the lack of political perception which still prevails among the legal authorities, suspension of this procedure must be reckoned with. The so-called "Agitator Priests" must therefore be dealt with in future by Stapo measures, and, if the occasion arises, be removed to a Concentration Camp, if agreed upon by the RSHA.

"The necessary executive measures are to be decided upon according to local conditions, the status of the person accused, and the seriousness of the case -- as follows:

1. Warning
2. Fine
3. Forbidden to preach
4. Forbidden to remain in parish
5. Forbidden all activity as a priest
6. Short-term arrest
7. Protective custody."
Members of monastic orders were forced by the seizure and confiscation of their properties to give up their established place of abode and seek homes elsewhere (R-101-A; R-101-D). A secret order of the SS Economic Administration Office to all Concentration Camp Commanders, dated 21 April 1942, concerning labor mobilization of clergy, reveals that clergymen were at that time, and had previously been, incarcerated in Concentration Camps. (1164-PS)

On the death of von Hindenburg, the Reich Government ordered the ringing of all church bells on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th August 1934. In Bavaria, there were many instances of failure to comply with this order. The Bavarian police submitted a report outlining the above situation and stating that in three cases the taking into protective custody of recalcitrant clergy could not be avoided.
"The Parish priest, Father Johann Quinger of Altenkunstadt BA., Lichtenfels. He was taken into protective custody on 3 August on the express order of the State Ministry of the Interior, because he assaulted SA leaders and SA men who were ringing the bells against his wishes. He was released from custody on 10 August 1934.

"The Parish priest, Father Ludwig Obholzer of Kiefersfelden, BA Rosenheim. For his personal safety he was in police custody from 2400 hours on the 2 August 1934, till 1000 hours on 3 August 1934. On 5 August 1934, he said sarcastically in his sermon, referring to the SA men who had carried out the ringing of the funeral knell on their own account, 'Lord forgive them, for they know not what they do' ! "The Parish priest, Father Johann Nepomuk Kleber of Wiefelsdorf, BA Burglengenfeld, refused to ring the church bells on the 2nd and 3rd. He is badly tainted politically and had to be taken into protective custody from the 5th to the 8th of August 34 in the interests of his own safety." (1521-PS)


After Hitler's rise to power, Bishop Sproll of Rottenburg delivered a series of sermons regarded by the Nazis as damaging, and on 10 April 1938 he refrained from voting in the plebiscite. For this, the Reich Governor of Wuertemberg declared he would no longer regard Bishop Sproll as head of the Diocese of Rottenburg; made an official request that he leave the Gau; and declared he would see to it that all personal and official intercourse between the Bishop and the State and Party offices as well as the Armed Forces would be denied (849-PS). For his alleged failure to vote in the plebiscite, of 10 April 1938, the Party caused three demonstrations to be staged against the Bishop and his household in Rottenburg. The third demonstration was described as follows in a teletype message from Gestapo Office Stuttgart to Gestapo Office Berlin:
"The Party on 23 July 1938 from 2100 on carried out the third demonstration against Bishop Sproll. Participants about 2,500-3,000 were brought in from outside by bus, etc. The Rottenburg populace again did not participate in the demonstration. The town took rather a hostile attitude to the demonstrations. The action got completely out of hand of the Party Member responsible for it. The demonstrators stormed the palace, beat in the gates and doors. About 150 to 200 people forced their way into the palace, searched the rooms, threw files out of the windows and rummaged through the beds in the rooms of the palace. One bed was ignited. Before the fire got to the other objects of equipment in the rooms and the palace, the flaming bed could be thrown from the window and the fire extinguished. The Bishop was with Archbishop Groeber of Freiburg and the ladies and gentlemen of his menage in the chapel at prayer. About 25 to 30 people pressed into this chapel and molested those present. Bishop Groeber was taken for Bishop Sproll. He was grabbed by the robe and dragged back and forth. Finally the intruders realized that Bishop Groeber is not the one they are seeking. They could then be persuaded to leave the building. After the evacuation of the palace by the demonstrators I had an interview with Archbishop Groeber, who left Rottenburg in the night. Groeber wants to turn to the Fuehrer and Reich Minister of the Interior Dr. Frick anew. On the course of the action, the damage done as well as the homage of the Rottenburg populace beginning today for the Bishop I shall immediately hand in a full report, after I am in the act of suppressing counter mass meetings." (848-PS)

Reich Minister for Church Affairs Kerrl and other Party officials alleged that these demonstrations were spontaneously staged by indignant citizens of Rottenburg and caused representations to be made to the Holy See in an effort to effect the Bishop's removal from office. (89-PS)

On or about 3 December 1941, a copy of a secret decree of the Party Chancellery on the subject of Relationship of National Socialism to Christianity was found by the Security Police in the possession of Protestant Priest Eichholz at Aix-la-Chapelle. For this he was arrested and held for questioning for an unknown period of time. (D-75)

(d) The Nazi conspirators confiscated church property. On 20 January 1938, the Gestapo District Office at Munich issued a decree dissolving the Guild of the Virgin Mary of the Bavarian Diocese, together with its branches and associations. The decree also stated:
"The property belonging to the dissolved Guild is to be confiscated by the police. Not only is property in cash to be confiscated, but also any stock on hand and their objects of value. All further activity is forbidden the dissolved Guilds, particularly the foundation of any organization intended as a successor or as a cover. Incorporation as a body into other women's societies is also to be looked on as a forbidden continuation of activity. Infringements against the above prohibition will be punished according to par. 4 of the order of 28 February 1933."

The reasons for the dissolution and confiscation were that the Guild of the Virgin Mary had occupied itself for years "to a most far-reaching degree" with arrangements of a "worldly and popular sporting character" such as community games and "social evenings"; and further that the president of the society supplied the members with "seditious materials" which served for "seditious discussions"; and that the members of the Guild were trained and mobilized for "political and seditious tasks." (1481-PS)

In a lecture delivered to a conference of police investigators of Church Affairs assembled in the lecture hall of the Reich Main Security Office (RSHA) in Berlin, 22 September 1941, Regiersrungsrat Roth stated that about 100 monasteries in the Reich had been dissolved and pointed out that the proper procedure called for seizure of the churches at the same time the monasteries were dissolved. (1815-PS)

In February 1940, SS Gruppenfuehrer Heydrich suggested to Himmler the seizure of monasteries for the accommodation of Racial Germans. He proposed that the authorities of the monastic orders be instructed to make the monasteries concerned available and move their own members to less populous monasteries. He pointed out that the final expropriation of properties thus placed at their disposal could be carried out step by step in the course of time. Himmler agreed to this proposal and ordered the measure to be carried out by the Security Police and Security Service (Sipo and SD) in collaboration with the Reich Commissioner for Consolidation of German Folkdom. (R-101-A)

These orders for confiscation were carried out, as revealed in a letter dated 30 March 1942 from the Reich Main Security Office (RSHA) Chief of Staff to Himmler mentioning claims for compensation pending in a number of confiscation cases. In this letter he stated that all rental payments to those monasteries and ecclesiastical institutions whose premises had been put to use as camps for resettlers had been stopped on receipt of Himmler's order. Concerning current developments, he stated:
"After further preparations in which the Party Chancellery participated prominently, the Reich Minister of the Interior found a way which makes it possible to seize ecclesiastical premises practically without compensation and yet avoids the impression of being a measure directed against the Church. * * *" (R-101-D)

In a letter of 19 April 1941, Bormann advised Rosenberg that libraries and art objects of the monasteries confiscated in the Reich were to remain for the time being in these monasteries and that the Fuehrer had repeatedly rejected the suggestion that centralization of all such libraries be undertaken. (072-PS)

(e) The Nazi conspirators suppressed religious publications. On 6 November 1934, Frick, as Reich and Prussian Minister of the Interior, issued an order forbidding until further notice publication of all announcements in the daily press, in pamphlets and other publications, which dealt with the Evangelical Church; with the exception of official announcements of the Church Government of the Reich. (1498-PS)

By order of the State Police for the District of Dusseldorf, the Police Regulation which is quoted in part below was promulgated 28 May 1934:
"The distribution and sale of published items of any sort in connection with worship or religious instructions in public streets or squares near churches is forbidden. In the same sense the distribution and sale of published items on the occasions of processions, pilgrimages and similar church institutions in the streets or squares they pass through or in their vicinity is prohibited." (R-145)

In January 1940, Bormann informed Rosenberg that he had sought to restrict production of religious publications by means of having their rations of printing paper cut down through the control exercised by Reichsleiter Amann, but that the result of these efforts remained unsatisfactory. (101-PS)

In March 1940, Bormann instructed Reichsleiter Amann, Director of the NSDAP Publications Office, that in any future redistribution of paper, confessional writings should receive still sharper restrictions in favor of literature politically and ideologically more valuable. He went on to point out:
" * * * according to a report I have received, only 10 of the over 3000 Protestant periodicals appearing in Germany, such as Sunday papers, etc. have ceased publication for reasons of paper saving." (089-PS)

In April 1940, Bormann informed the High Command of the Navy that use of the term "Divine Service" to refer exclusively to the services arranged by Christian Confessions was no longer to be used, even in National Socialist daily papers. In the alternative he suggested:
"In the opinion of the Party the term 'Church Service' cannot be objected to. I consider it fitting since it properly implies meetings arranged and organized by the Churches." (068-PS)

(f) The Nazi conspirators suppressed religious organizations. On 28 May 1934, the State Police Office for the District of Duesseldorf issued an order concerning denominational youth and professional organizations which stated in part as follows:
"Denominational youth and professional organizations as well as those created for special occasions only are prohibited from every public activity outside the church and religious sphere.

"Especially forbidden is: Any public appearance in groups, all sorts of political activity. Any public sport function including public hikes and establishment of holiday or outdoor camps. The public display or showing of flags, banners, pennants or the open wearing of uniforms or insignia." (R-145)

On 20 July 1935, Frick, as Reich and Prussian Minister of the Interior, issued secret instructions to the provincial governments and to the Prussian Gestapo that Confessional youth organizations were to be forbidden to wear uniforms, or uniform-like clothing, to assemble publicly with pennants and flags, to wear insignia as a substitute for uniforms, or to engage in any outdoor sport activity.

On 20 January 1938 the Gestapo District Office at Munich, issued a decree which stated in part as follows:
"The Guild of the Virgin Mary (de Marianisch Jungfrauenkongregation) of the Bavarian dioceses, including the diocese of Speyere, together with its branches and associations and the Societies of Our Lady (Jungfrauenvereinen) attached to it, is by police order to be dissolved and forbidden with immediate effect."

Among the reasons cited for this action were the following:
"The whole behavior of the Guild of the Virgin Mary had therefore to be objected to from various points of view. It could be repeatedly observed that the Guild engaged in purely worldly affairs, such as community games, and then in the holding of 'Social Evenings'.

"This proves incontestably that the Guild of the Virgin Mary was active to a very great degree in a manner unecclesiastical and therefore worldly. By so doing it-has left the sphere of its proper religious task and entered a sphere of activity to which it has no statutory right. The organization has therefore to be dissolved and forbidden." (1481-PS)


According to the report of a Security Police "church specialist" attached to the State Police Office at Aachen, the following points were made by a lecturer at a conference of Security Police and Security Service church intelligence investigators in Berlin, on 22 September 1941:
"Retreats, recreational organizations, etc., may now be forbidden on ground of industrial war-needs, whereas formerly only a worldly activity could be given as a basis.

"Youth camps, recreational camps are to be forbidden on principle, church organizations in the evening may be pre vented on grounds of the blackout regulations.

"Processions, pilgrimages abroad are to be forbidden by reason of the over-burdened transport conditions. For local events too technical traffic troubles and the danger of air attack may serve as grounds for their prohibition. (One Referent forbade a procession, on the grounds of it wearing out shoe leather)." (1815-PS)

(g) The Nazi conspirators suppressed religious education. In a speech on 7 March 1937, Rosenberg stated:
"The education of youth can only be carried out by those who have rescued Germany from disaster. It is therefore impossible to demand one Fuehrer, one Reich and one firmly united people as long as education is carried out by forces which are mutually exclusive to each other." (2351-PS)
In a speech at Fulda, 27 November 1937 Reich Minister for Church Affairs Hans Kerrl stated:
"We cannot recognize that the Church has a right to insure that the individual should be educated in all respects in the way in which it holds to be right; but we must leave it to the National Socialist State to educate the child in the way it regards as right." (252-PS)
In January 1939, Bormann, acting as Deputy of the Fuehrer, informed the Minister of Education, that the Party was taking the position that theological inquiry was not as valuable as the general fields of knowledge in the universities and that suppression of Theological Faculties in the universities was to be undertaken at once. He pointed out that the Concordat with the Vatican placed certain limitations on such a program, but that in the light of the general change of circumstances, particularly the compulsory military service and the execution of the four-year plan, the question of manpower made certain reorganizations, economies and simplification necessary. Therefore, Theological Faculties were to be restricted insofar as they could not be wholly suppressed. He instructed that the churches were not to be informed of this development and no public announcement was to be made. Any complaints, if they were to be replied to at all, should be answered with a statement that these measures are being executed in a general plan of reorganization and that similar things are happening to other faculties. He concludes with the statement that the professorial chairs vacated by the above program are to be turned over to the newly created fields of inquiry, such as Racial Research. (116-PS)

A plan for the reduction of Theological Faculties was submitted by the Reich Minister for Science, Education and Training in April 1939 to Bormann, who forwarded it to Rosenberg for consideration and action. The plan called for shifting, combining and eliminating Theological Faculties in various schools and universities throughout the Reich, with the following results:
"To recapitulate this plan would include the complete closing of Theological Faculties at Innsbruck, Salzburg and Munich, the transfer of the faculty of Graz to Vienna and the vanishing of four Catholic faculties.

"a. Closing of three Catholic Theological Faculties or Higher Schools and of four Evangelic Faculties in the winter semester 1939/40.

"b. Closing of one further Catholic and of three-further Evangelic Faculties in the near future." (122-PS)

In a secret decree of the Party Chancellery, signed by Bormann, and distributed to all Gauleiters on 7 June 1941, the following statement concerning religious education was made:
"No human being would know anything of Christianity if it had not been drilled into him in his childhood by pastors. The so-called dear God in no wise gives knowledge of his existence to young people in advance, but in an astonishing manner in spite of his omnipotence leaves this to the efforts of the pastors. If therefore in the future our youth learns nothing more of this Christianity, whose doctrines are far below ours, Christianity will disappear by itself." (D-75)

(2) Supplementary evidence of acts of oppression within Germany. In laying the groundwork for their attempted subversion of the Church, the Nazi conspirators resorted to assurances of peaceful intentions. Thus Hitler, in his address to the Reichstag on 23 March 1933 declared:
"While the government is determined to carry through the political and moral purging of our public life, it is creating and insuring prerequisites for a truly religious life. The government sees in both Christian confessions the factors most important for the maintenance of our Folkdom. It will respect agreements concluded between them and the states. However, it expects that its work will meet with a similar appreciation. The government will treat all other denominations with equal objective justice. However, it can never condone that belonging to a certain denomination or to a certain race might be regarded as a license to commit or tolerate crimes. The Government will devote its care to the sincere living together of Church and State." (3387-PS)

(a) Against the Evangelical Churches. The Nazi conspirators, upon their accession to power, passed a number of laws, under innocent-sounding titles, designed to reduce the Evangelical Churches to the status of an obedient instrument of Nazi policy. The following are illustrative:

Document Number: 3433-PS; Date 4 July 1933; Reichsgesetzblatt-Page: I.471; Title and Gist of Law: Gesetz ueber die Verfassung der Deutschen Evanelischen Kirche (Law concerning the Constitution of the German Evangelical Church), establishing among other things the new post of Reich Bishop.; Signed by Hitler, Frick.

Document Number: 3434-PS; Date 26 June 1935; Reichsgesetzblatt-Page: I.774; Title and Gist of Law: Gesetz ueber das Beschlussverfahren in Rechtsangelegenheiten der Evangelisschen Kirche (Law concerning procedure for decisions in legal affairs of the Evangelical Church), giving the Reich Ministry of the Interior sole authority to determine the validity of measures taken in the Churches since 5/1/1933, when raised in a civil lawsuit.; Signed by: Hitler, Frick.

Document Number: 3435-PS; Date: 3 July 1935; Reichsgesetzblatt-Page: I.851; Title and Gist of Law: Erste Verordnung zur Durchfuehrung des Gesetzes ueber das Reschluss-verfahren in Rechtsangelegenheiten der Evangelischen Kirche (First Ordinance for Execution of the Law concerning procedure for decisions in legal affairs of the Evangelical Church), setting up detailed organization and procedures under the law of 21 June 1935.; Signed by: Frick.

Document Number: 3466-PS; Date: 16 July 1935; Reichsgesetzblatt-Page: I.1029; Title and Gist of Law: Erlass ueber die Zusammen fassung der Zustaendigkeiten des Reichs und Preussens in Kirchenangelegenheiten (Decree to unite the competences of Reich and Prussia in Church affairs) transferring to Kerrl, Minister without Portfolio, the church affairs previously handled by Reich and Prussian Ministers of the Interior and of Science, Education, and Training.; Signed by: Hitler, Rust, Koerner.

Document Number: 3436-PS; Date: 24 September 1935; Reichsgesetzblatt-Page: I.1178; Title and Gist of Law: Gesetz zur Sicherung der Deutschen Evangelischen Kirche (Law for the Safeguarding of the German Evangelical Church) empowering the Reich Minister of Church Affairs (Kerrl) to issue Ordinances with binding legal force.; Signed by:
Hitler, Frick.

Document Number: 3437-PS; Date 2 December 1935; Reichsgesetzblatt-Page: I.1370; Title and Gist of Law: Fuenfte Verordnung Zur Durchfuehrung des Gesetzes zur Sicherung der Deutschen Evangelischen Kirche (Fifth decree for execution of the law for the Safeguarding of the German Evangelical Church) prohibiting the churches from filling their pastorates, ordaining ministers, visitation, publishing of banns, and collecting dues and assessments.; Signed by: Kerrl.

Document Number: 3439-PS; Date 25 June 1937; Reichsgesetzblatt-Page: I.697; Title and Gist of Law: Fuenfzehnte Verordnung zur Durchfuehrung des Gesetzes zur Sicherung der Deutschen Evangelischen Kirche (Fifteenth decree for the Execution of the Law for Security of the German Evangelical Church) establishing in the Reich Ministry for Church Affairs a Finance Department, to supervise administration of the church property budget, tax assessment, and use of budget funds.; Signed by: Kerrl

With the help of their Reich Bishop, Bishop Mueller, they maneuvered the Evangelical Youth Association into the Hitler Jugend under Von Schirach in December 1933. (1458-PS)

They arrested prominent Protestant leaders such as Pastor Niemoeller. By 1937, the result of all these measures was complete administrative control by the Nazi conspirators over the Evangelical churches.

David Thompson
Forum Staff
Posts: 23724
Joined: 20 Jul 2002, 20:52
Location: USA

#2

Post by David Thompson » 15 Dec 2005, 20:11

Part 2 (final):
(b) Against the Catholic Church. Just as in their program against the Evangelical Churches, so in their attack on the Catholic Church, the Nazi conspirators concealed their real intentions under a cloak of apparent respect for its rights and protection of its activities. On 20 July 1933, a Concordat was concluded between the Holy See and the German Reich, signed for the Reich by Von Papen (280-A-PS). It was the Nazi Government, not the Church, which initiated the negotiations.
"The German Government asked the Holy See to conclude a Concordat with the Reich." (268-PS)

By Article I of the Concordat,
"The German Reich guarantees freedom of profession and public practice of the Catholic religion.

"It acknowledges the right of the Catholic Church, within the limit of those laws which are applicable to all, to manage and regulate her own affairs independently, and, within the framework of her own competence, to publish laws and ordinances binding on her members." (3280-A-PS)

Other articles formulated agreements on basic principles such as free communication between Rome and the local ecclesiastical authorities, freedom of the Catholic press, of Catholic education and of Catholic action in charitable, professional, and youth organizations. In return, the Vatican pledged loyalty by the clergy to the Reich Government and emphasis in religious instruction on the patriotic duties of the Christian citizen. (3280-A-PS)

In reliance upon assurances by the Nazi conspirators, the Catholic hierarchy had already revoked their previous prohibition against Catholics becoming members of the Nazi Party (389 PS). The Catholic Center Party, under a combination of Nazi pressure and assurances, published on 29 December 1933, an announcement of its dissolution (2403-PS).

Thus the Catholics went a long way to disarm themselves and cooperate with the Nazis. Nevertheless, the Nazi conspirators continued to develop their policy of slow strangulation of religion, first in covert, and then in open, violation of their assurances and agreements.

In the Encyclical "Mit Brennender Sorge", on 14 March 1937, Pope Pius XI described the program:
"It discloses intrigues which from the beginning had no other aim than a war of extermination. In the furrows in which we had labored to sow the seeds of true peace, others like the enemy in Holy Scripture (Matt. xiii, 25) sowed the tares of suspicion, discord, hatred, calumny of secret and open fundamental hostility to Christ and His Church, fed from a thousand different sources and making use of every available means. On them and on them alone and on their silent and vocal protectors rests the responsibility that now on the horizon of Germany there is to be seen not the rainbow of peace but the threatening storm clouds of destructive religious wars. * * * Anyone who has any sense of truth left in his mind and even a shadow of the feeling of justice left in his heart will have to admit that, in the difficult and eventful years which followed the Concordat, every word and every action of Ours was ruled by loyalty to the terms of the agreement; but also he will have to recognize with surprise and deep disgust that the unwritten law of the other party has been arbitrary misinterpretation of agreements, evasion of agreements, evacuation of the meaning of agreements, and finally more or less open violation of agreements." (3280-PS)
The Nazis suppressed the Catholic Youth League, beginning ten days after the concordat was signed. (See Section 8, infra.)

On 18 January 1942, in declining to accede to a demand made by the German Government that no further appointment of Archbishops, Bishops, and other high administrative dignitaries be made in the new territories of the Reich, or of certain of them within the old Reich, without previous consultation with the German Government (3261-PS), the Secretary of State of Pope Pius XII pointed to measures taken by the German Government, "Contrary not only to the existing Concordats and to the principles of international law ratified by the Second Hague conference, but often -- and this is much more grave -- to the very fundamental principles of divine law, both natural and positive."

The Papal Secretary of State continued:
"Let it suffice to recall in this connection, among other things, the changing of the Catholic State elementary schools into undenominational schools; the permanent or temporary closing of many minor seminaries, of not a few major seminaries and of some theological faculties; the suppression of almost all the private schools and of numerous Catholic boarding schools and colleges; the repudiation, decided unilaterally, of financial obligations which the State, Municipalities etc. had towards the Church; the increasing difficulties put in the way of the activity of the religious Orders and Congregations in the spiritual, cultural and social field and above all the suppression of Abbeys, monasteries, convents and religious houses in such great numbers that one is led to infer a deliberate intention of rendering impossible the very existence of the Orders and Congregations in Germany.

"Similar and even graver acts must be deplored in the annexed and occupied territories, especially in the Polish territories and particularly in the Reichsgau Wartheland, for which the Reich Superintendent - has issued, under date of September 13th last, a 'Decree concerning Religious Associations and Religious Societies' (Verordnung uber Religioese Vereinigungen und Religion-gesellschaften) in clear opposition to the fundamental principles of the divine constitution of the Church." (3261-PS)
Illustrative of the numerous other cases and specific incidents which might be adduced as the program of suppression was carried into action within Germany proper, are the measures adopted beginning in 1936 to eliminate the priest Rupert Mayer of Munich. Because of his sermons, he was confined in various prisons, arrested and rearrested, interned in Oranienburg-Sachsenhausen concentration camp, and the Ettal Monastery, from which he was released by Allied troops in May 1945, and later died. (372-PS)

(c) Against other religious groups.

Members of the sect known as "Bibelforscher" -- meaning "Members of a Biblical Society" or "Bible-Researchers" -- were as early as 1937 sent as a routine matter to concentration camps by the Gestapo, even after serving of a sentence imposed by a court or after the cancellation of an arrest order (D-84). At one camp alone -- Dachau -- there were over 150 "Bibelforscher" in protective custody in 1937. (2928-PS)

B. Acts of suppression of the Christian Churches in Annexed and Occupied Territories.

(1) In Austria. The methods of suppression of churches followed in Austria by the occupying power began with measures to exclude the Church from public activities, such as processions, printing of newspapers and Reviews which could spread Christian doctrines; from forming Youth organizations, such as Boy Scouts; from directing educational or charitable activities; and even from extending help in the form of food to foreigners. Unable in conscience to obey the public prescription, ministers of religions were arrested and sent to concentration camps, and some were executed. Churches were closed, convents and monasteries suppressed, and educational property confiscated. The total number of confiscations, suppressions, or alienations of religious institutions exceeded 100 cases in one diocese alone. (3278-PS)

The Lutheran Church in Austria, though comprising a small minority of the population, was subjected to organized oppression. Its educational efforts were obstructed or banned. Believers were encouraged, and sometimes intimidated, to repudiate their faith. Lutheran pastors were given to understand that a government position would be awarded to each one who would renounce his ministry and if possible withdraw from the Lutheran Church. (3273-PS)

In summation of the period of Nazi domination and in review of the attempted suppression of the Christian Church, the Archbishops and Bishops of Austria in their first joint Pastoral after liberation declared:
"At an end also is an intellectual battle, the goal of which was the destruction of Christianity and the Church among our people; a campaign of lies and treachery against truth and love, against divine and human rights and against international law." (3274-PS)

(2) In Czechoslovakia. The Czechoslovak Official Report for the prosecution and trial of the German Major War Criminals by the International Military Tribunal established according to the Agreement of the Four Great Powers of 8 August 1945 describes in summary form the measures taken by the Nazi conspirators to suppress religious liberties and persecute the churches. The following excerpts are quoted from this report (998-PS):
"(a) Catholic Church.

"* * * At the outbreak of war, 487 Catholic priests were among the thousands of Czech patriots arrested and sent to concentration camps as hostages. Venerable high ecclesiastical dignitaries were dragged to concentration camps in Germany. * * * Religious orders were dissolved and liquidated, their charitable institutions closed down and their members expelled or else forced to compulsory labor in Germany. All religious instruction in Czech schools was suppressed. Most of the weeklies and monthlies which the Catholics had published in Czechoslovakia, had been suppressed from the very beginning of the occupation. The Catholic gymnastic organization "Orel" with 800,000 members was dissolved and its Property was confiscated. To a great extent Catholic church property was seized for the benefit of the Reich.

"(b) Czechoslovak National Church.

"* * * The Czechoslovak Church in Slovakia was entirely prohibited and its property confiscated under German compulsion in 1940. It has been allowed to exist in Bohemia and Moravia but in a crippled form under the name of the Czecho-Moravian Church. "

(c) Protestant Churches. "The Protestant Churches were deprived of the freedom to preach the gospel.

German secret state police watched closely whether the clergy observed the restrictions imposed on it. * * * Some passages from the Bible were not allowed to be read in public at all. * * *

"* * Church leaders were especially persecuted, scores of ministers were imprisoned in concentration camps, among them the General Secretary of the Students' Christian Movement in Czechoslovakia. One of the Vice-Presidents was executed.

"Protestant Institutions such as the YMCA and YWCA were suppressed throughout the country.

"The leading Theological School for all Evangelical denominations, HUS Faculty in Prague and all other Protestant training schools for the ministry were closed down in November 1939, with the other Czech universities and colleges."

(d) Czech Orthodox Church.

"The hardest blow was directed against the Czech Orthodox Church. The Orthodox churches in Czechoslovakia were ordered by the Berlin Ministry of Church Affairs to leave the Pontificate of Belgrade and Constantinople respectively and to become subordinate to the Berlin Bishop. The Czech Bishop Gorazd was executed together with two other priests of the Orthodox Church. By a special order of the Protector Daluege, issued in September 1942, the Orthodox Church of Serbian Constantinople jurisdiction was completely dissolved in the Czech lands, its religious activity forbidden and its property

"All Evangelical education was handed over to the civil authorities and many Evangelical teachers lost their employment; moreover the State grant to salaries of many Evangelical priests was taken away." (998-PS)

(3) In Poland. The repressive measures levelled against the Christian Church in Poland where Hans Frank was Governor General from 1939 to 1945, were even more drastic and sweeping. In protest against the systematic strangulation of religion, the Vatican, on 8 October 1942, addressed a memorandum to the German Embassy accredited to the Holy See in which the Secretariat of State emphasized the fact that despite previous protests to the Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Reich, von Ribbentrop, the religious condition of the Catholics in the Warthegau "has become even sadder and more tragic." This memorandum states:
"For quite a long time the religious situation in the Warthegau gives cause for very grave and ever increasing anxiety. There, in fact, the Episcopate has been little by little almost completely eliminated; the secular and regular clergy have been reduced to proportions that are absolutely inadequate, because they have been in large part deported and exiled; the education of clerics has been forbidden; the Catholic education of youth is meeting with the greatest opposition; the nuns have been dispersed; insurmountable obstacles have been put in the way of affording people the helps of religions; very many churches have been closed; Catholic intellectual and charitable institutions have been destroyed; ecclesiastical property has been seized." (3263-PS)
On 18 November 1942 the Papal Secretary of State requested the Archbishop of Breslau, Cardinal Bertram, to use every effort to assist Polish Catholic workers transferred to Germany, who were being deprived of the consolations of religion. In addition, he again appealed for help for the Polish priests detained in various concentration camps, whose death rate was "still on the increase." (3265-PS). On 7 December 1942 the Cardinal Archbishop of Breslau replied that all possible efforts were being put forward by the German Bishops without success on behalf of the victims of concentration camps and labor battalions, and deplored "the intolerable decrees" against religious ministration to Poles. (3266-PS)

On 2 March 1943, the Cardinal Secretary of State addressed a note to von Ribbentrop, Reichsminister for Foreign Affairs, in which the violations of religious rights and conscience among the civilian population of Poland were set out in detail, and the time, locality, and character of the persecutions were specified. Priests and Ecclesiastics were still being arrested, thrust into concentration camps, and treated with scorn and derision, while many had been summarily executed. Religious instruction was hampered; Catholic schools were closed; the use of the Polish language in sacred functions and even in the Sacrament of Penance was forbidden. Even the natural right of marriage was denied to men of Polish nationality under 28 years of age to women under 25. In the territory called "General Government" similar conditions existed and against these the Holy See vigorously protested. To save the harassed and persecuted leaders of the Catholic Church, the Vatican had petitioned that they be allowed to emigrate to neutral countries of Europe or America. The only concession made was that they would all be collected in one concentration camp -- Dachau. (3264-PS)

The Nazi conspirators adopted a dilatory and obstructionist policy toward complaints as to religious affairs in the overrun territories, and a decision was "taken by those competent to do so. * * * that no further consideration will be taken of proposals or requests concerning the territories which do not belong to the Old Reich." (3262-PS)

"Those competent" to make decisions on complaints as to religious affairs in the overrun territories- especially the Party Chancery, headed by Bormann -- the methods they used, and the reasons for their attitude are outlined by the Cardinal Archbishop of Breslau, a German living in Germany, in a letter to the Papal Secretary of State on 7 December 1942 as follows:
"Your Eminence knows very well the greatest difficulty in the way of opening negotiations comes from the overruling authority which the "National Socialist Party Chancery" (Kanzlei der Nazional-sozialistischen Partei, known as the Partei-Kanzlei) exercises in relation to the Chancery of the Reich (Reichskanzlei) and to the single Reich Ministries. This 'Parteikanzlei' directs the course to be followed by the State, whereas the Ministries and the Chancery of the Reich are obliged and compelled to adjust their decrees to these directions. Besides, there is the fact that the "Supreme Office for the Security of the Reich" called the 'Reichsscherheitshauptamt' enjoys an authority which precludes all legal action and all appeals. Under it are the 'Secret Offices for Public Security' called 'Geheime Staatspolizei' (a title shortened usually to Gestapo) of which there is one for each Province. Against the decrees of this Central Office (Reichsscherheitshauptamt) and of the Secret Offices (Geheime Staatspolizei) there is no appeal through the Courts, and no complaint made to the Ministries has any effect. Not infrequently the Councillors of the Ministries suggest that they have not been able to do as they would wish to, because of the opposition of these Party offices. As far as the executive power is concerned, the organization called the SS, that is Schutzstaffeln der Partei, is in practice supreme.

"This hastily sketched interrelation of authorities is the reason why many of the petitions and protests made by the Bishops to the Ministries have been foiled. Even if we present our complaints to the so-called Supreme Security Office, there is rarely any reply; and when there is, it is negative.

"On a number of very grave and fundamental issues we have also presented our complaints to the Supreme Leader of the Reich (Fuehrer). Either no answer is given, or it is apparently edited by the above-mentioned Party Chancery, which does not consider itself bound by the Concordat made with the Holy See." (3266-PS)

The interchange of correspondence following the transmission of the above-described note of 2 March 1943 on the religious situation in the overrun Polish Provinces illustrates the same evasive tactics. (3269-PS)

In his Allocution to the Sacred College, on 2 June 1945, His Holiness Pope Pius XII recalled, byway of example, "some details from the abundant accounts which have reached us from priests and laymen who were interned in the concentration camp at Dachau":
"In the forefront, for the number and harshness of the treatment meted out to them, are the Polish priests. From 1940 to 1945, 2,800 Polish ecclesiastics and religious were imprisoned in that camp; among them was the Auxiliary bishop of Wloclawek, who died there of typhus. In April last there were left only 816, all the others being dead except for two or three transferred to another camp. In the summer of 1942, 480 German-speaking ministers of religion were known to be gathered there; of these, 45 were Protestants, all the others Catholic priests. In spite of the continuous inflow of new internees, especially from some dioceses of Bavaria, Rhenania and Westphalia, their number, as a result of the high rate of mortality, at the beginning of this year, did not surpass 350. Nor should we pass over in silence these belonging to occupied territories, Holland, Belgium, France (among whom the Bishop of Clermont), Luxembourg, Slovenia, Italy. Many of those priests and laymen endured indescribable sufferings for their faith and for their vocation. In one case the hatred of the impious against Christ reached the point of parodying on the person of an interned priest, with barbed wire, the scourging and the crowning with thorns of our Redeemer." (3268-PS)
Further revealing figure on the persecution of Polish priests are contained in the following extract from Charge No. 17 against Hans Frank, Governor-General of Poland, submitted by the Polish Government, entitled "Maltreatment and Persecution of the Catholic Clergy in the Western Provinces":
"IV. GENERAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF THE PERSECUTION
11. The general situation of the clergy in the Archdiocese of Poznan in the beginning of April 1940 is summarized in the following words of Cardinal Hlond's second report:

'5 priests shot
27 priests confined in harsh concentration camps at Stutthof and in other camps
190 priests in prison or in concentration camps at Bruczkow, Chludowo, Goruszki, Kazimierz, Biskupi, Lad, Lubin and Puszczykowo,
35 priests expelled into the Government General,
11 priests seriously ill in consequence of ill-treatment,
122 parishes entirely left without priests.'

12. In the diocese of Chelmno,. where about 650 priests were installed before the war only 30 were allowed to stay, the 97% of them were imprisoned, executed or put into concentration camps.

13. By January 141 about 7000 priests were killed, 3000 were in prison or concentration camps." (3279-PS)
The Allocution of Pope Pius XII on 2 June 1945 described National Socialism as "the arrogant apostasy from Jesus Christ, the denial of His doctrine and of His work of redemption, the cult of violence, the idolatry of race and blood, the overthrow of human liberty and dignity." It summarized the attacks of "National Socialism" on the Catholic Church in these terms:
"The struggle against the Church did, in fact, become even more bitter: there was the dissolution of Catholic organizations; the gradual suppression of the flourishing Catholic schools,-both public and private; the enforced weaning of youth from family and Church; the pressure brought to bear on the conscience of citizens, and especially of civil servants; the systematic defamation, by means of a clever, closely organized propaganda, of the Church, the clergy, the faithful, the Church's institutions, teaching and history; the closing, dissolution, confiscation of religious houses and other ecclesiastical institutions; the complete suppression of the Catholic press and publishing houses." (3268-PS)
Document Description

Charter of the International Military Tribunal, Article 6, especially 6 (a, c).

International Military Tribunal, Indictment Number 1, Section IV (D) 3 (c) (2, 3); X (B).

[Note: A single asterisk (*) before a document indicates that the document was received in evidence at the Nurnberg trial. A double asterisk (*) before a document number indicates that the document was referred to during the trial but was not formally received in evidence, for the reason given in parentheses following the description of the document. The USA series number, given in parentheses following the description of the document, is the official exhibit number assigned by the court.]

Document: *064-PS; Description: Bormann's letter to Rosenberg, 27 September 1940, enclosing letter from Gauleiter Florian criticizing Churches and publications for soldiers. (USA 359)

Document: *068-PS; Description: Letter from Bormann to Rosenberg, 5 April 1940, enclosing copy of Bormann's letter to the High Command of Navy, and copy of Navy High Command letter to Bormann of 9 February 1940. (USA 726)

Document: *070-PS; Description: Letter of Deputy Fuehrer to Rosenberg, 25 April 1941, on substitution of National Socialist mottos for morning prayers in schools. (USA 349)

Document: *072-PS; Description: Bormann letter to Rosenberg, 19 April 1941, concerning confiscation of property, especially of art treasures in the East. (USA 357)

Document: *089-PS; Description: Letter from Bormann to Rosenberg, 8 March 1940, instructing Amann not to issue further news print to confessional newspapers. (USA 360)

Document: *098-PS; Description: Bormann's letter to Rosenberg, 22 February 1940, urging creation of National Socialist Catechism, etc. to provide moral foundation for NS religion. (USA 350)

Document: *100-PS; Description: Bormann's letter to Rosenberg, 18 January 1940, urging preparation of National Socialist reading material to replace Christian literature for soldiers. (USA 691).

Document: *101-PS; Description: Letter from Hess' office signed Bormann to Rosenberg, 17 January 1940, concerning undesirability of religious literature for members of the Wehrmacht. (USA 361)

Document: *107-PS; Description: Circular letter signed Bormann, 17 June 1938, enclosing directions prohibiting participation of Reichsarbeitsdienst in religious celebrations. (USA 351)

Document: *116-PS; Description: Bormann's letter to Rosenberg, enclosing copy of letter, 24 January 1939, to Minister of Education requesting restriction or elimination of theological faculties. (USA 685)

Document: *122-PS; Description: Bormann's letter to Rosenberg, 17 April 1939, enclosing copy of Minister of Education letter, 6 April 1939, on elimination of theological faculties in various universities. (USA 362)

Document: *129-PS; Description: Letter from Kerrl to Herr Stapol, 6 September 1939, found in Rosenberg files. (USA 727)

Document: *840-PS; Description: Party Directive, 14 July 1939, making clergy and theology students ineligible for Party membership. (USA 355)

Document: *848-PS; Description: Gestapo telegram from Berlin to Nurnberg, 24 July 1938, dealing with demonstrations against Bishop Sproll in Rottenburg. (USA 353)

Document: *849-PS; Description: Letter from Kerrl to Minister of State, 23 July 1938, with enclosures dealing with persecution of Bishop Sproll. (USA 354)

Document: *998-PS; Description: "German Crimes Against Czechoslovakia". Excerpts from Czechoslovak Official Report for the prosecution and trial of the German Major War Criminals by the International Military Tribunal established according to Agreement of four Great Powers of 8 August 1945. (USA 91)

Document: *1164-PS; Description: Secret letter, 21 April 1942, from SS to all concentration camp commanders concerning treatment of priests. (USA 736)

Document: *1458-PS; Description: The Hitler Youth by Baldur von Schirach, Leipzig, 1934. (USA 667)

Document: *1481-PS; Description: Gestapo order, 20 January 1938, dissolving and confiscating property of Catholic Youth Women's Organization in Bavaria. (USA 737)

Document: *1482-PS; Description: Secret letter, 20 July 1933 to provincial governments and the Prussian Gestapo from Frick, concerning Confessional Youth Organizations. (USA 738)

Document: *1498-PS; Description: Order of Frick, 6 November 1934, addressed inter alia to Prussian Gestapo prohibiting publication of Protestant Church announcements. (USA 739)

Document: *1521-PS; Description: Report from the Bavarian Political Police to the Gestapo, Berlin, 24 August 1934, concerning National mourning on occasion of death of von Hindenburg. (USA 740)

Document: *1708-PS; Description: The Program of the NSDAP. National Socialistic Yearbook, 1941, p. 153. (USA 255; USA 324)

Document: *1815-PS; Description: Documents on RSHA meeting concerning the study and treatment of church politics. (USA 510)

Document: 1855-PS; Description: Extract from Organization Book of the NSDAP, 1937, p. 418.

Document: *1997-PS; Description: Decree of the Fuehrer, 17 July 1941, concerning administration of Newly Occupied Eastern Territories. (USA 319)

Document: *2349-PS: Description: Extracts from "The Myth of 20th Century" by Alfred Rosenberg, 1941. (USA 352)

Document: 2351-PS; Description: Speech of Rosenberg, 7 March 1937, from The Archive, Vol. 3436, p. 1716, published in Berlin, March 1937.

Document: 2352-PS; Description: Speech of Kerrl, 27 November 1937, from The Archive, Vol. 4345, p. 1029, published in Berlin, November 1937.

Document: 2403-PS; Description: The End of the Party State, from Documents of German Politics, Vol. I, pp. 55-56.

Document: 2456-PS; Description: Youth and the Church, from Complete Handbook of Youth Laws.

Document: *2851-PS; Description: Statement by Rosenberg of positions held, 9 November 1945. (USA 6).

Document: *2910-PS; Description: Certificate of defendant Seyss-Inquart, 10 November 1945. (USA 17)

Document: *2928-PS; Description: Affidavit of Mathias Lex, deputy president of the German Shoemakers Union. (USA 239)

Document: *2972-PS; Description: List of appointments held by von Neurath, 17 November 1945. (USA 19)

Document: *2973-PS; Description: Statement by von Schirach concerning positions held. (USA 14)

Document: *2978-PS; Description: Frick's statement of offices and positions, 14 November 1945. (USA 8)

Document: *2979-PS; Description: Affidavit by Hans Frank, 15 November 1945, concerning positions held. (USA 7)

Document: *3261-PS; Description: Verbal note of the Secretariat of State of His Holiness, to the German Embassy, 1 January 1942. (USA 568)

Document: 3262-PS; Description: Report of His Excellency, the Most Reverend Cesare Orsenigo, Papal Nuncio in Germany to His Eminence the Cardinal Secretary of State to His Holiness, 27 June 1942.

Document: *3263-PS; Description: Memorandum of Secretariate of State to German Embassy regarding the situation in the Warthegau, 8 October 1942. (USA 571)

Document: *3264-PS; Description: Note of His Eminence the Cardinal Secretary of State to Foreign Minister of Reich about religious situation in Warthegau and in other Polish provinces subject to Germany, 2 March 1943. (USA 572)

Document: 3265-PS; Description: Letter to His Eminence the Cardinal Secretary of State to the Cardinal Archbishop of Breslau, 18 November 1942.

Document: *3266-PS; Description; Letter of Cardinal Bertram, Archbishop of Breslau to the Papal Secretary of State, 7 December 1942. (USA 573)

Document: 3267-PS; Description: Verbal note of German Embassy to Holy See to the Secretariat of State of His Holiness, 29 August 1941.

Document: *3268-PS; Description: Allocution of His Holiness Pope Pius XII, to the Sacred College, 2 June 1945. (USA 356)

Document: 3269-PS; Description: Correspondence between the Holy See, the Apostolic Nuncio in Berlin, and the defendant von Ribbentrop, Reich Minister of Foreign Affairs.

Document: 3272-PS; Description: Statement of Rupert Mayer, 13 October 1945.

Document: 3273-PS; Description: Statement of Lutheran Pastor, Friedrich Kaufmann, Salzburg, 23 October 1945.

Document: *3274-PS; Description: Pastoral letter of Austrian Bishops read in all churches, 14 October 1945. (USA 570)

Document: *3278-PS; Description: Report on fighting of National Socialism in Apostolic Administration of Innsbruck-Feldkirch of Tyrol and Vorarlberg by Bishop Paulus Rusch, 27 June 1945 and attached list of church institutions there which were closed, confiscated or suppressed. (USA 569)

Document: *3279-PS; Description: Extract from Charge No. 17 against Hans Frank submitted by Polish Government to International Military Tribunal. (USA 574)

Document: *3280-PS; Description: Extract from Papal Encyclical "Mit Brennender Sorge", set forth in Appendix II, p. 524, of "The Persecution of the Catholic Church in the Third Reich". (USA 567)

Document: 3280-A-PS; Description: Concordat between the Holy See and the German Reich. Reichsgesetzblatt, Part II, p. 679.

Document: *3387-PS; Description: Hitler Reichstag speech, 23 March 1933, asking for adoption of Enabling Act, from Voelkischer Beobachter, 24 March 1933, p. 1. (USA 566)

Document: *3389-PS; Description: Fulda Declaration of 28 March 1933, from Voelkischer Beobachter, 3/29/1933, p. 2. (USA 566)

Document: 3433-PS; Description: Law concerning the Constitution of the German Protestant Church, 14 July 1933. 1933 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 471.

Document: 3434-PS; Description: Law concerning procedure for decisions in legal affairs of the Protestant Church, 26 June 1935. 1935 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 774.

Document: 3435-PS; Description: First Ordinance for Execution of Law concerning procedure for decisions in legal affairs of the Protestant Church, 3 July 1935. 1935 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 851.

Document: 3436-PS; Description: Law for Safeguarding of German Protestant Church, 24 September 1935. 1935 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1178.

Document: 3437-PS; Description: Fifth Decree for execution of law for safeguarding of the German Protestant Church, 2 December 1935. 1935 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1370.

Document: 3439-PS; Description: Fifteenth decree for the Execution of law for Security of German Protestant Church, 25 June 1937. 1937 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 697.

Document: 3466-PS; Description: Decree to unite the competences of Reich and Prussia in Church Affairs, 16 July 1935. 1935 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1029.

Document: 3560-PS; Description: Decree concerning organization and administration of Eastern Territories, 8 October 1939. 1939 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 2042.

Document: 3561-PS; Description: Decree concerning the Administration of Occupied Polish Territories, 12 October 1939. 1939 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 2077.

Document: 3701-PS; Description: Proposal for Reichsleiter Bormann concerning speech of Bishop of Meunster on 3 August 1941.

Document: *3751-PS; Description: Diary of the German Minister of Justice, 1935 concerning prosecution of church officials and punishment in concentration camps. (USA 828; USA 858)

Document: *D-75.; Description: SD Inspector Bierkamp's letter, 12 December 1941, to RSHA enclosing copy of secret decree signed by Bormann, entitled Relationship of National Socialism and Christianity. (USA 348)

Document: *D-84; Description: Gestapo instructions to State Police Departments, 5 August 1937, regarding protective custody for Bible students. (USA 236)

Document: *EC-68; Description: Confidential letter from Minister of Finance and Economy, Baden, containing directives on treatment of Polish Farm workers, 6 March 1941. (USA 205)

Document: *R-101-A; Description: Letter from Chief of the Security Police and Security Service to the Reich Commissioner for the Consolidation of German Folkdom, 5 April 1940, with enclosures concerning confiscation of church property. (USA 358)

Document: R-101-B; Description: Letter from Himmler to Dr. Winkler, 31 October 1940, concerning treatment of church property: in incorporated Eastern countries.

Document: *R-101-C; Description: Letter to Reich Leader SS, 30 July 1941, concerning treatment of church property in incorporated Eastern areas. (USA 358)

Document: *R-101-D; Description: Letter from Chief of Staff of the Reich Main Security Office (RSHA) to Reich Leader SS, 30 March 1942, concerning confiscation of church property. (USA 358)

Document: *R-103; Description: Letter from Polish Main Committee to General Government of Poland on situation of Polish workers in the Reich, 17 May 1944. (USA 204)

Document: *R-145; Description: State Police Order, 28 May 1934, at Duesseldorf, signed Schmid, concerning sanction of denominational youth and professional associations and distribution of publications in churches. (USA 745)


nny
Member
Posts: 199
Joined: 19 May 2005, 18:11
Location: Mass, US

#3

Post by nny » 16 Dec 2005, 11:29

Thank you for these interesting posts DT. A few questions, how many churches in Germany did the Nazis burn down to suppress the church? How many priests were executed or imprisoned for their Christian views (and of course not their anti-Nazi views, for which anyone could be executed or imprisoned.)
"He openly and unrelentingly fights the most dangerous enemies of the State; Jews, Free Masons, Jesuits, and political clergymen.
Clergymen are there to express opinions based upon their beliefs, they are not political. If the catholic church decided Nazism was better than Bolshevism, then changed its mind with "burning concern", that really is not religion, it is politics. When the Nazis openly fight the most dangerous enemies "Jews, Free Masons, Jesuits and political clergymen", this is not really a campaign against the church.
The Nazi conspirators considered religious literature undesirable for the Wehrmacht.
Perhaps I have been caught up in anti-Bush rhetoric, but why were so many Wehrmacht soldiers sent into battle after having holy water sprinkled on them? Or Got Mitt Uns? Perhaps they were all victims of course? Perhaps they didn't see the writing on the wall in Nazi Germany, in the same way that certain Americans are encouraged to speak of the "Holiday Tree"?
On 14 July 1939, Bormann, as Deputy of the Fuehrer, issued a Party regulation excluding clergymen, persons closely connected with the church, and Theology students from membership in the Party. It was further decreed that in the future Party Members who entered the clergy or turned to the study of Theology must leave the Party.
Theology students weren't allowed to become Nazis? Is there evidence that a large number of Theology students were pushing to become Nazis? More importantly IMO, were these Theology students 'suppressed', or murdered? Perhaps in 1940, the Nazis knew what the Catholic church was doing to young boys? Or perhaps not, that is probably a more popular view in Anti-Catholic circles today than it would be in 1940.
In January 1939, Bormann, acting as Deputy of the Fuehrer, informed the Minister of Education, that the Party was taking the position that theological inquiry was not as valuable as the general fields of knowledge in the universities and that suppression of Theological Faculties in the universities was to be undertaken at once. He pointed out that the Concordat with the Vatican placed certain limitations on such a program, but that in the light of the general change of circumstances, particularly the compulsory military service and the execution of the four-year plan, the question of manpower made certain reorganizations, economies and simplification necessary. Therefore, Theological Faculties were to be restricted insofar as they could not be wholly suppressed. He instructed that the churches were not to be informed of this development and no public announcement was to be made. Any complaints, if they were to be replied to at all, should be answered with a statement that these measures are being executed in a general plan of reorganization and that similar things are happening to other faculties. He concludes with the statement that the professorial chairs vacated by the above program are to be turned over to the newly created fields of inquiry, such as Racial Research.
So Bormann decided that "Theological Inquiry" (and thus Religious Inquiry), was not as valuable as Scientific Inquiry (Or General Fields of Knowledge)? This sounds so much like what we in America expect today! So many Americans wish to see a A-Theological Education system, and the removal of any word that could be considered "God, Creator or Higher Being" from any Long Standing public address.

(
2) Supplementary evidence of acts of oppression within Germany. In laying the groundwork for their attempted subversion of the Church, the Nazi conspirators resorted to assurances of peaceful intentions. Thus Hitler, in his address to the Reichstag on 23 March 1933 declared:

Quote:
"While the government is determined to carry through the political and moral purging of our public life, it is creating and insuring prerequisites for a truly religious life. The government sees in both Christian confessions the factors most important for the maintenance of our Folkdom. It will respect agreements concluded between them and the states. However, it expects that its work will meet with a similar appreciation. The government will treat all other denominations with equal objective justice. However, it can never condone that belonging to a certain denomination or to a certain race might be regarded as a license to commit or tolerate crimes. The Government will devote its care to the sincere living together of Church and State." (3387-PS)
I can't tell you how much the above quote doesn't shock me, I find it quite ineffective, this isn't 1945 and this type of propoganda rarely finds a receptive audience IMO.
Document Number: 3436-PS; Date: 24 September 1935; Reichsgesetzblatt-Page: I.1178; Title and Gist of Law: Gesetz zur Sicherung der Deutschen Evangelischen Kirche (Law for the Safeguarding of the German Evangelical Church) empowering the Reich Minister of Church Affairs (Kerrl) to issue Ordinances with binding legal force.; Signed by:
Hitler, Frick.
Is this fluff or real 'supression' of the Christian Church?

Again, for those "Priests" who were "punished" under the Nazis, I am looking for more of a "They were punished for being Christian" and not "They were punished for being anti-Nazi".

David Thompson
Forum Staff
Posts: 23724
Joined: 20 Jul 2002, 20:52
Location: USA

#4

Post by David Thompson » 16 Dec 2005, 12:21

nny -- You asked:
How many priests were executed or imprisoned for their Christian views (and of course not their anti-Nazi views, for which anyone could be executed or imprisoned.)
How will you clearly distinguish one from the other?

nny
Member
Posts: 199
Joined: 19 May 2005, 18:11
Location: Mass, US

#5

Post by nny » 16 Dec 2005, 12:43

David Thompson wrote:nny -- You asked:
How many priests were executed or imprisoned for their Christian views (and of course not their anti-Nazi views, for which anyone could be executed or imprisoned.)
How will you clearly distinguish one from the other?
How would I? I wouldn't be able to with any sort of certainty, but if I had to (without being locked out of a forum) I would being with analysing how many Priests existed in Germany 1933 and how many were exectued / imprisioned until 1939 and what the charges were against them in this time period. From 1939 to 1945, during the war (and heightened paranoia) I will assume the arrest rate increased, as did Nazi paranoia, and Priest objection. As for a 'campaign against the church', which would certainly be reflected in the number of Priests arrested in Germany (IE Priests whom existed in Germany pre-1939 expansionist Germany) I would like to see solid figures in the numbers of Priests arrested, German soldiers (Catholics especially but Christian in general) arrested for their religious beliefs, and Churches destroyed in occupied territories (Such as France, Poland, Holland, Belgium, Norway, Finland etc). Until then I really wouldn't be able to decide if Priests were being persecuted for their beliefs or if they were being attacked for their anti-Nazi views.

David Thompson
Forum Staff
Posts: 23724
Joined: 20 Jul 2002, 20:52
Location: USA

#6

Post by David Thompson » 16 Dec 2005, 20:45

nny -- You answered:
I would being with analysing how many Priests existed in Germany 1933 and how many were exectued / imprisioned until 1939 and what the charges were against them in this time period.
The number of priests in Germany in 1933, and the number of those imprisoned in 1933-1939, should be available on the internet.

The charges against them may be more problematical. Your approach makes the Nazi label the test for distinguishing between priests who were being persecuted for their beliefs and those being attacked for their anti-Nazi views. This has the effect of assuming, without proving, the very point at issue by defining the argument in Nazi ideological terms. Whether this test is an objective one is also questionable, particularly since there is no assurance that the Nazis were open about their goals or decided to implement them abruptly rather than through a process of increasing intimidation.

Furthermore, there is an additional, and more serious problem. As early as the end of February, 1933, the "charges" against detained persons in Nazi Germany did not require the kind of specificity we have come to expect in an Anglo-Saxon system of law. For example, Article 4 of the Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of the People and State of 28 February 1933
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 151#571151
provided:
Whoever provokes, or appeals for or incites to the disobedience of the orders given out by the supreme state authorities or the authorities subject to them for the execution of this decree, or the orders given by the Reich Government according to Article 2, is punishable—insofar as the deed is not covered by other decrees with more severe punishments—with imprisonment of not less than one month, or with a fine from 150 up to 15,000 Reichsmarks.
* * * * *
Whoever provokes or incites to an act contrary to public welfare is to be punished with a penitentiary sentence, under mitigating circumstances, with imprisonment of not less than three months.
An official announcement, pursuant to this decree, published in the Frankfurter Zeitung of 1 March 1933 shows that persons were arrested on the basis of "suspicion" without the basis or the subject matter of the suspicion being given, and that others were held in protective custody without the authorities having to provide a factual basis for the detention.
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 199#571199
The records-keeping standards became even less stringent with the Decree of the Reich Cabinet relating to the formation of special courts of March 21, 1933:
Section 9 prohibits any hearing on an arrest warrant.
Section 11 prohibits any investigation by the special court into the charges.
Section 16 eliminates any appeal.
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 276#571276

The Law on the Secret State Police of 30 November 1933
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 092#558092
reposed the responsibility for policing political matters in the Gestapo; see also
Secret State Police Department Decree of 8 March 1934 for Application of the Law of 30 November 1933
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 093#558093
in which Articles 4 and 5 allowed the Gestapo to make determinations of the necessity for ordering restrictions on personal freedom. Section VII of the Law on the Secret State Police of 10 February 1936
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 094#558094
eliminated administrative review of these decisions.

As a result of these and other practices, the official records of the Nazi regime may not provide the statistical certainty you seek, even where those records have survived.

You also said:
I would like to see solid figures in the numbers of Priests arrested, German soldiers (Catholics especially but Christian in general) arrested for their religious beliefs, and Churches destroyed in occupied territories (Such as France, Poland, Holland, Belgium, Norway, Finland etc).
So would I, though these steps are only the most extreme in a campaign of suppression and aren't absolutely necessary to accomplish the goal. The approximate figures for arrests and deaths may be available through internet research, which you can probably accomplish in a few hours' work. Again, however, there is the problem of distinguishing arrests for religious beliefs from arrests and detentions for far more generalized offenses. A Directive of the Chief of the Security Police and SD dated 17 December 1942
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 147#620147
provided for elimination of case details where detained persons were sent to concentration camps, and required only the "reason for apprehension in catch words." Similarly, a letter sent to the concentration camps where priests were imprisoned -- Dachau, Sachsenhausen, Buchenwald, Mauthausen, Flossenbuerg, Neuengamme, Auschwitz, Gross-Rosen, Natzweiler, "Nie.", Stutthof, Arbeitsdorf, Ravensbrueck, PW camp Lublin -- does not refer to the supposed crimes, but just to "priests."
Nazi concentration camp work assignments for priests
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=64723

See also the provisions for prisoners arrested pursuant to the "Night and Fog" Decree:

Other war crimes -- The "Night and Fog Decree"
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=54699
Night & Fog Prisoner: Testimony of Hans Cappelen
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=63095
Dead "Night and Fog" Prisoners
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=63646

In any event, good luck in your research. Please let us know how it comes out, and if you are able to make the clear distinctions you seek.

nny
Member
Posts: 199
Joined: 19 May 2005, 18:11
Location: Mass, US

#7

Post by nny » 20 Dec 2005, 09:37

The charges against them may be more problematical. Your approach makes the Nazi label the test for distinguishing between priests who were being persecuted for their beliefs and those being attacked for their anti-Nazi views. This has the effect of assuming, without proving, the very point at issue by defining the argument in Nazi ideological terms. Whether this test is an objective one is also questionable, particularly since there is no assurance that the Nazis were open about their goals or decided to implement them abruptly rather than through a process of increasing intimidation.
First I would like to thank you for your patience with me, you have been more than generous. Secoud I would say that my approach does not make the Nazi label the litmus test for whether or not a priest was persecuted for their religious beliefs or not. Being Agnostic, and not so indoctorinated into the ways of Christians or Catholics, I will assume that being devoted to Christian religion means in some part being bound to the pretexts of a bible that it is not up to the individual priest to interpret what is right or wrong, good or bad in terms of what God believes (IE is something pious because God loves it or does God love it because it is pious?). This means that if the Nazis were persecuting Christians (IE Priests, Nuns, Clergy and Chaplains), that ALL of them would be imprisioned, and not a select few. Since I understand that Christianity is about interpreting the bible and not simply living by its code, I have doubts whether those priests were imprisoned for their beliefs in Christianity, or their anti-Nazi views. First, I would be interested to know how many of these priests were Catholic (In Ian Kershaws delightful book "Hitler : Huberis", he describes the Nazis as having significant trouble in Catholic areas, particularly Bavaria, and to some extent highlights their Catholic-Propoganda campaign). In Christopher Brownings book "Ordinary Men" I believe it was Wolhoff (sp?) who (with derision) accused a member of the batallion of not shooting Jews because he was Catholic. The Nazis were looking to eliminate divisions that divided Germans from eachother, Protestant and Catholicism was a major division that needed to be overcome in their eyes, but I don't believe Christianity as a whole was ever incompatible with Nazisim. (There were other more pressing divisions I believe the Nazis were concerned with IE Bavaria, Prussia, Hanover - Regional Divisions and Class divisions - Upper, Middle, Lower class). Another thing I am interested in is how many chaplains were assigned to German units during WWII?

Its interesting the hypocrisy that many anti-Christian Americans describe the Christian attributes of the Nazis, or more gutterly describe Hitler as a devout Catholic. I have a book on order, "The Holy Reich : Nazi Concepts of Christianity", and I would like to post a poignant review of it before I can directly quote it :
Richard Steigmann-Gall's new book offers an important re-evaluation of German history. For years scholars have argued that Nazism was fundamentally anti-Christian. In recent years we have become more aware of the moral failure of Christianity to oppose the Nazis, whether it is over the recent controversies over the Vatican and the Pope, or from the disproportionate support given the Nazis by rural Protestant believers, or from the complete failure of German chaplins to oppose war crimes while assigned to the Wehrmacht. Now Steigmann-Gall reminds us that the Nazis themselves were not uniformly, or even mainly, anti-Christian.
Steigmann-Gall starts off with telling us that one prominent Nazi war criminal, Erich Koch, was in 1932 the president of a provincial Protestant Church synod. Other Nazis were also Christian believers, such as William Kube and Walter Buch, the head of the Nazi Party Court, and Martin Boorman's father-in-law. More typically, many Nazis were believes in "positive Christianity," which was fiercely nationalist and anti-Jewish. Goebbels spoke of the struggle "between Christ and Marx," and Hitler spoke well of Jesus (supposedly an Aryan Christ) and The Ten Commandments to the end of his life. Goering had his children baptized, as well as Goebbels. These Nazi Christians disliked Catholicism-it was too powerful and internationalist a movement to be incorporated into Nazi doctrine-but at least until 1937 many Nazis were keen with working on organizing the Protestants into a more unified Church. Nor was this simply a sign of the Nazi lust for power. There were many elements within German Protestant doctrine that made a rapport with the Nazis plausible-a shared anti-Semitism, authoritarianism, nationalism and pseudo-socialist demagoguery. Steigmann-Gall, in his discussion of the struggle between the "German Christians" and the less Nazi "Confessing Church," makes good use of his knowledge of the chaos and confusion, the polyocracy of the Nazi state. He points out that many of the "German Christians" moves were made on their own initiative, not the Nazi Party's, that many Nazis, including Hitler, were opposed to their rashness and crudity, that much of the opposition to their hamhandedness came from loyal and viciously anti-Semitic Nazis from Franconia. He also reminds us of the fundamental loyalty of most of the Confessing Church. (No Protestant publicly protested the Euthanasia campaign and one Confessing Church member lauded that only 0.3% of clergymen were non-Aryan.)

There was a paganist element among the Nazis from the very beginning, and it continued right to the end. For much of the twenties and thirties this was personified by the figure of Alfred Rosenberg, whose sinister stare and vicious ideology blurred the fact, as Steigmann-Gall shows, that he was a stupendously ineffective politician and player in the Nazi regime. Indeed, refutations of his pompous "Myth of the Twentieth Century" were allowed to circulate freely in the thirties. Heinrich Himmler was also a powerful "pagan", and it is striking that both Hitler and Goebbels viewed his nostalgia for the Ancient German Past and his enthusiasm for Occultist and Asian religions as very silly. As time went on there would be bans on clergymen becoming Nazis, and restrictions on SS members holding Church Office. But these restrictions also applied to professional pagans. In the war years, Martin Boorman, the power beyond the throne asserted his own fierce anti-Christian views. These views seemed to be based, as Steigmann-Gall points out, not on any coherent Nazi anti-Christianity, but on spite towards his in-laws. Nor was he always successful in his struggles in the Nazi's chaotic bureaucracy. Goebbels prevented him from having Bishop Galen executed for denouncing euthanasia, and also prevented him from removing religious music from the air. Even Boorman could not remove churches altogether from his dark plans for the Warthegau. Himmler's deputy, Heydrich, was also a powerful pagan, but after his assassination his replacement, Kaltenbrunner, eased snooping of Christians noticeably. Steigmann-Gall makes some important points about Hitler's rage against Christainity. First off, Hitler was not an atheist, despised atheism and of course despised the Enlightenment Liberalism and Marxist Socialism that are the main sources for modern atheism. Secondly, one should be cautious about Hitler's "Table Talk." Richard Carrier has argued that it has been unscrupulously translated: while in English Hitler denounces Christianity as the greatest idiocy, in the actual German it is clear that Hitler's target is transubstantiation. Steigmann-Gall points out that Hitler had the habit of telling people what they wanted to hear, and his most venomous comments were made in front of Bormann and Himmler. Third, Steigmann-Gall also makes the suggestion that instead of seeing Hitler's anger at Christianity as a revelation of Nazism's basic antipathy, it should be seen as the bitter rage of a defeated megalomaniac, a rage Hitler also directed at the army, some of his closest associates, and indeed the German people themselves.

There is one major flaw with the book. "Positive Christians" spoke of getting rid of the Old Testament and described Jesus as an Aryan. While Anti-Semitism can be compatible with Christianity, these beliefs clearly aren't. Steigmann-Gall does not really deal with this point. It is not enough for him to show that many Liberal Protestants had a dim view of Judaism. The connections he does draw, between the liberal scholar von Harnack's sympathy with the anti-Jewish heretic "Marcion" are too small and too obscure to bear the weight Steigmann-Gall places on them. Liberal biblical scholarship clearly showed that Jesus was a Jew. How anyone could have thought otherwise is not something that Steigmann-Gall explains. Nevertheless, this is an important revision that simply goes beyond what leading Nazis happened to think. Instead of viewing Nazi anti-Semitism as a new "racial" variety we can see its continuity with other religious and conservative ideologies. Instead of viewing totalitarianism as fundamentally anti-Christian we can see it is as similar to other expressions of "post-Christian" moralisms. It is, as Steigmann Gall's says "much closer to us than we dare allow ourselves to believe."
He has very interesting views on the narrow quotings of Bormann and Rosenberg which seem near ubiquitous (Unless of course the person is attacking Christianity via Nazisim of course). Either way I will be interested to verify these views in the book.
In any event, good luck in your research. Please let us know how it comes out, and if you are able to make the clear distinctions you seek.
Thank you and I will :)

walterkaschner
In memoriam
Posts: 1588
Joined: 13 Mar 2002, 02:17
Location: Houston, Texas

#8

Post by walterkaschner » 28 Dec 2005, 04:40

nny wrote:
David Thompson wrote:nny -- You asked:
How many priests were executed or imprisoned for their Christian views (and of course not their anti-Nazi views, for which anyone could be executed or imprisoned.)
How will you clearly distinguish one from the other?
How would I? I wouldn't be able to with any sort of certainty, but if I had to (without being locked out of a forum) I would being with analysing how many Priests existed in Germany 1933 and how many were exectued / imprisioned until 1939 and what the charges were against them in this time period. From 1939 to 1945, during the war (and heightened paranoia) I will assume the arrest rate increased, as did Nazi paranoia, and Priest objection. As for a 'campaign against the church', which would certainly be reflected in the number of Priests arrested in Germany (IE Priests whom existed in Germany pre-1939 expansionist Germany) I would like to see solid figures in the numbers of Priests arrested, German soldiers (Catholics especially but Christian in general) arrested for their religious beliefs, and Churches destroyed in occupied territories (Such as France, Poland, Holland, Belgium, Norway, Finland etc). Until then I really wouldn't be able to decide if Priests were being persecuted for their beliefs or if they were being attacked for their anti-Nazi views.
I'm tardy as usual, but compelled to a comment or two and somewhat surprised at the apparent lack of general interest in this (to me at least) highly fascinating topic, although perhaps somewhat miscast under the rubric of "Holocaust and 20th Century War Crimes".

Unfortunately, as far as I'm aware, there are few "solid" figures available for the number of priests or soldiers arrested "for their religious beliefs" rather than "for their anti-Nazi views", probably in great part for the reasons suggested by David Thompson, but also because in many, if not most such cases, the religious beliefs of those Christians arrested were directly opposed to Nazi ideology, political policies and goals. The best figures I can find as to Catholics are in John S. Conway's article "The Role of the Churches in the German Resistance Movement" contained in Andrew ChandlerThe Moral Imperative: New Essays on the Ethics of Resistance in National Socialist Germany, 1933-1945, (Westview Press, 1998), at 27:

"For the Catholics, Professor von Hehl has estimated that around one in three Catholic priests endured some form of reprisal during the Third Reich. In Dachau, there were no fewer than 2771 priests, the majority of them from Poland, but including some 400 German Catholic priests and 35 Evangelical pastors." [Citing Ulrich von Hehl, Priester unter Hitlers Terror. Eine biographische und statistische Erhebung, Mainz 1984, pp. xlii-iii.] And this was in only one Concentration Camp.

As to Protestant pastors, the only semi-hard figure I have found is Richard J. Evan's statement that over 700 (presumably clergy of the breakaway Bekennende Kirche) had been imprisoned by 1937, in his The Third Reich in Power (The Penguin Press, 2005) at 230. Obviously there were subsequently more, Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Martin Niemöller being the most prominent.

Although somewhat outdated, Conway's The Nazi Persecution of the Churches, 1933-45 (Basic Books, 1968), is the best overall study in English of this topic, but contains almost no "solid" figures as to the total number of Christian clergy incarcerated by the Germans. The German Catholic hierarchy itself was unable to come up with any such figures, as noted in the following memo written in December 1942 by the German Cardinal Bertram to the Papal Secretary of State, Cardinal Maglione:

"About the concentration camps. Up to this point, we have been able to learn little, because we know scarcely anything of the reasons why the individuals are sent there, of the treatment they receive, of their fate, their health or their needs. Those who are put into the camps are compelled by threat of the severest penalties to maintain the strictest silence about all that happens in the camps; as a result, they dare not say anything. All the bishops feel a deep sympathy and a keen sense of pity for those in concentration camps, especially as we are persuaded that the great majority of those held there are innocent. Many of the clergy have died there — men whom I held in special esteem and love for their upright life and conduct, known to the whole people." Conway, The Nazi Persecution, supra, at 298, FN 23.

Moreover, the assumption that a bright line could be drawn under the Third Reich between a priest or pastor's religious beliefs and his anti-Nazi views is IMHO fatally flawed. Virtually all Christian denominations have by now come to acknowledge the innate and essential incompatibility between Naziism and Christianity. Notions of neighborly love, of forgiveness, of individual dignity and worth, of the verity of the Beatitudes, of God's supreme love and sacrifice on behalf of mankind, of the foundation of the Jewish Old Testament for the New, of Jesus' identity as a Jew and as God's promised Messiah to the Jews - all beliefs at the heart of Christianity - were totally alien to Nazi ideology. NNY's inability to comprehend this incompatibility may obviously be excused by his admitted agnosticism and failure to grasp basic tenets of the Christian faith - a failing that to their shame was inexcusably shared during the Third Reich by a vast number of professed German Christians.

Thus nny wrote:
Secoud I would say that my approach does not make the Nazi label the litmus test for whether or not a priest was persecuted for their religious beliefs or not. Being Agnostic, and not so indoctorinated into the ways of Christians or Catholics, I will assume that being devoted to Christian religion means in some part being bound to the pretexts of a bible that it is not up to the individual priest to interpret what is right or wrong, good or bad in terms of what God believes (IE is something pious because God loves it or does God love it because it is pious?). This means that if the Nazis were persecuting Christians (IE Priests, Nuns, Clergy and Chaplains), that ALL of them would be imprisioned, and not a select few. Since I understand that Christianity is about interpreting the bible and not simply living by its code, I have doubts whether those priests were imprisoned for their beliefs in Christianity, or their anti-Nazi views.
This reflects a profound misconception that all Christians are welded together in a uniform, monolithic set of religious beliefs and practices, when the truth is that various sects, although all professing to be Christian, can be, have been, and are today separated by wildly divergent views as to what their faith consists of and what it demands. This was certainly true of the various groups which considered themselves embraced within the Christian community in Germany during the Third Reich. Not only was the traditional division between Catholics and Protestants continued during this period, but the Protestants themselves were torn apart by the centrifical force exerted by Naziism. Although the Calvinist and Lutheran denominations had indeed been united in the 19th Century into the Evangelische Kirche, which became virtually a state religion under Wilhelmine Germany, that union did not embrace other miner Protestant sects, such as the Pentecostals, Seventh Day Adventists and Jehovah's Witnesses. Moreover, the Evangelische Kirche was soon rent from within by a group of radically pro-Nazi young pastors, members of the Glaubensbewegung Deutschen Christen, which was formed in 1932 with the notion that the Evangelische Kirche should swerve in a new direction and serve as the vehicle for a version of Christianity in which the Old Testament was eliminated, Christ's Jewishness denied, and Nazi ideology of racism, nationalism and the supremacy of the State and the Volk over the individual adopted as part of the total Nazi effort toward Gleichschaltung and totalitarianism. And in the Church elections in July 1933 the Deutschen Christen did prevail. Although their dominance turned out to be shaky, their influence was substantial and ultimately led to the breaking away of some 6,000 pastors to form the Bekenntniskirche (the Confessing Church). Their breakaway was due to the adoption of the "Aryan Paragraph" by the Evangelische Kirche, which in effect expelled all Jewish converts to Christianity from offices or membership in that church. The members of the Bekenntniskirche believed that all individuals who had confessed to Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour were equal members of the Christian community, regardless of race. Which strikes me as a profoundly religious belief as well as a profoundly anti-Nazi point of view.

Moreover, I think it an error to attempt to judge the Nazi's attitude toward Christianity and its various denominations on the basis of how many of its clergy were incarcerated or killed or its churches desecrated or destroyed. About 20 million Germans (roughly 1/3 of its population in 1933) were Catholics and under the spiritual influence, if not domination, by an external power - the Vatican. It is, I believe, a mistake to assume that Hitler's political considerations were constant throughout the 12 years the Nazis were in power. The fact is that in the March 1933 Reichstag elections - after the Reichstag fire and after the SA was turned loose to freely brutalize and terrorize the other parties - the Nazis failed to obtain a majority of votes or of seats, and even with their Nationalist allies came up with only a slim majority of seats and still no overall majority of votes. Clearly at that point, although the NASDP had done reasonably well in most of the Protestant areas, Hitler felt the need of the support of the Catholic Church and promptly rushed to conclude a Concordat with the Vatican, which the Nazis gradually proceeded to virtually ignore. And at that point as well he had significant support within the Evangelische Kirche, which was traditionally nationalist and anti-semitic. So from a political standpoint, whatever his basic views were concerning the ultimate place of Christianity and the churches within the Third Reich, it was in his best interest in the early years to avoid a showdown.

His principal concern was with the Jews, and the Christians could wait 'till later, when his power was absolutely secure and he had nibbled away at the foundations of the major Christian denominations. In that he was in accord with the old Texas tradition that you have to kill the closest snake first. But at the same time the Nazis showed no restraint whatsoever in acting against small Protestant denominations of no political power or significance - such as the Jehovah's Witnesses, who obstinately refused to take the mandatory oath of loyalty to Hitler and the Nazi régime, on the religious grounds that oath-taking was simply idolatry and forbidden under the Second Commandment of the Decalogue. There were less than 20,000 Jehovah's Witnesses in Germany during the Third Reich, and so the Nazis saw no political danger in persecuting them en masse. About 10,000 were thrown in concentration camps, and around 5,000 perished before war's end. Michael H. Kater "Die Ersten Bibelforscher in Dritten Reich", Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitschriften 17, April 1969, at 181.

For this reason I personally put less credence in Hitler's public pronouncements and appearances and more credence in his reported table talk denigrating Christianity and predicting its ultimate replacement with Nazi ideology, and believe that his ultimate goal was to replace Christianity with a semi- paganism, clutching perhaps to some of the external vestiges Christianity but replacing Christ's teachings with an idolatry of his own Volkist racism with himself as Führer and Messiah of the chosen and risen German Volk.

Additional sources for much of the above and for further reading in English:

Michael Burleigh, "The Brown Cult and the Christians" in his The Third Reich (Hill and Wang, 2000, paperback ed.) at 252-67;

Richard J. Evans, The Coming of the Third Reich (The Penguin Press, 2003) passim; also Part 3 "Converting the Soul" in his The Third Reich in Power, supra at 220-60;

Wolfgang Gerlach & Victoria J. Barnett, And the Witnesses Were Silent: The Confessing Church and the Persecution of the Jews (University of Nebraska Press, 2000) passim;

Doris L. Bergen, Twisted Cross: The German Christian Movement in the Third Reich (University of North Carolina Press, 1996) passim ;

Richard Grunberger, The 12-Year Reich: A Social History of Nazi Germany 1933-1945 (Ballantine Books, 1971, paperback ed.) Chapter 29 "Religion", at 481-501.

Regards, Kaschner

Dan
Member
Posts: 8429
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 15:06
Location: California

#9

Post by Dan » 28 Dec 2005, 16:58

I am also surprised at the seeming lack of interest in this thread, but in my case the problem is with the wording of many of the allegations made about the persecution of Christian Churches. It's sometimes hard to know exactly what is meant without more context than is given in the IMT indictments. Just a few examples:
1) In Austria. The methods of suppression of churches followed in Austria by the occupying power began with measures to exclude the Church from public activities, such as processions, printing of newspapers and Reviews which could spread Christian doctrines;


Just reading that one is led to believe that Catholic processions were banned in Austria for 6 years. Is this really the case? Or were a few procession deemed by local bureaucrats not given permits for various reasons? Or is it something in the middle?
The Lutheran Church in Austria, though comprising a small minority of the population, was subjected to organized oppression. Its educational efforts were obstructed or banned. Believers were encouraged, and sometimes intimidated, to repudiate their faith.
Who, what, where and how? Were all Lutherans in Austria put under strong pressure to leave the Lutheran Church? Something seems rather fishy to me there, but I know nothing about Lutherans in Austria. I know that the majority of defendants at the IMT were Lutherans, and membership in that particular church sure didn't seem to hinder their upwards mobility in the armed forces.

About a third of what has been posted on this thread I find equally ambiguous.
The Nazi conspirators considered religious literature undesirable for the Wehrmacht. National Socialist publications were prepared for the Wehrmacht for the expressed purpose of replacing and counteracting the influence of religious literature disseminated to the troops. (101-PS; 100-PS; 064-PS)


Well, sure. Nazism is as Mr. Kaschner pointed out not compatable with Christianity. But what was actually done about religious material dissmeinated to the troops? Where Bibles banned?

And as an aside, were Jehovah's witnesses given the purple triange because of their (quite heterodox) Christianity or because they refused to fight?

David Thompson
Forum Staff
Posts: 23724
Joined: 20 Jul 2002, 20:52
Location: USA

#10

Post by David Thompson » 28 Dec 2005, 17:30

I'm pleasantly surprised by the interest in this topic, to which I was indifferent, until now. I'll try to post more information.

walterkaschner
In memoriam
Posts: 1588
Joined: 13 Mar 2002, 02:17
Location: Houston, Texas

#11

Post by walterkaschner » 29 Dec 2005, 00:51

I would readily agree with Dan that certain of the charges in this section of the IMT indictment may rest on evidence which could be questionable if it were available for us to judge. For example, the accusation of oppression of Austrian Lutherans is based on a single post-war affidavit of a Lutheran Pastor (Document 3273-PS), the text of which is not given. From my quite spotty reading I have come across nothing else that would further support this accusation. But let us not forget that the indictment was drawn up by the prosecution, for the obvious purpose of making the strongest case possible from the evidence at hand.

The documents relied upon for the charges concerning oppression of the Catholic Church in Austria (Docs. 3278-PS and 3274-PS) would seem to bear considerably more weight, the first coming from a Catholic Bishop reporting what occured in his own diocese, and the latter a joint pastoral letter signed by all Austrian Catholic Bishops and read out in all Austrian Catholic Churches.

In the latter connection, here is what John S. Conway has to say in his The Nazi Persecution of the Churches [cited in my preceding post] at 224-7:

Equally discouraging [after the banishment of the Catholic Bishop of Rottenburg] was the series of events which transpired in Austria during its first year under Nazi rule. Following the enthusiastic welcome to the new régime given by the Austrian Catholic bishops, their optimism quickly turned to disillusionment and dismay. Hitler was no more impressed by their subservience than he had been with the German Catholic bishops' willingness to sign the Concordat of 1933. In the new Greater German Reich, the Austrian Catholics were of little political significance, and in July 1938, less than four months after the Anschluss, Hitler decided to revoke the Austrian Concordat and to deprive the Church of any legal status.

Since Austria is no longer an independent state after its reunification with the German Reich and has lost its position in international law, the Austrian Concordat is extinguished on its own account. The reunification does not have the result of extending the German Concordat which is composed purely for the conditions of Germany proper [Alt-Reich] and therefore can find no appropriate application in the different circumstances of Austria. The result is that at the present time Austria finds itself without a Concordat.

Nazi policy was flexible and was always determined by tactical necessity. The Reich Commissar in Vienna, Gauleiter Bürckel, was accordingly given a free hand to implement as many of the Nazi regulations as would wipe out Church resistance in the individual dioceses, which simply meant the rapid institution of prohibitions to bring the country into line with the situation in Germany proper.

In the summer of 1938 the Austrian Catholic educational institutions were subjected to the same stringent measures as had already been imposed in Germany. The theological faculties of Salzburg, Graz and Innsbruck were closed. 'In view of the necessity of educating the whole youth in the spirit of National Socialism', private schools were banned, hostels, kindergartens and orphanages were forced to shut down, and 'National' schools replaced church schools. Youth activities were severely curtailed. Pastoral care in the hospitals and other welfare institutions was restricted. Catholic organizations, such as the large Volksbund der Katholiken Oesterreichs, were dissolved and their property was confiscated. The Catholic publishing houses were closed. In May 1938 sixty Austrian Roman Catholic priests were arrested on charges of immoral conduct. A year later a law was passed abolishing the compulsory church tax and making all contributions voluntary; this, it was alleged, was to save the national exchequer 25-30 million Reich Marks, though the Churches' budgets were still to be approved by the State; there was no intention of introducing complete separation. The Austrian marriage laws were altered by the introduction of civil marriage and new procedures for divorce. A full-scale anti-clerical campaign was launched in the press, and new recruits to the Austrian Hitler Youth were sedulously instructed in Nazi doctrines.

..................................................[quotation omitted]......................................................................................................

In August 1938 detachments of the Party were ordered to make a survey of all the buildings, houses and hostels in the possession of 'the Churches, church organizations, Jews or politically implicated individuals', and local Party representatives were instructed to inform headquarters of the buildings needed for 'the local detachment of the Party, its affiliates or associated organizations, or for rest homes'. Many Church properties, including the famous monastery of St Lamprecht, were confiscated by Party functionaries even before the outbreak of war. And in October, when the Austrian bishops in desperation were finally driven to protest, the Nazis provoked a riot in the main square outside St Stephen's Cathedral in Vienna, culminating on the following day in the looting and burning of Cardinal Innitzer's palace.

These violent moves shocked the Austrian population to the core, coming as they did at a time when many people were striving to reconcile their long-established Catholicism with their newfound enthusiasm for Nazism. In fact, of course, there was nothing new in any of these repressive measures, all of which had already been applied on the other side of the border. Only the illusion died hard. From the Nazis' point of view, the one novelty in their Austrian Church policy lay in the decision to leave the organization of anti-clerical measures in the hands of the Reich Commissar, Bürckel, and to exclude the Ministry of Church affairs in Berlin from jurisdiction over the Austrian Church. There can be little doubt that this decision was not due to the improvised character of the Nazi administration of Austria, but stemmed simply from the determination of the Party leaders, particularly Bormann, to do everything possible to undermine Kerrl's influence and competency: by leaving Austrian Church affairs in the charge of local officials who were responsible only to the Party, the Ministry of Church Affairs was neatly circumvented and ignored.
[Footnotes omitted.]

Dan asked:
And as an aside, were Jehovah's witnesses given the purple triange because of their (quite heterodox) Christianity or because they refused to fight?
Here again, as I indicated in a previous post, I find it hard to distiguish a political position from a religious belief. In truth I know very little about the Jehovah's Witnesses, but it is my understanding that their religion is based on a belief that they are citizen's of Jehovah's kingdom, and that as such it would be sacriledge for them to pledge allegiance, fight for or even demonstrate fidelity to any worldly nation or join in any organization sponsored by any worldly nation. This got them into huge trouble in Germany (and the US as well) in WWI for defying conscription and although their oppression relaxed considerably during the Weimar Republic they suffered violent attacks, both figuratively and physically, by Nazi SA elements during the late 20s and early 30s. They refused to render the Nazi salute on the grounds it would constitute idolatry and after Hitler came to power in 1933 refused on grounds of sacriledge to take the oath required of all civil servants. During 1933 their organization was banned throughout most of Germany and their church offices confiscated. Nonetheless their congregations all refused to comply with the ban, and here is a letter dated October 7, 1934 which was sent by every Jehovah's Witness congregation in Germany to the German Government:

JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES' STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES (1934)
To the Officials of the Government:

The Word of Jehovah God, as set out in the Holy Bible, is the supreme law and to us it is our sole guide for the reason that we have devoted ourselves to God and are true and sincere followers of Christ Jesus.

During the past year, and contrary to God's law and in violation of our rights, you have forbidden us as Jehovah's Witnesses to meet together to study God's Word and worship and serve Him. In His Word he commands us that we shall not forsake the assembling of ourselves together. (Hebrews 10:25) To us Jehovah commands: 'Ye are my witnesses that I am God. Go and tell the people my message.' (Isaiah 43:10, 12; Isaiah 6:9; Matthew 24:14) There is a direct conflict between your law and God's law, and, following the lead of the faithful apostles we ought to obey God rather than men,' and this we will do. (Acts 5:29) Therefore this is to advise you that at any cost we will obey God's commandments, will meet together for the study of His Word, and will worship and serve Him as He has commanded. If your government or officers do violence to us because we are obeying God, then our blood will be upon you and you will answer to Almighty God.

We have no interest in political affairs, but are wholly devoted to God's Kingdom under Christ His King. We will do no injury or harm to anyone. We would delight to dwell in peace and do good to all men as we have opportunity, but, since your government and its officers continue in your attempt to force us to disobey the highest law of the universe, we are compelled to now give you notice that we will, by His Grace, obey Jehovah God and fully trust Him to deliver us from all oppression and oppressors.

Reprinted and translated in Jehovah's Witnesses: Proclaimers of God's Kingdom (New York: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, 1993), p. 694.
Source: http://www.holocaust-trc.org/Jletter.htm

This defiant letter, of course, predated the institution of compulsory conscription in Germany and was long before commencement of WWII, but although I believe there were a number of arrests around this time I think (but am not sure) that the mass arrests of the Witnesses, their incarceration in the KLs, and the purple triangles all came a few years after the letter.

Due to the lenght of this post, I will save my last comment for a future one.

Regards, Kaschner

David Thompson
Forum Staff
Posts: 23724
Joined: 20 Jul 2002, 20:52
Location: USA

#12

Post by David Thompson » 29 Dec 2005, 02:13

For the treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses in Nazi Germany, see:

Jehovah's Witnesses in the Concentration Camps
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=46583
Jehovah's Witnesses
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=19468
what concentration camp patch did christians wear?
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=14742
Purple Triangle -- the "Bibelforschers"
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=13855

walterkaschner
In memoriam
Posts: 1588
Joined: 13 Mar 2002, 02:17
Location: Houston, Texas

#13

Post by walterkaschner » 29 Dec 2005, 02:38

Dan wrote:
About a third of what has been posted on this thread I find equally ambiguous.

Quote:
The Nazi conspirators considered religious literature undesirable for the Wehrmacht. National Socialist publications were prepared for the Wehrmacht for the expressed purpose of replacing and counteracting the influence of religious literature disseminated to the troops. (101-PS; 100-PS; 064-PS)


Well, sure. Nazism is as Mr. Kaschner pointed out not compatable with Christianity. But what was actually done about religious material dissmeinated to the troops? Where Bibles banned?
As usual, I must plead that I know very little about the details of Nazi religious policy as applied to the Wehrmacht. I do know that Bibles were not banned - not even the Old Testament - at least for middle to senior officers of the Heer, for I now have in my library the tattered and worn Bible that my Father-in-Law carried throughout WWII. I also know that Evangelische chaplains were attached to the Heer at least at Divisional level, for the Evangelische Probst (in Schleswig-Holstein called a "Probst" rather than "Bischof") for the Diocese in which I was married, and who conducted my marriage ceremony, had been a Divisional Chaplain at the war's end and an Army chaplain and close friend of my Father-in-Law when the latter was stationed in Schleswig-Holstein before the war. I also know that there were Catholic chaplains in my Father-in-Law's regiment (which had been Austrian before the Anchluss) during the 1941-2 Winter in Russia, for I have a photo taken by my Father-in-Law of a Regimental Mass being held in a snow storm just before going into battle in Russia. I suspect that it might have been quite different in SS Units - at least initially when they were composed of hot-eyed Nazi enthusiast volunteers - and believe there has been some evidence to this effect proffered on this Forum, which in my dotage I can't recall.

But I would suggest that the Nazi Government's initial overt actions of suppression of Christian Churches and Christianity itself were of practical necessity substantially tempered by the fact of the War itself. Hitler had demonstrated his pragmatism several times previously. In the Thousand Year Reich there would be plenty of time to supplant Christianity and its Churches with Nazi ideology, but that goal had to delayed until the immediate challenge of winning the war was met, and the sorry fact was that in 1939 the overwhelming majority of Germans still considered themselves to be Christians. So one had to be very cautious and careful of the potential effect of overt and clumsy anti-Christian pressures might have on morale - both within the Wehrmacht and on the home front.

Here is what Conway has to say in this connection in his The Nazi Persecution of the Churches [cited in a preceding post] at 232-3:
The outbreak of war brought about a change in Nazi Church policy. The preoccupation of the authorities in mobilizing the German people behind the war effort necessitated the abandonment of policies likely to lead to internal strife or tension, and, since Church matters were considered of minor importance in comparison with the large issues now at stake, a truce was called in the Church conflict. Hitler himself, fully alive to the need for national unity, commanded that 'no further action should be taken against the Evangelical and Catholic Churches for the duration of the war', and ten months later he ordered the suspension of all non-essential measures that might lead to a worsening of relations between the Churches and the State and Party.

The Nazis had to reckon with the fact that, despite all Rosenberg's efforts, only 5 per cent of the population registered themselves in the 1939 census as no longer connected with the Christian Churches: 3.5 per cent declared themselves to be 'God believers' (gottgläubig) and another 1.5 per cent atheists. The remaining 95 per cent of the eighty million people of the greater German Reich were still registered as members of the Catholic or Evangelical Churches, and even the majority of the three million Nazi Party members still paid the Church taxes and registered themselves as Christians. The united support of all these millions of German Christians was needed for the war effort if Hitler's plans for Germany were to be fulfilled. According to Goering, it was Hitler's view that
If religious belief is a help, it can only be an advantage, and any disturbances in this connection could conceivably affect the soldier's inward strength. The main concern now was that every German should do his duty and that every soldier should, if need be, go to his death bravely.


Furthermore, it was fully appreciated that measures against the Churches might cause dissension at home, and that, if the news of such steps reached the outside world, it might create an impression of disunity within Germany. Even Goebbels, with his notorious record of anticlericalism, switched to the view that there should be a complete cessation of activities against the Church, being now convinced, as frequent entries in his diary show, that the church question would be best left in abeyance until the war was over.

The mood of the German people was also not to be discounted. As Dr Stewart Herman observed,
The keenly felt catastrophe of another World War, following so closely on the heels of the last, had the effect of sobering the German people and placing them under spiritual pressures which gradually evoked a hunger for the substantial bread of a real religion rather than the inadequate cake of political ideology. The Party was as prompt as the Church to recognize the fact and to try to satisfy it.
The Party agencies, especially the Ministry of Propaganda, brought considerable pressure to bear on the Churches to declare their whole-hearted support of the war effort, and even threatened reprisals against church newspapers that did not devote themselves to that end. On 7 September the Gestapo prohibited all church meetings for the next few weeks, lest the congregations should be influenced by defeatist ideas similar to those spread abroad by the authors of the Fürbitteliturgie a year earlier, though commemoration services for Germans living in Poland who had suffered persecution for their nationality were approved and even encouraged.
[Footnotes omitted]

I would be highly interested in any further or better information that anyone might have to offer.

Regards, Kaschner

Regards, Kaschner

Dan
Member
Posts: 8429
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 15:06
Location: California

#14

Post by Dan » 29 Dec 2005, 03:36

Great personal information from your father in law the General. There must have been some solemn times during religious services at Stalingrad. And it again makes one aware of the relative lack of such historically valuable photography available on the net, or in books for that matter.
I suspect that it might have been quite different in SS Units - at least initially when they were composed of hot-eyed Nazi enthusiast volunteers - and believe there has been some evidence to this effect proffered on this Forum
There have been some posts on the subject here, I believe it depended to a large degree on the Standartenfuehrer of the individual Divisions, with very religious men such as Degrelle having Chaplains and others not. Didn't Gross Deutchland's men celebrate mass in Notre Dame after the fall of France? And there were Moslem Chaplains in both Scanderbeg and Handschar, and no doubt groups like the Armenian volunteers et. al. had their own.

Great info also on the Glaubensbewegung Deutchen Christen. I'd wondered about the circumstances of the birth of the Confessing Church, as you may remember when you supplied all that information about Bonhoeffer after I asked for it several months ago.

nny
Member
Posts: 199
Joined: 19 May 2005, 18:11
Location: Mass, US

#15

Post by nny » 29 Dec 2005, 04:15

http://www.tpub.com/content/combat/1431 ... 16_116.htm

Interesting article regarding Christianity and the IMT trial behavior of top nazis. Not too surprising that Goering was such a leader at the services, besides being a Nazi, he felt compelled (As did Goebbels) to have all his children baptized.

Thank you for the footnotes Walter, as of today "The Coming of the Third Reich" is the only book cited I have, if possible could you provide page numbers? If not thats okay, I often go by memory of what I've read and can only cite books. I have looked in the Index for Churches and Christianity but for the most part the book describes the rationale behind the "Church" backing of the Nazis.

Also in Brownings "Ordinary Men", he cites some of the propoganda articles the Police Men were made to read, since he estimates that something along the lines of 70 percent of this propoganda did not survive the war (IE there was nothing about preparing the Policemen to murder innocent Jewish women and Children), its fortunate that articles relating to Christianity did survive. It makes the suggestion that Christianity is fundamentally wrong because it encourages compassion for all people, not just the select few the Nazis would consider worthy. But it must be remembered that the Police Battalions were under different circumstances, and different stresses than an average German civilian would have been, and transposing propoganda aimed at the murderers of Jews onto civilians can be dangerous. I believe the Nazis argued that "Not everything with a human face is a human." (Carl Schmidt I believe). Thus by todays standards no matter how much I love my dog, he is not going to heaven. Animals don't have souls, thus are not engulfed in the moral sphere of human or indeed Gods responsibility. I think this is a tool used by many defenders of theology to rationalize how so much suffering is inherant in nature via "Intelligent Design". I think it was possible for the Nazis to engulf a (bastardized at best) version of Christianity based on this and a number of other arguments. They wanted to create an "Aryan Christ", but according to one defendant at Nuremberg (in the article quoted above) "The son of God is a Jew? Sounds like propoganda to me." (of course based on a purely racial view of Judaism.)

Of course Nazism is incompatable with present day popular Christianity and its values, but this does not mean that Christianity was not compatable with Nazism. Also do not forget that it was no secret to AH that his 'Table Talk' sessions were being taken down in writing, so they encompass no more a private view of Hitler than do any of his speeches. Ian Kershaw likes to argue that "Hitler had no private personality."

I believe much of the vehemence with which people dive into the topic of Christianity and Nazism is a reaction to the Holocaust and Nazi actions during the war. Organized Christianity wished to distance itself from the actions of Nazis, hopefully encompass themselves under the umbrella of victims but if not simply portray themselves as some how incompatable with Nazism (or vice-versa).

As far as Nazi plans for Christianity AFTER the war, this doesn't impress me too much, why any supression of Christianity during the war at all if they were so concerned about 'rousing the Christian masses' against them? Thomas Childers in "History of Hitlers Empire" states something to the effect that Christian Priests were before their churches every sunday preaching "It is incompatable with Christian morales and ideals to vote either Communist or National Socialist". Well needless to say saying something like that to a large group of people during the war is going to get you thrown into a place like Dachau regardless of whom you are.

Of course I can see the propoganda value in 'appearing' Christian when it suits a purpose but being fundamentally anti-Christian at heart, and having an inward desire to remove Christianity from the German sphere of influence after the war, or indeed if it suits you, within a thousand years. Perhaps I am looking for something more along the lines of what happened to the Churches in the Soviet Union under the Bolsheviks, or Hungary under Bela Kun and I am getting caught up on what was done, rather than what was intended. I'm sorry if I appear naive about the topic, but it seems too full of contradictions to be fundamentally "Black and White".

Post Reply

Return to “Holocaust & 20th Century War Crimes”