Japanese heavy tank

Discussions on the vehicles used by the Axis forces. Hosted by Christian Ankerstjerne
User avatar
Demophilos
Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 22 Oct 2002, 11:10
Location: Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece

Japanese heavy tank

#1

Post by Demophilos » 26 Oct 2002, 01:20

Which was the heaviest Japanese tank of the war?
Type 4 Chi-Ro?

Did the Type 5 Chi-Ri saw any action during the war?
When was it first put into production and how many were built?

Logan Hartke
Member
Posts: 1226
Joined: 12 Mar 2002, 19:30
Location: Illinois, USA

#2

Post by Logan Hartke » 26 Oct 2002, 04:33

The Japanese Chi-To Type 4 was the second heaviest ever fully in Japan during WWII (30t).

Image

Image

The Chi-Re was the heaviest (37t) with a picture and confirmed built.

Image

http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/japan/japan.html

Logan Hartke


User avatar
Demophilos
Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 22 Oct 2002, 11:10
Location: Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece

#3

Post by Demophilos » 26 Oct 2002, 10:58

Interesting.

Thanks.

User avatar
Mait
Member
Posts: 440
Joined: 16 Jun 2002, 15:18
Location: Estonia

#4

Post by Mait » 26 Oct 2002, 11:10

Of course there are rumors about 120 ton super-heavy tank called O-I.
I can´t say are these true or not, but check out the http://member.nifty.ne.jp/takixxx/ and ask the owner of the site...

Best Regards,

Mait.

User avatar
Demophilos
Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 22 Oct 2002, 11:10
Location: Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece

#5

Post by Demophilos » 29 Oct 2002, 16:03

According to the site a prototype of O/I was actually built and according to witnesses it was sent immediately to Manchuria.I've searched and found out that it was to be armed with a 100mm cannon.

User avatar
Mait
Member
Posts: 440
Joined: 16 Jun 2002, 15:18
Location: Estonia

#6

Post by Mait » 29 Oct 2002, 19:12

This was 105mm AT gun developed by Japanese in late ww2. It was planned to be used on modified Type 5 Chi-Ri chassis to be something like German Elefant.

Picture of this gun can be seen on the site I posted previously, under the AFV section (experimental vehicles/105mm sph Ho-Ri).

Best Regards,

Mait.

User avatar
Sephiroth
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 01 Nov 2002, 08:45
Location: Nagoya

#7

Post by Sephiroth » 03 Nov 2002, 08:09

Mait wrote:Of course there are rumors about 120 ton super-heavy tank called O-I.
I can´t say are these true or not, but check out the http://member.nifty.ne.jp/takixxx/ and ask the owner of the site...

Best Regards,

Mait.
Hi, I think this site make some mistake about the O-I Tank. The pic is the other super tank named "100t". Contains one 100mm cannon and two 37mm AT gun. O-I has also three turrets, main turret in the middle. One small turret with 45mm gun is in front of the main turret, another small turret with Anti-air MG in rear. It looks like a bigger TYPE95 heavy tank. Her name "O-I" means "Big Type I" in Japanese.

Best regards.

User avatar
Kurt_Steiner
Member
Posts: 3980
Joined: 14 Feb 2004, 14:52
Location: Barcelona, Catalunya

#8

Post by Kurt_Steiner » 21 Jul 2004, 20:19

As the average Japanese tank was unable to face the USA tanks, why Japan didn't try to produce something like the Chi-To Type 4? Perhaps did they started too late?

Best regards

User avatar
Lkefct
Member
Posts: 1294
Joined: 24 Jun 2004, 23:15
Location: Frederick MD

#9

Post by Lkefct » 21 Jul 2004, 20:45

In terms of a vehile which would have served them best, how about some sort of StuG or jagdpanzer. The best bang for the buck is probably the jagdpanzer 38. Reasonably tough armour, good gun (although it can probably be replaced by the nearest Japanese equivilent), and some mobility. Given that Japan, was not planning to fihgt a protract conflict in asia, probably doesn't need a large tank force. A tank destroyer/StuG force might be a better use of their researces.

User avatar
David C. Clarke
In memoriam
Posts: 11368
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 18:17
Location: U.S. of A.

#10

Post by David C. Clarke » 22 Jul 2004, 01:54

As the average Japanese tank was unable to face the USA tanks, why Japan didn't try to produce something like the Chi-To Type 4? Perhaps did they started too late?
A few reasons for this. First, American mediums scaled in at 35 tons. A Japanese "medium" scaled in at about half the weight. Why, because China was the IJAs (Imperial Japanese Army's) preoccupation and heavy tanks were unsuited to its terrain. Moreover, tanks were thought of as strictly infantry support weapons by Army doctrine, so why build a tank that can't accoompany the infantry? (Of course, this doctrine was partially ignored in the Burma campaign by force of circumstance).
Secondly, strictly as a matter of national priority in the distribution of scarce resources, the IJN (Imperial Japanese Navy) had priority on armor plate: Japan needed a strong Navy to defend the homeland more than it neeeded, at the time, an tank-heavy Army.
In the event, by the time the threat to the home islands became clear, Japan looked at tank designs again, even going so far as to import the design of the Tiger I (they bought one, but it was never delivered!).

Best Regards,
~D

User avatar
Eden Zhang
Member
Posts: 1196
Joined: 28 Dec 2003, 10:54
Location: XXX

#11

Post by Eden Zhang » 22 Jul 2004, 08:11

they bought one, but it was never delivered
Did they get their money back? :)

User avatar
Sun Tsu
Member
Posts: 359
Joined: 27 Feb 2004, 19:04
Location: Sweden (Gothenburg atm)

#12

Post by Sun Tsu » 22 Jul 2004, 09:23

They borrowed it to Germany, IIRC...

User avatar
Kurt_Steiner
Member
Posts: 3980
Joined: 14 Feb 2004, 14:52
Location: Barcelona, Catalunya

#13

Post by Kurt_Steiner » 22 Jul 2004, 10:13

Thanks for the info, David. In fact, in 1943, Japan bought also a Panther Ausf D along with PzKpfw VI Tiger, but both were never delivered due to the war situation.

Best regards

User avatar
tom!
Member
Posts: 887
Joined: 15 Dec 2003, 12:42
Location: Dorsten Germany
Contact:

#14

Post by tom! » 03 Aug 2004, 08:57

Hi.

Type 4 Chi-To: 6 built
Type 5 Chi-Ri: 1 built

None of them saw any battle action.
The Type 3 Chi-Nu saw no battle action too.


In 1944 the US-Navy (especially the submarines) caused heavy losses of japanese naval transport capacities and so the japanese heavy industy got not enough raw materials from the occupied terretories to produce higher numbers of tanks.

There were a lot of spg- and spatg-projects but only some were produced in limited numbers:

short 120 mm naval gun on chassis type 97
Image

long 120 mm naval gun on chassis type 97
Image

Ho-I
Image

Ho-Ni I
Image

Ho-Ni II
Image

Ho-Ni III
Image

Ho-Ro
Image

Na-To
Image

sources:
found them on various websites
linked from my website


Yours

tom! :wink:

User avatar
R-Bob The Great!
Member
Posts: 549
Joined: 24 Jan 2003, 07:13
Location: Canada

#15

Post by R-Bob The Great! » 04 Aug 2004, 08:36

Did the Na-to ever see combat?

Post Reply

Return to “The Ron Klages Panzer & other vehicles Section”