Also manufactured in Shanxi, possibly completed in 1935, with a total of two samples, but one has been lost and only one remains.
Need ID Chinese artillery
-
- Member
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 27 Jan 2023 04:04
- Location: Guangzhou China
-
- Member
- Posts: 1619
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004 13:39
- Location: Europe
Re: Need ID Chinese artillery
Thanks!
So built at the same place as the 88m and 10,5 mountain howitzer?
So built at the same place as the 88m and 10,5 mountain howitzer?
-
- Member
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 27 Jan 2023 04:04
- Location: Guangzhou China
Re: Need ID Chinese artillery
Good question.On the shell, 44kg should be derived from SFH13, and 36kg should be Yan Xishan's special preference for Japanese shells, which were modified from Japanese shells.The problem is the Muzzle velocity of 436 m/s.I think this data may be a bit too high. Schneider M1917,a bullet weight of 45kg and a Muzzle velocity of around 450m/s.It is slightly larger than this 150mm howitzer in range, but its weight is far more than.So I think there may be some changes on the gun rack, but the specific situation is not very clear.nuyt wrote: ↑28 Apr 2023 15:00The specs you give are better than the original sfH 13 by Krupp when it comes to elevation and range. Nevertheless, the Nanjing howitzer appears to still have the box trail carriage and, judging by the barrel, it was likely based on the sFH13 lang or L17 sub type. Better range may have been due to higher fixing point of the weapon on the barrel? Or better ammo? Or a combination?
-
- Member
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 27 Jan 2023 04:04
- Location: Guangzhou China
-
- Member
- Posts: 1619
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004 13:39
- Location: Europe
Re: Need ID Chinese artillery
Very interesting!