The invasion of Oahu, December 1941.

Discussions on alternate history, including events up to 20 years before today. Hosted by Terry Duncan.
robdab
Member
Posts: 778
Joined: 30 Mar 2007 15:45
Location: Canada

Re: The invasion of Oahu, December 1941.

Post by robdab » 14 Feb 2017 20:35

glenn239 wrote:
Never. The original could use some tweaking and cleaning up, but I won't be doing it.
Understood.

Thanks for clarifying your PoV.
.

Wenbo
New member
Posts: 1
Joined: 08 Mar 2021 22:09
Location: Belgium

Re: (5) Shipping requirements

Post by Wenbo » 08 Mar 2021 22:23

glenn239 wrote:
17 May 2007 16:18
Total cubic volume: 5,651,861 cubic feet.
Shipping required @ 30 cubic feet per ship ton = 188,395 tons.


Note the tremendous impact of horses upon shipping. In addition to the 30.7% of grand total needed for the horses and their equipment, most of the food stowed (76%) was also for horses - a stunning 42% (79,333 tons) of the total divisional lift was needed just for the 7,930 horses, their food for 2 months and equipment. (About 10 shipping tons per horse vs. 3-5 tons per man). The only way to decrease this burden entailed some risk - either to reduce the amount of food embarked or increase the ratio of oats to hay in the animal's diet (at the cost of increased rates of sickness).
Hi Glenn,

Probably you over estimated the total tonnage needed to load a Japanese division at end of 1941. Take the landing at Malaya as an example: 5th div were landed on two beaches with the following ships:
Songkhla
Ship tonnage speed
SADO 7,189 19.5
KASHII 8,417 19.0
KYUSHU 8,666 19.9
ASAKASAN 8,812 19.0
AOBASAN 8,706 19.0
ATSUTASAN 8,663 19.0
SHINSHU (RYUJO) 7,100 20.4
KANSAI 8,614 17.5
NAKAO 7,190 18.5
SASAKO MARU 7,189 19.5
Total 80,546

Pattani:
tonnage speed
HIROKAWA 6,872 19.5
SAGAMI 9,264 19.5
KINUGAWA 6,936 16
KINKA MARU 9,301 21.6
Tosan Maru 8,684 19.9
41,057

grand total 153,263

This not only includes the 5th division but all aux forces and a tank regiment with 20 * type 97 and 37* Type 95 tanks.
So without unnecessary loadings, the battle load of Japanese forces could be much less.

BTW, the garrison on Oahu has basically very weak armored forces if any, and possibly lack of anti tank weapons as well, when in face of a Japanese landing of tanks. This could be devastating...

OpanaPointer
Member
Posts: 4803
Joined: 16 May 2010 14:12
Location: United States of America

Re: The invasion of Oahu, December 1941.

Post by OpanaPointer » 09 Mar 2021 00:13

The 3" AAA was dual purpose, IIRC.
Come visit our sites:
hyperwarHyperwar
World War II Resources

Bellum se ipsum alet, mostly Doritos.

ChristopherPerrien
Member
Posts: 7050
Joined: 26 Dec 2002 00:58
Location: Mississippi

Re: The invasion of Oahu, December 1941.

Post by ChristopherPerrien » 09 Mar 2021 02:30

:thumbsup: I give both of you "The dead horse shovel" award for digging up the same necro .
Wembo, I salut your further efforts.
OP? IDK. I think we have already dug enough. Write a book yourself. I'll buy it. :D

Carl Schwamberger
Host - Allied sections
Posts: 8847
Joined: 02 Sep 2006 20:31
Location: USA

Re: The invasion of Oahu, December 1941.

Post by Carl Schwamberger » 09 Mar 2021 04:53

Thread Necromancy.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

David Thompson
Forum Staff
Posts: 23579
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 19:52
Location: USA

Re: The invasion of Oahu, December 1941.

Post by David Thompson » 09 Mar 2021 06:31

R.I.P.

Return to “What if”