Understood.glenn239 wrote:
Never. The original could use some tweaking and cleaning up, but I won't be doing it.
Thanks for clarifying your PoV.
.
Understood.glenn239 wrote:
Never. The original could use some tweaking and cleaning up, but I won't be doing it.
Hi Glenn,glenn239 wrote: ↑17 May 2007 16:18Total cubic volume: 5,651,861 cubic feet.
Shipping required @ 30 cubic feet per ship ton = 188,395 tons.
Note the tremendous impact of horses upon shipping. In addition to the 30.7% of grand total needed for the horses and their equipment, most of the food stowed (76%) was also for horses - a stunning 42% (79,333 tons) of the total divisional lift was needed just for the 7,930 horses, their food for 2 months and equipment. (About 10 shipping tons per horse vs. 3-5 tons per man). The only way to decrease this burden entailed some risk - either to reduce the amount of food embarked or increase the ratio of oats to hay in the animal's diet (at the cost of increased rates of sickness).