LWD wrote:
SoDak would probably have been a bit worse for it but Yamato isn't going to do much better at taking 2700 lb rounds at that range than Kirishima.
Well, Yamato was far better armored than the Kongos. Those were ww1-vintage battlecruisers reclassified as battleships after their reconstruction, but they did not really warrant the BB qualification. Their armor remained really subpar by ww2 standards. They had no IZ vs the US 16" Mark8 shells.
You may have a look at this article to see that the Washington made short work of Kirishima :
http://www.navweaps.com/index_lundgren/ ... alysis.pdf
On the other hand, Yamato had a 16" belt (and 24" on the front of the turrets) as well as a 8" deck. This gives her, in very rough number an IZ from 20-22,000 yards to 35,000 yards for the citadel.
It should not be forgotten either what would happen if Yamato had been able to score hits. In case of Kirishima's 14-inchers, Washington should have been able to withstand it -- her armor scheme was after all designed to defeat precisely such shells. But it was an entirely different matter to sustain hits by 3,300lbs shells. I lack some precise data here, but if Washington had an IZ vs Yamato, it was a very narrow one, at around 32,000 yards. (I do not have the figures for SoDak right now). Anyway none of the US BBs was designed to withstand 18" shells.
I cant recall were the US carriers were that date.
USS Enterprise was the only carrier available in the area by that time (Saratoga was still on her way to South Pacific by that time, probably in the Fidji area). She was stationed south of Guadalcanal, but had still not fully recovered from the damage received at Santa Cruz (she had one elevator off service, impairing her air operations, IIRC).
She headed for Noumea for repair after the OTL battle.