"Knockout blow" in regards to Russia?

Discussions on alternate history, including events up to 20 years before today. Hosted by Terry Duncan.
Post Reply
Ianseymour95
Member
Posts: 29
Joined: 04 May 2017, 22:59
Location: UK

"Knockout blow" in regards to Russia?

#1

Post by Ianseymour95 » 27 Sep 2017, 16:37

In terms of delivering "Knockout blows" what would you consider a Knockout blow to Russia be in 1941?

This is either Germany doing or another power

User avatar
stg 44
Member
Posts: 3376
Joined: 03 Dec 2002, 02:42
Location: illinois

Re: "Knockout blow" in regards to Russia?

#2

Post by stg 44 » 27 Sep 2017, 16:50

Not sure there is one. The closest would be Moscow IMHO due to the centralized nature of the Soviet government.


User avatar
BDV
Member
Posts: 3704
Joined: 10 Apr 2009, 17:11

Re: "Knockout blow" in regards to Russia?

#3

Post by BDV » 28 Sep 2017, 22:31

stg 44 wrote:Not sure there is one. The closest would be Moscow IMHO due to the centralized nature of the Soviet government.
Telegraph and radio together with rail-way ensure that a centralized government can change physical positions and move to different location if such is available; not a problem in Russia. Short of a A-Bomb strike on a joint STAVKA-KGB-Politburo meeting, there is no such "knockout blow" possibility.
Nobody expects the Fallschirm! Our chief weapon is surprise; surprise and fear; fear and surprise. Our 2 weapons are fear and surprise; and ruthless efficiency. Our *3* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency; and almost fanatical devotion

User avatar
stg 44
Member
Posts: 3376
Joined: 03 Dec 2002, 02:42
Location: illinois

Re: "Knockout blow" in regards to Russia?

#4

Post by stg 44 » 28 Sep 2017, 22:45

BDV wrote:
stg 44 wrote:Not sure there is one. The closest would be Moscow IMHO due to the centralized nature of the Soviet government.
Telegraph and radio together with rail-way ensure that a centralized government can change physical positions and move to different location if such is available; not a problem in Russia. Short of a A-Bomb strike on a joint STAVKA-KGB-Politburo meeting, there is no such "knockout blow" possibility.
I'm going to disagree with you; for the Soviet state Moscow WAS the state. It could displace, but it loses it's legitimacy to relocate to a deep provincial city after losing the core of the regime, agricultural, and industrial heartland. Moscow was about 10% of the USSR's industry and even with population/industrial evacuation, you aren't displacing the core of the electrical infrastructure of the iron/coal deposits in the area. Plus losing Moscow means Leningrad falls due to lack of supply to the Ladoga 'road of life'. Losing Moscow means losing the #s 1 and 2 cities in the country, the cores of the revolution, and the heart of industry. Stalin loses legitimacy with the country and rest of the regime, plus THE crucial staging area to supply and organize the partisans in Belarus.

User avatar
SpicyJuan
Member
Posts: 258
Joined: 14 Mar 2015, 03:08
Location: Luxemburg

Re: "Knockout blow" in regards to Russia?

#5

Post by SpicyJuan » 29 Sep 2017, 00:03

Ianseymour95 wrote:In terms of delivering "Knockout blows" what would you consider a Knockout blow to Russia be in 1941?

This is either Germany doing or another power
Moscow falling in the classic earlier typhoon scenario. However if that was not enough, it would likely take several additional blows such as the fall of Leningrad, Murmansk, and the German's holding Rostov.

User avatar
BDV
Member
Posts: 3704
Joined: 10 Apr 2009, 17:11

Re: "Knockout blow" in regards to Russia?

#6

Post by BDV » 29 Sep 2017, 03:06

The loss of industry would not help the Sovjets, true.

But the government and its repressive organs can evacuate efficiently by rail and continue to control the Soviet state by means of commands relayed by telegraph and radio. Moscow, the geographical location, means little for the continued function of the soviet state.
Nobody expects the Fallschirm! Our chief weapon is surprise; surprise and fear; fear and surprise. Our 2 weapons are fear and surprise; and ruthless efficiency. Our *3* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency; and almost fanatical devotion

thaddeus_c
Member
Posts: 816
Joined: 22 Jan 2014, 04:16

Re: "Knockout blow" in regards to Russia?

#7

Post by thaddeus_c » 01 Oct 2017, 17:23

will offer one blow (not a knock out) that is out of left field, but very possible for Germany to achieve.

complete elimination of Soviet fleets from Baltic & Black Seas, they had majority trapped in port of Tallinn in Baltic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_ev ... of_Tallinn

relied on Romania on the Black Sea (malpractice by KM)

if they had eliminated the fleets the escape from Odessa, reinforcement of Leningrad and Crimea would not have happened. they might at outside chance have even been able to refloat and/or capture intact some ships and form small flotillas.

solves a lot of German transportation problems to have been able to use both seas unmolested.

User avatar
Dark Age
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 23:18

Re: "Knockout blow" in regards to Russia?

#8

Post by Dark Age » 01 Oct 2017, 17:30

You people on the forum should stop contributing to these lazy What if posts.

Best not to even respond I think. The original poster doesn't want to contribute anything to the conversation.

Post Reply

Return to “What if”