Better approach would be to 'discuss' definitions as Atrevida suggests.Grzesio wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019, 21:16You want us to believe, explosion of a 50 kg bomb covered area of some 57 square kilometres, while area of 450 sqkm suffered from "much destruction"?
BTW, quite an interesting discussion on the Hexenkessel (in German): https://unterirdisch.de/index.php?threa ... ombe.5055/
I read about this in the LUFTWAFFE OVER AMERICA. but the impression is a unsuccessful nuclear device. Puzzled by this reference to levels of destruction, I wondered if it might be a "dirty bomb". But with further research I came across turn of the century [19th] article examining possibilities of increasing explosive force with addition of coal dust.
I wonder if this would be like a fuel-air explosive like terrorist have used in the past?