Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
-
- Member
- Posts: 10162
- Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 12:19
Re: Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
Hi Steve,
No, I did not say that electricity was an add-on to a house (though it literally was in the older house where I live). I was saying that electricity was an add-on to cities, which predated its harnessing by several thousand years.
Perhaps widespread atheism, rather than Christianity, is a more representative "European" trait compared with other societies?
Your Barry Cunliffe definition of western Eurasia as a peninsula of a continent, rather than as a continent in its own right, articulates my position better than I have done myself.
How can we say that the Iranians clearly don't live in "Europe" if we can't define the boundaries of "Europe" in the first place? If one defines "Europe" linguistically or ethnically, then they are probably in.
China was long stagnant in science and technology for cultural reasons. Culture adapts and developes. Western Eurasian advantage in these areas was late in coming, built initially on outside input and already may have passed.
"Europe" is an artificial construct without an agreed natural, linguistic, ethnic, religious or cultural boundary.
Cheers,
Sid.
No, I did not say that electricity was an add-on to a house (though it literally was in the older house where I live). I was saying that electricity was an add-on to cities, which predated its harnessing by several thousand years.
Perhaps widespread atheism, rather than Christianity, is a more representative "European" trait compared with other societies?
Your Barry Cunliffe definition of western Eurasia as a peninsula of a continent, rather than as a continent in its own right, articulates my position better than I have done myself.
How can we say that the Iranians clearly don't live in "Europe" if we can't define the boundaries of "Europe" in the first place? If one defines "Europe" linguistically or ethnically, then they are probably in.
China was long stagnant in science and technology for cultural reasons. Culture adapts and developes. Western Eurasian advantage in these areas was late in coming, built initially on outside input and already may have passed.
"Europe" is an artificial construct without an agreed natural, linguistic, ethnic, religious or cultural boundary.
Cheers,
Sid.
-
- Member
- Posts: 10162
- Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 12:19
Re: Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
Hi Steve,
No, I did not say that electricity was an add-on to a house (though it literally was in the older house where I live). I was saying that electricity was an add-on to cities, which predated its harnessing by several thousand years.
Perhaps widespread atheism, rather than Christianity, is a more representative "European" trait compared with other societies?
Your Barry Cunliffe definition of western Eurasia as a peninsula of a continent, rather than as a continent in its own right, articulates my position better than I have done myself.
How can we say that the Iranians clearly don't live in "Europe" if we can't define the boundaries of "Europe" in the first place? If one defines "Europe" linguistically or ethnically, then they are probably in.
China was long stagnant in science and technology for cultural reasons. Culture adapts and developes. Western Eurasian advantage in these areas was late in coming, built initially on outside input and already may have passed.
"Europe" is an artificial construct without an agreed natural, linguistic, ethnic, religious or cultural boundary.
So, if Europe extends beyond the three main language groups, which of the smaller languages I mentioned above are in or out and why? Let's concentrate on the Basques and the Hungarians. One apparently predates the arrival of "European" languages in western Eurasia and the other arrived in "Europe" little more than a thousand years ago. Are they in or out and why?
Cheers,
Sid.
No, I did not say that electricity was an add-on to a house (though it literally was in the older house where I live). I was saying that electricity was an add-on to cities, which predated its harnessing by several thousand years.
Perhaps widespread atheism, rather than Christianity, is a more representative "European" trait compared with other societies?
Your Barry Cunliffe definition of western Eurasia as a peninsula of a continent, rather than as a continent in its own right, articulates my position better than I have done myself.
How can we say that the Iranians clearly don't live in "Europe" if we can't define the boundaries of "Europe" in the first place? If one defines "Europe" linguistically or ethnically, then they are probably in.
China was long stagnant in science and technology for cultural reasons. Culture adapts and developes. Western Eurasian advantage in these areas was late in coming, built initially on outside input and already may have passed.
"Europe" is an artificial construct without an agreed natural, linguistic, ethnic, religious or cultural boundary.
So, if Europe extends beyond the three main language groups, which of the smaller languages I mentioned above are in or out and why? Let's concentrate on the Basques and the Hungarians. One apparently predates the arrival of "European" languages in western Eurasia and the other arrived in "Europe" little more than a thousand years ago. Are they in or out and why?
Cheers,
Sid.
Re: Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
If the Hungarians are out of Europe, why would the Finns and Estonians be inside of Europe?
Re: Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
Sid, I am puzzled as to how on the one hand you say that “Your Barry Cunliffe definition of western Eurasia as a peninsula of a continent, rather than as a continent in its own right, articulates my position better than I have done myself”. And then say "Europe" is an artificial construct without an agreed natural, linguistic, ethnic, religious or cultural boundary”.
Cunliffe said that the peninsulas boundary ran through the Black Sea to Georgia a country which stretches most of the way from the Black Sea to the Caspian Sea. What geographical feature stretches between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea? The Caucasus Mountains which Encyclopaedia Britannica tells us is where Europe and Asia converge. I would bet that most of the world agrees with this. These mountains constitute a clear natural boundary between the Black Sea and the Caspian, short of moving the Himalayas you could not have a much better one.
Cunliffe also said that some people defined Europe’s eastern boundary as the Urals or the Volga but he thought the peninsula graded imperceptibly away. Clearly it could not do that if it met the Caucasus Mountains. Also as it graded away towards the east past the Caspian Sea I doubt that he thought it did a right turn and continued grading away imperceptibly over Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan and then Iran.
Presumably if you think that Iran is in Europe you do not agree that the Caucasus Mountains are where Europe and Asia converge. If Iran is in Europe is Central Asia which borders on Iran also in Europe? My girlfriend thinks that this is all bonkers and I am beginning to suspect she could be right.
Ps I never said a European was defined by a particular language.
Cunliffe said that the peninsulas boundary ran through the Black Sea to Georgia a country which stretches most of the way from the Black Sea to the Caspian Sea. What geographical feature stretches between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea? The Caucasus Mountains which Encyclopaedia Britannica tells us is where Europe and Asia converge. I would bet that most of the world agrees with this. These mountains constitute a clear natural boundary between the Black Sea and the Caspian, short of moving the Himalayas you could not have a much better one.
Cunliffe also said that some people defined Europe’s eastern boundary as the Urals or the Volga but he thought the peninsula graded imperceptibly away. Clearly it could not do that if it met the Caucasus Mountains. Also as it graded away towards the east past the Caspian Sea I doubt that he thought it did a right turn and continued grading away imperceptibly over Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan and then Iran.
Presumably if you think that Iran is in Europe you do not agree that the Caucasus Mountains are where Europe and Asia converge. If Iran is in Europe is Central Asia which borders on Iran also in Europe? My girlfriend thinks that this is all bonkers and I am beginning to suspect she could be right.
Ps I never said a European was defined by a particular language.
-
- Member
- Posts: 10162
- Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 12:19
Re: Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
Hi Futurist,
Yup, my earlier point.
Sid.
Yup, my earlier point.
Sid.
-
- Member
- Posts: 10162
- Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 12:19
Re: Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
Hi Steve,
Your Cunliffe post says the following:
"Where Europe ends and Asia begins has for long been a matter of debate. For those who favour a mountain barrier the Urals have their attraction” …………… “Others though have preferred a river boundary, suggesting the Don or the Volga. There is little consensus nor need there be one; peninsulas by their very nature grade imperceptibly into continents”
My point has always been that Eurasia is a continuum, not two distinct entities.
What you quote Cunliffe as saying is entirely consistent with what I wrote; " 'Europe' is an artificial construct without an agreed natural, linguistic, ethnic, religious or cultural boundary.".
The accompanying maps, which show at least sixteen different boundary possibilities, illustrate the problem differentiating "Europe" from "Asia":
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundar ... o_1900.png
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundar ... d_Asia.png
Eurasia is a continuum, not two distinct entities.
Cheers,
Sid.
Your Cunliffe post says the following:
"Where Europe ends and Asia begins has for long been a matter of debate. For those who favour a mountain barrier the Urals have their attraction” …………… “Others though have preferred a river boundary, suggesting the Don or the Volga. There is little consensus nor need there be one; peninsulas by their very nature grade imperceptibly into continents”
My point has always been that Eurasia is a continuum, not two distinct entities.
What you quote Cunliffe as saying is entirely consistent with what I wrote; " 'Europe' is an artificial construct without an agreed natural, linguistic, ethnic, religious or cultural boundary.".
The accompanying maps, which show at least sixteen different boundary possibilities, illustrate the problem differentiating "Europe" from "Asia":
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundar ... o_1900.png
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundar ... d_Asia.png
Eurasia is a continuum, not two distinct entities.
Cheers,
Sid.
Last edited by Sid Guttridge on 01 Jul 2020, 06:30, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 10162
- Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 12:19
Re: Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
Combined with previous post.
Re: Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
@Sid: Have you ever considered that the popularity of anime among white people might indicate that there is a Eurasian spirit lurking deep within many of us?
-
- Member
- Posts: 8269
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
-
- Member
- Posts: 10162
- Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 12:19
Re: Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
Hi Futurist,
I like Porco Rosso, which is about as mixed a Eurasian product as you are likely to get.
Cheers,
Sid.
I like Porco Rosso, which is about as mixed a Eurasian product as you are likely to get.
Cheers,
Sid.
Re: Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
Yes, but not only that!
(For reference, if anyone doesn't know, he's talking about this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panchira )
Re: Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
Sounds like an interesting anime film:Sid Guttridge wrote: ↑08 Jul 2020, 11:06Hi Futurist,
I like Porco Rosso, which is about as mixed a Eurasian product as you are likely to get.
Cheers,
Sid.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porco_Rosso
Re: Churchill - Katyn - Appeasement
Related Link at viewtopic.php?f=6&t=56940