Buffalo's in normandy...
- Vegemite/jordan
- Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: 01 Sep 2005, 07:34
- Location: New Zealand
Buffalo's in normandy...
Hey all, does anybody have any info on how many buffalos were in use/were they a rare sight? I would also like to know if they came in any painted camo-pictures would be well appreciated
- Michael Emrys
- Member
- Posts: 6002
- Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 19:44
- Location: USA
- Vegemite/jordan
- Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: 01 Sep 2005, 07:34
- Location: New Zealand
- Michael Emrys
- Member
- Posts: 6002
- Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 19:44
- Location: USA
Come to think of it, I'm not aware of any DUKWs being used in Normandy either, though they might have been. But I suspect there really wasn't any need of them. There were LSTs and LCTs enough that could land vehicles right on the beach, and the Mulberries got up and operating quickly for deep draft vessels. AIUI, DUKWs were used mainly for unloading deep draft cargo vessels that had no docking facilities.
Michael
Michael
- Vegemite/jordan
- Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: 01 Sep 2005, 07:34
- Location: New Zealand
Well i know for sure that british and Americans had DUKW's in Normandy, i dont have any referencs available but i think a handful at least of DUKs were used by british to cross one of the rivers near Arnhem..... dam sorry its midnight here, sorry i cant get my bearings. Itll probably be a week before i can get anything solid back to you :roll:
Anyway, thanks Michael
Anyway, thanks Michael
DUKWs most certainly were used at each of the beaches. They were utilized on the American beaches to transport the 57mm AT guns of the regimental AT companies and - without much success - the 105mm M2 howitzers of the attached artillery battalions of the RCT. They were also utilized to transport preloaded assault supplies to the beaches. Four were also utilized at Point du Hoc. Atotal of at least 103 were employed at OMAHA from the 457th, 459th and 461st Amphbious Truck Companies. I also know they were utilized at the British beaches and have a partial count of 46 employed in the assault at GOLD. Typically they were loaded and launched at sea from an LST, with usually 20+ loaded per LST.Michael Emrys wrote:Come to think of it, I'm not aware of any DUKWs being used in Normandy either, though they might have been. But I suspect there really wasn't any need of them. There were LSTs and LCTs enough that could land vehicles right on the beach, and the Mulberries got up and operating quickly for deep draft vessels. AIUI, DUKWs were used mainly for unloading deep draft cargo vessels that had no docking facilities.
Michael
Buffaloes were not utilized in the assault AFAIK but were evidently a part of the service groups set up to operate the beaches after the assault. I will see if I can find any firm numbers on them.
-
- Member
- Posts: 8267
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
- Vegemite/jordan
- Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: 01 Sep 2005, 07:34
- Location: New Zealand
Thanks Rich, I know they were definatly there and I have always had a suspicion that buffalos were used at Normandy, and why not? I know theyre better for protection instead of a rubber raft or wooden boat crossing rivers so I would of thought that they would be a good idea but that would be up to how generals at the time thought and supply as many went to the marines im sure.
Ill have a look on missing lynx Kenny but thanks for that If i find anything ill keep you all posted
Thanks guys
Jordan
Ill have a look on missing lynx Kenny but thanks for that If i find anything ill keep you all posted
Thanks guys
Jordan
- Vegemite/jordan
- Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: 01 Sep 2005, 07:34
- Location: New Zealand
- Virgil Hiltz
- Member
- Posts: 418
- Joined: 28 Jul 2004, 01:05
- Location: USA
-
- Member
- Posts: 8267
- Joined: 07 May 2002, 20:40
- Location: Teesside
- Vegemite/jordan
- Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: 01 Sep 2005, 07:34
- Location: New Zealand
Awww! dang owell, ML didnt work for me either hopefully someone can dig the picture up somewhere But thanks Virgil that information was definatly interesting You dont happen to have any book or site references to which crossings they were used in or if they were quite standard everywhere?
Thanks guys, that'll keep me on my search
Jordan
Thanks guys, that'll keep me on my search
Jordan
- Michael Emrys
- Member
- Posts: 6002
- Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 19:44
- Location: USA
- Vegemite/jordan
- Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: 01 Sep 2005, 07:34
- Location: New Zealand
Oh thanks Michael thats a thought to....well for example, the American 10th mountain division served in Italy and crossed quite afew rivers and made it to the south of the battle of the buldge after the germans surrendered in Italy-would they (if they had any buffalos) have retained them for use in Normandy/Germany? Oh and before i forget-if you have any photos of the colour scheme of the buffalos in Italy, they'd be much appreciated to
Anyway thanks Michael/all
Jordan
Anyway thanks Michael/all
Jordan
Sorry, but no, they were not, interservice rivalry had nothing to do with it and they were in fact used on a limited scalefor TORCH. It was more a question of availability and utility.Virgil Hiltz wrote:They were offered by the Navy for the D-Day invasion, but interservice rivalry rejected their use.
By 1 February 1944 (the earliest that production could reasonably be presumed to get into the hands of units for use by 1 June 1944) the total production of unarmored LVT was 3,118 and of armored LVT it was 592. Given that only the LVT (A) could be considered an "assault" amphibian the numbers, when shared with the forces in the Pacific and after considering losses (IIRC nearly 200 were lost or damaged at Tarawa alone), would have been insufficient in numbers.
Further, only the LVT (A) 4, which was newly in production, was ramped and had a capacity similar to the LCVP and LCA (30 troops). Only 50 were available for the June 1944 landing at Saipan, otherwise, all production to date would have been the earlier model, rampless types with a capacity of 18 troops. The result would have been that each assault wave would have required 1.5 times as many assault craft, in an operation where the numbers of assault craft were already enormous. Finally, aside from the possible advantage of the light armor in the run-in (the LVT (A) were about as well armored as an LCA, but better than an LCVP), there would have been little advantage to them in the Normandy assault. However, a good use may have been later in the flooded Praries of the Cotentin.
Finally, I cannot find any other specific reference to their use on D-Day. For the British, the records of 1st Assault Brigade, RE indicate that they were not issued until August and did not become operational until September, the numbers available are first recorded as of 1 October (130). But I'll keep digging.