56 Years Later- Navy finally admits USS Eagle was attacked

Discussions on all aspects of the United States of America during the Inter-War era and Second World War. Hosted by Carl Schwamberger.
Post Reply
User avatar
Psycho Mike
Member
Posts: 3243
Joined: 15 Sep 2002, 14:18
Location: United States

56 Years Later- Navy finally admits USS Eagle was attacked

#1

Post by Psycho Mike » 10 Mar 2003, 05:13

Too bad the families that had blamed negligence by the Navy never knew for sure the truth. Rest in peace at last.

ARIZONA DAILY WILDCAT

Thursday August 30, 2001 |



WASHINGTON - For more than half a century, the Navy said a boiler was to blame for an explosion that sank the USS Eagle PE-56 within sight of the Maine coast, killing 49 sailors. But now the Navy is rewriting the Eagle's record to reflect what survivors said all along: A torpedo from a German submarine sank the ship.


The new evidence was presented to Navy Secretary Gordon England, who in June ruled that the sinking was due to enemy attack. The change means those who died or were seriously injured will get Purple Hearts.


Harold Petersen, one of two survivors still living, said he's gratified by the change but sorry it took so long. He still thinks of the parents of the sailors who died and wishes they could have known the truth.


''They had to think all these years, 'Who was so negligent that they allowed the boilers to explode and kill my child?''' said Petersen, 79, of Rochester, N.Y. ''That's a hard thing.''


The Eagle sank April 23, 1945, just two weeks before Germany surrendered. The 200-foot submarine chaser was sailing off Portland, Maine, when the blast broke it apart and sent water 300 feet into the air.


Petersen, a second-class machinist's mate, was below deck when the explosion occurred, sending him crashing headfirst into a metal locker. He made for the ladders but stopped to carry an injured sailor too hurt to move. With water pouring in and dozens of sailors jostling to get to safety, Petersen lost the injured man off his back, then was confronted by a panicked sailor who said he couldn't swim.


Petersen said he told the sailor, '''Whether you can swim or not, get away from this ship'. So, we both go. He never came up.''


Petersen made it overboard, clinging to wreckage in the chilly waters until rescuers arrived about 15 minutes later. He was one of 13 who survived.


A Navy Court of Inquiry was convened in Portland a week later. Five survivors testified that they saw a submarine surface briefly after the explosion, according to Navy records. Some said they saw a red-and-yellow marking on the submarine's conning tower.


''I only saw it momentarily,'' said John Breeze, 78, of Milton, Wash. ''We didn't know what we'd hit or what had hit us. You don't think about things like that. All you think about is saving your own life.''


Survivors testified that the Eagle's boiler had been overhauled just two weeks before the explosion. And no failures were reported with the same type of boilers on the 59 other ships in the Eagle class, said Paul Lawton, a Brockton, Mass., lawyer who teaches maritime history.


Rear Adm. Felix Gygax, commandant of the First Naval District in Boston, wrote on June 1, 1945, that there was ''at least equal evidence to support the conclusion that the explosion was that of a device outside the ship, the exact nature of which is undetermined. It might have been an enemy mine or an enemy torpedo.''


Still, Gygax ultimately endorsed the court's finding that the sinking ''was the result of a boiler explosion, the cause of which could not be determined.''


No one knows for sure why the Navy stuck with that conclusion. It's clear Navy investigators did not have access to later declassified information showing a German sub was in the area. Additionally, there likely was a reluctance by Navy officials in Portland to acknowledge that an enemy ship struck in their territory, said Lawton.


Twelve days after the Eagle's sinking, the German sub and its crew of 55 was sunk off the coast of Rhode Island. Before it was destroyed, it sunk another U.S. ship - a collier headed to South Boston - killing 12 men.


Lawton, who has taught college courses on German submarine operations, became interested in the Eagle case a few years ago after chatting with some friends whose father, Ivar Westerlund, perished on the Eagle. With the help of late Rep. Joseph Moakley, D-Mass., and Bernard F. Cavalcante, a Navy archivist, Lawton gathered enough evidence to disprove the boiler theory and urged the Navy to re-examine the case.


A key break came when Cavalcante uncovered records showing German submarine U-853 was operating in the Gulf of Maine at the time of the explosion. It had an insignia of a red horse on a yellow shield.


''We always wondered what really happened,'' said Frederick Westerlund of Brockton, who was six years old when his father died. ''It shouldn't have taken 56 years to get this straight.''

User avatar
davethelight
Member
Posts: 1691
Joined: 21 Dec 2002, 08:52
Location: Australia

#2

Post by davethelight » 10 Mar 2003, 16:20

Well there you go. And some people still wonder why so many other people don't trust or beleive what their governments tell them!! :wink:


User avatar
Dan W.
Member
Posts: 8518
Joined: 12 Mar 2002, 02:53
Location: IL.

#3

Post by Dan W. » 11 Mar 2003, 05:34

That was an interesting story, thanks for posting that. The U.S. Navy has a shameful record on matters such as these. They really outdid themselves a few months later, when in July of 1945 the U.S.S. Indianapolis was sunk, her port of call did nothing for an entire week even though she never reported when she should have, and then had the gall to court-martial (later reversed) the Admiral in charge in the ship. This man later committed suicide in 1966, and even though his rank was restored the damage was done. Then, in 1987, I think it was the U.S.S. Iowa that had an on-board explosion and they again tried to blame it on the sailors on board, court-martialing someone who was killed in the blast. It turned out to be something totally unrelated.

But then a sub commander out joyriding his sub (and letting civilians control the ship) surfaces out of the water right into a Japanese fishing boat and the Navy tries to cover the whole affair up, blaming the fishing boat.

Caldric
Member
Posts: 8077
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 22:50
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

#4

Post by Caldric » 11 Mar 2003, 05:41

Yep US Navy is bad when it comes to taking blame for actions. Mainly because someone is always blamed which means whoever gets the finger is going to be finished in the Navy. They always find one person to blame and then cross their fingers it will pass over.

User avatar
redcoat
Member
Posts: 1361
Joined: 03 Mar 2003, 22:54
Location: Stockport, England

#5

Post by redcoat » 13 Mar 2003, 12:08

Why would the US Navy wish to hide the fact that a US ship was sunk by a German U-Boat?
U-Boats were sinking Allied ships until the very day the war in Europe ended.
To me it sounds more like the SNAFU theory, than conspiracy theory

Situation, , Normal, All, Fouled, Up. :roll:

Post Reply

Return to “USA 1919-1945”