Id. british gun

Discussions on all aspects of the The United Kingdom & its Empire and Commonwealth during the Inter-War era and Second World War. Hosted by Andy H
Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17994
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. british gun

#271

Post by Sturm78 » 05 Jun 2016, 16:48

Thank you very much for your information, gambadier

Any information about the 20mm Polsten and Hispano AA guns ??

Regards Sturm78

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17994
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. british gun

#272

Post by Sturm78 » 15 Jun 2016, 12:47

Hi all,

Does somebody know where/when this image was taken ??

Sturm78
Attachments
-DD90ER.jpg


Clive Mortimore
Member
Posts: 1288
Joined: 06 Jun 2009, 23:38

Re: Id. british gun

#273

Post by Clive Mortimore » 18 Jun 2016, 01:33

Sturm78 wrote:Nobody for the 20mm Polsten ?? :(

Well, I hope to have more lucky with this other light AA gun. Any information and/or wartime image of the 20mm Hispano AA gun?

Used this gun the same mount that the Polsten gun ?? :?

Sturm78
There was a universal mount for the Polsten, Hispano and Oerlikon guns.
Clive

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17994
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. british gun

#274

Post by Sturm78 » 18 Jun 2016, 16:22

Clive wrote
There was a universal mount for the Polsten, Hispano and Oerlikon guns
Thanks, Clive.

Do you have any wartime image of these guns ??

Sturm78

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17994
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. british gun

#275

Post by Sturm78 » 02 Jul 2016, 12:18

Hi all,

Any idea about this sextuple Bofors AA mount ?? Wartime or Postwar ??

Sturm78
Attachments
40mm bofors gun mounting at Armstrong Scotswood works, Sep 1946.jpg

Dunserving
Member
Posts: 757
Joined: 14 Sep 2009, 12:43
Location: UK, not far north of Dungeness

Re: Id. british gun

#276

Post by Dunserving » 05 Jul 2016, 21:05

The image title dates it as September 1946...........

So 16 months after VE Day and 13 months after VJ Day, but given design and construction time, probably dating to wartime in concept.

Dunserving
Member
Posts: 757
Joined: 14 Sep 2009, 12:43
Location: UK, not far north of Dungeness

Re: Id. british gun

#277

Post by Dunserving » 05 Jul 2016, 21:05

I wonder how much it weighed....

OldBill
Member
Posts: 358
Joined: 04 Mar 2012, 10:19

Re: Id. british gun

#278

Post by OldBill » 08 Jul 2016, 10:35

Take a close look at the guns, these are water cooled. This mount would have been heavy, but also very, very deadly. It could, in effect, fire as long as you have ammo being fed into it, without reaching a hot gun situation or burning out a barrel. Your loaders may well fail before the mount does. This is an impressive piece of gear.

LineDoggie
Member
Posts: 1280
Joined: 03 Oct 2008, 21:06

Re: Id. british gun

#279

Post by LineDoggie » 08 Jul 2016, 13:14

Dunserving wrote:I wonder how much it weighed....
Well a US MK 4 quadruple mount weighed 25,140lb
"There are two kinds of people who are staying on this beach: those who are dead and those who are going to die. Now let’s get the hell out of here".
Col. George Taylor, 16th Infantry Regiment, Omaha Beach

ROLAND1369
Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: 26 May 2007, 16:22
Location: USA

Re: Id. british gun

#280

Post by ROLAND1369 » 08 Jul 2016, 22:04

Re: Sturm78 » 02 Jul 2016, 12:18 The picture is a RP 50 Mk VI mounting intended for large warships. Its weight was 21.24 tons. As suspected it went into service post WW II. Found it in: "Naval Weapons of WWII", JOHN CAMPBELL, NAVAL INSTITUTE PRESS, 1985 Page 71.

gambadier
Member
Posts: 221
Joined: 23 Aug 2007, 15:11
Location: AsiaPac

Re: Id. british gun

#281

Post by gambadier » 09 Jul 2016, 05:15

Re HAA gun, IRC two HAA Regts manned by African troops served in Italy. Of course two African divisions served in SE Asia, but infantry divisions did not have organic HAA,

Clive Mortimore
Member
Posts: 1288
Joined: 06 Jun 2009, 23:38

Re: Id. british gun

#282

Post by Clive Mortimore » 10 Jul 2016, 17:43

gambadier wrote:Re HAA gun, IRC two HAA Regts manned by African troops served in Italy. Of course two African divisions served in SE Asia, but infantry divisions did not have organic HAA,
The white NCOs are wearing bush hats which indicates they are on tropical service, as far as I am aware the bush hat was not worn in Italy. It could be a gun almost anywhere in the British Empire defending an important city, port or military base.
Clive

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17994
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 18:18
Location: Spain

Re: Id. british gun

#283

Post by Sturm78 » 10 Jul 2016, 17:57

Roland1369 wrote
Re: Sturm78 » 02 Jul 2016, 12:18 The picture is a RP 50 Mk VI mounting intended for large warships. Its weight was 21.24 tons. As suspected it went into service post WW II. Found it in: "Naval Weapons of WWII", JOHN CAMPBELL, NAVAL INSTITUTE PRESS, 1985 Page 71.
Thank you for your help, Roland1369

Sturm78

ROLAND1369
Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: 26 May 2007, 16:22
Location: USA

Re: Id. british gun

#284

Post by ROLAND1369 » 11 Jul 2016, 04:18

No problem, glad to help.

ROLAND1369
Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: 26 May 2007, 16:22
Location: USA

Re: Id. british gun

#285

Post by ROLAND1369 » 11 Jul 2016, 04:26

HMS Vangard for instance mounted 10 of these Mark VI SYSTEMS.

Post Reply

Return to “The United Kingdom & its Empire and Commonwealth 1919-45”