The Blitz, the british moral?

Discussions on all aspects of the The United Kingdom & its Empire and Commonwealth during the Inter-War era and Second World War. Hosted by Andy H
Post Reply
User avatar
Dr. Tempura
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: 20 Apr 2002, 15:41
Location: Hong Kong

The Blitz, the british moral?

#1

Post by Dr. Tempura » 11 Aug 2002, 12:20

At school, we've been asked to answer some essay questions for our couseworks. With me knowing little about the Blitz, is already strugging to anwser some questions.

"The impression that the British faced the Blitz with courage and unity is a myth. Explain whether you agree with this statement."

I really don't know where to start in this question...could someone please help me out?

User avatar
AirborneAllTheWay
Member
Posts: 89
Joined: 18 Jul 2002, 13:25
Location: An underground bunker...

#2

Post by AirborneAllTheWay » 11 Aug 2002, 12:33

I would say that it is not a myth. The people really did come together and suffer the hardships and privitation of sustained bombing. The royal family also stayed so as to suffer the same as their subjects. How much they really endured I dont know as I aint much of a monarchist. Try the Imperial War Museum web site, they had some info, if i can find the address I will post it up.


User avatar
RCR_Raider
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: 02 Aug 2002, 18:13
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

#3

Post by RCR_Raider » 12 Aug 2002, 05:43

Britain is still here isnt it?

It wouldnt be if all Londoners ran away.

People did send their children up north or overseas for safety. This ws sensible, as the children were vulnerable, and could not really contribute to the war effort. (other than soaking up propaganda taught at school)

User avatar
Paul Timms
Member
Posts: 218
Joined: 13 Mar 2002, 00:18
Location: Warwickshire

Blitz

#4

Post by Paul Timms » 12 Aug 2002, 08:27

To be honest many evacuees returned home before the blitz. My great aunt moved to Oxfordshire and was bombed in the 1st week. She returned to London saying if she was going to die it would be in her own bed. As for schooling a bloke i went to work with said there was no school for him after 1940.

Caldric
Member
Posts: 8077
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 22:50
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

#5

Post by Caldric » 12 Aug 2002, 10:29

What a question. What do they mean by the British? The military the civilians? Or both?

I do not remember reading about any hordes of British pilots running away and not defending the nation, they won, a great battle I would say it was also. And they did not win without a great deal of courage and conviction. That as already stated is proof enough for me.

User avatar
Dr. Tempura
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: 20 Apr 2002, 15:41
Location: Hong Kong

#6

Post by Dr. Tempura » 13 Aug 2002, 11:01

I think the question is talking about the civilians in britain

User avatar
Dr. Tempura
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: 20 Apr 2002, 15:41
Location: Hong Kong

#7

Post by Dr. Tempura » 13 Aug 2002, 12:08

I think the question is about the british civilians.

User avatar
AirborneAllTheWay
Member
Posts: 89
Joined: 18 Jul 2002, 13:25
Location: An underground bunker...

#8

Post by AirborneAllTheWay » 13 Aug 2002, 13:18

Here is an extract from a web site I found, might interest you...


It was a night when London was ringed and stabbed with fire.

They came just after dark, and somehow you could sense from the quick, bitter firing of the guns that there was to he no monkey business this night.

Shortly after the sirens wailed you could hear the Germans grinding overhead. In my room, with its black curtains drawn across the windows, you could feel the shake from the guns. You could hear the boom, crump, crump, crump, of heavy bombs at their work of tearing buildings apart. They were not too far away.

Half an hour after the firing started I gathered a couple of friends and went to a high, darkened balcony that gave us a view of a third of the entire circle of London. As we stepped out onto the balcony a vast inner excitement came over all of us-an excitement that had neither fear nor horror in it, because it was too full of awe.

You have all seen big fires, but I doubt if you have ever seen the whole horizon of a city lined with great fires - scores of them, perhaps hundreds.

There was something inspiring just in the awful savagery of it.

The closest fires were near enough for us to hear the crackling flames and the yells of firemen. Little fires grew into big ones even as we watched. Big ones died down under the firemen's valor, only to break out again later.

About every two minutes a new wave of planes would be over. The motors seemed to grind rather than roar, and to have an angry pulsation, like a bee buzzing in blind fury.

The guns did not make a constant overwhelming din as in those terrible days of September. They were intermittent - sometimes a few seconds apart, sometimes a minute or more. Their sound was sharp, near by; and soft and muffled, far away. They were everywhere over London.

Into the dark shadowed spaces below us, while we watched, whole batches of incendiary bombs fell. We saw two dozen go off in two seconds. They flashed terrifically, then quickly simmered down to pin points of dazzling white, burning ferociously. These white pin points would go out one by one, as the unseen heroes of the moment smothered them with sand. But also, while we watched, other pin points would burn on, and soon a yellow flame would leap up from the white center. They had done their work - another building was on fire.

The greatest of all the fires was directly in front of us. Flames seemed to whip hundreds of feet into the air. Pinkish-white smoke ballooned upward in a great cloud, and out of this cloud there gradually took shape - so faintly at first that we weren't sure we saw correctly - the gigantic dome of St. Paul's Cathedral.

St. Paul's was surrounded by fire, but it came through. It stood there in its enormous proportions - growing slowly clearer and clearer, the way objects take shape at dawn. It was like a picture of some miraculous figure that appears before peace-hungry soldiers on a battlefield.

The streets below us were semi-illuminated from the glow. Immediately above the fires the sky was red and angry, and overhead, making a ceiling in the vast heavens, there was a cloud of smoke all in pink. Up in that pink shrouding there were tiny, brilliant specks of flashing light-antiaircraft shells bursting. After the flash you could hear the sound.

Up there, too, the barrage balloons were standing out as clearly as if it were daytime, but now they were pink instead of silver. And now and then through a hole in that pink shroud there twinkled incongruously a permanent, genuine star - the old - fashioned kind that has always been there.

Below us the Thames grew lighter, and all around below were the shadows - the dark shadows of buildings and bridges that formed the base of this dreadful masterpiece.

Later on I borrowed a tin hat and went out among the fires. That was exciting too; but the thing I shall always remember above all the other things in my life is the monstrous loveliness of that one single view of London on a holiday night - London stabbed with great fires, shaken by explosions, its dark regions along the Thames sparkling with the pin points of white-hot bombs, all of it roofed over with a ceiling of pink that held bursting shells, balloons, flares and the grind of vicious engines. And in yourself the excitement and anticipation and wonder in your soul that this could be happening at all.

These things all went together to make the most hateful, most beautiful single scene I have ever known."

References:
Johnson, David, The London Blitz : The City Ablaze, December 29, 1940 (1981); Pyle Ernie, Ernie Pyle in England (1941), Reprinted in Commager, Henry Steele, The Story of the Second World War (1945).

varjag
In memoriam
Posts: 4431
Joined: 01 May 2002, 02:44
Location: Australia

British moral

#9

Post by varjag » 24 Aug 2002, 14:09

Under the 'we shall NEVER surrender' slogans of 1940 the British stood up very well to the German raids on the U.K. Correct me if I am wrong - but a much more war-weary Britain in 1944 - was,in the exposed areas, very much more shattered by the V-1 and later V-2 attacks of 1944 and -45 which again,caused widespread evacuations from a war,they had largely been told,'had already been won'.

Smert-Fashistam
Member
Posts: 159
Joined: 12 Aug 2002, 08:13
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

#10

Post by Smert-Fashistam » 25 Aug 2002, 02:05

doesnt term BlitzKreig refer to the combine rapid advancement of air AND gorund forces rather then just bombing runs?

User avatar
Lord Gort
Member
Posts: 2014
Joined: 07 Apr 2002, 15:44
Location: United Kingdom: The Land of Hope and Glory

#11

Post by Lord Gort » 27 Aug 2002, 01:11

Well Krieg means war, as in Kriegsmarine the german navy, war marine.

Blitz kinda means lightining because Blitzkrieg means lightning war, hence the blitz, because it was like lightning.

Post Reply

Return to “The United Kingdom & its Empire and Commonwealth 1919-45”