A future Belgian Air Force 1941

Discussions on the Allies and the Neutral States in general and the countries that does not have sections of their own.
User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

Re: A future Belgian Air Force 1941

#16

Post by phylo_roadking » 26 Nov 2012, 20:25

I had assumed the radiators to be housed in the air scoop below the fuselage. Can you tell me if the Renard company was trying to use evapouration type rads? Since the wing root fillets are the radiators then I can see no through airflow and unless we have evap. type radiators - which RR tried and abandoned - I can't see how they would work. That would certainly place the weight of the 1,440 lbs weight (both Merlin 11 and 111 came in at that) relatively further forward and contribute to stability. This would give a similar position to the Spitfire.
The sub-fuselage installation does indeed look more like a radiator, we need to find a source of far more detail so we can say definitively what it is - rad or oil cooler ;) I presume the similar installation on the R-36 is for the same thing...there seems to be slightly more data around on THAT...

Although looking round again - some of the R-38 pics seem to show the front of that inboard wing "fillet" filled in...so I'm slowly changing my mind back again. However - only that fairing brings the leading edge fully forward - the majority of it is indeed still further rearwards than the Spitfire's.

Incidently - it's worth noting that crash investigators put the loss of the earlier R.36 down to one of TWO causes...neither of which had anything to do with its air manners or handling ;) But it's fair to say the extra power of the Merlin II "made" the design, over the earlier Hispano and Gnome et Rhone-engined attempts :)
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

Re: A future Belgian Air Force 1941

#17

Post by phylo_roadking » 26 Nov 2012, 22:10

Sandy, the one detailed book/profile available on the types/family seems to be THIS - http://www.aerostories.org/~aerobiblio/article3022.html

..but scope out the cover illustration! ;) The R.36 in flight, by the excellent French artist and illustrator Romain Hugault.

Image

Image

Image

Spot the two intakes in the wing roots :D However...by the R.38 -

Image

...the wingroot intakes have gone, replaced by a little secodnary ventral intake :wink: But SABCA obviously thought there was nothing wrong with the overall design - the R.36 prototype flew over 70 satisfactory test hours before its crash - so just faired over the wingroot intake position.
Last edited by phylo_roadking on 26 Nov 2012, 23:27, edited 1 time in total.
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...


User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

Re: A future Belgian Air Force 1941

#18

Post by phylo_roadking » 26 Nov 2012, 23:25

Hmmm....it's an obscure comment courtesy of an excreble autotranslation, but...referring to changes made during the R.36's testing period -
Among them, there was particularly the replacement of the radiator glycol, under the fuselage aft of the wing, by a water radiator positioned vertically above the wing.
Fed air by the two inlets, perhaps???
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...

A McAuslan
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: 28 Jul 2012, 11:06

Re: A future Belgian Air Force 1941

#19

Post by A McAuslan » 28 Nov 2012, 12:50

Hi Phylo,
Your research has been much more fruitful than mine. I am trying to attach a jpeg scan of the entry in War Planes of the Second World War which indludes a very similar, but I presume earlier since no cockades, illustration of the R38. According to it the rear fuselage was fabric covered. I accept a 'nice' looking plane but perhaps the Merlin was not the right fit and the R37's radial was the way to go (an early Fw 190)?
Cheers,
Sandy McAuslan
Renard38.jpg

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

Re: A future Belgian Air Force 1941

#20

Post by phylo_roadking » 29 Nov 2012, 16:25

According to it the rear fuselage was fabric covered.
Yes, been doing some more searching myself - fabric covered indeed - but the tubework/bracing of rear airframe was dural, as opposed to the Hurricane's three-tube "inner" supporting wooden "formers.
I accept a 'nice' looking plane but perhaps the Merlin was not the right fit and the R37's radial was the way to go (an early Fw 190)?
If anything - given the previously-illustrated engine cradle supporting the R.36's Hispano....an in-line engine was the way to go. There might have been some concerns over whether Gnome et Rhone could have supplied the 14N radial in quantity - and whether by the time the ultimate pre-war 14R was ready for series production would it have been as competitive as equivalent Merlins? I know it's only Wiki, but this says no - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnome-Rh%C3%B4ne
The 14N-series was itself replaced by the ultimate pre-war evolution of the line, the Gnome-Rhône 14R. The first versions introduced in 1939, the 14R-4/5, produced 1,291 hp (950 kW) for takeoff and was only slightly heavier than the 14N. By 1940 the improved 14R-8/9 was delivering 1,578 hp (1,161 kW) by increasing RPM from 2,400 to 2,600. Although this was a good figure for the era, British and German design had already passed this mark, and would soon be pressing on 2,000 hp (1,500 kW).
Also, that amount of extra power could mean a considerable redesign of the basic R. airframe for new balance factors, stress factors etc. :( Time-consuming...
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...

A McAuslan
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: 28 Jul 2012, 11:06

Re: A future Belgian Air Force 1941

#21

Post by A McAuslan » 30 Nov 2012, 17:14

Hi Phylo,
I agree that the Merlin developed into a superb engine. It is my candidate for the single item of military equipment which made the greatest contribution to the Allied victory in WW2. The only reason I hoisted that kite of the G&R was that it had a higher power output than the contemporaneous Merlin. I would never argue that the Hurricane was cutting edge technology but the wooden components were not structural. See attached jpeg.
Cheers,
Sandy McAuslan
Attachments
Hurricane.jpg

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

Re: A future Belgian Air Force 1941

#22

Post by phylo_roadking » 01 Dec 2012, 17:29

I would never argue that the Hurricane was cutting edge technology but the wooden components were not structural. See attached jpeg.
O not structural...but still very necessary - and a lot of it! :lol:

Image
Image

If that forming...plus the tubing..was aluminium alloy on the R. series... :wink:
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...

User avatar
Juha Tompuri
Forum Staff
Posts: 11562
Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 21:02
Location: Mylsä

Re: A future Belgian Air Force 1941

#23

Post by Juha Tompuri » 01 Dec 2012, 23:19

phylo_roadking wrote:Don't forget, that isn't a blending fillet there in the R-38's wingroot - that's its radiators!
Don't remember seeing any such.

Most probably even the ones of R-36 being (far) too small for the purpose.

Regards, Juha

User avatar
phylo_roadking
Member
Posts: 17488
Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
Location: Belfast

Re: A future Belgian Air Force 1941

#24

Post by phylo_roadking » 01 Dec 2012, 23:58

Don't forget, that isn't a blending fillet there in the R-38's wingroot - that's its radiators!
Don't remember seeing any such.
The thread has moved on from there somewhat...http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 5#p1751922 and after.
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...

User avatar
Juha Tompuri
Forum Staff
Posts: 11562
Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 21:02
Location: Mylsä

Re: A future Belgian Air Force 1941

#25

Post by Juha Tompuri » 02 Dec 2012, 00:06

phylo_roadking wrote:The thread has moved on from there somewhat...http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 5#p1751922 and after.
Yep, the claimed wing root radiators seem not to have been based on any facts.

Regards, Juha

User avatar
Juha Tompuri
Forum Staff
Posts: 11562
Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 21:02
Location: Mylsä

Re: A future Belgian Air Force 1941

#26

Post by Juha Tompuri » 02 Dec 2012, 21:47

A McAuslan wrote:That said probably the fighter pilots who would have been looking forward most to their new aircraft would have been the poor unfortunates who had to fly the Buffalo. At least the CR 42 was manouverable.
There exists a thread about the virtues & flaws of the Brewster Buffalo:
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 8938&hilit
I appreciate there would only be two months to assess the qualities of the Buffalo as against the Hurricane. I would assume this would have been enough to see it rejected.
About British ex-Belgian Buffalo flight testing and Buffalo vs. Hurricane:
http://www.warbirdforum.com/eagle.htm

Regards, Juha

User avatar
Juha Tompuri
Forum Staff
Posts: 11562
Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 21:02
Location: Mylsä

Re: A future Belgian Air Force 1941

#27

Post by Juha Tompuri » 04 Dec 2012, 21:28

phylo_roadking wrote:pot the two intakes in the wing roots However...by the R.38 -
the wingroot intakes have gone, replaced by a little secodnary ventral intake
Actually the "little secodnary ventral intake" has been there at R.36 already
phylo_roadking wrote:
I had assumed the radiators to be housed in the air scoop below the fuselage. Can you tell me if the Renard company was trying to use evapouration type rads? Since the wing root fillets are the radiators then I can see no through airflow and unless we have evap. type radiators - which RR tried and abandoned - I can't see how they would work.
The sub-fuselage installation does indeed look more like a radiator, we need to find a source of far more detail so we can say definitively what it is - rad or oil cooler ;) I presume the similar installation on the R-36 is for the same thing...there seems to be slightly more data around on THAT

Juha wrote: the claimed wing root radiators seem not to have been based on any facts.
Renard R.36 (initial) cooling system
http://www.fnar.be/?Archives%26nbsp%3B% ... %26nbsp%3B
Attachments
renard.2.jpg

Post Reply

Return to “The Allies and the Neutral States in general”