Youngest Allied Generals and Field Marshals
-
- Member
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: 25 Aug 2003 10:32
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Youngest Allied Generals and Field Marshals
Does anyone know who were the youngest Allied officers who received a General officer rank, and who was the youngest Field Marshal among the Allied nations? I know that the Soviet had very young generals, some in their 30s?
Last edited by Jeremy Chan on 01 Apr 2004 08:15, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 16 Nov 2002 16:11
- Location: The Netherlands
-
- Member
- Posts: 3267
- Joined: 13 Mar 2002 12:48
- Location: Denmark
The Soviets had, as already mentioned, a number of very young generals. Some of the youngest would be:
Maj-Gen A.R. Belov (born 1923)
Maj-Gen S.S. Bronevski (born 1923)
This is of cause army generals, and it should be remembered that air force generals had a tendency to be even younger.
Also the British Commonwealth nations had some young generals i.e.:
Maj-Gen G. Kitching (born 1910)(Cdn)
This was due to rapid expansion of their armed forces during WWII.
Kind Regards
Steen Ammentorp
The Generals of World War II
Maj-Gen A.R. Belov (born 1923)
Maj-Gen S.S. Bronevski (born 1923)
This is of cause army generals, and it should be remembered that air force generals had a tendency to be even younger.
Also the British Commonwealth nations had some young generals i.e.:
Maj-Gen G. Kitching (born 1910)(Cdn)
This was due to rapid expansion of their armed forces during WWII.
Kind Regards
Steen Ammentorp
The Generals of World War II
-
- Member
- Posts: 7050
- Joined: 26 Dec 2002 00:58
- Location: Mississippi
-
- Member
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: 25 Aug 2003 10:32
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Do you mean douglas MacArthur? ARE YOU JOKING??? MacArthur was born in 1880! He may have been the youngest major-general when promoted to that rank, but not in WW2. And what's this bull about him being a traitor?
Surely the Soviets couldn't have been 'alone' among the Allies with young generals? We have Wingate and Kitching for the British, weren't there more?
Surely the Soviets couldn't have been 'alone' among the Allies with young generals? We have Wingate and Kitching for the British, weren't there more?
-
- Member
- Posts: 7050
- Joined: 26 Dec 2002 00:58
- Location: Mississippi
No, I am not joking about "Dugout Doug". He obeyed the wishes of the president of the Phillipines and did not start offensive actions against the Japs as he was ordered to do so by the US government immediately after the Pearl Harbor attack. This caused a loss of air power for his forces and the later loss of American territory and a whole lot of American casualties. That is treason. Even better he was paid to do so!!!!Colonel SteelFist wrote:Do you mean douglas MacArthur? ARE YOU JOKING??? MacArthur was born in 1880! He may have been the youngest major-general when promoted to that rank, but not in WW2. And what's this bull about him being a traitor?
Surely the Soviets couldn't have been 'alone' among the Allies with young generals? We have Wingate and Kitching for the British, weren't there more?
I suggest a book "Days of Infamy" by John Costello.
He was the oldest general except for maybe Patton. but if I remember right he was the youngest person to make general which happened in WWI. Some of our flying generals may have made it sooner in WWII , I have forgotten a good bit of WWII trivia.
-
- Member
- Posts: 456
- Joined: 05 May 2002 16:14
- Location: Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
-
- Member
- Posts: 3267
- Joined: 13 Mar 2002 12:48
- Location: Denmark
The youngest US general or flag officer during WWII was Richard C. Sanders, USAAF. Promoted to Brigadier General in June 1944 at the age of 28.
Kind Regards
Steen Ammentorp
The Generals of World War II
Kind Regards
Steen Ammentorp
The Generals of World War II
-
- Member
- Posts: 121
- Joined: 19 Sep 2003 18:27
- Location: New Cumberland, PA
ChristopherPerrien wrote:No, I am not joking about "Dugout Doug". He obeyed the wishes of the president of the Phillipines and did not start offensive actions against the Japs as he was ordered to do so by the US government immediately after the Pearl Harbor attack. This caused a loss of air power for his forces and the later loss of American territory and a whole lot of American casualties. That is treason. Even better he was paid to do so!!!!Colonel SteelFist wrote:Do you mean douglas MacArthur? ARE YOU JOKING??? MacArthur was born in 1880! He may have been the youngest major-general when promoted to that rank, but not in WW2. And what's this bull about him being a traitor?
Surely the Soviets couldn't have been 'alone' among the Allies with young generals? We have Wingate and Kitching for the British, weren't there more?
I suggest a book "Days of Infamy" by John Costello.
He was the oldest general except for maybe Patton. but if I remember right he was the youngest person to make general which happened in WWI. Some of our flying generals may have made it sooner in WWII , I have forgotten a good bit of WWII trivia.

Sometimes the Commander of the forces present in the situation, has better decisions then the gov't who are 100's of miles away ...
What do you think would have happened if he took the offensive with the outdated military supplies he had at the time and lack of manpower?
By defending he held the japs at bay long enough to make a difference. Leading an offensive at that time, i think would have been suicidel. Either way we were going to loose territory, but i believe he saved more lives by defending rather than attacking ...
-
- Member
- Posts: 7050
- Joined: 26 Dec 2002 00:58
- Location: Mississippi
Dam lost a half page post
Why don't you research how a so-called military genius can be caught by suprised a day after the war started? Or how an airforce can be destroyed on the ground DAYS later.
I suppose B-17's and P-40's were outdated in 1941.
Why did our planes not premptively bomb the Japanese airfields on Formosa , instead of sitting on airfields in the PHillipines like so many targets, days later?
Why did Macathur accept a multi-million dollar (current$) payment in 1942 from the dis-posed Phillipine government for an UNSUCCESSFUL defence?
Why did Macathur not take any offensive action as ordered by the UNITED STATES against the Japanese?
see above
The first parts of this reply is excusable deriliction of duty
the last part makes it tantamount to TREASON.
Suggest you read up on the battle plans of America being performed directly before Pearl Harbor and the reasons why and for, our Phillipine debacle and why Macathur's questionable actions were swept under the rug.
by our government and the Roosevelt administration.
Bullshit,By defending he held the japs at bay long enough to make a difference. Leading an offensive at that time, i think would have been suicidel. Either way we were going to loose territory, but i believe he saved more lives by defending rather than attacking ...
Why don't you research how a so-called military genius can be caught by suprised a day after the war started? Or how an airforce can be destroyed on the ground DAYS later.
I suppose B-17's and P-40's were outdated in 1941.
Why did our planes not premptively bomb the Japanese airfields on Formosa , instead of sitting on airfields in the PHillipines like so many targets, days later?
Why did Macathur accept a multi-million dollar (current$) payment in 1942 from the dis-posed Phillipine government for an UNSUCCESSFUL defence?
Why did Macathur not take any offensive action as ordered by the UNITED STATES against the Japanese?
see above
The first parts of this reply is excusable deriliction of duty
the last part makes it tantamount to TREASON.
Suggest you read up on the battle plans of America being performed directly before Pearl Harbor and the reasons why and for, our Phillipine debacle and why Macathur's questionable actions were swept under the rug.
by our government and the Roosevelt administration.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: 25 Aug 2003 10:32
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
- Member
- Posts: 7050
- Joined: 26 Dec 2002 00:58
- Location: Mississippi
True , his father actually ruled the Phippine sas US Mitary commander .Colonel SteelFist wrote:One musn't forget he held a special attachment with the Phillipines, as his father had served there. ?
Admiral Kimmel and General Short, Admiral Halsey, and a whole bunch of Battling bastards of BattaanIs anyone surprised he wasn't court-martialled?
-
- Member
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: 25 Aug 2003 10:32
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
What about them?ChristopherPerrien wrote:Admiral Kimmel and General Short, Admiral Halsey, and a whole bunch of Battling bastards of BattaanColonel SteelFist wrote:.
Is anyone surprised he wasn't court-martialled?
After this, maybe we should return to the topic

Part of the topic was 'Youngest Allies Field Marshals. Wasn't Pavel Rotmistrov the youngest Soviet Marshal (Chief Marshal of the Soviet Armed Forces?) (b. 1901)?
-
- Member
- Posts: 7050
- Joined: 26 Dec 2002 00:58
- Location: Mississippi
-
- Member
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: 01 Aug 2003 08:43
- Location: Flagstaff,Arizona
Brigadier General Dalton
Gentlemen,
I think there was a U.S. Army Brigadier General named Dalton who was born in 1910 and was killed in action in the Philippines in 1944. He was a holder of the DSC and the Silver Star. He may had been decorated by the Philippine Government as well. Do you know what year that Casey Vincent was born? He was a fighter ace with six kills against the Japanese Army Air Force. He became a Brigadier General at the age of 29 I think.
With Regards,
Edward
I think there was a U.S. Army Brigadier General named Dalton who was born in 1910 and was killed in action in the Philippines in 1944. He was a holder of the DSC and the Silver Star. He may had been decorated by the Philippine Government as well. Do you know what year that Casey Vincent was born? He was a fighter ace with six kills against the Japanese Army Air Force. He became a Brigadier General at the age of 29 I think.
With Regards,
Edward
