► Photothread: SS Vehicle License Plate Photo Database
More
Hi Mike,
On second thoughts, as the Krupp is a Kfz 70 (personnel carrier) rather than a Kfz 69 (gun limber) I would think it probably belongs to either the 11th or 12th Kompanie, III Bataillon LSSAH. Going by other photos, I would lean torwards 11th Kompanie.
Shame the original image is so small... the marking on the right fender (our left) is the vehicle number within the Kompanie (eg, 8, 9, 10, etc).
Cheers
Steve
On second thoughts, as the Krupp is a Kfz 70 (personnel carrier) rather than a Kfz 69 (gun limber) I would think it probably belongs to either the 11th or 12th Kompanie, III Bataillon LSSAH. Going by other photos, I would lean torwards 11th Kompanie.
Shame the original image is so small... the marking on the right fender (our left) is the vehicle number within the Kompanie (eg, 8, 9, 10, etc).
Cheers
Steve
-
- Member
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: 09 Jan 2004, 00:22
- Location: Georgia USA
number plate
Hi there,
The number plate range 93XXXX appears to be associated with HJ, as the 92XXXX range is linked to LAH. By the look of your photo, I would say it was HJ during training in Belgium, 1943-44.
Cheers
Steve
The number plate range 93XXXX appears to be associated with HJ, as the 92XXXX range is linked to LAH. By the look of your photo, I would say it was HJ during training in Belgium, 1943-44.
Cheers
Steve
Re: number plate
It seems that the number is SS-932 900.
Cheers,
Ivan
Cheers,
Ivan
-
- Member
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 16 Feb 2006, 13:53
- Location: Alkmaar the Netherlands
-
- Member
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 16 Feb 2006, 13:53
- Location: Alkmaar the Netherlands
-
- Member
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: 09 Jan 2004, 00:22
- Location: Georgia USA
Strange link Xavy.
Edit: Try it without the http and the backslash and it works fine. http://www.eucmh.com
Bill
Edit: Try it without the http and the backslash and it works fine. http://www.eucmh.com
Bill
-
- Member
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: 09 Jan 2004, 00:22
- Location: Georgia USA
Hi Steve
Well, ahem, er, interesting.
I try to never make judgements, but about 80% of the softskin photos on that site I have seen on ebay in the last six months or so including many I have nicked myself after the auction was over. And...with my very good taste...........almost all of them sold that I thought to nick so seller and buyer were both happy. As with you, my nicks go into my private files not to be published so no one gets hurt.
Just an observation from a very old observer.
Bill
Well, ahem, er, interesting.
I try to never make judgements, but about 80% of the softskin photos on that site I have seen on ebay in the last six months or so including many I have nicked myself after the auction was over. And...with my very good taste...........almost all of them sold that I thought to nick so seller and buyer were both happy. As with you, my nicks go into my private files not to be published so no one gets hurt.
Just an observation from a very old observer.
Bill
hi
Hi Bill,
Absolutely, a lot of this stuff is in the public domain, and don't get me wrong, I've right-clicked my fair share of images!
It just seems a bit off for a website to set itself up as an 'archive' and then use images gathered from the net and seem to pass them off as part of said 'archive'. If I use an image from a book to illustrate a point I always give credit to where the image came from, they could do the same.
Oh well, no one is being harmed really, so it doesn't really matter too much in the grand scheme of things.
Cheers
Steve
Absolutely, a lot of this stuff is in the public domain, and don't get me wrong, I've right-clicked my fair share of images!
It just seems a bit off for a website to set itself up as an 'archive' and then use images gathered from the net and seem to pass them off as part of said 'archive'. If I use an image from a book to illustrate a point I always give credit to where the image came from, they could do the same.
Oh well, no one is being harmed really, so it doesn't really matter too much in the grand scheme of things.
Cheers
Steve