1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

Discussions on historical model building of all eras.
hj1985
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: 01 Jan 2014, 06:43

1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#1

Post by hj1985 » 02 May 2018, 14:51

Made a diorama depicting a Jagdpanzer IV from schwere Panzerjäger-Abteilung 655 in latre Autumn, Ardennes (photo attached)
IMG_8687.jpg
IMG_8686.jpg
IMG_8684.jpg
IMG_8682.jpg
A few questions in my head:

1. Did it snow in late Autumn, Ardennes or the muddy ground (caused by the rain) is good enough?
2. Would the rust be a bit excessive given the unit only received the new Jagdpanzer IV in Sep and there was no combat in between Sep and Dec.
3. Did ww2 AFV rust much easier and quicker than the modern counterpart given they did not have baked painting technique in 1940's.

User avatar
dgfred
Member
Posts: 386
Joined: 31 Jan 2008, 17:56
Location: N.C., USA

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#2

Post by dgfred » 02 May 2018, 18:03

Excellent!


turcoscot
Member
Posts: 145
Joined: 14 Jan 2008, 06:05
Location: USA

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#3

Post by turcoscot » 06 May 2018, 05:23

Very nice work! Which kit did you use?

User avatar
Cult Icon
Member
Posts: 4472
Joined: 08 Apr 2014, 20:00

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#4

Post by Cult Icon » 06 May 2018, 05:34

Initially it did not snow in the Ardennes. It started snowing later on in the battle.

imho I do not see much rust with AFVs in ww2. They didn't last that long in the field.

Also, the nco with the MP is wearing a SS fur jacket. This was a standard item in Russia 1943 but later on I do not see it much, and I've never seen a SS man wear it in the Ardennes. The standard snow suit was a reversible.

The caps worn by the TD crewmen are non-standard.

User avatar
T. A. Gardner
Member
Posts: 3546
Joined: 02 Feb 2006, 01:23
Location: Arizona

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#5

Post by T. A. Gardner » 06 May 2018, 10:07

Very nice work, but I have to ask, would the crew really pile stuff over the engine deck such that the cooling vents for the engines were blocked? That and I'd note that the gun sight and gun are pointed in two different directions. Is that possible?

hj1985
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: 01 Jan 2014, 06:43

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#6

Post by hj1985 » 14 May 2018, 15:43

turcoscot wrote:Very nice work! Which kit did you use?
Tamiya 35340 + Eduard PE side skirt + Friulmodel Metal Track

hj1985
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: 01 Jan 2014, 06:43

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#7

Post by hj1985 » 14 May 2018, 15:47

T. A. Gardner wrote:Very nice work, but I have to ask, would the crew really pile stuff over the engine deck such that the cooling vents for the engines were blocked? That and I'd note that the gun sight and gun are pointed in two different directions. Is that possible?
I have seen lots of modeller doing this, it actually happened in real. See photo links below


https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602310655782/

https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602307195914/

hj1985
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: 01 Jan 2014, 06:43

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#8

Post by hj1985 » 14 May 2018, 15:50

Cult Icon wrote:Initially it did not snow in the Ardennes. It started snowing later on in the battle.

imho I do not see much rust with AFVs in ww2. They didn't last that long in the field.

Also, the nco with the MP is wearing a SS fur jacket. This was a standard item in Russia 1943 but later on I do not see it much, and I've never seen a SS man wear it in the Ardennes. The standard snow suit was a reversible.

The caps worn by the TD crewmen are non-standard.
You are the expert. I regretted about the rust, but not sure how to make amends.

The SS is actually from the Alpine figure NCO in Kharkov, I should not use it. You have real sharp eyes.

The TD crewmen is from the kit, cant make changes

Let's say if it is not for Ardennes, which year (season) and which theater of war do you think the diorama most closely represents?

User avatar
T. A. Gardner
Member
Posts: 3546
Joined: 02 Feb 2006, 01:23
Location: Arizona

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#9

Post by T. A. Gardner » 14 May 2018, 17:13

hj1985 wrote:
T. A. Gardner wrote:Very nice work, but I have to ask, would the crew really pile stuff over the engine deck such that the cooling vents for the engines were blocked? That and I'd note that the gun sight and gun are pointed in two different directions. Is that possible?
I have seen lots of modeller doing this, it actually happened in real. See photo links below


https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602310655782/

https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602307195914/
Those are Sherman tanks. The air inlet for engine cooling is at the very front of the engine deck.

Image

That rectangular, raised cover is where the cooling air comes in.

On a Jadgpanzer IV, there are two large ventilation grills on top for the same purpose:

Image

So, while you see US tanks having stuff piled on the engine deck, the Germans don't do that normally because it cuts off the cooling air intakes

User avatar
Cult Icon
Member
Posts: 4472
Joined: 08 Apr 2014, 20:00

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#10

Post by Cult Icon » 15 May 2018, 02:37

hj1985 wrote:
You are the expert. I regretted about the rust, but not sure how to make amends.

The SS is actually from the Alpine figure NCO in Kharkov, I should not use it. You have real sharp eyes.

The TD crewmen is from the kit, cant make changes

Let's say if it is not for Ardennes, which year (season) and which theater of war do you think the diorama most closely represents?
If you take out the figure, it could pass for Ardennes. Leave the figure in, and perhaps Hungary, late 1944. Before the snows dropped. The figure in the Kharkov smock is a bit odd. Although I have seen members of 3.SS and 5.SS wearing the smock later on (they only fought on the Eastern Front).

hj1985
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: 01 Jan 2014, 06:43

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#11

Post by hj1985 » 15 May 2018, 14:16

T. A. Gardner wrote:
hj1985 wrote:
T. A. Gardner wrote:Very nice work, but I have to ask, would the crew really pile stuff over the engine deck such that the cooling vents for the engines were blocked? That and I'd note that the gun sight and gun are pointed in two different directions. Is that possible?
I have seen lots of modeller doing this, it actually happened in real. See photo links below


https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602310655782/

https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602307195914/
Those are Sherman tanks. The air inlet for engine cooling is at the very front of the engine deck.

Image

That rectangular, raised cover is where the cooling air comes in.

On a Jadgpanzer IV, there are two large ventilation grills on top for the same purpose:

Image

So, while you see US tanks having stuff piled on the engine deck, the Germans don't do that normally because it cuts off the cooling air intakes
Thanks for sharing mate, sharing is caring, lol.

I will not repeat the same mistake in next Diorama.

hj1985
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: 01 Jan 2014, 06:43

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#12

Post by hj1985 » 15 May 2018, 14:25

Cult Icon wrote:
hj1985 wrote:
You are the expert. I regretted about the rust, but not sure how to make amends.

The SS is actually from the Alpine figure NCO in Kharkov, I should not use it. You have real sharp eyes.

The TD crewmen is from the kit, cant make changes

Let's say if it is not for Ardennes, which year (season) and which theater of war do you think the diorama most closely represents?
If you take out the figure, it could pass for Ardennes. Leave the figure in, and perhaps Hungary, late 1944. Before the snows dropped. The figure in the Kharkov smock is a bit odd. Although I have seen members of 3.SS and 5.SS wearing the smock later on (they only fought on the Eastern Front).
If I take out the Jagdpanzer IV and leave the figure, can I say Eastern Front, Late Autumn 1943 (i.e. 5.SS operated around Dnieper river) not sure if the soil colour, muddy condition and leaves match Ukraine?

User avatar
Cult Icon
Member
Posts: 4472
Joined: 08 Apr 2014, 20:00

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#13

Post by Cult Icon » 15 May 2018, 20:11

hj1985 wrote:
If I take out the Jagdpanzer IV and leave the figure, can I say Eastern Front, Late Autumn 1943 (i.e. 5.SS operated around Dnieper river) not sure if the soil colour, muddy condition and leaves match Ukraine?
Not sure about the foilage but the photos I've seen of the SS in the Ukraine largely show them wearing the 2-piece padded suit. Yea, maybe.

hj1985
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: 01 Jan 2014, 06:43

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#14

Post by hj1985 » 18 May 2018, 11:39

T. A. Gardner wrote:
hj1985 wrote:
T. A. Gardner wrote:Very nice work, but I have to ask, would the crew really pile stuff over the engine deck such that the cooling vents for the engines were blocked? That and I'd note that the gun sight and gun are pointed in two different directions. Is that possible?
I have seen lots of modeller doing this, it actually happened in real. See photo links below


https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602310655782/

https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602307195914/
Those are Sherman tanks. The air inlet for engine cooling is at the very front of the engine deck.

Image

That rectangular, raised cover is where the cooling air comes in.

On a Jadgpanzer IV, there are two large ventilation grills on top for the same purpose:

Image

So, while you see US tanks having stuff piled on the engine deck, the Germans don't do that normally because it cuts off the cooling air intakes
I recently came across this photo.

http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/n ... Marsch.jpg

User avatar
T. A. Gardner
Member
Posts: 3546
Joined: 02 Feb 2006, 01:23
Location: Arizona

Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed

#15

Post by T. A. Gardner » 18 May 2018, 22:45

hj1985 wrote: I recently came across this photo.

http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/n ... Marsch.jpg
I would think that it might be acceptable in cold weather when the engine could get excessive cooling. But, as a rule, I'd say it's not done. I've also seen modelers do things like cover hatches, periscopes, etc., with camouflage nets, tarps, or even exterior baggage. This too would never be done by a sane crew. Why would they block their means of entering and exiting the vehicle, particularly in combat if it might be hit and they need to get out quickly? The same goes for other things like vision devices. Deliberately blind yourself? I think not.

It's about common sense. Ask yourself, If I was the crew of this vehicle, what's the most convenient and least obstructive place to put stuff?

Post Reply

Return to “Model building”