1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
-
- Member
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 01 Jan 2014 05:43
1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
Made a diorama depicting a Jagdpanzer IV from schwere Panzerjäger-Abteilung 655 in latre Autumn, Ardennes (photo attached)
A few questions in my head:
1. Did it snow in late Autumn, Ardennes or the muddy ground (caused by the rain) is good enough?
2. Would the rust be a bit excessive given the unit only received the new Jagdpanzer IV in Sep and there was no combat in between Sep and Dec.
3. Did ww2 AFV rust much easier and quicker than the modern counterpart given they did not have baked painting technique in 1940's.
A few questions in my head:
1. Did it snow in late Autumn, Ardennes or the muddy ground (caused by the rain) is good enough?
2. Would the rust be a bit excessive given the unit only received the new Jagdpanzer IV in Sep and there was no combat in between Sep and Dec.
3. Did ww2 AFV rust much easier and quicker than the modern counterpart given they did not have baked painting technique in 1940's.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Member
- Posts: 361
- Joined: 31 Jan 2008 16:56
- Location: N.C., USA
-
- Member
- Posts: 145
- Joined: 14 Jan 2008 05:05
- Location: USA
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
Very nice work! Which kit did you use?
-
- Member
- Posts: 4337
- Joined: 08 Apr 2014 19:00
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
Initially it did not snow in the Ardennes. It started snowing later on in the battle.
imho I do not see much rust with AFVs in ww2. They didn't last that long in the field.
Also, the nco with the MP is wearing a SS fur jacket. This was a standard item in Russia 1943 but later on I do not see it much, and I've never seen a SS man wear it in the Ardennes. The standard snow suit was a reversible.
The caps worn by the TD crewmen are non-standard.
imho I do not see much rust with AFVs in ww2. They didn't last that long in the field.
Also, the nco with the MP is wearing a SS fur jacket. This was a standard item in Russia 1943 but later on I do not see it much, and I've never seen a SS man wear it in the Ardennes. The standard snow suit was a reversible.
The caps worn by the TD crewmen are non-standard.
-
- Member
- Posts: 3123
- Joined: 02 Feb 2006 00:23
- Location: Arizona
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
Very nice work, but I have to ask, would the crew really pile stuff over the engine deck such that the cooling vents for the engines were blocked? That and I'd note that the gun sight and gun are pointed in two different directions. Is that possible?
-
- Member
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 01 Jan 2014 05:43
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
Tamiya 35340 + Eduard PE side skirt + Friulmodel Metal Trackturcoscot wrote:Very nice work! Which kit did you use?
-
- Member
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 01 Jan 2014 05:43
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
I have seen lots of modeller doing this, it actually happened in real. See photo links belowT. A. Gardner wrote:Very nice work, but I have to ask, would the crew really pile stuff over the engine deck such that the cooling vents for the engines were blocked? That and I'd note that the gun sight and gun are pointed in two different directions. Is that possible?
https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602310655782/
https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602307195914/
-
- Member
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 01 Jan 2014 05:43
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
You are the expert. I regretted about the rust, but not sure how to make amends.Cult Icon wrote:Initially it did not snow in the Ardennes. It started snowing later on in the battle.
imho I do not see much rust with AFVs in ww2. They didn't last that long in the field.
Also, the nco with the MP is wearing a SS fur jacket. This was a standard item in Russia 1943 but later on I do not see it much, and I've never seen a SS man wear it in the Ardennes. The standard snow suit was a reversible.
The caps worn by the TD crewmen are non-standard.
The SS is actually from the Alpine figure NCO in Kharkov, I should not use it. You have real sharp eyes.
The TD crewmen is from the kit, cant make changes
Let's say if it is not for Ardennes, which year (season) and which theater of war do you think the diorama most closely represents?
-
- Member
- Posts: 3123
- Joined: 02 Feb 2006 00:23
- Location: Arizona
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
Those are Sherman tanks. The air inlet for engine cooling is at the very front of the engine deck.hj1985 wrote:I have seen lots of modeller doing this, it actually happened in real. See photo links belowT. A. Gardner wrote:Very nice work, but I have to ask, would the crew really pile stuff over the engine deck such that the cooling vents for the engines were blocked? That and I'd note that the gun sight and gun are pointed in two different directions. Is that possible?
https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602310655782/
https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602307195914/
That rectangular, raised cover is where the cooling air comes in.
On a Jadgpanzer IV, there are two large ventilation grills on top for the same purpose:

So, while you see US tanks having stuff piled on the engine deck, the Germans don't do that normally because it cuts off the cooling air intakes
-
- Member
- Posts: 4337
- Joined: 08 Apr 2014 19:00
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
If you take out the figure, it could pass for Ardennes. Leave the figure in, and perhaps Hungary, late 1944. Before the snows dropped. The figure in the Kharkov smock is a bit odd. Although I have seen members of 3.SS and 5.SS wearing the smock later on (they only fought on the Eastern Front).hj1985 wrote:
You are the expert. I regretted about the rust, but not sure how to make amends.
The SS is actually from the Alpine figure NCO in Kharkov, I should not use it. You have real sharp eyes.
The TD crewmen is from the kit, cant make changes
Let's say if it is not for Ardennes, which year (season) and which theater of war do you think the diorama most closely represents?
-
- Member
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 01 Jan 2014 05:43
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
Thanks for sharing mate, sharing is caring, lol.T. A. Gardner wrote:Those are Sherman tanks. The air inlet for engine cooling is at the very front of the engine deck.hj1985 wrote:I have seen lots of modeller doing this, it actually happened in real. See photo links belowT. A. Gardner wrote:Very nice work, but I have to ask, would the crew really pile stuff over the engine deck such that the cooling vents for the engines were blocked? That and I'd note that the gun sight and gun are pointed in two different directions. Is that possible?
https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602310655782/
https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602307195914/
That rectangular, raised cover is where the cooling air comes in.
On a Jadgpanzer IV, there are two large ventilation grills on top for the same purpose:
So, while you see US tanks having stuff piled on the engine deck, the Germans don't do that normally because it cuts off the cooling air intakes
I will not repeat the same mistake in next Diorama.
-
- Member
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 01 Jan 2014 05:43
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
If I take out the Jagdpanzer IV and leave the figure, can I say Eastern Front, Late Autumn 1943 (i.e. 5.SS operated around Dnieper river) not sure if the soil colour, muddy condition and leaves match Ukraine?Cult Icon wrote:If you take out the figure, it could pass for Ardennes. Leave the figure in, and perhaps Hungary, late 1944. Before the snows dropped. The figure in the Kharkov smock is a bit odd. Although I have seen members of 3.SS and 5.SS wearing the smock later on (they only fought on the Eastern Front).hj1985 wrote:
You are the expert. I regretted about the rust, but not sure how to make amends.
The SS is actually from the Alpine figure NCO in Kharkov, I should not use it. You have real sharp eyes.
The TD crewmen is from the kit, cant make changes
Let's say if it is not for Ardennes, which year (season) and which theater of war do you think the diorama most closely represents?
-
- Member
- Posts: 4337
- Joined: 08 Apr 2014 19:00
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
Not sure about the foilage but the photos I've seen of the SS in the Ukraine largely show them wearing the 2-piece padded suit. Yea, maybe.hj1985 wrote:
If I take out the Jagdpanzer IV and leave the figure, can I say Eastern Front, Late Autumn 1943 (i.e. 5.SS operated around Dnieper river) not sure if the soil colour, muddy condition and leaves match Ukraine?
-
- Member
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 01 Jan 2014 05:43
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
I recently came across this photo.T. A. Gardner wrote:Those are Sherman tanks. The air inlet for engine cooling is at the very front of the engine deck.hj1985 wrote:I have seen lots of modeller doing this, it actually happened in real. See photo links belowT. A. Gardner wrote:Very nice work, but I have to ask, would the crew really pile stuff over the engine deck such that the cooling vents for the engines were blocked? That and I'd note that the gun sight and gun are pointed in two different directions. Is that possible?
https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602310655782/
https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/47428602307195914/
That rectangular, raised cover is where the cooling air comes in.
On a Jadgpanzer IV, there are two large ventilation grills on top for the same purpose:
So, while you see US tanks having stuff piled on the engine deck, the Germans don't do that normally because it cuts off the cooling air intakes
http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/n ... Marsch.jpg
-
- Member
- Posts: 3123
- Joined: 02 Feb 2006 00:23
- Location: Arizona
Re: 1/35 Jagdpanzer IV Diorama Feedback needed
I would think that it might be acceptable in cold weather when the engine could get excessive cooling. But, as a rule, I'd say it's not done. I've also seen modelers do things like cover hatches, periscopes, etc., with camouflage nets, tarps, or even exterior baggage. This too would never be done by a sane crew. Why would they block their means of entering and exiting the vehicle, particularly in combat if it might be hit and they need to get out quickly? The same goes for other things like vision devices. Deliberately blind yourself? I think not.hj1985 wrote: I recently came across this photo.
http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/n ... Marsch.jpg
It's about common sense. Ask yourself, If I was the crew of this vehicle, what's the most convenient and least obstructive place to put stuff?