That means you know you can not discredit the numbers.Christianmunich wrote: ↑06 Mar 2019 01:26Sorry Kenny your data sample was shot down and proven to be hogwash. Leaving the basic math issues aside, we might want to start focusing on the Briitish sample again.
Did you not say you had a book on your head that could show the numbers were wrong?
And this:Christianmunich wrote: ↑05 Mar 2019 17:50I knew your data is incorrect from the top of my head because I read Hubert Meyers book..............
If you are having problems accessing Meyer's book and you meant it was on Google Books preview (rather than the top of your head)and you have used up your free viewing allowance I can help you out. Tell me what page in Meyer shows 'your data is incorrect ' and I will scan and post it for you. If you turn down this offer of help then the obvious conclusion is that you were lying when you claimed 'the data know it is wrong because I read Hubert Meyers book 'Christianmunich wrote: ↑05 Mar 2019 17:14
I already without checking the data know it is wrong because I read Hubert Meyers book...........
Your own words best describe you:
you again made outlandish claims and when pressed for evidence you responded with an empty post.